Investors flock to Europe as bloc's stability contrasts with concerns over US
While tariff risks mean the CEO of Luxembourg-based hydrogen firm H2Apex (H2A.DE), opens new tab can no longer rely on U.S. suppliers for its more than 200 million euro ($235 million) project in Lubmin, Germany, investor interest in European projects is rising.
"Investors in the hydrogen sector are now focusing more on the European market due to the absolute uncertainty and planning insecurity in the USA," he told Reuters, adding this included both local and U.S. players.
"The framework conditions in Europe are not ideal, but they are stable."
Roessner's comments are indicative of a trend that has taken hold in recent months: Investors and companies are increasingly turning to Europe, drawn by an infrastructure- and defence-led spending push that offers stability at a time when Trump's erratic tariff policies have made the U.S. market a less safe bet, according to more than a dozen interviews with executives and fund managers.
The shift has also been fuelled by Trump's tendency to make sweeping tariff threats and announcements that are then often delayed or changed, and to draw up executive orders that have tested the limits of his presidential power.
"The U.S. is coming from a very capital market-friendly and stable environment. Now there is political intervention and also an attempt to expand power," said Christoph Witzke, who heads the CIO office at Deka, one of Germany's largest investment funds.
"This creates uncertainty that some kind of intervention ... could come at any time," he said, adding that Europe had become the centre of attention in the most recent investor conferences as a result.
With a July 9 deadline for a trade deal less than two weeks away - and Trump saying he will impose 50% tariffs on all EU goods without a deal - investors have started shifting their money.
Data from LSEG's Lipper Funds show that more than $100 billion has flowed into European equity funds so far this year - up threefold from the same period last year - while outflows from the U.S. more than doubled to nearly $87 billion.
"All that is an indication that at least market forces, investors, those who move real money around, actually see value and have confidence in Europe," ECB President Christine Lagarde said earlier this month.
This shift in focus was also illustrated by the weak market debut of Holcim's (HOLN.S), opens new tab North American spin-off Amrize (AMRZ.S), opens new tab in late June, which was announced to much fanfare in early 2024 at a time when the lure of U.S. valuations also got some of its rivals excited.
In contrast, the share price of Holcim itself, now squarely focused on Europe, Latin America and North Africa, soared 15%.
Siemens Energy (ENR1n.DE), opens new tab, which makes more than a fifth of its sales in the U.S., has noted a shift in sentiment, finance chief Maria Ferraro said, on the back of a recent U.S. road show and an 84% rise in the group's share price year-to-date.
Apart from the improved market view, more investments are also crucial in efforts to revive the EU's economy and narrow its competitiveness gap compared with other regions, most notably China and the United States.
Closely watched foreign direct investment flows into Germany, the bloc's largest economy, more than doubled to 46 billion euros in the first four months of 2025, according to the most recent data from the Bundesbank, marking the highest level since 2022.
It also shows that German companies even pulled money out of the United States in three of the first four months of the year, with their balance of foreign direct investments in April at a negative 2.38 billion euros.
Negative balances emerge when companies either divest more than they invest in a foreign country or decide against extending credit lines to local counterparts.
But the picture is not all rosy, with several investors pointing out that Europe is now under pressure to act faster, create better regulation and make good on its spending pledges.
"This sentiment can quickly turn again. This should be both a warning and an incentive to use the momentum now and consistently implement the planned agenda," said Stefan Wintels, head of German state-backed lender KfW (KFW.UL).
This chimes with comments from Hajo Kroesche, partner at private equity firm Altor, who said "the window of opportunity will not stay open forever" for Europe to attract capital.
Having recently travelled to Qatar, Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia, Deutsche Bank CEO (DBKGn.DE), opens new tab Christian Sewing last week said investor interest in Europe and Germany was huge - while still cautioning that conditions needed to be stable in the long-term.
"These are not people who invest within two days. But of course they see what is happening in the world right now."
