Midnight Hammer strikes: Tulsi Gabbard frozen out of Situation Room as Trump snubs her over Iran statements
Tulsi Gabbard
was not in any of the
Situation Room
photos, which makes people wonder if there is tension between the president and his director of
national intelligence
.
Why was Tulsi Gabbard absent from the Situation Room?
After she warned about nuclear tensions and contradicted Trump's stance, she was reportedly pushed out and was excluded from the Situation Room images of the
Midnight Hammer strikes
.
The president said that Gabbard was using the situation for political gain, which pushed her to the side.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
How Much Money Should You Have Before Hiring a Financial Advisor?
SmartAsset
Learn More
Undo
The president has repeatedly criticized Gabbard on the issue of Iran this past week, making her absence from the Situation Room photo release unlikely to be a coincidence, as per a report by The Independent.
As reported by the New York Times, Gabbard has been having issues with Trump since the beginning of the month.
Live Events
Earlier in June, Tulsi Gabbard shared a video on social media about her visit to Hiroshima, Japan, and a warning against war in a time when nuclear weapons pose a threat to world peace.
ALSO READ:
Russia, Pakistan ready to supply nuclear weapons to Iran? This message from a top Russian leader gives clues
In the video, she states, "As we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before."
"Political elites and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tension between nuclear powers," Gabbard warns in the next clip.
According to reports,
Donald Trump
took issue with her remarks. Trump interpreted Gabbard's video as evidence that she was only using her time in his White House as a stepping stone, according to people who spoke to the Times.
Did Donald Trump snub Tulsi Gabbard over her Iran remarks?
After Donald Trump was compelled to address testimony Gabbard provided in March stating that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons through its refinement efforts, his disagreements with Gabbard, who CBS reports was one of the officials in the Situation Room on Saturday, became more apparent.
President Trump told reporters, "She's wrong," on Friday following his arrival in New Jersey.
Trump made it apparent in his remarks on Friday that any action the United States took would be done so under the guise of preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Hegseth informed reporters that Trump had acted after reviewing the alleged intelligence he had received regarding Iran's nuclear aspirations.
According to Hegseth, Trump has considered all of this information and concluded that the Iranian nuclear program poses a threat.
What will this mean for Tulsi Gabbard's role going forward?
Tulsi Gabbard used ambiguous "intelligence" to justify her reversal of her March testimony and her support for Trump's Iran policy on Friday, the same day Trump publicly criticized her.
She said that in order to create division, the "dishonest media" was purposefully misrepresenting her testimony and disseminating false information. The U.S. intelligence, she added, "can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly."
FAQs
Why was Tulsi Gabbard left out of the Situation Room photographs?
Probably due to tensions with Trump after she contradicted him on Iran's nuclear threat.
What caused the split between Tulsi Gabbard and Donald Trump?
Tulsi Gabbard warned about nuclear tensions and downplayed Iran's weapons threat, which Trump saw as undermining his agenda.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Explained: Donald Trump's landmark $1.35 trillion trade deal with EU before tariff deadline
In a significant breakthrough, President Donald Trump on Sunday announced that the United States and the European Union have reached a comprehensive trade deal, just days before a 30 per cent tariff on European imports was due to take effect. U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a trade deal between the US and the EU.(REUTERS) After high-stakes negotiations in Scotland's Turnberry with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the two leaders revealed a new trade framework aimed at averting a full-blown transatlantic trade war. The deal, according to CNN, hailed by both sides as 'powerful' and 'historic', centers around new tariffs, large-scale energy purchases, and significant investment commitments. Also read: Donald Trump turns up to play golf amid protests against his Scotland trip What does the US-EU deal include? Under the terms of the agreement, the EU will purchase $750 billion worth of US energy, marking a massive expansion in transatlantic energy cooperation. Additionally, the 27-member bloc has committed to investing $600 billion more into the US than its current levels, stated another CNBC report. The report added that in exchange, Trump has agreed to impose a 15 per cent tariff on most European imports to the US, down from the 30 per cent rate he previously announced. The deal is expected to significantly ease trade tensions between the long-time allies. A CNBC report quoted Donald Trump declaring