How Did Freddie McKee Die? A Grieving Black Mom Investigates Two Conflicting Autopsies
As The Root previously reported, around 2:45 a.m. on July 8, 2020, a neighbor called authorities to report a shirtless man in her trash who said he was looking for his phone. Around 6 a.m, police received another call but from Freddie Gardner, McKee's father, reporting that his son was dead on his front porch.
Now, Freddie's mother, Doressia McKee, is suing the Columbia Police Department for racial discrimination after she says they didn't fully investigate her son's manner of death. Instead, she says they wrote him off as just another statistic: a drug addict.
Here's what we know.
University of Missouri Medical Examiner Dr. Carl Stacy's handwritten autopsy notes cite several abrasions (a superficial rub or wearing off of the skin), contusions (ruptured bruises), and scars on Freddie's back and the back of his legs.
McKee believes, based on the reports, that there was a struggle preceding her son's death and that McKee's body was moved or in motion before the police arrived. The Root reviewed both an EMS and police report that confirms his arm was raised off the ground when authorities arrived on the scene. A paramedic wrote they attempted to move the arm but confirmed Freddie's body was in rigor mortis.
A July 26, 2020, toxicology report shows Freddie's blood tested positive for caffeine, olanzapine (used to treat psychotic disorders) and Celexa/Lexapro (used to treat depression). His mother tells The Root she received a call from Detective Steve Wilmoth in August 2020 claiming he was given the name of another drug found in her son's system and alleged Freddie, a business owner and Black history buff, died of an overdose.
'My son ain't never been no addict. Please, if I knew about any of that, I would be sitting at the rehabilitation [center] with my son making sure he would overcome whatever kind of issue,' Ms. McKee told The Root. Freddie's medical records show no evidence of drug abuse.
McKee described Freddie as kind and non-confrontational. She admits he may have mixed with a bad crowd when he was younger, but did not fit the profile of what the cops were trying to push. She insisted Freddie did smoke marijuana, but 'never raised his voice, never cursed, never talked back — he's always been a good kid.'
Per McKee, not only did Wilmoth not specify how he identified the cause of death prematurely, but a letter Dr. Stacy filed to a judge that August claimed the cause of death was still 'pending.'
McKee said a second toxicology report was mysteriously issued despite never being contacted by the medical examiner about the retesting of her son's blood. The second 'corrected' report, obtained by The Root, detailed extensively the evidence of injury from the original autopsy.
Dr. Stacy concluded Freddie's official cause of death was an 'accident caused by eutylone toxicity.' Another toxicology report, nearly identical to the first, included a new compound listed as a 'special request finding' which Freddie tested positive for: eutylone, a stimulant similar to Bath Salts. Who exactly requested the new test is unclear.
She called out the police who deemed her 'a liar' who 'knew about my son's drug abuse.' She added: 'How do you come to a death scene and you know already, on that day, that my son is an addict? Where did you get that information from?'
According to the report, Freddie tested positive for 5500 ng/ml of eutylone. However, his autopsy noted all of his internal organs were 'unremarkable' or absent of any damage. His heart, specifically, had no flaws.
'I didn't read anything about anything about his nose, like if he was snorting. They took his brain out and everything. So, for them to come back and for everything to be 'unremarkable' then how the hell are the police going to say that he had a history [of drug abuse]?' said McKee.
The Root asked Boone/Callaway County Medical Examiner's Office death investigator Stacey Huck about an 'expanded panel' in cases like Freddie's. He revealed that the test may run if the first test includes an 'out of scope' finding. Expanded panels are where synthetic substances specifically are tested.
When asked to detail the amount of eutylone found, Huck couldn't explain exactly what the results meant but said it implies a 'really high number.' Despite the scientific findings, McKee wasn't convinced and pushed to find her own answers.
The Root reached out to an expert to review the two autopsies. They also compared the findings to a globally known police brutality case that brought forth the same concerns.
What they had to say in Part 2 may surprise you...