($1 = 0.8520 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
43 minutes ago
- Sky News
Chief rabbi condemns BBC's 'mishandled response' to anti-IDF chanting at Glastonbury - as Bob Vylan issue new statement
The chief rabbi has described the BBC's response to anti-IDF chanting at Glastonbury as "belated and mishandled" - as the rap duo involved, Bob Vylan, said the UK government needed to talk about its "criminal inaction". Sir Ephraim Mirvis said "vile Jew-hatred" had been aired at the Somerset music festival and it was a "time of national shame". Confidence in the BBC's "ability to treat antisemitism seriously" has been brought to a "new low", he said in a post on X, adding that "outright incitement to violence and hatred" appeared to be acceptable if it was couched as "edgy political commentary". Ordinary people had not only failed to see incitement "for what it is" but had cheered it, chanted it, and celebrated it, he said. "Toxic Jew-hatred is a threat to our entire society," he added. Bob Vylan, posting a new statement on Instagram on Tuesday, said they were "not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people". Rather, they were for the "dismantling of a violent military machine" - the Israel Defence Forces. Bob Vylan chanted "death to the IDF" at Glastonbury. As many as 95% of the IDF are thought to be Jewish. In their statement, the group said they were a "distraction from the story" and that whatever "sanctions" they received would also be a distraction. Their US visas have been revoked and United Talent Agency, their US representatives, have dropped them. Referring to the war in Gaza, they claimed the UK government does not want them to ask "why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity", "why they aren't doing more to stop the killing" and "feed the starving". They added: "The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction. "We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first, we will not be the last, and if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too." It has emerged that Tim Davie, the BBC's director-general, was at Glastonbury when the duo led chants of "Death to the IDF" which were broadcast live. The prime minister's spokesman, asked if the PM had confidence in Mr Davie, said Sir Keir Starmer had "confidence in the BBC", adding: "The position of the director-general is a matter for the BBC's board." Speaking in the Commons, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said "accountability" was important and it was something she had "impressed upon the BBC leadership". She added: "When you have one editorial failure, it's something that must be gripped. When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership." The cabinet minister said she'd called Mr Davie after Bob Vylan's set had been broadcast to find out why it had aired, and why the feed had not been cut. "I expect answers to these questions without delay," she said. Avon and Somerset Police has begun a criminal investigation and is reviewing footage of both Bob Vylan and Kneecap's performances at Glastonbury. The force said a senior detective had been appointed - and it had been contacted by people from around the world. "We... recognise the strength of public feeling," it said. During Kneecap's set, one member suggested starting a "riot" outside his bandmate's forthcoming court appearance, before clarifying that he meant "support". Liam Og O hAnnaidh, also known as Mo Chara, is charged with a terror offence. Bob Vylan had been due to tour the US before their visas were revoked. US deputy secretary of state Christopher Landau said action had been taken "in light of their hateful tirade at Glastonbury, including leading the crowd in death chants". "Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country," he added. During Bob Vylan's set, the duo performed in front of a screen that showed several messages, including one that claimed Israel's actions in Gaza amounted to "genocide". The war in Gaza began after Hamas militants attacked Israel on 7 October 2023 and killed 1,200 people and took about 250 hostage. Israel's offensive in Gaza has led to the deaths of more than 56,500 people, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, which does not differentiate between civilians and combatants. Media watchdog Ofcom has said the BBC "clearly has questions to answer" over the live stream from Glastonbury. A BBC spokesperson said: "The director-general was informed of the incident after the performance and at that point he was clear it should not feature in any other Glastonbury coverage." The broadcaster respects freedom of expression but "stands firmly against incitement to violence", they said. They added: "The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves... "The team were dealing with a live situation, but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Starmer defends his record in power as biggest revolt of his premiership looms
Sir Keir Starmer has defended his Government's record over its first year in office, all while he faces the largest revolt of his premiership. The Prime Minister insisted at a meeting of senior ministers that his team could look back with a 'real sense of pride and achievement' as the July 5 anniversary of his first year in office nears. The Government's work has focused on giving working people a 'chance to thrive, not just survive', a Downing Street spokesman said, as Labour backbenchers continue to threaten a rebellion over welfare reforms they insist will have a negative impact on disabled people. The welfare reform Bill will have its first airing in the Commons on Tuesday, and some Labour backbenchers continue to say they will vote to halt the legislation, after a much larger rebellion was quelled by ministers last week. Cabinet ministers, and even the Prime Minister himself, are said to be involved in efforts to persuade Labour MPs not to join the rebellion. Sir Keir opened the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning by telling senior ministers the welfare reforms are 'designed to help those who can work into employment and ensure dignity and security for those who can't work', a No 10 spokesman said. 'He then reflected on the last year in office, saying we could all rightly look back with a real sense of pride and achievement,' the spokesman added. No 10 pointed to the three trade deals struck with India, the US, and the EU, the extra investment in the spending review, and a cut in NHS waiting lists among the Government's achievements one year on. The spokesman added: 'He said the Government's work is all designed and focused on improving the lives of working people and giving them the chance to thrive, not just survive, and the Government should be proud of those achievements as a team.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds had earlier urged Labour MPs to back the reforms package, and warned that retreating entirely from them would mean losing the chance to 'make any changes for the better whatsoever' and undermining 'public support'. 