
Special prosecutor grills Karen Read's final witness, turning up the heat on his credibility
The witness is Dr. Andrew Rentschler, the second expert from a firm called ARCCA to take the stand. Special prosecutor Hank Brennan tried repeatedly to have the firm's findings limited or withheld completely in the case.
Using Rentschler's own words, Brennan asked him if "facts matter."
"You said it many, many times, 'facts matter,' Isn't that correct?" Brennan asked.
"It was details," Rentschler said. "But facts matter too."
Brennan pressed Renstchler on details about his testimony under direct questioning from defense lawyer Alan Jackson earlier in the day, when he said O'Keefe's remains were found between 10 and 20 feet from the side of the road. Then he showed a still image from police dashcam video of the initial response, showing witnesses near the side of the road, presumably over O'Keefe's remains.
"Details matter, don't they?" Brennan asked.
Brennan has accused ARCCA of destroying text messages with the defense they were ordered to give to prosecutors as well as slow-walking discovery disclosures.
He also grilled Rentschler on whether he considered broken pieces of taillight in the yard where O'Keefe was found dead.
He said he hadn't.
"That wasn't part of my analysis," he testified.
He also hadn't considered how O'Keefe's hat wound up on the ground or the taillight fragments recovered from his clothes.
Rentschler's testimony began Tuesday and kicked off again Wednesday morning with a series of objections from Brennan that led Judge Beverly Cannone to interrupt the witness after he told jurors he had three children and wished his 10-year-old a happy birthday.
"So I was going to say I have three kids, a 9-year-old who's actually turning 10 today -- happy birthday Kai -- and I have two older ones," Rentschler began.
"All right, I'm going to, we're going to stop this -- [use] another example," said Judge Beverly Cannone after an objection from special prosecutor Hank Brennan.
Read is accused of mowing down O'Keefe after a night of drinking and leaving him to die as she went to his house and left him raging voicemails as his niece and nephew slept in the home. He had taken them in after they were orphaned when his sister and brother-in-law died within months of one another.
"Was it appropriate? I think it's his personality," said David Gelman, a Philadelphia-area defense attorney and former prosecutor who is following the trial. "It may have missed the mark, but it's a breath of fresh air since experts are usually boring."
Grace Edwards, a Massachusetts trial lawyer who is also following the case, said the judge likely Rentschler off because narrative answers can distract from the facts of the case.
"The story can lead to a long answer that could be potentially off-topic or the jury could take from it something else that was not intended, like 'Happy Birthday,' and only remember that part," she told Fox News Digital. "The judge wanted the witness refocused to specific questions with focused answers rather than potentially rambling about his three kids."
Rentschler insisted that "details matter" repeatedly as he explained the basics of the scientific method and took issue with another expert report from the firm Aperture, retained by the prosecution.
Aperture labeled the injuries to O'Keefe's arm "lacerations," he said -- a term that he testified contradicts the findings of the official autopsy, which described them as "superficial abrasions."
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
"The superficial abrasions and abrasions occur when there's rubbing or scraping of the skin, and it just rubs away the top layer, the epidermis of the skin," he testified. "Now, a laceration is an actual a jagged, ripping or tearing of the skin which gets down through the epidermis into the dermis. So abrasions take much less force. They're less severe than what a laceration actually is."
Based on his testing, he said that he ruled out an impact with Read's 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV and O'Keefe's arm as the cause of those injuries.
"They're inconsistent with striking the tail light or being produced as a result of contact with the tail light," he testified.
The prosecution claims that these minor injuries came from an impact with Read's broken taillight after she allegedly drove into him on Jan. 29, 2022 and left him to die on the ground in the snow.
The defense denies a collision and has claimed the injuries came from dog teeth and claws.
Aperture's Dr. Judson Welcher testified earlier, based on digital forensics of phone and vehicle data, that Read's SUV reversed at 75% throttle right before O'Keefe's last conscious interaction with his cellphone.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment
President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen. Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024 event in Houston. But there is simply no basis for Trump's claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular. Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé's production company, which the campaign listed as a 'campaign event production' expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline last year that they didn't pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances. Regardless of the merits of this particular $165,000 expenditure, it's far from an $11 million one. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment to Beyoncé since the claim that it was '$10 million' began spreading last year among Trump supporters on social media. Fact-check websites and PolitiFact looked into the '$10 million' claim during the campaign and did not find any basis for it. The White House did not immediately respond to a CNN request late Saturday for any evidence of Trump's $11 million figure. When Trump previously invoked the baseless figure, during an interview in February, he described his source in the vaguest of terms: 'Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.' A Harris spokesperson referred CNN on Saturday to a November social media post by Beyoncé's mother Tina Knowles, who called the claim of a $10 million payment a 'lie' and noted it was taken down by Instagram as 'False Information.' 'When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris's (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote. A spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact in November that the claim about a $10 million payment is 'beyond ridiculous.' What Trump wrote Sunday Trump revived the false claim in a social media post published after midnight early Sunday morning in Scotland, where he is visiting. He wrote that he is looking at 'the fact' that Democrats 'admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.' Democratic officials actually reject the claim of an $11 million payment. The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's request for any evidence of a Democratic admission of such a payment. Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is 'TOTALLY ILLEGAL' to pay for political endorsements, though no federal law forbids endorsement payments. Trump concluded: 'Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Trump has repeatedly called for the prosecution of political opponents. His Saturday post about Harris and celebrity endorsements was an escalation from a post in May, when he said he would call for a 'major investigation' on the subject but did not explicitly mention prosecutions.


CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
1 killed, 3 hurt in West Garfield Park traffic crash, police say
One man is dead and three others were taken to the hospital following a traffic crash early Sunday morning on the city's West Side. The crash happened just before 4 a.m. in the 3800 block of West Lake Street. Chicago police said a blue Ford sedan, driven by a 20-year-old man, with three passengers, including a 22-year-old man, and two other 20-year-old men, was heading eastbound when the driver disregarded a traffic light and hit a red Chevy sedan. The 22-year-old was taken to Mt. Sinai Hospital, where he was pronounced dead. The three 20-year-olds were taken to Stroger Hospital with unknown injuries in fair condition. The Chevy driver, a 37-year-old woman, and the passenger, a 35-year-old woman, refused medical treatment at the scene. Citations are pending. Investigation into the crash remains ongoing by the Major Accidents Investigation Unit.


CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
Jim speaks with Mayor Javier Fernandez, of the city of South Miami, about his lawsuit challenging Florida immigration law
Jim goes one-on-one with the Mayor of South Miami to talk about his lawsuit challenging Florida immigration law. Guest: Mayor Javier Fernàndez/City of South Miami MIAMI — CBS News Miami's Jim DeFede continues scrutinizing the three-plus decades during which Katherine Fernandez Rundle has led the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office. Not doing enough to prosecute public corruption cases has been — according to some — a weakness of Rundle. This week, Jim's guest is South Miami Mayor Javier Fernandez.