Industry Lobby Group's ‘Fishy' Marine Protection Claims Under Fire
In an open letter published today, the signatories accuse Seafood New Zealand of misleading the public with its repeated and unsubstantiated claims that Aotearoa New Zealand has already achieved the global target of protecting 30% of its ocean territory by 2030.
'Claiming New Zealand has already protected 30% of our ocean is utterly disingenuous and creates a dangerous illusion of progress – when in reality, less than 1% of our ocean is highly protected and our fragile marine species and habitats remain exposed to immense harm,' says Dr Kayla Kingdon-Bebb, Chief Executive of WWF-New Zealand.
Seafood New Zealand continues to argue that New Zealand has already protected 30% of its ocean because it counts a type of protection known as 'Benthic Protection Areas' (BPAs). While these areas restrict bottom trawling and dredging on the seabed, they still allow midwater trawling, longlining, and other extractive industrial practices to continue unabated. They fall wildly short of 'highly protected' as defined by internationally recognised standards.
Even the Department of Conservation acknowledges BPAs don't protect sufficient biodiversity to meet the standard of a Marine Protected Area.
'These areas were chosen – by industry – because they had little impact on commercial fishing operations, not because they protect biodiversity. Most of these zones were never bottom trawled in the first place - because they're simply too deep for it - and in many of them, harmful industrial fishing practices are still rampant. That's not protection – it's pulling the wool over Kiwis' eyes,' says Dr Kingdon-Bebb.
'Calling BPAs 'protected areas' is a dangerous distortion that risks delaying the urgent action needed to safeguard ocean health. It gives the public and policymakers a false sense of progress while deep-sea corals, seamounts, and vital habitats for our declining native species and key fish stocks remain under immense threat.'
Dr Kingdon-Bebb says Seafood New Zealand's continued peddling of misinformation does a disservice to many of New Zealand's commercial fishing companies.
Fishing company Sealord, for example, has publicly backed the 30% ocean protection target – and acknowledged the significant effort still needed to reach this goal.
'There are commercial fishing companies genuinely trying to do better, but they're being undermined by an industry lobby group more interested in greenwashing and spin. That needs to change,' says Kingdon-Bebb.
Since 1970, the health of some of Aotearoa New Zealand's commercial fish stocks have plummeted. In the Hauraki Gulf/Tīkapa Moana, scallop and crayfish fisheries have nearly collapsed.
Our country's waters are home to half the world's whale and dolphin species, but 22% of marine mammals are now on the brink of extinction. More species of seabird breed in Aotearoa than anywhere else on earth – but a staggering 90% are now threatened or at risk.
'With our marine life on the brink and New Zealand lagging behind the rest of the world in ocean conservation, we urge Seafood New Zealand to stop overstating the nation's marine protection efforts and instead back meaningful, inclusive, science-led conservation that upholds Māori rights and interests. Our fragile marine environment deserves more than paper parks and poorly executed PR spin. It needs real protection,' says Kingdon-Bebb.
The full list of signatories to the open letter include:
Dr Kayla Kingdon-Bebb, WWF-New Zealand
Dr Russel Norman, Greenpeace Aotearoa
Nicola Toki, Forest & Bird
Professor Conrad Pilditch, Marine Scientist, University of Auckland
Professor Simon Thrush, Marine Scientist, University of Auckland
Professor Daniel Hikuroa, Earth Systems Scientist, University of Auckland
Vince Kerr, Marine Ecologist, Kerr and Associates
Nicola Rata-MacDonald, Ngāti Manuhiri Settlement Trust
Duncan Currie, Deep Sea Conservation Coalition
Natalie Jessup, Endangered Species Foundation
Daren Grover, Project Jonah
Anna Campbell, Yellow-Eyed Penguin Trust
Karen Saunders, Native Bird Rescue
James Gibson, BLAKE
Tom Karstensen, New Zealand Underwater Association
Jenny Craig, Dive Pacific
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Watercare charges Auckland woman estimated $800 bill due to faulty meter
Watercare admits up to 16,000 of its 40,000 EDMI smart meters were faulty. Photo: Supplied / Watercare Watercare has issued a public apology - via RNZ's Checkpoint - to a user facing an estimated $800 water bill, due to a faulty meter. The water provider now admits up to 16,000 of its 40,000 EDMI smart meters around Auckland are faulty, generating zero bills and leading to substantial catch-up bills. Two weeks ago, Lizzie from the North Shore told Checkpoint about a $410 bill that she refused to pay, until it was "based in fact and not just plucked out of the air". She subsequently received another, even bigger bill that equated to using 4342 litres of water a day. The Browns Bay couple now face a combined bill of about $1200. "This has gone beyond being mildly irritating," Lizzie said. "I can't figure out where this has come from. "I went back through our previous bills - our monthly water usage is somewhere between $65-75. The most it's ever been was $85 over a Christmas/New Year period. "I can't figure out why they're saying we must pay our overdue accounts immediately to avoid further action, when they were the