
YouTuber Mohak Mangal's video about ANI appears disparaging, says Delhi High Court
Justice Amit Bansal, hearing a defamation suit filed by ANI, said the content appeared to merit the agency's concerns and asked Mangal's counsel to take instructions on removing certain portions of the video. These include expressions such as 'hafta vasooli', 'kidnapping,' and 'goondaraj', which ANI claims are defamatory. "This video on the face of it is disparaging " said Justice Bansal after the video was played in court.
The matter is expected to resume after the lunch recess, when Mangal's legal team will update the court on whether they are willing to remove the contested language.
The case stems from a video Mangal published on 25 May in which he accused ANI of blackmail and extortion. He alleged that a representative of the agency demanded more than ₹ 40 lakh to lift copyright strikes issued against his channel for using ANI's footage without permission.
Senior advocate Amit Sibal, appearing for ANI, told the court that Mangal had repeatedly used ANI's video clips without permission on his YouTube channel. He explained that ANI had issued copyright strikes through YouTube's automated system, two of which were upheld. The controversy, he said, erupted ahead of a third strike, with Mangal going public instead of engaging with ANI through formal channels.
According to YouTube's support website, if a channel gets three copyright strikes it is subject to termination along with any associated channels. 'If your channel is terminated, all the videos uploaded to your account will be made inaccessible,' it says.
Sibal said ANI had offered a subscription licence to Mangal, which he declined. He suggested Mangal was now attempting to portray a legitimate enforcement of copyright as an act of intimidation or coercion.
He also argued that the video went beyond criticism and was part of a broader, targeted campaign to harm ANI's public standing. He pointed its amplification on social media by public figures such as comedian Kunal Kamra and fact checker Mohammed Zubair of Alt News, which added to the agency's reputational damage.
Sibal noted that the video used inflammatory language such as 'extortion' and 'goondaraj', which triggered a wave of online abuse against ANI and its employees. He sought a John Doe order to prevent its further dissemination by unidentified parties and indicated that ANI would file a separate copyright infringement suit.
In response, senior advocate Chander M. Lall from Mohak's team argued that the agency's demand for ₹ 40 lakh in exchange for lifting the copyright strikes amounted to extortion.
Lall also claimed that ANI could not assert exclusive ownership over news footage that concerned matters of public interest, and that the agency was targeting the YouTuber.
He argued that a series of news reports have suggested that ANI is running an extortion racket targeting content creators. However, ANI has not countered those those reports, he added.
Lall maintained that ANI could not ask him to purchase a license, and that this was a form of extortion by the news agency. If the issue was about copyright infringement, why had ANI not filed a copyright lawsuit, he asked.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Befriending girl doesn't give right to sex with her'
New Delhi: Befriending a girl doesn't give a man the right to have sex with her without consent, Delhi High Court stated on Thursday. It dismissed the bail plea of a man accused of sexually assaulting a minor. The court underlined that mere friendship doesn't eliminate the need for consent. Justice Girish Kathpalia rejected the man's claim of having consensual relations with the girl, pointing out that even consent could not be legal as the girl was a minor at the time. "Merely because a girl befriends a boy, the latter cannot be given liberty to indulge in sexual intercourse with her without her consent. Further, even the consent would not be lawful in the present case because the prosecutrix was minor in age," the court observed in its order. It highlighted the girl's specific allegations in the FIR and her testimony about the man's repeated sexual assaults despite her protestations. "I am unable to find it a case of consensual relations merely because in the FIR the prosecutrix stated that the accused/applicant with his sweet talk befriended her," it said, adding that for these reasons, the case is "not a fit case to grant bail to the accused." You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi The prosecution alleged that in April 2023, the man, working as a construction labourer in NDMC apartments in Vikaspuri, befriended the minor and subsequently raped her. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search Ads Get Info Undo According to the complaint, the girl was threatened not to confide in anyone, and the man continued to rape her until Nov 2023. The accused was subsequently booked last year for rape, stalking, criminal intimidation, and under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. In his defence, the accused maintained that the girl was a major at the time of the incident and he had consensual sex with her, while claiming several inconsistencies in her testimony. Rejecting the plea, the court said a single handpicked line from the testimony of the girl's mother cannot be read in isolation from the remaining material on record. The court considered her educational records establishing her age as a minor and said it couldn't minutely examine evidence in a bail application, leaving the issue of juvenility to be raised in trial. Recently, the Centre told Supreme Court that the age of consent for sex cannot be lowered from 18 years, as it is meant to protect minors. Loosening age-based protections could open avenues for abuse (rape) under the guise of consensual activity, it stated.


