logo
Braun's tax plan takes millions from schools

Braun's tax plan takes millions from schools

Chicago Tribune08-02-2025
The growing public school districts of Crown Point and Lake Central stand to lose the most money in Lake and Porter counties from Republican Gov. Mike Braun's property tax reform plan now before the state Senate.
Senate Bill 1 would slice off $31 million in property tax funding from the Crown Point Community School Corp. from 2026-28, according to a fiscal analysis by the state's Legislative Services Agency.
It estimated Braun's plan would cost Indiana school districts about $1.9 billion over the three-year period. Cutting budgets would be one of few options for the districts, many of which already rely on operating fund referendums to be taxpayer-approved to continue transportation and other student services.
In Porter County, Duneland School Corp. could lose $20 million, if Senate Bill 1 passes in its current form.
The bill, however, is likely to face vigorous debate as it moves through the legislature.
School districts are dependent on property taxes to fund bus transportation, capital projects, and debt service funds.
Braun told reporters Tuesday school districts need to be more efficient with funding.
'Almost all of them are saying that they can't do without what they're having now, I would say, prove it,' Braun said.
Braun, a former school board member, didn't single out any districts but seemed to criticize their decisions.
'Prove it that you didn't salt away a lot, that you didn't overburden the taxpayer by maybe making investments in buildings that weren't needed or other things that weren't essential.'
State Sen. Rodney Pol, D-Chesterton, said Braun's comments are frustrating as many school districts have convinced voters to pass referendums in order to maintain staffing levels and fund bus service.
'When I heard the administration insult the local governments by telling them to 'prove it' and accuse them of 'using scare tactics,' I was very disappointed,' Pol said. 'The locals have been proving it, essentially living paycheck to paycheck, yet remaining fiscally responsible and delivering well before the new administration came in.
'Duneland Schools, in particular, has done so well, they have had a community value of their performance and invested into its schools with a referendum. Now, the Governor's Office is proposing to arbitrarily pull the rug from under them once again. Local counties and cities are in the same boat. The legislature continues proposes to cut their autonomy to fix their own issues and forcing police to become evictions judges and ICE agents while cutting their funding. It's wholly unacceptable and irresponsible.'
Senate Bill 1 also impacts local and country governments with the same tax caps as municipal officials worry about providing services and maintaining operations if their funding is slashed.
Lake County Commissioner Michael Repay, D-Hammond, said Friday that he wonders how state officials expect counties to fully fund core services under the proposed cuts.
'There are an awful lot of functions that county government does on behalf of the state of Indiana, and I think that people that are contemplating reductions to county government revenues should contemplate the idea that maybe the state will have to pick up the slack,' Repay said. 'You name it — the judiciary. Does the state want to operate 92 courthouses?'
'They tend to use the federal government as the bad guy, but in this scenario, the state government is being unfair to the people that local government serves,' Repay said.
Lake County is proposed to lose $25.4 million over the three-year span.
The bill could undergo some changes as early as Tuesday, if the Senate's Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee moves the bill forward with an amended plan.
Braun's plan would cap tax increases at 3%, while increasing the homestead exemption. Senior citizens would see caps of 2%.
Hamilton Southeastern Schools would lose more funding than any other school district at $82 million over the three-year span. Gary Superintendent Yvonne Stokes headed the district from 2021 to 2023.
2026-2028 estimated revenue loss*
Lake districts
Hanover Community: $12.6 million
River Forest: $3.81 million
Merrillville: $15.18 million
Lake Central: $28.92 million
Tri-Creek: $9.61 million
Lake Ridge: $2.4 million
Crown Point: $31 million
East Chicago: $2 million
Lake Station: $2.5 million
Gary: $11.5 million
Griffith: $9.6 million
Hammond: $24.9 million
Highland: $8.4 million
Hobart: $9.3 million
Munster: $18.3 million
Whiting: $645,500
Porter districts
Duneland: $20.06 million
East Porter: $3.6 million
Porter Township: $3.57 million
Union Township: $5.73 million
Portage Township: $8.45 million
Valparaiso: $12.7 million
*Indiana Legislative Services Agency
Originally Published: February 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM CST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oklahoma state superintendent under investigation after board members report seeing naked women on his office TV
Oklahoma state superintendent under investigation after board members report seeing naked women on his office TV