ones that agreed we should cancel our direct debit, because the previous bill was over the time. "I don't know what's going on. I can't figure out how anyone could use this amount of water. "They don't value their customers, do they?" Checkpoint host Lisa Owens was able to pass on a message from Watercare. "They say they have made a mistake, and they'll get in touch with you directly to apologise and sort this," she said. "They said they sincerely apologise for the inconvenience to you, and they will get you a new water meter and sort out that large bill, which is an estimation." Lizzie responded emotionally: "I want to say thank you to you, but it shouldn't have come to this, should it? "Could you imagine a small business trying to operate this way - they wouldn't survive. "I'm really grateful for what you've done for me ... really, really grateful." Watercare admitted to Checkpoint it had made a mistake with the estimation, blaming a processing error by the service agent. It said it would re-assess the charge in line with past water consumption at that address. Of the 16,000 fault meters, 13,672 have been shifted to manual reading and the balance are scheduled to move to manual reading. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
4 hours ago
- 1News
'So unexpected, so wrong': Investigators reflect on Rainbow Warrior bombing
News feature: On the 40th anniversary of the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, key members of the investigation team reflect to Police Ten One Magazine on their roles in the landmark events. Late on Wednesday July 10, 1985, two explosions sank the Rainbow Warrior, the Greenpeace flagship moored at Marsden Wharf, Auckland. Most of the crew escaped, but photographer Fernando Pereira drowned while trying to retrieve equipment from his cabin. What was then the New Zealand police's biggest investigation exposed a complex sabotage plot sanctioned by the French Government in the hope of scuppering Greenpeace's high-profile campaign against its nuclear testing in the Pacific. Dawn ceremony marks 40 years since the Rainbow Warrior was attacked, killing Pernando Pereira. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT It involved multiple teams of agents and months of planning. It was exposed because of diligent detective work, sharp-eyed members of the public and considerable luck. It sparked an international crisis and brought an eventual 'Oui, we did it' from France. The French defence minister resigned, France's spymaster was sacked, two agents were jailed and two children were left without a father. "With all the mayhem and awful things going on around the world, one wonders why the Rainbow Warrior still pops up as a major incident – and not only in New Zealand," says retired Assistant Commissioner Allan Galbraith, who led the inquiry as a detective superintendent. "I think it's because it was so unusual, so unexpected and so wrong on the part of the French. "It's amazing that they even contemplated it as a good idea. Why did they do it? Why did they think it would solve problems for them? "The other thing that stood out about it was that they had the cheek to think they could do this in New Zealand and get away with it. They obviously thought this was a bit of a backwater in the South Pacific." Fernando Pereira drowned when the French intelligence agency (DGSE) detonated a bomb aboard the Rainbow Warrior. (Source: Supplied) ADVERTISEMENT The players in the sabotage plot — melodramatically titled Opération Satanique — were agents of the French spy agency Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure (DGSE). They included a woman who infiltrated Greenpeace in Auckland; and the crew of the yacht Ouvéa — three French combat divers and a doctor specialised in diving injuries — which arrived in Northland carrying equipment including mines, an inflatable boat and an outboard motor. The best-known to Kiwis were Commander Alain Mafart – another combat diver – and Captain Dominique Prieur, posing as Swiss couple Alain and Sophie Turenge, in a rented camper van. Three days before the bombing, more DGSE divers arrived in Auckland and lay low in another camper van while their commander lived it up in the Hyatt Hotel. By the time the mines exploded on the Rainbow Warrior's hull at 11.38 and 11.45pm on July 10, the Ouvéa had already sailed for Norfolk Island. The sabotage team headed south, enjoying a skiing break at Mt Hutt before flying out. Their commander, Lieutenant Colonel Louis-Pierre Dillais, was photographed riding a tourist jet boat. He spotted the camera too late and in the photo does not look happy about it. Even less happy were Mafart and Prieur, who police took into custody two days after the attack. ADVERTISEMENT People gathered in Auckland this morning for a dawn service 40 years since the bombing of the Greenpeace vessel in 1985. (Source: Breakfast) A homicide investigation was launched on July 11 after Navy divers established the blasts were external – it was an attack, not something gone wrong inside the vessel. "We had some good luck, but we also had bad luck in terms of what might have been – but that's the name of the game," said Galbraith. "They didn't only underestimate how New Zealand police would respond, they underestimated how New Zealand people would respond. "The general public were strongly interested and actively looking for information to pass to us." An early breakthrough