Indonesia's palm oil groups urge levy cuts to offset US tariff impact
Palm smallholders' group SPKS called on the government to lower costs by removing an export tax and levy, saying the U.S. tariff would result in an up to 3% fall in the price farmers receive for palm fresh fruit bunches.
"SPKS estimated President Trump's tariffs will distort demand for CPO and palm oil products," the group's chairman Sabarudin said in a statement.
"The drop in prices at farmers' level could be offset by the reduction of export tax and levy down to 0% to help stabilise prices of palm fruits," he added. Indonesia collects a total of $196 per metric ton export tax and levy on crude palm oil shipments
Already on Tuesday, Indonesia said it would adjust its palm oil export tax, which should reduce the burden of the U.S. tariffs on exporters "by an equivalent of 5%".
While the SPKS urged reducing the costs to zero, Indonesia's largest palm oil group GAPKI said it is waiting to see what the impact of the reduction will be on costs, the group chairman Eddy Martono said.
He said domestic market obligations, and the palm oil export tax and levy currently increase costs by $221 per ton for Indonesian palm oil exporters.
That compared to an estimated $140 per ton export cost borne by rival Malaysian exporters.
Following the U.S tariffs, GAPKI said it has proposed a $100 per ton cost reduction for shipments specifically to the U.S., to maintain competitiveness against exports from Malaysia.
"If it is not competitive yet, we will talk to the government .. We are not asking this for all export markets, just for this one country," Martono said.
The U.S., Indonesia's fourth largest palm oil export market, accounted for about 7% of palm oil export volume and revenue in 2023.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
26 minutes ago
- NBC News
Orange juice importer says Brazil tariffs will raise prices for American consumers
Orange juice prices could rise by 20% to 25%, according to Johanna Foods, a small U.S. business suing the White House over tariffs threatened against Brazil. President Donald Trump said in a July 9 letter to President Luiz Inacio da Silva that he would apply a 50% tariff to all imports from Brazil starting on August 1. Trump said the high tariff rate was necessary because of "the way Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro." Prosecutors in Brazil have alleged that Bolsonaro was part of a scheme that included a plan to assassinate the country's current president, who defeated him in the last election, and Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes. Bolsonaro has denied all wrongdoing. Trump also said Brazil was censoring U.S.-based social media platforms and was running 'unsustainable Trade Deficits' with the United States. However, the United States has a goods trade surplus with Brazil — more than $7 billion last year, according to data from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Johanna Foods, which says it supplies nearly 75% of all private label 'not from concentrate' orange juice to customers in the U.S., says those arguments do not constitute an economic emergency and therefore the president does not have the power to levy this tariff. 'The Brazil Letter does not refer to any legal or statutory authority under which the Brazil Tariff can be imposed by the President,' the company's attorney Marc Kaplin writes in a filing. 'The Brazil Letter does not constitute a proper executive action, is not an Executive Order, does not reference or incorporate any Executive Orders or modify or amend any existing Executive Order.' The company says some of its customers include Walmart, Aldi, Wegman's, Safeway and Albertsons. Johanna Foods CEO Robert Facchina says the duty would result in an estimated $68 million hit, exceeding any single year of profits since the company was created in 1995. 'The Brazil Tariff will result in a significant, and perhaps prohibitive, price increase in a staple American breakfast food,' he writes. 'The not from concentrate orange juice ingredients imported from Brazil are not reasonably available from any supplier in the United States in sufficient quantity or quality to meet the Plaintiffs' production needs.' Brazil's Supreme Court ruled last month that social media companies can be held accountable for the content posted on their platforms. Elon Musk's social media site, X, was also briefly banned last year in Brazil after Musk refused to comply with a court request to ban some accounts. Facchina says layoffs of union manufacturing employees, administrative staff and a reduced production capacity at the company's Flemington, New Jersey, and Spokane, Washington, facilities are near certain should these tariffs go into effect. Johanna Foods employs almost 700 people across Washington state and New Jersey. Brazil was the 18th-largest source of U.S. goods imports last year, with more than $42 billion worth of imports entering the country, according to U.S. International Trade Commission data. In its legal filing, the company asks the Court of International Trade to declare that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant Trump the statutory authority to impose the tariffs against Brazil, and that the president has not identified a national emergency or 'unusual and extraordinary threat' as required by the IEEPA law to impose the tariffs. In response to the lawsuit, a White House spokesman said the administration is "legally and fairly using tariff powers that have been granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to level the playing field for American workers and safeguard our national security.'
