Public charter schools get strong support from North Dakota Senate
A bill authorizing public charter schools in North Dakota cleared the Senate Thursday on a 40-7 vote. It will now advance to the House of Representatives, which previously was split on a similar bill.
Senate Bill 2241, sponsored by Sen. Michelle Axtman, R-Bismarck, received little pushback from lawmakers during floor debate. However, during the bill's public hearing, education and public school associations raised concerns about diverting teachers and resources away from traditional K-12 schools, which could significantly affect rural school districts.
'Senate Bill 2241 is not about replacing, or reducing, the importance of our traditional public schools,' Axtman said. 'It's about expanding opportunities for students and families who are looking for another alternative public school option.'
She said, as part of their licensing agreement, charter schools would have to demonstrate that they have community support for their proposed locations.
'Without strong community support, a charter school simply will not open,' Axtman said.
Sen. Larry Luick, R-Fairmount, said he struggled to find the difference between public schools and public charter schools.
Axtman said there was very little difference. She added charter schools would have a specialized learning approach, they wouldn't be able to levy local tax dollars for infrastructure, and they would be governed by an internal school board, not by a public school board.
Her bill would also prohibit charter schools from charging tuition or engaging in religious programming. It would also require the charter schools to meet or exceed public school academic and graduation benchmarks.
Public charter schools would be prohibited from accessing the school building fund and instead need to rely on per-pupil state aid payments, donations and federal grants.
Charter school bill narrowly fails in North Dakota House; Senate considers similar bill
'Improved student outcomes are the ultimate goal of our public education system and this bill provides another public school tool we can use to achieve this goal,' she said.
A fiscal note attached to the bill could not determine the financial impact for the state of establishing charter schools.
In a recent interview, Nick Archuleta, president of North Dakota United, a union representing teachers and public employees, said public schools are becoming more innovative by allowing more student schedule flexibility and incorporating career and technical education programs into their offerings.
During the committee hearing, members of the North Dakota Council of Educational Leaders, North Dakota Small Organized Schools and North Dakota School Boards Association told lawmakers they opposed the bill because it could create additional workforce strain at a time when some school districts are already struggling to recruit and retain staff.
Another public charter school bill, House Bill 1358, narrowly failed in the House chamber on Jan. 31. That bill would have allowed up to 27 public charter schools to be established by 2029. The proposal called for the new charter schools to receive the same per-pupil payment that other public K-12 schools receive.
North Dakota House advances 1 of 3 Education Savings Account bills
Axtman's bill does not provide a cap for the number of charter schools that can be established each year.
Lawmakers also are considering other bills related to Education Savings Accounts, with a vote expected soon on Axtman's Senate Bill 2400.
The House has approved House Bill 1540 that would use money from the state's general fund to help families pay for private school or private classes.
As the bill passed the House, Rep. Pat Heinert, R-Bismarck, urged action because the Trump administration is expected to supply funding to the states for school choice.
'If we do not pass a bill … we will then have to adopt the federal government's guidelines,' Heinert said. 'We know we don't like their guidelines very much.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump doubles down on call for Senate nominees before breaking for August recess
President Trump on Thursday doubled down on his call for the Senate to stay in session and confirm his nominees before breaking for their annual August recess. 'The Senate must stay in Session, taking no recess, until the entire Executive Calendar is CLEAR!!! We have to save our Country from the Lunatic Left,' Trump wrote Thursday night on Truth Social. 'Republicans, for the health and safety of the USA, DO YOUR JOB, and confirm All Nominees. They should NOT BE FORCED TO WAIT. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump's demand has been a consistent rallying cry in the past few weeks, as the Senate gears up for its extended break, with several key nominations remaining in limbo. He notably pressed Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to keep Senate Republicans in town, with Thune saying last week he could consider the move. 'We're thinking about it. We want to get as many [nominations] through the pipeline as we can,' Thune said. On Wednesday, Thune told reporters that there is an expanding interest within the Senate GOP conference for a potential rule change that would accelerate the confirmation process amid the Democrats' effort to slow-walk progress. 'There's certainly interest in looking at options that might enable us to break the logjam and expedite consideration of nominees in a way that, in the end, would benefit both parties when their party has the presidency,' Thune said, according to CBS News. GOP lawmakers have argued that Democrats' strategy is a break from tradition from how Republicans acted toward nominees of then-President Biden. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's (D-N.Y.) office disagreed, with the spokesperson saying in a statement that 'Historically bad nominees deserve historic levels of scrutiny.'
