logo
The GOP's new bill is structural racism at its deadliest

The GOP's new bill is structural racism at its deadliest

Yahooa day ago
Let's call the Republicans' so-called 'big beautiful bill' what it is: a legislative double-barreled shotgun aimed at the bodies of women, especially Southern women and women who are Black, brown and low-income. One barrel blasts Medicaid access. The other guts Planned Parenthood. The result? A deliberate attempt to kill reproductive freedom, strip women of their basic dignity and destroy what progress this region has made in maternal health outcomes.
This isn't just policy. It's punishment.
Cutting Medicaid while attacking Planned Parenthood isn't fiscal responsibility. It's a targeted cruelty that hurts women nationwide. But particularly for women in the South — where health systems are already under-resourced, rural clinics are vanishing and maternal mortality rates are similar to those in developing nations — it's nothing short of a death sentence for them and their babies.
Let's talk facts.
In 2023 in Mississippi, 57% of births were covered by Medicaid. In Louisiana, it was 64%. These aren't just statistics. These are lives — sisters, daughters, mothers and aunties — trying to survive a system designed to abandon them.
In many rural ZIP codes, Planned Parenthood is the only accessible provider of cancer screenings, contraception, prenatal maternal care and postpartum care. Gutting its funding while simultaneously choking Medicaid is like setting fire to the only lifeboat in a flood. Let's be even more real: If you are a woman living in rural Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas or Alabama, this bill doesn't just inconvenience your access to care. It incinerates it.
In rural Southern counties, hospitals have shut down their labor and delivery units in droves. Some counties don't have a single practicing OB-GYN. That's not a policy failure — that's an egregious policy choice being carried out with surgical precision.
Imagine being six months pregnant, with no car and no public transit and with the closest provider two hours away — if it's even taking Medicaid patients. That's not health care. That's sanctioned neglect.
Rural women — especially Black, Indigenous and Latina women — have been treated like afterthoughts for generations. But now, they're being treated like collateral damage in a culture war they didn't ask to be in. This is structural racism at is deadliest.
If you're a lawmaker who's gutting access to women's reproductive while smiling for photo ops at church on Sunday, understand this: Every rural woman who dies from a preventable complication, every baby born undernourished because its mother couldn't access prenatal care, every ZIP code that loses a clinic because of these budget cuts is your fault.
These attacks aren't incidental. They are ideological. They are part of a long game to control women's bodies while criminalizing their autonomy — especially in Black and brown communities. It's no coincidence that the same states eager to shred Medicaid expansion are the ones leading the charge against abortion rights, denying gender-affirming care to trans youths and standing opposed to the very notion of care as a public good.
That's exactly why we released 'Shift the South,' groundbreaking report rooted in the lived realities and leadership of women and girls of color across the American South. It maps the merciless, maniacal movement to suppress autonomy, erase reproductive justice and underfund communities into silence. But it also lifts up the blueprint for transformation — investing in Southern women as agents of change, not casualties of policy. It's more than data — it's our declaration. And in the face of cruelty disguised as governance, we offer clarity, courage and counterstrategy.
What's left when the clinic closes, the OB-GYN relocates and the Medicaid card is worthless?
Silence. Suffering. Stillbirths.
We've been here before. But we refuse to die quietly this time.
At the Women's Foundation of the South, we refuse to act as if women are disposable. We know that maternal health, reproductive access and community wellness aren't luxuries — they are basic rights.
This bill? It's not just bad policy. It's a betrayal.
We will fight it — not just with data and dollars, but with the righteous rage of every grandmother who buried a daughter too soon, every mother who had to drive 200 miles for care and every young girl growing up in a state that sees her more as a womb than a whole human being.
Republicans Thursday passed their bill that cuts Medicaid and defunds Planned Parenthood, and Friday, President Trump signed it into law. They should all be aware, though, of the rage they've unleashed in women — in the South and across the country — who don't plan to sit around silently and die.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Man Who Thinks Medicaid Cuts Won't Cut Medicaid
The Man Who Thinks Medicaid Cuts Won't Cut Medicaid