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump's 'big beautiful bill' is projected to add $3.4 trillion to the debt, budget office says
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill," which he signed into law this month, will add $3.4 trillion to the U.S. national debt over the next decade, according to a new report published Monday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The report found that the law, which Republicans passed along party lines, will also 'increase by 10 million the number of people without health insurance' by 2034. The budget office scrutinized the final version of the bill after Republicans made a series of last-minute changes to cobble together the votes needed in the Senate; it passed by a vote of 51-50. That revised version subsequently passed the House on a vot of 218-214. Trump enacted it on July 4. The 887-page package extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts while providing tax deductions for tips and overtime pay for the next four years. It includes hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending for the military and to carry out Trump's mass deportation agenda. And it pays for some of that with cuts to Medicaid, SNAP benefits (which help low-income families purchase groceries) and clean energy funding. The analysis found that the law's net spending cuts of $1.1 trillion are outstripped by the $4.5 trillion in decreased revenue, compared to if the measure had not passed. Republican leaders said passing the 'big, beautiful bill' was essential to averting a tax hike at the end of this year, when much of Trump's 2017 tax law was slated to expire. Recent surveys show the bill is unpopular with Americans. Democrats are leaning heavily into attacks on the bill as a tax cut that disproportionately benefits the wealthy, paid for in part with spending cuts that harm the working class. Some Republicans and White House allies, meanwhile, are casting the bill as a tax benefit for 'working families,' highlighting the move away from taxes on tips and overtime in particular. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., predicted that voters will 'reward' Republicans for the bill in the midterm elections. 'This is a bill that was written for hard working Americans, middle and lower class earners in particular, and they will feel the effects of that in the economy, and they'll have higher wages and more opportunity and more economic growth, and that's a major factor in a midterm election. And the border will be secure. We'll have American energy dominance going again,' Johnson told NBC News earlier this month after it passed. Asked if he has any concerns that it will cost the GOP seats in the 2026 midterm elections, Johnson responded, 'No concerns at all. In fact, it's going to gain seats for us. We're that confident.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Mexico's headline inflation seen returning to target in early July
MEXICO CITY, July 21 (Reuters) - Mexico's annual headline inflation likely slowed in the first half of July, though the core index remained under pressure, fueling expectations the central bank will moderate the pace of its interest rate cuts, a Reuters poll showed on Monday. The median forecast from 11 analysts was for a 3.64% annual headline inflation rate, down from 4.13% in the second half of June. The rate would place it within the central bank's target range of 3%, plus or minus one percentage point. (MXCPHI=ECI), opens new tab In contrast, forecasts for core inflation, considered a better measure of price trends because it strips out highly volatile items, indicated an acceleration to 4.30%, its highest level since the middle of last year. (MXCPIC=ECI), opens new tab Compared with the previous two-week period, consumer prices were seen rising 0.27%, while the core index is forecast to have increased 0.20%, according to the poll. (MXCPIF=ECI), opens new tab (MXCPIH=ECI), opens new tab Official data is scheduled for release on Thursday. Last month, Mexico's central bank cut its key interest rate by 50 basis points to 8.0%, although the five-member board's decision was not unanimous, as Deputy Governor Jonathan Heath voted to leave it unchanged. According to the meeting minutes, the four officials who supported the cut, the fourth consecutive cut of that size, said the bank could adopt a more gradual approach in future decisions. The central bank has lowered its benchmark rate by 325 basis points since the start of 2024 as part of an easing cycle after the rate reached a historic high of 11.25%. The next monetary policy decision is scheduled for August 7.