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump goes after Susan Collins for her voting record
The simmering dispute over the FBI's future headquarters derailed Senate efforts Thursday night to launch floor debate on the legislation that funds the agency, as well as the departments of Commerce and Justice, NASA and science programs. Sen. Chris Van Hollen objected Thursday night to including the bill in a larger package of funding measures. The Maryland Democrat demanded that the Senate agree to adopt language that would require the FBI to meet a specific security threshold for its headquarters, as the Trump administration keeps the agency in downtown Washington instead of relocating it to the suburban Maryland campus previously selected after a yearslong competition. But Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), who chairs the funding panel that handles the bill, shot down that request on the Senate floor Thursday night, after the dispute over the FBI headquarters already snagged committee action on the bill. Tearing up as he spoke on the floor, Moran said he knows 'no path forward' that would allow Van Hollen's amendment. 'Our appropriations process is fragile,' he said. If Van Hollen, who serves as the ranking member on the Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee, hadn't objected, his amendment would have been teed up for a vote. But Van Hollen didn't want to take the risk that the language would not have been adopted. 'That is a simple request that I would have thought all of us could stand behind,' Van Hollen said, 'making sure that the new headquarters of the men and women of the FBI meets the security requirements that we and they have set out.' Senate appropriators already killed another amendment Van Hollen proposed in committee, which would have barred the Trump administration from dipping into a $1.4 billion construction account for anything besides relocating the FBI to the previously selected site. After the proposal was initially adopted, the committee later voted to strike the language because so many Republicans were threatening to tank the underlying bill if it rebuked Trump on the headquarters decision. 'We did it because the president of the United States was going to throw a fit if that provision stayed on, that's why people reversed the position,' Van Hollen said on the Senate floor Thursday night. 'And we shouldn't make our decisions out of fear about what somebody in the White House is going to do, because that distorts the entire process here in the United States Senate.' Moran's Thursday evening request was to tie together four bills to fund the government for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Those bills would collectively fund the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, as well as military construction projects, the operations of Congress and the FDA. The Kansas Republican touted that those four measures had made it through the full Senate Appropriations Committee with bipartisan support and 'in some instances, unanimously.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CNN Data Chief Flags Exactly How GOP Is Playing 'Hardball' Ahead Of Midterms
CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten on Thursday broke down how Texas Republicans' new congressional redistricting proposal could prove to be a 'huge difference' as they look to maintain control of the House of Representatives ahead of the midterms. 'They are playing hardball at this particular point. And right now it seems to me that Democrats are actually playing closer to Little League pee wee,' said Enten in a segment with CNN's John Berman. GOP lawmakers in the state shared their draft of a new congressional map Wednesday — a rare move to occur in the middle of a decade. The new map, per the Texas Tribune, targets Democratic districts in the chamber and could result in five seats being flipped in the GOP's favor in next year's elections. The proposed map in Texas — which could see changes before it makes its way to the desk of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) — falls in line with GOP efforts togain House seats in other states. Enten, when asked by Berman what Texas' five House seats would do for Republicans 'overall' in the chamber, stressed the importance of such a gain. He added that Democrats had four House seats to spare for the majority after the 2020 elections. Republicans then had four seats to spare for the majority following the 2022 midterms and, after the 2024 elections, Republicans had two seats to spare. 'Five seats can make all the difference in the world,' Enten said. Related... Trading Partners Scramble To Reach Deals With U.S. Ahead Of Trump's Looming Deadline For New Tariffs Trump Is Tearing Up Part Of The White House To Build A $200 Million Ballroom Trump Lobs All-Caps Insults At Jerome Powell For Refusing To Lower Interest Rates Once Again
