
Can Pheu Thai retain its grip on power?
He expressed confidence that Ms Paetongtarn, who has been suspended from duty as prime minister over the content of the controversial telephone call, will survive the ongoing crisis. But this was always going to be wishful thinking.
While speaking on a chat show, the Pheu Thai Party's de facto leader likened the suspension of Ms Paetongtarn, pending a court ruling, to that of Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha, saying the latter was later acquitted. And in his view, this might also be the case for his daughter.
Besides, Thaksin has confidence that Thai politics will not experience a deadlock as long as he is around.
Political pundits, however, envisage the opposite scenario for Ms Paetongtarn, who is currently serving as culture minister. The Constitutional Court is expected to hand down a ruling against her in a month or two. In fact, the Pheu Thai Party cannot afford to be so optimistic regarding Ms Paetongtarn's political future. It is involved in a tough game with Bhumjaithai, a friend turned foe, which is pushing for Anutin Charnvirakul to take the political baton as "interim prime minister" in accordance with a proposal drawn up by the People's Party.
Pheu Thai's immediate plan is to pass the torch to Chaikasem Nitisiri, the party's third prime ministerial candidate, who has regained his strength after a long illness. Mr Chaikasem, now 76 years of age, told the media he's ready for the top job when the time comes.
It could be said that all political parties foresee a political scenario without Ms Paetongtarn. Pheu Thai has to accept the hard fact that the party, with its slim majority, is politically vulnerable. Even if Mr Chaikasem eventually assumes the role of PM, he may not be able to stay in power for long, particularly if and when financial bills are shot down, as this would mean the government would have to resign.
Coming into the picture is the idea of "interim prime minister". This idea was coined by the People's Party as a way out of the political impasse if Ms Paetongtarn is removed from office. Surprisingly, the opposition bloc leader said, while insisting it will stay out of a new coalition, said it will vote for any party that accepts its conditions: dissolving parliament by end of the year after the approval of 2026 budget, and proceeding with charter amendment, especially setting the groundwork for the formation of a charter drafting panel. Under the People's Party's conditions, the interim PM must ensure that poll ballots include a referendum question on whether voters approve the charter panel's bill.
Given its surging popularity, the People's Party is the only one that is ready for snap elections. Besides, the interim government plan could prevent political intervention in case of Ms Paetongtarn's downfall, referring to Section 5 of the 2017 charter. This enables the palace to appoint an outsider prime minister if and when the country faces political deadlock. Under that scenario, therefore, there is speculation that Gen Prayut, who is now a privy councillor, may make a political comeback. Lest we forget, the former junta leader still retains his position as a PM candidate for the United Thai Nation (UTN) Party. Another form of intervention, a coup d'etat, is even more worrisome.
The People's Party concedes that it is in talks with Bhumjaithai to see the proposal being translated into reality. But the chances are almost nil. This is because even if the two parties enter into an alliance, they will still need around 40 MPs to secure the premiership for the Bhumjaithai leader. But three parties in the coalition, namely UTN (36 MPs), Democrat (25 MPs), and Chart Thai Pattana (10 MPs), which have received rewards from Pheu Thai in the form of cabinet seats appear to favour the status quo, thus, they see no benefit in the interim government proposal.
Not to mention that the coalition parties are waiting for another bonus if Ms Paetongtarn is replaced with Mr Chaikasem, which would mean Pheu Thai would need to form a new cabinet again. In this case, they would get a chance to optimise demands for cabinet seats like in the previous reshuffle that saw micro parties, or even political factions with only 3-4 MPs, get big slices of the reshuffle cake. Pheu Thai would have to make sumptuous offers again to ensure no parties shift to Bhumjaithai.
Moreover, since the lawsuits against Thaksin over the extended hospitalisation known as the "14th-floor saga" and against his daughter for "Hun Sen-gate" will soon be wrapped up, it's necessary for Pheu Thai to cling on to power at this crucial time.
It's an open secret that Bhumjaithai finds changes to the constitution an unfavourable option. Undeniably, it is the current charter that opened the door for the much-criticised senatorial vote in which candidates who are believed to have affiliations with Bhumjaithai entered the Upper House in droves.
It will come as no surprise if the Senate throws cold water on charter amendment proposals. Besides this, the requirement for three referendums, as suggested by the charter court, would in effect stall the amendment efforts.
At the same time, even if Bhumjaithai and the People's Party can push the interim PM proposal, tight scrutiny by the latter would make Mr Anutin uncomfortable. Instead, as the Pheu Thai-led administration is unlikely to last long, the Bhumjaithai leader would rather wait for the next election when he has a better chance to become prime minister.
Last but not least, we must not forget that Pheu Thai still has House dissolution as its trump card. If other options seem not to be working, the party would rather start afresh instead of seeing Bhumjaithai rise to power.
