
Pippa Middleton, 41, embraces chic new style at British Grand Prix
The 41-year-old sister of the Princess of Wales opted to straighten her bob into a sleek style at the Formula 1 event held at Silverstone on Sunday.
Pippa's polished look marks a departure from the much longer style that she had when she became public figure in 2011 after the marriage of Kate Middleton and Prince William.
While she showed off a shorter hairstyle at sister Kate's Christmas concert in December 2024, Pippa's shoulder-length locks this weekend were much straighter, bearing a strong resemblance to 70-year-old Carole's style.
And, just as Carole embraced neutral tones at Wimbledon yesterday, her youngest daughter combined similar shades when she donned a tan suede jacket and a white midi dress.
Accompanied by her hedge-fund manager and former racing driver husband, James Matthews, the mother-of-three looked completed her look with a pair of espadrilles and aviator style sunglasses.
Her attendance at the Grand Prix marks Pippa's first public appearance since Kate's Christmas concert, which was held at Westminster Abbey on December 6.
Recently, Pippa, who lives at Buckleberry Farm, Berkshire, with her young family, unveiled the site's Christmas plans - after previously facing backlash from roadway experts.
Children in the UK are yet to go on their summer holidays, but staff at Pippa and James Matthews's venture have helped ensure parents stay ahead of the curve by unveiling upcoming Santa's grotto tickets.
In 2020, Pippa and James snapped up 72 sprawling acres of land in leafy Berkshire for just £1.5million - in a village where a detached house with a garden already costs close to that price.
The rolling fields, which had a 'wedding tractor' to celebrate the Prince and Princess of Wales 's marriage in 2010, is currently home to a 44-acre deer park, café, glamping pods and children's play area.
The couple have since opened the lodge at Bucklebury Farm for social events, including parties or Pilates classes.
Now, they appear to be gradually increasing their offerings, with more activities for children, including the grotto.
Tickets for the grotto are landing 'very soon', according to the farm's Instagram, which added in the post's caption, 'Is it too soon to mention... Father Christmas?! Because guess what - Father Christmas Grotto tickets at Bucklebury Farm will be on sale very soon!
'We know it's only Summer and you are probably lighting your BBQ as we speak, but magic takes planning - and the elves are already hard at work! Keep your eyes peeled... you won't want to miss out on the festive fun!'
Michael and Carole Middleton are well-established in the area and had been living in the small village of Bucklebury for many years before moving into the local manor house in 2012.
James Middleton also purchased a £1.45 million 16th-century farmhouse near Bucklebury with his wife, Alizee Thevenet, in 2021.
Next to relocate from West London to West Berkshire was Pippa and her investment banker husband, James Matthews, along with their three children. They have set up a home in a £15 million mansion a 20-minute drive from her parents.
James Matthews and business pals later purchased the 72-acre Bucklebury Park Farm, a stone's throw from Pippa's parents.
However, Pippa and James came under fire from highway bosses after revealing their plans to build a countryside creche.
In March this year, roads chiefs said the idea for the rural nursery would mean too many cars.
And a local councillor was so concerned that he has called the decision in, meaning it will be debated by the planning committee.
The site has been open to the public since 1992 and is located on the edge of the village of Bucklebury, Berks, around 4km north east of Thatcham.
The couple have made various additions to the offerings at Berkshire's Buckleberry Farm over the years
Mr Matthews - whose brother is reality star Spencer Matthews - wants to open the facility for pre-schoolers at their rural Bucklebury Farm in Berkshire.
The Princess of Wales is known to be a huge advocate of a strong start in the early years and she and William's Royal Foundation champion the cause.
Bucklebury Farm's petting zoo was said to be a favourite of young Prince George when he visited his grandparents.
But 'significant concerns' have been voiced by the local council's road experts who say they are worried about the extra number of cars the creche will spark - and have recommended the plans be refused.
Cllr Christopher Read, the ward member for Bucklebury, was also worried, applying to have the decision debated by the planning committee.
The Matthews have carried out a series of improvements to Bucklebury Farm since they bought it four years ago, continuing its 40-year success.