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The Man Who Thinks Medicaid Cuts Won't Cut Medicaid

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. The Trump administration's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' will reduce Medicaid spending by about $800 billion over the next decade by kicking some 8 million Americans off the program's rolls. That is, if you listen to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the hospital industry, or the basic intuition that any plan to spend drastically less money on giving health care to poor people will result in those people ceasing to have health care. But the Trump administration's own projection is that the giant cuts in Medicaid will result in nobody losing coverage. If true, this would be astonishing, the fiscal equivalent of the immaculate conception. Fortunately, the administration has just the man to explain this economic miracle to the public: Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council and a professional soothsayer of implausible events that Republicans hope, or at least claim, will occur. Appearing on CBS's Face the Nation over the weekend, Hassett made his sales pitch. 'It's sound budgetary politics,' he said. 'And I think that nobody's going to lose their insurance.' Sadly for those Americans at risk of losing their access to medical care, and unsurprisingly for those familiar with Hassett's track record as an economic forecaster, his explanation was not particularly convincing. If the Trump administration's estimate is based on an alternative model, Hassett did not share it. Instead, his argument was a purely negative one. The CBO, he explained, cannot be trusted, because it has been wrong in the past—specifically, during the debate over legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) during the first Trump administration. 'Go back to 2017, when we had work requirements for Obamacare: They said that we'd lose about 4 million insured between 2017 and 2019, and about double that over the next 10 years,' he said. 'And in fact, the number of insured went up.' This sounds like a devastating indictment of CBO's ability to measure the effect of work requirements on the uninsured rate. It becomes less impressive when you recall that the bill in question—Donald Trump's attempt to repeal Obamacare—never became law. Trump proposed a national Medicaid work requirement in 2017, and Republicans passed a bill including that provision in the House, but it died in the Senate. (John McCain? Thumbs-down? Remember?) Trump did, however, sign executive orders designed to undercut Obamacare. One of those orders allowed states to implement requirements for Medicaid. Arkansas took Trump up on the offer. The new requirements proved very hard for users to navigate, and caused significant coverage losses without any evidence of having increased employment. This real-world experiment informs the CBO's model of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. [Annie Lowrey: Annoying people to death] Now, it's possible that other states will design systems for verifying employment status that work more smoothly than Arkansas's. If that happens, however, it will defeat the Republican Party's purpose for implementing them. The whole point is to save money, and the only way to save money is by kicking people off the program so that the government doesn't have to pay for their medical treatment. (In addition to those who will lose their health insurance because of Medicaid cuts, the CBO projects that another 8 million people will lose their insurance by 2034 because of changes to the ACA private marketplaces.) Hassett has not only made up a history of CBO being wrong about work requirements; he argues that this imagined sequence discredits the agency. 'They should look back at all the things they got wrong, and explain what they're going to do to get it right in the future and to do a better job,' he said on Face the Nation. 'And if they do that, we'll take them more seriously.' If the administration wishes to hinge its defense of its signature domestic legislation on the premise that sources of inaccurate historical predictions cannot be trusted, it has picked an especially unfortunate spokesperson. Hassett comes from the 'supply-side economics' wing of the Republican Party, a school of pseudo-economic thought once famously derided by George H. W. Bush as 'voodoo economics' for its unlikely claims that cutting taxes can yield higher government revenue. In 1999, Hassett co-authored Dow 36,000, which asserted that the stock market was wildly undervalued and was poised to more than quadruple in a few years. In fact, it would be more than two decades before the Dow Jones hit 36,000. Hassett proceeded to serve as chair of the Council of Economic Advisers in the first Trump administration, where his capacity for optimistic projection again proved useful. During the first weeks of the coronavirus pandemic, in 2020, Hassett designed a 'curve-fitting exercise' indicating that deaths from the virus would peak in April and trail off to almost zero by mid-May. That is not, in fact, what happened. In a normal administration, an episode like that, let alone two of them, would kill an economist's career. But it is perhaps because of, rather than despite, these absurd predictions that Hassett has found his way into an even more influential role in Trump's second term. Now here he is arguing that people should refuse to take the Congressional Budget Office seriously, because the Congressional Budget Office has made some embarrassing predictions in the past. Instead, we should believe that the CBO's projection of 8 million people losing Medicaid is 8 million too high. Can we at least see the model that arrived at this amazing conclusion? No, we can't. But we should trust the proven track record of Kevin Hassett. Article originally published at The Atlantic