By dissolving the House, the ruling party could retain its grip as a caretaker government for around two months and grasp whatever opportunities come its way.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Bangkok Post
an hour ago
- Bangkok Post
NACC takes up PM's phone call case
The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has unanimously agreed to set up a panel to investigate suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra for alleged ethical misconduct, in connection with the audio clip featuring a controversial phone conversation between her and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen. The conversation in question, concerning border tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, has not only called into question Ms Paetongtarn's ability to lead the government but also sparked ethical questions. On July 1, the Constitutional Court voted unanimously to accept a petition filed by a group of senators and, by a 7-2 majority, ordered Ms Paetongtarn's suspension from her duties as it began reviewing the leaked audio clip of the private conversation with Hun Sen. In the recording, the premier made critical remarks about the commander of the Second Army Region and appeared overly conciliatory towards the Cambodian strongman, allegedly implying a willingness to yield to his demands. Earlier, the NACC had unanimously agreed to launch a preliminary investigation into the matter, setting a 10-day deadline for officials to verify the facts. The panel was tasked with transcribing the leaked conversation, providing accurate foreign-language translations, interviewing relevant witnesses and reviewing applicable legal precedents. The precedents include the Constitutional Court's ruling in the case of former prime minister Srettha Thavisin, who was removed over his appointment of Pichit Chuenban as minister attached to the Prime Minister's Office. Pichit was convicted of contempt of court for attempting to bribe Supreme Court officials in 2008 while representing former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra in a controversial land case. The law forbids the appointment of cabinet ministers with a criminal background. NACC chairman Suchart Trakulkasemsuk and commissioner Prapas Kong-ied will serve as members of the new inquiry panel, according to a report by Isra News Agency. The formation of the inquiry panel marks the beginning of a formal legal process under NACC procedures, while several steps remain before any formal charges can be brought, said the report. If sufficient evidence is found, allegations will be formally presented, and the accused will be given the opportunity to respond. Only then will the case file be concluded and submitted to the NACC board for a final decision. On June 20, Senate Speaker Mongkol Surasajja formally signed a letter to the chairman of the NACC, forwarding a complaint submitted by the group of senators against Ms Paetongtarn. The complaint accuses her of a serious violation of ethical standards and possibly of committing a deliberate breach of the constitution or the law. On the same day, Mr Mongkol also filed a petition with the Constitutional Court, requesting a ruling under Section 170, Paragraph 3 in conjunction with Section 86 of the constitution. The petition seeks to determine whether Ms Paetongtarn's premiership should be terminated under Section 170, Paragraph 1 (4), in connection with Sections 160 (4) and (5), due to her alleged misconduct. This development stemmed from a motion filed by Gen Sawat Tatsana, senator and chairman of the Senate's military affairs committee, who earlier gathered signatures from fellow senators calling for the prime minister's removal. They accused her of lacking ability and credibility after she confirmed the veracity of the leaked audio clip. According to Constitutional Court President Nakharin Mektrairat, Ms Paetongtarn can seek a deadline extension to submit her defence in her ongoing ethics case.

Bangkok Post
2 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
NACC takes up phone call case
The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has unanimously agreed to set up a panel to investigate suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra for alleged ethical misconduct, in connection with the audio clip featuring a controversial phone conversation between her and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen. The conversation in question, concerning border tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, has not only called into question Ms Paetongtarn's ability to lead the government but also sparked ethical questions. On July 1, the Constitutional Court voted unanimously to accept a petition filed by a group of senators and, by a 7-2 majority, ordered Ms Paetongtarn's suspension from her duties as it began reviewing the leaked audio clip of the private conversation with Hun Sen. In the recording, the premier made critical remarks about the commander of the Second Army Region and appeared overly conciliatory towards the Cambodian strongman, allegedly implying a willingness to yield to his demands. Earlier, the NACC had unanimously agreed to launch a preliminary investigation into the matter, setting a 10-day deadline for officials to verify the facts. The panel was tasked with transcribing the leaked conversation, providing accurate foreign-language translations, interviewing relevant witnesses and reviewing applicable legal precedents. The precedents include the Constitutional Court's ruling in the case of former prime minister Srettha Thavisin, who was removed over his appointment of Pichit Chuenban as minister attached to the Prime Minister's Office. Pichit was convicted of contempt of court for attempting to bribe Supreme Court officials in 2008 while representing former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra in a controversial land case. The law forbids the appointment of cabinet ministers with a criminal background. NACC chairman Suchart Trakulkasemsuk and commissioner Prapas Kong-ied will serve as members of the new inquiry panel, according to a report by Isra News Agency. The formation of the inquiry panel marks the beginning of a formal legal process under NACC procedures, while several steps remain before any formal charges can be brought, said the report. If sufficient evidence is found, allegations will be formally presented, and the accused will be given the opportunity to respond. Only then will the case file be concluded and submitted to the NACC board for a final decision. On June 20, Senate Speaker Mongkol Surasajja formally signed a letter to the chairman of the NACC, forwarding a complaint submitted by the group of senators against Ms Paetongtarn. The complaint accuses her of a serious violation of ethical standards and possibly of committing a deliberate breach of the constitution or the law. On the same day, Mr Mongkol also filed a petition with the Constitutional Court, requesting a ruling under Section 170, Paragraph 3 in conjunction with Section 86 of the constitution. The petition seeks to determine whether Ms Paetongtarn's premiership should be terminated under Section 170, Paragraph 1 (4), in connection with Sections 160 (4) and (5), due to her alleged misconduct. This development stemmed from a motion filed by Gen Sawat Tatsana, senator and chairman of the Senate's military affairs committee, who earlier gathered signatures from fellow senators calling for the prime minister's removal. They accused her of lacking ability and credibility after she confirmed the veracity of the leaked audio clip. According to Constitutional Court President Nakharin Mektrairat, Ms Paetongtarn can seek a deadline extension to submit her defence in her ongoing ethics case.