It has a deer park, soft play area, animal petting, office space and cafe. There are also rustic glamping tents, where families can stay with just the heat from a logburner and no electricity or Wi-Fi.
They hope the latest plans for a day nursery will give local parents more choice, with no similar facilities for five miles.
Many local ones also don't provide cover in school holidays meaning parents nearby are missing out on working outside of term time.
Farm bosses wouldn't need to build the nursery as the buildings already exist, but a change of use would need to be granted to allow them to legally use them for early years education.
It would be housed in a log cabin approved for on-site staff accommodation in 2015, before Pippa and her family owned the park.
A change of use was granted eight years later, to allow the cabin to be used as office space with meeting rooms, a workshop and studio.
But the application has been called in at West Berkshire Council to be debated by the planning committee following worries about the traffic the proposals could cause.
West Berkshire Council's highways department said: 'When the local highways authority assessed (the 2023 planning application) there were concerns that the building would be utilised independently of the farm park and that there would be an unacceptable increase in vehicle movements in an unsustainable location.
'There are no alternative modes of travel to the site other than private car.
'The application was, on balance, accepted by highways on the basis that the use was proposed to be once or twice a week.
'This application now seeks to add in a non-residential creche, day centre or nursery. This is a significant concern.
'This would result in staff and children/attendees' vehicle movements, travelling to and from the site potentially daily, in what is an unsustainable location.
'No details of sessions, capacity etc is provided, which should accompany an application such as this, however this will not overcome the highway concerns with this proposal.
'A creche, day centre or nursery could see a much greater use at the site, potentially daily use, with all staff and children/attendees travelling to the site by private car.
'The proposed additional use class would result in an unacceptable increase in vehicle movements in what is an unsustainable location.'
They added that they recommended refusal.
However, the council did add that concerns could be allayed by benefits to the rural economy, the provision of jobs and the lack of similar nearby nurseries.
Bucklebury Parish Council has no objection to this application, but did add: 'There was discussion about the vehicular access to the proposed facility, which is shared with pedestrians as they enter the farm from the carpark…..
'The plans are not clear on where staff or parents will be expected to park.'
Caroline Downie - writing to West Berkshire planners on behalf of agents Lasseter Downie Planning - tried to calm fears.
She explained that there would be a maximum of 24 children on site and it would take three years to reach capacity.
There would be one manager, two qualified teachers and a couple of apprentices, adding that up to 20 parents had already expressed an interest.
'The local nurseries are at capacity or near capacity,' she added.
'This offering as discussed above will not be large but will offer children a unique experience with access to the farm park facilities and the learning that this will provide.
'The applicant has been researching demand through social media and has established that there are already 17 to 20 parents that are interested should this facility become available to them.'
She estimated 48 extra vehicle movements per day - 240 a week or 12,480 per annum - and less if some children were siblings.
The farm had 45,000 visitors last year, estimated at 30,000 vehicle movements,.
Ten staff add an extra 7,280 a year, meaning adding the nursery would still keep cars below the 70,000 allowed by the local council.