was a case in point: members of Auckland Outboard Boating Club in Hobson's Bay — on alert after a series of thefts from boats – had reported suspicious behaviour about three hours before the explosions. Someone was seen dragging an inflatable boat on to the shore, and a Newmans' rental camper van was standing by. Gear was transferred to the van. It looked like the aftermath of a burglary. ADVERTISEMENT The infamous Newmans van. (Source: TVNZ) The suspicious boaties had time to take the van's registration number. This led directly to Mafart and Prieur, who were picked up as they tried to return the vehicle at Newmans in Auckland's Mount Wellington, on July 12. As publicity grew, and more and more evidence pointed to a French connection, reports of camper vans and French people behaving strangely poured in. They included a remarkably good account from witnesses to the transfer of gear from an Avis rental Commodore station wagon, linked to the Ouvéa, to the Newmans camper van, days before the bombing. Suspicious forestry workers in Te Puni Forest, Northland, took down the Commodore's registration number after seeing what seems to have been an abortive transfer attempt, when the vehicles missed each other. They noted an outboard motor in the back of the station wagon and later identified an Ouvéa crew member as being in the vehicle. Then a couple in Kaiwaka saw the successful transfer. They were able to identify Alain Mafart as the driver of the camper van. The investigation was also helped by evidence left at the scene. ADVERTISEMENT The saboteurs' getaway went wrong. They changed the time of the attack with the intent of avoiding casualties on board, but the tide was lower than planned for and they had trouble finding a place to come ashore. They left in a panic, abandoning the Zodiac inflatable, its outboard motor – witnesses heard the splash as it was dumped, allowing it to be retrieved from the harbour by police divers – and two oxygen bottles. The French saboteurs dumped their Zodiac inflatable, outboard motor, and two oxygen bottles. (Source: TVNZ) "The French left so many clues," says Galbraith. "That outboard motor was one because we traced it back to a purchase in London by one of their team. The oxygen bottles recovered in the harbour had French markings on them. "It was amazing. Even the worst criminals manage to cover their tracks better than that. "Because things went wrong, that connection with the French became very obvious. ADVERTISEMENT "Their plan wasn't inherently poor, it's just that it went wrong – and when it went wrong they didn't have any recovery possibilities." The investigation team quickly grew, reaching 130 at its height. The case presented unique challenges, at home and overseas. "It was an unusual investigation with a very difficult scene," says Allan. "Usually a major investigation has a scene which is static and secure. In this case, of course, the scene was at the bottom of the sea. "A major part of it had to be taken away – the boat had to be dry-docked – before the usual search could take place. "One thing worth mentioning is the dedication of the police dive team who spent weeks looking for forensic evidence at the scene, on the boat and under the boat, in very difficult midwinter conditions. "Their persistence was amazing, the way they stuck with it." ADVERTISEMENT A less glamorous side of the investigation involved scrutiny of border paperwork – including arrival cards for the 66,000 people who came to New Zealand between March and July 1985. From these the team built a picture of suspects' comings and goings. Maurice Whitham, Allan Galbraith's second-in-command, had day-to-day management of the investigation. Even 40 years later his recall of the case is encyclopaedic. As the inquiry was getting under way on July 11, there were a number of milestones: confirmation of external explosions; the report from the boaties; and a Customs report about the activities of the Ouvéa. At its peak, there were 130 people on the investigation team. (Source: Supplied) The inquiry was soon "running at 100mph," says Whitham, who started the inquiry as a detective senior sergeant but was a detective inspector by the end. "I was doing something like 60-odd job sheets a day for enquiries to follow up the information coming in. "We had no computers like now, of course, no electronics. We had a card index system with the standard offender-victim-scene categories. ADVERTISEMENT "We had no way of collating one lot of information with another lot. You couldn't just put in there 'Newmans camper van' and get all the sightings. It was a real manual, laborious system." Exhibits were recorded on the Whanganui computer, with a second record held manually. Just in case. The Auckland team was supplemented by investigators from other districts. "We had this big team of probably 100 detectives working in different offices in Central and we became a great team. There was a lot of camaraderie." There was also a lot of resources. "Anything we wanted, we got it" – from a fax machine and public service cars to free meals in the canteen and the secondment of French-speaking staff. It was, Allan Galbraith says, probably the one investigation in his career where money was no object. "Ken Thompson, the Commissioner of the day, more or less said to me 'Go for it, don't worry about what this is going to cost – we need to get on and do this' and that's what we