Judge temporarily blocks Planned Parenthood ‘defunding' in Trump megabill
Judge temporarily blocks Planned Parenthood ‘defunding' in Trump megabill

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Judge temporarily blocks Planned Parenthood ‘defunding' in Trump megabill

A federal judge on Monday granted Planned Parenthood's request to temporarily halt Medicaid funding cuts to the group's health centers under a provision of Republicans' new tax and spending package. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani's ruling marks the first known instance of a federal judge limiting enforcement of any part of the 'big, beautiful' bill, which President Trump signed into law on Friday. It came just hours after Planned Parenthood sued over a provision that imposes a one-year ban on state Medicaid payments to health care nonprofits that also offer abortions and received more than $800,000 in federal funding in 2023. Talwani's ruling still allows the administration to enforce the provision against other providers, but Planned Parenthood says it comprises almost the entirety of the impacted entities. The judge issued the decision before the government responded, providing no explanation beyond a brief note that Planned Parenthood had shown 'good cause' for her to immediately intervene. The ruling lasts two weeks, and the judge will rule on whether to grant a longer injunction following a July 21 hearing. Talwani is an appointee of former President Obama. Stressing that federal law already bans federal funding for abortion, Planned Parenthood argues that the provision unconstitutionally singles out the organization, violates its equal protection rights and amounts to retaliation for Planned Parenthood's protected speech. The group warned that it would have to make cuts if the judge did not immediately get involved. 'We're grateful that the court acted swiftly to block this unconstitutional law attacking Planned Parenthood providers and patients,' the group said in a statement following her ruling. 'Already, in states across the country, providers and health center staff have been forced to turn away patients who use Medicaid to get basic sexual and reproductive health care because President Trump and his backers in Congress passed a law to block them from going to Planned Parenthood. There are no other providers who can fill the gap if the 'defunding' of Planned Parenthood is allowed to stand,' the statement continued. The Hill has reached out to the Department of Justice for comment. It is due to respond to Planned Parenthood's arguments in court filings by next Monday.

Russ Vought on Trump's megabill: ‘There's like, no downside'
Russ Vought on Trump's megabill: ‘There's like, no downside'

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Russ Vought on Trump's megabill: ‘There's like, no downside'

Trump budget chief Russ Vought proclaimed that there were no 'downsides' to the 'big, beautiful bill' in a Fox Business appearance Monday, the latest in a series of praises for the GOP's landmark piece of legislation. 'It is a home run. There's like, no downside to this bill. This is not one where you have to say pros and cons. It's all good,' Vought said on Larry Kudlow's show. Vought, the director of the White House's Office of Management and Budget, was among the key figures who pushed the megabill over the finish line, persuading fiscal hawks in the House Freedom Caucus to swallow their discontent over its cost, Politico reported. The sprawling legislation package makes permanent many of the tax cuts Republicans passed during Trump's first term and includes new deductions and exemptions for seniors and tipped workers. It includes some $170 billion in funding for immigration enforcement and mass deportations. The bill also has significant cuts to Medicaid, food stamps, and other welfare programs. Democrats have assailed it as being a wealth transfer to rich Americans, who stand to benefit most from its tax breaks. All of this is projected to be expensive. The conservative Cato Institute estimated that the bill would add to the national debt by $6 trillion, while the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office put that figure at $3.4 trillion. To Vought, the bill is 'all good.' 'That is the story we're going to continue to explain to people as we focus in on each aspect of the bill,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store