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
Debanking innocent Americans should be illegal
Republican and Democratic leaders agree: Closing the bank accounts of Americans for no apparent reason is wrong. In recent years, major banks have begun the quiet, calculated and often callous closing of bank accounts belonging to honest, law-abiding Americans — typically without warning, cause or recourse. The practice is called debanking. And, to put it plainly, it just ain't right. According to members of the Senate Committee on Banking, Bank of America 'was the subject of 988 improper closure complaints and 584 improper account denial complaints.' JPMorgan Chase 'was the subject of 1,423 improper closure complaints and 443 improper account denial complaints,' and in 2021, Chase closed the account of retired former National Security Adviser Gen. Michael Flynn's nonprofit, citing 'reputational risk.' Wells Fargo 'was the subject of 1,053 improper closure complaints and 350 improper account denial complaints'; it has faced allegations of closing long-standing customer accounts in 'high-risk' categories, like firearms dealers. Citigroup 'was the subject of 742 improper closure complaints and 96 improper account denial complaints,' including closing personal and business accounts of Armenian Americans. Most people are unaware of this practice until it touches them directly. Bank failures and employee embezzlements get far more attention from the media and policymakers. But to those affected, debanking is as devastating as being caught in a bank robbery crossfire — and the consequences can be permanent. To put things in context, we are not talking about fraudsters, drug lords or terror financiers. Debanking is being used against men and women whose only crime is running a small business, engaging in lawful commerce or having views or associations that run counter to traditional orthodoxy, such as adult content creators. Some are foreign nationals. Others are part of religious nonprofits. Some are just on the conservative side of the political spectrum. It has been happening to regular people — people like the owner of a barbershop in a historically Black neighborhood who manages an informal savings club. To his neighbors, the owner is a lifeline. But to the bank, he is a suspicious actor whose account gets frozen after depositing a large sum of money. There's no warning and no conversation — just an ATM terminal denying him access to his own funds. Or it could be a cybersecurity expert whose firm defends against hackers and cybercriminals. Because she interacts with cyberthreats, the bank froze her account, assuming she was the criminal. Maybe it's the owner of a bakery whose teenage son sells inert replicas of firearms online as collectibles. Because of his hobby, the bank closed down the mother's account. Perhaps the next victim is a retired Marine and Civil War re-enactor who was told his bank account was closed because of his 'military paraphernalia.' These are not anomalies. They are becoming more commonplace as banks are increasingly guided — or misguided — by the concept of reputational risk, driven by the fear of being associated with certain businesses like adult entertainment, cannabis, firearms, crypto or fringe political groups. Understandably, no bank wants to be grilled by a hostile Senate committee or slapped with a billion-dollar fine for missing a bad actor. Nor do they want to be accused of helping to finance terrorism or violent organizations. So they overreach. To avoid risk, they 'de-risk' certain people, not based on their behavior but on categories and algorithms. This is not compliance. It is digital profiling. Earlier this year, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), introduced the Financial Integrity and Regulation Management Act, which expressly prohibits federal regulators from using 'reputational risk' as a justification for examining or penalizing banks. In rare bipartisan agreement, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) also highlighted thousands of complaints collected in recent years from people who could not open accounts or had them abruptly closed. 'Big banks are relying on black-box algorithms and middlemen companies, and shutting down accounts without doing careful due diligence,' she said, citing Muslims, cannabis businesses and recently incarcerated people as victims. Beyond the personal harm, the societal impact of debanking is enormous. In a digital economy, it widens the gap between the unbanked and the rest of the world, and forces good people into underground economies that cut them off from full economic participation. Banks are meant to be neutral custodians of commerce, not referees of righteousness. To be sure, banks have a duty to fight illicit finance. But that duty should not include disenfranchising individuals based on vague reputational concerns. Federal watchdogs should clarify what 'reputational risk' means, and there must be much more transparency. Congress should also encourage banks to practice diligent risk analysis, not blanket exclusion. Regulators should reward, not penalize, banks that create culturally competent, innovation-friendly frameworks. Every American deserves to know why their financial life has been upended. Vague form letters are not acceptable. A bank should not be allowed to destroy someone's livelihood without a process for redress. Reasons must be specific, reviewable and appealable. Most Americans who have had their accounts closed are not money launderers, cybercriminals, militia leaders or threats to national security. They are citizens. Taxpayers. Workers. Innovators. Parents. Patriots. They are being punished not for what they've done, but for how they are perceived. Without question, banks must guard against criminality. But they should do so with discernment, discretion and decency. Otherwise, they are not protecting consumers. They are prosecuting them. And in America, that just ain't right. Adonis Hoffman writes on business law and policy. He served in senior legal roles at the FCC and in the U.S. House of Representatives.