did. "We had support from the Air Force in terms of moving people around. We sent 23 staff to nine different countries. ADVERTISEMENT "It was all done very quickly, well organised at the drop of a hat with full cooperation from the Defence folks, Foreign Affairs and everyone else who needed to be involved." A team flew to Norfolk Island, with a 24-hour window under Australian law to interview the Ouvéa crew and search the yacht. What the search threw up put the yacht's involvement beyond doubt, but it was too late – they could not legally hold the crew. They sailed before evidence could be analysed and warrants could be obtained. The yacht was scuttled and the crew transferred to the French submarine Rubis. The yacht Ouvéa. (Source: TVNZ) A team went to France, where a high degree of cooperation from local police suddenly stopped as the political dimension of the affair grew. A team member who visited the Rainbow Warrior to gather intel on the day of the attack was interviewed in Papeete. The doctor from the Ouvéa was found in a Sydney cinema. In many cases, evidence came too late and suspects returned to France, where they were out of reach. The skiing sabotage team flew out of New Zealand and vanished. ADVERTISEMENT The ones that didn't get away, Mafart and Prieur, faced the music alone. They were picked up at the Newmans rental depot in Mount Wellington, Auckland, returning the camper van days earlier than they had arranged to return it in Wellington. Newmans had been put on alert. The Mount Wellington office called when the pair arrived and a team led by Detective Sergeant Terry Batchelor dashed to get there as the office staff used delaying tactics. The Turenges, as they called themselves, underwent extensive interviews as Batchelor and the suspects team chipped away at their story. Handsome, debonair Neil Morris interviewed Sophie, while Batchelor, built like the proverbial brick ablutions facility, interviewed Alain. Sometimes they put them together to see how they interacted. Their Swiss passports were proven to be faked. The investigators picked them up on inconsistencies in their accounts of their time in New Zealand. But they gave little away, says Batchelor. "When you're used to dealing with burglars, murderers and thieves, they were clearly a cut above that. ADVERTISEMENT "They were cool and calm. They gave implausible answers to some of our questions but they never really admitted anything." Commander Alain Mafart – another combat diver – and Captain Dominique Prieur, posed as Swiss couple Alain and Sophie Turenge (Source: 1News) Little things didn't add up. Why did Alain speak English with an American accent if, as he said, he had only visited there? Why did the scars on his face and torso look more like combat wounds than botched surgery as he claimed? The pair admitted being on the waterfront on July 10, and said they helped a fisherman get an inflatable out of the water, then gave him a lift. So why did they disagree about whether he sat in the front or back? "Neil wasn't getting much out of her, and neither was I with him," says Batchelor. "He was as cool as he could possibly be. He was wearing a scarf around his neck which he would often twist, but he was unemotional, and cooperative to an extent." Even when confronted over the fake Swiss passports, Alain responded with a classic Gallic shrug – palms up, shoulders raised, and 'Pfffft'. ADVERTISEMENT "If he did that once he did it a thousand times." One time the cool exterior slipped was after Batchelor had dangled the prospect that Sophie might be able to go home in return for an admission. "He wasn't exactly aggressive, but he became assertive. He actually told me off. He said 'Do not make promises to my wife that you do not intend to keep'. "I said to him 'My concern is for the life of the man who has died and the children who don't have a father'. "I had a pen. I said 'I don't care this much' – and I broke the pen and threw the pieces to either side – 'I don't care this much about the woman you call your wife'. "It was a bit melodramatic." Mafart and Priuer faced the music alone. (Source: TVNZ) ADVERTISEMENT There was a lightbulb moment when Mafart spilled a drink on his trousers. He was upset and took great pains to mop it up. "I don't think it would have affected most people like that. It occurred to me that it was the sort of reaction you might expect from a military person about to go on parade." Before being formally arrested, the pair were billeted in a bugged motel room. They still gave little away, though there was a phone call seeking advice from 'Uncle Emile' in France. They had been held on charges – as the Turenges – relating to their fake passports. Eventually the growing evidence was such that they were charged with murder and other offences under their real names, which had been confirmed in August by the French Government's Tricot Report into the affair. Batchelor was a regular visitor to Mafart at Paremoremo Prison. "He didn't admit his involvement but one peculiar thing he said was that if they had been apprehended in a wilder country they would have been told 'If you don't tell the truth we'll take you out and shoot you'. "He put his hands together like he'd been handcuffed and said 'I would go out and be shot'. "Anyone could say that but I thought he actually meant it. They were well aware they were in a friendly country and we didn't behave like that." ADVERTISEMENT