'I'd ask (colleagues) to support the Government on that basis, because clearly what we've got here is something which is better than the existing system,' Mr Reynolds told Sky News on Tuesday morning. Ministers hope a partial U-turn on the benefit cuts, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of universal credit, are enough to win over Labour rebels. Ahead of the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill's second reading in the Commons on Tuesday evening, 39 Labour backbenchers have signed an amendment aimed at halting its progress. Leading rebel Rachael Maskell has warned 'many more' have told her they still plan to vote against the Government's plans than those who have signed up. The York Central MP said she had no fear in voting down the Bill and felt a 'moral duty' to 'speak up for' disabled people. Asked whether MPs would lose the whip for voting against the Government, Mr Reynolds said he was 'not aware of anything like that' but 'those issues are for the chief whip'. To see off the threat of far greater rebellion, the Government last week softened the impact of its changes to protect some 370,000 existing Pip claimants who had been set to lose out following reassessment. Some 126 Labour MPs had signed that previous 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, which would have stopped the legislation if approved. Ministers also committed to a review of the system, involving disabled people and led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, and unfreezing the higher UC rate for those already claiming the health-related element. But critics have argued the concessions risk creating a 'three-tier' system of disparity between existing and new claimants, as well as any future changes that emerge as a result of the Timms review. Facing questions from broadcasters on Tuesday morning, Mr Reynolds insisted it was 'entirely normal' for existing entitlements to be 'grandfathered' during major changes to the welfare system. Downing Street would not guarantee Sir Stephen's review would be completed by the time its planned reforms are implemented. No 10 was also insistent that Government modelling, which predicts its welfare proposals will push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030, was 'subject to uncertainty'. The Downing Street spokesman said the prediction did not take into account the additional £1 billion a year the Government is investing in helping get people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work or support with the cost of living.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Parental leave probe could tackle gender pay gap, says minister
A parental leave review will look at 'shifting social and gender norms', taking into account paternal childcare, the employment rights minister has said. Justin Madders criticised a 'piecemeal approach' to designing the parental leave system over the past 134 years. Unveiling the plan, Mr Madders set out four objectives for the probe. Among these was 'support for economic growth by enabling more parents to stay in work and advance their careers', which could help the Government better tackle the gender pay gap. Currently, new fathers can take two weeks' paid leave, at a rate of either £187.18, or 90% of average weekly earnings, whichever is lowest. Maternity leave is paid at 90% of average weekly earnings for the first six weeks, and then whichever is lower of that 90% or £187.18 for the next 33 weeks. Ministers hope to increase the take-up of shared parental leave, which allows a couple to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay between them. They also hope to simplify the system for both parents and employers, with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds warning that there are 'eight different types of parental leave'. Mr Madders told the Commons that 'the current system has grown up gradually over time'. He referred to the Factory and Workshop Act 1891, which banned women from working in factories for four weeks after they had given birth. 'Subsequent entitlements have been added to support specific groups as needs have emerged,' Mr Madders added. 'This has created a framework that does not always work cohesively as a whole. This piecemeal approach to parental leave and pay means that the system has never had an overarching set of objectives for what it should deliver. 'This review presents an opportunity to reset our approach and understanding of parental leave and pay, and what we want the system to achieve.' The minister later said: 'Our first objective is to support the physical and mental health of women during pregnancy and after giving birth to a child. 'Our second objective is to support economic growth by enabling more parents to stay in work and advance in their careers after starting a family. This will particularly focus on improving both women's labour market outcomes and tackling the gender pay gap. 'Our third objective is to ensure that there are sufficient resources and time away from work to support new and expectant parents' wellbeing. This will also include facilitating the best start in life for babies and young children, supporting health and development outcomes. 'Our fourth objective is to support parents to make balanced childcare choices that work for their family situation, including enabling co-parenting and providing flexibility to reflect the realities of modern work and childcare needs.' The review, carried out by the Department for Business and Trade and the Department for Work and Pensions, will consider how to 'balance costs and benefits to businesses and the Exchequer, as well as examining how a system can support economic opportunities for businesses and families', Mr Madders said. The review will also look at 'improving our society, for example, in supporting the child poverty strategy and on shifting social and gender norms, including around paternal childcare'. Mr Reynolds has previously told the PA news agency: 'We want this to work for millions of families who tell us at the minute that it is not working, so only about one in three new dads take paternity leave, mainly for financial reasons.' He insisted businesses would be 'absolutely integral' to the review, and would not face extra burdens as a result. He added: 'They tell us the current system is quite confusing, that people don't know what they're entitled to, that businesses don't know what they should be offering.' Shadow business minister Greg Smith described a 'toxic treatment of enterprise' by the Government and argued the British economy will be 'stripped of all signs of life' by the time the review concludes. 'I would like to take this opportunity to make it crystal clear that Conservatives are not opposed to increased parental leave, so long as it is proportionate, affordable and does not increase unemployment,' he said. 'But therein lies the problem, because this Government has left themselves no breathing room. Their political choices have imposed the most significant headwinds on business in a generation.' Mr Smith told MPs: 'It's all well and good that the minister announces this review in the House today, but, let us be in no doubt, when it concludes in a year and a half's time, Britain's economy will have been stripped of all signs of life because of the choices Labour have made.'