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Yusuf Salaam owes six figures in taxes, despite speaking fees
City Councilman Yusef Salaam — one of the exonerated Central Park Five — owes hundreds of thousands of dollars in unpaid federal taxes, despite making big money from speaking fees, The Post has learned. The anti-cop councilman owes between $100,000 and $250,000 to the IRS, his 2024 annual financial disclosure to the city Conflicts of Interest Board shows. Salaam, 51, insisted in the forms he is 'in the process of repaying all taxes' for the past two years. 5 Salaam owes big money to the IRS, financial disclosures reveal. Gregory P. Mango The Harlem pol won his seat in 2023, then took office at the start of 2024 — so it's not clear when the taxes owed date back to. His office declined to comment, and the IRS is barred from disclosing tax return information. Salaam maintains his mountain of debt despite making a killing in speaking fees since his surprise victory in 2023. He charges around $31,000 a pop for a virtual event — and closer to $40,000 to come talk about criminal justice in person. He's had at least 36 speaking engagements since announcing his run in 2023. 5 Salaam was 16 when the court proceedings took place in 1990. ASSOCIATED PRESS Since taking office last year, he raked in up to $250,000 in fees alone, records show — on top of the $148,500 salary he gets for his Council gig. The father of 10 also declared getting '$500,000 or more' annually from a trust, estate or other beneficial interest, likely the terms of his 2014 settlement with the city. NYC ended up paying $40.75 million to the members of the Central Park Five to settle a civil rights suit. Salaam's share was $7.125 million. 5 Salaam was arrested along with four other Black and Latino teenagers in the Central Park case in 1989. Andrew Savulich 5 Salaam served nearly seven years in prison on the since overturned conviction. NY Post File Photo This isn't the first controversy for the councilman, who's also chairman of the Public Safety Committee overseeing the NYPD. Last year he was caught motoring around the Big Apple with out-of-state license plates and alleged illegally tinted windows. He was living in Georgia for six years before running for office in the Big Apple and still had his Peach State plates. 5 Salaam says he's been in the process of repaying all taxes for the past two years. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post Salaam has been a vocal critic of the NYPD since being elected and among the lawmakers who pushed the controversial 'How Many Stops Act' that buries cops in paperwork. He was one of five Black and Latino teenagers wrongly accused, convicted and imprisoned for the assault and rape of a woman jogging in Central Park in 1989. After his arrest at age 15, Salaam served nearly seven years behind bars, before a re-examination of the case led to his conviction being tossed in 2002 — after career criminal Matias Reyes confessed to the attack and DNA evidence confirmed Reyes' involvement. Reyes had confessed during interrogation to being at the Central Park crime scene, but the admission was later determined to be coerced.
Black America Web
a day ago
- Black America Web
EJI's Yearly Calendar Sheds Light On America's Hidden History Of Racial Injustice
Source: Equal Justice Initiative / Photo courtesy of the Equal Justice Initiative The Equal Justice Initiative (EJI), a non-profit challenging racial and economic injustice, has created an eye-opening calendar filled with the untold stories of America's insidious racial inequality legacy. Spanning over two centuries—from the 1800s through the 2000s—the EJI's 'A History of Racial Injustice' calendar is a powerful digital tool designed to shed light on critical but often overlooked moments in American history. Each day, the virtual calendar highlights an event with historical significance, providing richly detailed narratives and easy sharing options to spark reflection and dialogue. For those seeking a tangible version, EJI's award-winning wall calendar serves as a valuable educational resource, ideal for classrooms, community centers, offices, and homes. Both formats aim to deepen public understanding of America's legacy of racial injustice and help chart a path toward truth and repair. Among this month's notable entries is the 2016 death of Philando Castile. On July 6, Mr. Castile was fatally shot during a routine traffic stop in Falcon Heights, Minnesota, by former law officer Jeronimo Yanez. Although Mr. Castile legally owned a firearm and calmly informed the officer he had it, he was shot multiple times at close range, with his fiancée and her four-year-old daughter in the car. The shooting sparked national outrage and added to the ongoing calls for police accountability and justice in the face of systemic violence against the Black community. Today, July 11, also marks the painful anniversary of another chapter in America's long resistance to racial equality. On this day in 1954, white residents in Indianola, Mississippi, formed the first White Citizens' Council, just weeks after the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision. While less openly violent than the Ku Klux Klan, these so-called 'Uptown KKK' groups used economic coercion, intimidation, and political power to prevent school desegregation and maintain white supremacy. The White Citizens' Councils were led by businessmen, pastors, and civic leaders who weaponized respectability and social standing to retaliate against those—Black or white—who supported integration. In South Carolina, 17 Black parents were fired or evicted after signing a pro-integration petition. In Mississippi, the Yazoo County council published the names of petition signers in a newspaper ad, leading to job loss, harassment, and the eventual collapse of the local NAACP chapter. Though the councils claimed to reject violence, their impact was devastating. Their tactics proved so effective that by the fall of 1960—six years after Brown —every Black child in the five Deep South states still attended segregated schools. Even by the 1964–65 school year, fewer than 3% of Black children in the South attended integrated schools. In states like Alabama and Mississippi, that number hovered below 1%. EJI's calendar invites us to engage with these stories, not as distant relics of the past, but as living truths that continue to shape our present. By confronting this history, we open the door to understanding, accountability, along with 'truth and reconciliation.' The EJI added in a statement, 'As a nation, we have not yet acknowledged our history of racial injustice, including the genocide of Native people, the legacy of slavery and racial terror, and the legally supported abuse of racial minorities. When we engage truthfully with our history, we are better equipped to address contemporary issues ranging from mass incarceration, immigration, and human rights to how we think and talk about cultural moments and icons.' Take a look at the EJI's ' A History of Racial Injustice' calendar here. SEE MORE: Activists Kick Off Criminal Justice Reform Festival In Philadelphia The Legacy Of 'Good Trouble' SEE ALSO EJI's Yearly Calendar Sheds Light On America's Hidden History Of Racial Injustice was originally published on