Another time, Batchelor asked Prieur why they had taken the van back to Newmans instead of dumping it and getting on a flight. "She said 'You would have blocked the airport'. I said 'We didn't even know who you were'. "That gave her quite a shock – I think she suddenly realised they had made a bad mistake." The trial was over before it began when Mafart and Prieur pleaded guilty to manslaughter and were sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment in November 1985. Infamously, under a UN-brokered deal, they were deported to the French Polynesian Hao Atoll to serve their sentences. Soon they were back in France, free and feted as heroes. Having been with Mafart and Prieur at the start of their involvement with police, Batchelor was also there at the end as one of two officers – with Detective Robin Borrie – escorting Prieur to Hao in 1986. He does not share the general anger about the deal which let the agents slip out of New Zealand custody, and questions the value of keeping them in prison for 10 years at Kiwi taxpayers' expense. ADVERTISEMENT "I can't speak for everyone, but I think the main victory was New Zealand exposing the French as being the perpetrators… and that they had to eventually admit to it." From left: Nick Hall, Peter Burridge, Glenda Hughes (obscured), Bert White, Terry Batchelor, Peter Williams, the late Cushla Watson, Maurice Witham, the late Dr Margaret Lawton, Chris Martin, Allan Galbraith, John Birmingham and Harry Hilditch. (Source: Supplied) Members of the Rainbow Warrior investigation team are meeting on Saturday for a reunion, as they have on a number of significant anniversaries. Some have contributed to documentaries, podcasts and news articles over the years, with a slew of new ones being prepared to mark this anniversary. If there is frustration that most of the agents got away, there is satisfaction at an extremely difficult job, done very well. "I think we were the only civil police organisation in the world to capture active DGSE agents on the job," says Maurice Witham, who today attended a commemoration in Auckland on board Greenpeace's new Rainbow Warrior vessel. "It's a pretty significant milestone for a small country like New Zealand to capture these guys, put them through the court and get a conviction. ADVERTISEMENT "Looking back 40 years, I don't think there's ever been anything bigger than this – one country vs another country, a 'friendly' country doing an act of what they call now terrorism. "In those days, the word terrorism wasn't used. We didn't consider it to be terrorism; to us we were investigating the murder of a man, Fernando Pereira, by blowing up of ship." — Police Ten One Magazine.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara to contest Tāmaki Makaurau by-election for Te Pāti Māori
Oriini Kaipara. Photo: Screenshot / YouTube / Newshub Former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara has been chosen to contest the Tāmaki Makaurau by-election for Te Pāti Māori. Kaipara was selected at a behind-closed-doors hui at Hoani Waititi Marae on Thursday evening. The by-election has been triggered by the death of Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp , who died suddenly two weeks ago. Te Pāti Māori said Kaipara (Ngāi Tūhoe, Ngāti Awa, Tūwharetoa, Ngāti Rangitihi) had dedicated decades amplifying the stories of Māori communities, holding prime ministers to account, and chairing nationally televised Māori electorate debates. The party co-leaders said she would bring a lifetime of leadership and advocacy, and that she understood the deep connection between whakapapa and politics. "Her voice is exactly what Tāmaki needs to honour the memory of Takutai Moana and to ensure Māori voices are heard loud and clear in Parliament," said co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. Kaipara said she was pledging to tackle the cost of living crisis facing Tāmaki whānau, with a focus on housing, youth homelessness, and skyrocketing food bills. "Māori are being attacked left, right and centre for purely existing. It's vile and it's not good enough," she said. "My role now is to move from covering the story to changing it." She said if elected her key priorities would be securing mana whenua first right of refusal on significant private land, driving kaupapa Māori housing solutions to eliminate rangatahi houselessness, and expending investment in kaupapa Māori education models such as Te Aho Matua. Te Kou o Rehua Panapa, a former youth worker at Manurewa Marae had also sought the nomination. Hīkoi leader Eru Kapa-Kingi had earlier ruled out running. Kaipara has most recently worked as Pouwhiringa Māori culture lead for the New Zealand Olympic Committee. In 2021, she became the first wāhine Māori with moko kauae to present a mainstream news bulletin, when she fronted Newshub Live at 6pm. Labour's Peeni Henare previously held the Tāmaki Makaurau seat, before being beaten by Kemp in the 2023 election by a slim margin of 42 votes. Henare had held the seat since 2014. RNZ understands Labour's internal nomination process is underway and will close on Friday. The Prime Minister is yet to announce the date for a by-election. However, the Speaker of the House published the notice of vacancy in the Gazette on Wednesday, meaning the Governor-General will issue a writ within 21 days of July 9th, instructing the Chief Electoral Officer to conduct the by-election.