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bizman duped of Rs 1.7 cr in fake namkeen venture
1 2 Hyderabad: A businessman from Noorkhan Bazar has alleged that he was duped of nearly 1.7 crore by a fake manufacturer of savouries and snack foods, who lured him into a bogus partnership under the pretext of running a namkeen and paan masala business. Acting on his complaint, Hyderabad central crime station (CCS) police have registered a case of cheating and launched a manhunt for the accused. The complainant, Syed Shah Hamed Hussain Sabri, told police that Abhishek Avula introduced himself as a reputed manufacturer of snack foods, claiming his family owned several popular brands. To support his claims, Abhishek reportedly pointed to YouTube videos and a substantial online following to bolster his credibility. Convinced by these representations, Sabri said he entered into a formal business partnership with Abhishek in Sept 2024. Between Oct 22 and Dec 14, 2024, Sabri transferred 1.21 crore from his HDFC Bank account to Abhishek's firm, and an additional 48.1 lakh to individuals introduced as employees and suppliers. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad "I was told the funds would be used to purchase machinery, raw materials, and to hire staff. But after the transfers were made, Abhishek became untraceable — he switched off his phone and cut off all contact," Sabri said in his complaint. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The World's Oldest Living Actors. Reportingly Undo Suspecting foul-play, Sabri made inquiries and discovered that Abhishek had allegedly cheated several others in a similar fashion under the guise of running namkeen and masala businesses. Multiple FIRs are reportedly pending against him in Hyderabad, Bengaluru, and Chennai. Following Sabri's complaint, CCS police registered a case against Abhishek on July 18 under sections 316(2) (criminal breach of trust) and 318(4) (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. "We have prima facie evidence of Sabri transferring substantial amounts to a company operated by the accused. He is currently absconding, and efforts are on to trace and apprehend him," a CCS official said.


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Tushar Chaudhary files defamation FIR for remarks on YouTube
Surat: Two persons have been accused of defamation and offences under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act based on a complaint filed by Congress MLA and former central minister Tushar Chaudhary with Tapi district police. The FIR states that the accused, Jagdish Mehta, made defamatory comments during a debate with Ghangar on the latter's YouTube platform, expressing doubts about Chaudhary's tribal status. Ghangar allegedly agreed with Mehta's comments. Vyara police booked both Mehta and Ghangar under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 356, for defamation, and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1) subsections r, s, t and v, which deal with abusing and insulting a member of the tribal community held in high esteem. In the complaint, Chaudhary alleged that Mehta, who also works for a news outlet, raised doubts about his tribal status. Commenting on Tushar Chaudhary, Mehta allegedly made derogatory comments about tribal people to Ghangar. The FIR alleges that when Mehta said this, Ghangar agreed with him on the platform. Chaudhary alleged that Mehta had tried to ruin his social and political image with the comments. Chaudhary stated that he was elected twice on an ST reserved seat to the Lok Sabha and elected twice on an ST reserved seat to the Gujarat assembly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He alleged that Mehta's comments were an insult to the tribal community of the whole country. Chaudhary currently represents the Khedbrahma ST seat in the Gujarat assembly and was recently appointed the Congress's leader in the assembly. Deputy superintendent of police (SC-ST cell) Nikita Saroya has been handed the investigation. Tushar Chaudhary has been elected to the Lok Sabha from the Mandvi and Bardoli ST reserved seats and went on to become a central minister in the UPA govt. He has won elections from the Vyara and Khedbrahma assembly seats, which are reserved for the ST community. He is the son of former Gujarat chief minister Amarsinh Chaudhary.