that this was a 'very big deal, biggest of all' as he stood alongside von der Leyen. Meanwhile, the European Commission chief, speaking after the meeting, acknowledged the difficulty of the talks and said, 'It is a good deal, it is a huge deal, with tough negotiations.' Donald Trump-EU deal impact The agreement was finalized just before the August 1 deadline, after which the Trump administration had vowed to raise tariffs on most EU goods from 10 per cent to 30 per cent. Earlier in the day, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had reaffirmed that Washington would not give further extensions, calling the deadline 'firm', reported CNN. Had the talks collapsed, Brussels was prepared to launch a major counter-tariff package targeting a wide range of US exports and invoke its new Anti-Coercion Instrument, a legislative mechanism designed to push back against economic pressure. Also read: Trump says US will work with Thailand and Cambodia, adds both 'want to settle' A fractured trade relationship The US-EU trade relationship is among the world's largest, valued at nearly $1.97 trillion in 2024, including both goods and services. While the EU ran a goods trade surplus, it faced a deficit in services, resulting in an overall $58.7 billion surplus with the US. Trump repeatedly criticized the imbalance and used it to justify tougher trade terms. 'The US and EU have one of the largest trade deficits,' he had said, defending the imposition of tariffs as leverage. FAQs What is the latest trade deal Trump announced? Trump and EU President Ursula von der Leyen finalized a deal where the EU will buy $750 billion in US energy and invest $600 billion more into the country in exchange for lower tariffs. Why was this deal considered urgent? It came just days before Trump was set to increase tariffs on European imports from 10 per cent to 30 per cent on August 1. What was at stake in the US–EU trade balance? The EU had a $58 billion overall surplus with the US in 2023, mainly due to goods exports, prompting Trump to demand fairer trade terms. What other trade deals has the Trump administration secured? The administration has renegotiated NAFTA (now USMCA), reached agreements with Japan and South Korea, and imposed tariffs on China during its broader trade overhaul. What is the proposed new tariff structure? Instead of the planned 30 per cent hike, the new deal imposes a 15 per cent across-the-board tariff on most EU imports. What are the key risks or criticisms? Critics argue the deal may strain diplomatic ties, shift costs to consumers, and provoke retaliation from other trading partners not offered similar terms.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Passenger threat forces emergency landing at Glasgow; shouts made against Trump
A passenger aboard an easyJet flight from London to Glasgow forced an emergency landing on Sunday morning (July 27) after allegedly shouting that he had a bomb and threatening US President Donald Trump, according to The New York Post. The flight, carrying dozens of passengers, was met by police upon arrival at Scotland's Glasgow Airport around 8:20 a.m. Eyewitness footage captured the man—identified only as a 41-year-old—shouting 'Allahu Akbar,' and, 'I'm going to bomb the plane! Death to America! Death to Trump!' The suspect reportedly began making the threats after leaving the bathroom, prompting alarm onboard. Trump was just an hour away at his Turnberry golf course. Fellow travelers quickly subdued the man. Passengers then held the man in place until the plane landed safely. Police Scotland confirmed the arrest in a statement Sunday. 'We received a report of a man causing a disturbance on a flight arriving in Glasgow around 8:20 am on Sunday, 27 July, 2025. Officers boarded the plane on its arrival and a 41-year-old man was arrested and remains in custody. Enquiries are continuing.' Officials added that no explosives were found on the aircraft and there was no indication of a wider threat to the public. EasyJet confirmed the incident and praised the crew for their response. 'Flight EZY609 from Luton to Glasgow this morning was met by police on arrival in Glasgow, where they boarded the aircraft and removed a passenger due to their behavior onboard,' the airline said in a statement to AFP. 'The safety and wellbeing of our customers and crew is always easyJet's highest priority,' the airline added, noting the crew is trained to assess and handle such situations swiftly. Counter-terrorism officers are now assessing the incident, including unverified videos that circulated online shortly after the landing. Authorities confirmed these videos are being reviewed as part of the ongoing investigation.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
34 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Thai, Cambodian leaders to meet in Malaysia for talks to resolve dispute