It's not clear whether the plans have been approved or disapproved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
21 minutes ago
- Times
Minister criticises BBC for ‘catastrophic failures' after Gaza report
The BBC News chief has apologised for failing to sufficiently scrutinise a documentary, as the culture secretary criticises a 'series of catastrophic failures' at the corporation. An internal review found the BBC breached editorial guidelines by failing to give audiences the 'critical information' that the narrator of Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone, Abdullah al-Yazouri, was the son of a Hamas minister. It found that the programme, which was pulled from iPlayer days after it aired in February, breached editorial guidelines on accuracy, but not impartiality. Three members of the film's production company, Hoyo Films, knew who the 13-year-old's father was at the time the programme aired but did not tell the BBC, which the review called a 'significant oversight'. Peter Johnston, the BBC's director of editorial complaints and reviews, found that the corporation 'bears some responsibility' as 'it has ultimate editorial responsibility for the programme as broadcast'. He ruled the BBC team was not 'sufficiently proactive' with initial editorial checks and there was a 'lack of critical oversight of unanswered or partially answered questions'. Ofcom said that it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its Broadcasting Code. An spokesman said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.' On Monday Deborah Turness, the BBC News chief executive, apologised for the error, which she said had been taken 'incredibly seriously' by the broadcaster. 'I'm sorry this happened. It was a mistake,' she said. 'At BBC News, we are fully accountable for everything that we publish and everything we broadcast, but we didn't run those questions to ground.' However, she blamed Hoyo Films for the error. 'The questions should have been answered by the independent production company at the many times of asking,' she said. Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, welcomed the acknowledgement by the BBC that there had been a 'series of catastrophic failures' over recent weeks, including its decision to broadcast punk duo Bob Vylan's Glastonbury performance which included chants of 'death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]'. 'Our national broadcaster is too important for its independence and impartiality to be called into question,' Nandy added. 'I am pleased that there has been progress over recent weeks but as the BBC itself has recognised, there is more that has to be done.' The BBC has said it would 'ensure accountability' and said it had no planned commissions with Hoyo Films. Tim Davie, the BBC's director-general, said: 'Peter Johnston's report identifies a significant failing in relation to accuracy in this documentary. I thank him for his thorough work and I am sorry for this failing. 'We will now take action on two fronts: fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated.' Johnston said that in hindsight the use of this child to narrate the film was 'not appropriate', but there was no evidence that Hamas or the boy's father influenced the film. He did not rule that the production company misled the corporation, but found that it bore most of the responsibility for the failure. The report detailed at least five occasions when the BBC asked Hoyo about 'background checks' on individuals. For example, on January 12, a month before the programme aired, an editorial policy adviser asked Hoyo: 'Has due diligence been done on those featured to ensure eg the lead boy doesn't have links in any way to [Hamas] — I'm sure it has but critics may raise something and I want to make sure we're completely sure.' The BBC said How To Survive A Warzone, which followed children as they lived through the Israeli siege of Gaza, could return to iPlayer as a series of edited, shorter films. Hoyo Films said: 'We take the findings extremely seriously and apologise for the mistake. Our team in Gaza risked their lives to document the devastating impact of war on children. Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone remains a vital account, and our contributors, who have no say in the conflict, deserve to have their voices heard.' The Campaign Against Antisemitism pressure group called for an independent investigation 'into bias in the BBC's Middle East coverage'. Its chief executive, Gideon Falter, said: 'If the BBC were an accountable organisation, senior executives would be scrambling to save their jobs. Instead, it's the usual weasel pledge to 'update some guidelines'.' He called for Davie's resignation, accusing him of steering the broadcaster 'from national treasure to national embarrassment'. In a note to staff sent on Monday, Turness said that the failings 'did not take away' from the division's wider achievements. Several staffers said that it felt 'tone deaf' in light of the conclusions. 'There have been repeated failures and apologies on getting it wrong on Israel coverage and it seems to always be one way,' said one. 'Deborah's email read like a 'aren't we brilliant, but here's one small failing'.' Katie Razzall, the BBC culture and media editor, said that 'eyebrows were raised' about how the film came to be broadcast having been classified as a 'high risk project' by bosses. Davie is preparing to meet the broadcaster's Jewish staff network on Wednesday. Responding to the review on Monday evening, Downing Street said the BBC must take 'swift action' to ensure 'such errors' are never repeated again. The prime minister's official spokesman said: 'The BBC must ensure that such errors are never repeated and the public rightly expect the highest standards from the BBC and the corporation must learn and take swift action from the report's findings.'