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Oklahoma state superintendent under investigation after board members report seeing naked women on his office TV

Oklahoma's controversial state superintendent is under investigation after state Board of Education members alleged they saw images of naked women on his office's television during a closed meeting last Thursday. State Superintendent Ryan Walters, the fiery Republican pick leading one of the nation's lowest-ranked education systems, was in the middle of a meeting during an executive session of the Oklahoma State Board of Education when images of naked women allegedly popped up on his television screen, two board members told The Oklahoman. 4 Pictures of naked women were allegedly seen on a television behind Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters during a meeting last Thursday. BRYAN TERRY/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images One of the board members said she could barely believe what she was seeing. 'And I was like, 'Those are naked women'. And then I was like, 'No, wait a minute. Those aren't naked, surely those aren't naked women. Something is playing a trick on my eye. Maybe they just have on tan body suits. This is just really bizarre',' board member Becky Carson told the outlet. 'I saw them just walking across the screen, and I'm like, 'No.' I'm sorry I even have to use this language, but I'm like, 'Those are her nipples.' And then I'm like, 'That's pubic hair.' What in the world am I watching? I didn't watch a second longer. I was so disturbed by it, I was like, 'What is on your TV?' I was very stern, like I'd been a mother or a classroom teacher. And I said, 'What am I watching? Turn it off now!'' Ryan Deatherage, another board member, added that Walters was sitting with his back to the television, so he wasn't able to see the alleged X-rated video in the moment. 4 Walters has denied all allegations about the situation — calling them 'falsehoods.' DOUG HOKE/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images 'I am in shock and I'm not wanting to distract them. I'm trying to listen. Quite frankly, I didn't know how to handle it. I was just in shock. I was being human and I didn't know what to think. I kept thinking that it was just going to go away and so I quit watching it,' Deatherage told the outlet. Carson wound up having to tell Walters about the lewd images lingering on the screen behind him, which he then shut off without any explanation or apology. Walters later issued a statement Sunday denying all claims as 'categorically false.' 4 Two Oklahoma Board of Education members claimed that Walters offered no apology or explanation for the bizarre images. AP 'These falsehoods are the desperate tactics of a broken establishment afraid of real change. They aren't just attacking me, they're attacking the values of the Oklahomans who elected me to challenge the status quo. I will not be distracted. My focus remains on making Oklahoma the best state in the nation, in every category,' Walters said. Other members of the board told the outlet that while they didn't see the images themselves, Walters appeared 'shook up' and 'flustered or embarrassed' by whatever Carson pointed out. Walters, a staunch conservative, has previously made national headlines for his stances and policies in Oklahoma schools. He repeatedly sought to enforce strict rules about what's permitted inside the classroom, including restrictions against LGBTQ+ students that have come under fire from critics on the left. 4 Walters is best known for the anti-LGBTQ+ policies he's put forward, along with other rules loosening restrictions on Christian education in public schools. DOUG HOKE/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images At the same time, he's loosened prohibitions on the separation of church and state by requiring the Bible to be taught in public schools as a 'historical document.' Deatherage and Carson said Walters should hold himself to the same standards he enforces on educators, noting that the board has 'suspended teaching certificates for less than this.' It's unclear who may have been responsible for the racy images and why they were bizarrely featured on the government office's system. The investigation into the incident is being led by the Office of Management and Enterprise Services.

Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030
Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030

Key Points Quantum Computing has emerged alongside other popular quantum stocks such as IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum over the last year. While the company's approach to building quantum applications is interesting, past ambitions in other markets and an inconsistent financial profile should make investors pause before blindly buying the hype narrative. Although Quantum Computing has interesting potential, the amount of unknowns surrounding the company's future are hard to ignore. 10 stocks we like better than Quantum Computing › One of the more curious companies that has piqued investor intrigue in the quantum computing market is a business called (wait for it!) Quantum Computing (NASDAQ: QUBT). With a name like that, I wonder how it landed on so many radars. Sarcasm aside, Quantum Computing (the business) deserves a look -- and not just because of its 2,400% share price gains over the last year. To me, the company's technological promises and its actual business just don't align. Let's explore how Quantum Computing is attempting to disrupt the artificial intelligence (AI) realm and then dig into whether or not the company has what it takes to fulfill its lofty ambitions. Is Quantum Computing the next multibagger AI stock? Read on to find out. Quantum Computing might look like an exciting company on the surface, but... Quantum-based applications have the potential to transform the computing industry thanks to their fundamentally differentiated architectures. In simple terms, classical computing is based on binary code, written through a series of bits expressed as 1 or 0. Quantum computing uses qubits, which means they can exist as both 1 and 0 at the same time -- a process known as superposition. This allows for more complex information processing compared to today's classical computers. There are multiple ways that companies are developing qubits. IonQ relies on a process called trapped-ion, which essentially uses lasers to trap atoms and use them as the foundation of a qubit. Meanwhile, other competitors such as Rigetti Computing and D-Wave Quantum use superconducting circuits and quantum annealing techniques to make qubits. Quantum Computing, on the other hand, is using light (photons) as opposed to Rigetti and D-Wave's electricity-based foundation or IonQ's trapped atom technology. In theory, photonic qubits may be more energy efficient and easier to scale than other approaches that are heavily reliant on sophisticated cooling systems. ... there are quite a few red flags to point out Before buying into the idea that Quantum Computing is on the verge of a technological breakthrough, consider the following: Quantum Computing was once known as Innovative Beverage Group Holdings (IBGH). Why did the company pivot from beverages to qubits? Well, consider that IBGH went out of business, and the leftover management team decided to acquire a small company called QPhoton and completely shift its focus to quantum computing. Over the last year, Quantum Computing has generated $385,000 in sales. While the idea of photonic qubits is interesting, Quantum Computing is far from building a competitive moat over its rivals. The company's nominal revenue base and unproven roadmap hint at possible liquidity crunches down the road. For now, Quantum Computing appears to be relying on issuing stock as a means to raise cash and fund the operation. Despite these red flags, Quantum Computing has seen its market value climb from $55 million to $2.4 billion in just one year. The company's valuation is far higher than what investors witnessed during prior stock market bubbles during the internet boom and the COVID-19 stock market euphoria. Where will Quantum Computing stock be in five years? Given the ideas explored above, it's clear that Quantum Computing has virtually nothing to show for its supposed innovative photonic processes. The lack of strategic partners and product-market fit has me thinking that Quantum Computing offers more along the lines of vaporware than anything groundbreaking at this time. With ongoing research and development (R&D) and capital expenditures (capex) required to explore quantum technology, Quantum Computing is likely going to continue tapping the capital markets for liquidity unless some transformative deals begin to take shape -- which I suspect is highly unlikely. In my eyes, Quantum Computing stock is benefiting for one reason above all else. The company's name isn't just associated with one of AI's hottest new themes -- it's literally the name of the actual trend. To me, this is a case study revolving around the idea of investors blindly chasing narratives over sound fundamentals. I think that Quantum Computing is headed toward insolvency and could wind up bankrupt by 2030 (if not sooner). Alternatively, regulators could begin to scrutinize the company more heavily, and Quantum Computing could end up as a delisted stock. Regardless of how things shake out, I think Quantum Computing's equity value will diminish significantly in the coming years. For this reason, I think the company will have little-to-no value by the end of the decade. Should you buy stock in Quantum Computing right now? Before you buy stock in Quantum Computing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Quantum Computing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Adam Spatacco has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030 was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store