Thai and Cambodian leaders will meet in Malaysia for talks to end hostilities, a spokesperson for the Thai prime minister's office said on Sunday. This comes following pressure from US President Donald Trump to end a deadly border dispute, now in its fourth day, which has killed at least 34 people and displaced more than 168,000. Jirayu Huangsap said Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai will attend Monday's talks in response to an invitation from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to discuss peace efforts in the region. The spokesperson also said Phumtham's Cambodian counterpart Hun Manet will also attend the talks, though this was not immediately confirmed by the Cambodian side. He added that Anwar was acting in his capacity as chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, held on an annual rotating basis by its 10 members. Trump posted on Truth Social on Saturday that he spoke to the leaders of Thailand and Cambodia and suggested he would not move forward with trade agreements with either country if the hostilities continued. He later said both sides agreed to meet to negotiate a ceasefire. Both sides agree to discuss a ceasefire Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said earlier Sunday his country agreed to pursue an immediate and unconditional ceasefire. He said Trump told him that Thailand had also agreed to halt attacks following the US president's conversation with Phumtham. He said he tasked his deputy, Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn, to coordinate next steps with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and to engage directly with Thailand's foreign minister to implement the ceasefire. Thailand expressed cautious support. Phumtham thanked Trump and said that Thailand agreed in principle to a ceasefire but stressed the need for sincere intention from Cambodia, the Thai Foreign Ministry said. Phumtham called for swift bilateral talks to discuss concrete steps toward a peaceful resolution, it said. Both sides blame the other for the clashes The fighting flared Thursday after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Both sides blamed each other for starting the clashes. Both countries recalled their ambassadors and Thailand closed its border crossings with Cambodia. Despite the diplomatic efforts, fighting continued Sunday along parts of the contested border, with both sides refusing to budge and trading blame over renewed shelling and troop movements. Col. Richa Suksowanont, a Thai army deputy spokesperson, said Cambodian forces fired heavy artillery into Surin province, including at civilian homes, early Sunday. He said Cambodia also launched rocket attacks targeting the ancient Ta Muen Thom temple, claimed by both countries, and other areas in a bid to reclaim territory secured by Thai troops. Thai forces responded with long-range artillery to strike Cambodian artillery and rocket launchers. Richa said Trump's efforts to mediate were a separate matter. The battlefield operations will continue and a ceasefire can only happen if Cambodia formally initiates negotiations, he added. Any cessation of hostilities cannot be reached while Cambodia is severely lacking in good faith and repeatedly violating the basic principles of human rights and humanitarian law," Thailand's Foreign Ministry said separately. Cambodian Defence Ministry spokesperson Lt. Gen. Maly Socheata accused Thai forces of escalating the violence with bombardment of Cambodian territory early Sunday, followed by a "large-scale incursion" involving tanks and ground troops in multiple areas. Such actions undermine all efforts toward peaceful resolution and expose Thailand's clear intent to escalate rather than de-escalate the conflict, she said. Thailand on Sunday reported a new death of a soldier, bringing the total number of fatalities to 21, mostly civilians. Cambodia said 13 people have been killed. More than 131,000 people in Thailand have evacuated to safe locations and over 37,000 people fled from three Cambodian provinces. Many border villages are mostly deserted, with many schools and hospitals shut. Evacuees hope for a swift end to the fighting Pichayut Surasit, an air-conditioning technician in Thailand, said the sudden outbreak of fighting meant leaving his work in Bangkok to return home to protect his family. I didn't have the heart to continue with my work when I heard the news. I wanted to come back as soon as possible, but I had to wait until the evening, he said. Now at a shelter in Surin housing some 6,000 evacuees, Pichayut worries for his wife and twin daughters, hoping the conflict will end soon so they can return to their home in Kap Choeng district, one of the hardest hit by shelling. Bualee Chanduang, a local vendor who moved to the same shelter Thursday with her family and pet rabbit, is counting on swift negotiations to end the violence. I pray for God to help so that both sides can agree to talk and end this war, she said. The UN Security Council has called on ASEAN, a regional bloc, to mediate peace between the two members. Human Rights Watch has condemned the reported use of cluster munitions, weapons banned by International law, in populated areas, and urged both governments to protect civilians. The 800-kilometre frontier between Thailand and Cambodia has been disputed for decades, but past confrontations have been limited and brief. The latest tensions erupted in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thailand's domestic politics.