The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ofcom to investigate after Gaza documentary breached BBC editorial guidelines
Ofcom has announced it will investigate the BBC's Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone documentary after a review found it had breached the corporation's editorial guidelines on accuracy. The regulator said it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its broadcasting code, which states that factual programmes 'must not materially mislead the audience'. An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.' The programme was removed from BBC iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture. The review, conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews, which is independent of BBC News, said the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'. But the review found no other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that outside interests 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'. The report said that 'careful consideration of the requirements of due impartiality was undertaken in this project given the highly contested nature of the subject matter'. Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone, which also aired on BBC Two, was made for the BBC by independent production company Hoyo Films. The detail of the background information regarding the narrator's father is deemed as 'critical information', which the report said was not shared with the BBC before broadcast. The report found that Hoyo Films did not 'intentionally' mislead the BBC about the position of the narrator's father, but said the independent production company 'bears most responsibility for this failure'. However, it further added that the BBC also 'bears some responsibility'. The report detailed that at the time the programme first aired the information regarding the position of the narrator's father was known only by three members of the production company, 'but not anyone within the BBC'. It said: 'In light of this inequality of information and the opportunities that the production company had to bring this information to the BBC's attention, which it did not take, the production company is the party with most responsibility for this failure. 'However, I do not consider that the production company intentionally misled the BBC about the narrator's father's position. 'The production company has been consistently transparent that, notwithstanding their belief that the father's position was a civilian or technocratic one, as opposed to a political or military position in Hamas, they made a mistake and should have informed the BBC about it.' The narrator's scripted contribution to the programme also did not breach BBC standards on due impartiality, the report said, adding: 'I have also not seen or heard any evidence to support a suggestion that the narrator's father or family influenced the content of the programme in any way.' But the use of a child narrator for this programme was 'wrong', the report added. It explained that in this instance, the narrator 'was put in a position where his narration had to be highly scripted (meaning there was a limited portrayal of his background, story and life) and where he had to carry the rights-of-reply of others, in particular the IDF. 'In light of what the production company knew about the narrator's family and background, putting him forward as the voice of the programme as it was scripted was wrong in my view.' The BBC's director-general Tim Davie said: 'Peter Johnston's report identifies a significant failing in relation to accuracy in this documentary. I thank him for his thorough work and I am sorry for this failing. 'We will now take action on two fronts – fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated.' The BBC Board said: 'We thank Peter Johnston for his work. His report is a comprehensive examination of a complex programme, the production of which spanned many months from concept through to broadcast – and is critical in laying bare the facts of what happened. 'Nothing is more important than trust and transparency in our journalism. We welcome the actions the executive are taking to avoid this failing being repeated in the future.' Hoyo Films said in a statement that they take the report findings 'extremely seriously' and 'apologise for the mistake that resulted in a breach of the (BBC) editorial guidelines'. They added: 'We are pleased that the report found that there was no evidence of inappropriate influence on the content of the documentary from any third party. 'We appreciate the rigorous nature of this investigation, and its findings that Hoyo Films did not intentionally mislead the BBC, that there were no other breaches of the editorial guidelines in the programme, and that there was no evidence to suggest that the programme funds were spent other than for reasonable, production-related purposes. 'Hoyo Films welcomes the report's recommendations and hope they will improve processes and prevent similar problems in the future. 'We are working closely with the BBC to see if we can find an appropriate way to bring back to iPlayer the stories of those featured in the programme. 'Our team in Gaza risked their lives to document the devastating impact of war on children. 'Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone remains a vital account, and our contributors – who have no say in the conflict – deserve to have their voices heard.' It comes as it was announced that Mr Davie and BBC chairman Samir Shah will face questions from MPs over the documentary, the investigation into allegations of misconduct made against Gregg Wallace, and its Glastonbury Festival coverage of Bob Vylan and Kneecap. The pair will appear before the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on September 9.


Sky News
35 minutes ago
- Sky News
Can BBC learn from Gaza documentary controversy?
👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈 The BBC breached its own editorial rules when it didn't explain that a 13-year-old, used to narrate a documentary about Gaza was, in fact, the son of a Hamas official. A review has found that the independent production company, Hoyo Films, bears most of the responsibility for what happened - but that BBC bosses should have had more oversight of the film. The corporation says it is taking action but, so far, nobody has lost their job. However, it is creating a new management role called 'Director of News Documentaries' as a result of the review. Niall Paterson speaks to correspondent Katie Spencer about the BBC's response - and former culture secretary John Whittingdale tells the podcast that he's concerned the corporation doesn't seem to learn from its mistakes.