Bangkok Post
10 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Thai govt loans to cushion blow of Trump tariffs
The Government Savings Bank (GSB) has been ordered to provide 200 billion baht in soft loans to support Thai entrepreneurs hit by US President Donald Trump's tariff measures. According to Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira, the GSB loans will charge an interest rate as low as 0.01%, while the bank's cost of funds is around 2%. The government will bear the interest rate differential in order to support the liquidity and inventory carrying costs of domestic entrepreneurs, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), during this current period of uncertainty. For large companies, commercial banks will step in to help them. But if the burden exceeds commercial banks' capacity then the government will assist, said Mr Pichai. He also addressed measures to prevent the subrogation of certificates of origin (COs) for exporting goods to America, saying it is still unclear what percentage of local content the US will require for products exported to its market. However, it is expected to be higher than the current level of 40%, with the new requirement possibly rising to 60%, 70%, or even 80%, said Mr Pichai He added that for calculating local content for goods exported to the US, America will count domestic raw materials, including those sourced from the US and its allies, as part of efforts to manage competition with rival countries. According to Mr Pichai, in the first round of negotiations with the US regarding market access, which aims at allowing American goods to enter the Thai market at a 0% or near-zero import tariff, Thailand proposed eliminating import duties on 69% of all imported goods from the US. Later, Thailand pledged to eliminate import duties on up to 90% of all goods imported from the US and to remove various non-tariff barriers. Once a final agreement is reached on the tariff negotiations with the US, the entire agreement must be submitted to the Thai House of Representatives for approval, Mr Pichai said. He also noted that certain US goods which are not currently imported into Thailand will also be allowed to enter at a 0% tariff rate, in order to further expand market access and open up the Thai market to US automobiles. Mr Pichai said the guiding principle in the negotiations is that a 0% import tariff for US goods should apply only to products that Thailand already needs to import or to those that can be produced domestically but in insufficient quantities. "The impact of the Trump tariff measures should be seen as a crisis that presents an opportunity for Thailand to adapt and enhance the country's competitiveness," he said. "This is a bitter medicine for every country: we need to understand the situation and move in the same direction. We can't expect to gain 100% because it's a zero-sum game.' He added that Thailand's economy relies heavily on exports — up to 58%, though this is down from a previous peak of 70%. Of that, 18% of Thai exports go to the US, which is relatively high. Mr Pichai emphasised that negotiations with the US must ensure mutual benefit and balance, and the outcome must be sustainable — not just short-term fixes. This, he noted, is a challenging task. Historically, the US has had a trade deficit with Thailand amounting to US$30 billion a year. Therefore, Thailand must open up its market to more US products. Nevertheless, of that $30-billion deficit, one-third consists of electronic goods such as notebook computers, most of which are produced in Thailand by US companies with manufacturing bases in the country. According to Mr Pichai, these US companies have been operating in Thailand for 20-30 years, due to the availability of skilled labour that cannot easily be replaced in the US, as well as the presence of extensive supply chains. Relocating production out of Thailand would be nearly impossible. Products exported by these US firms in Thailand are often components used in America's artificial intelligence industry, he said. At the same time, according to Mr Pichai, Thailand is committed to promoting Thai investment in the US, especially in sectors such as agricultural processing, including both human and animal food, along with investment in energy resource development. The US has relatively low energy costs, particularly natural gas, which is priced at just $2–$3 per million British thermal units (BTU), compared to $11 in the international market. He added that Thailand must adapt by increasing reliance on its domestic economy. This includes maximising the use of domestic resources in production for overseas sales and diversifying export markets. However, Mr Pichai cautioned that if the negotiations adversely affect third countries, Thailand must take that into consideration as well, since part of these negotiations involves geopolitical issues, and the country does not wish to bring foreign conflict into its own borders.