Warner Bros to get studio business after split, Discovery to house news, sports brands
Warner Bros will house the crown jewels of WBD's entertainment library, including Warner Bros and DC Studios as well as the HBO Max streaming service, the company said in a statement.
The global networks division will include its cable networks, CNN and TNT Sports as well as the Discovery+ streaming service, which will be called Discovery Global.
The split, which would create two publicly traded companies, was announced in June and is expected to be completed by mid-2026.It demerges WarnerMedia and Discovery, with an aim to grow the streaming and studios business without the drag of the declining networks unit.
Like other entertainment companies, WBD is struggling with declining ratings and revenue at its cable networks. Consumers have been dropping pay-television subscriptions in favor of streaming services.
The breakup is the latest unraveling of decades of media consolidation that created global conglomerates spanning content creation, distribution and in some cases, telecommunications.
Comcast (CMCSA.O), opens new tab is spinning off most of its NBCUniversal cable networks portfolio into a separate company, Versant. Lionsgate Entertainment (LION.N), opens new tab completed the separation of its Starz cable network from its film and television studio in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
American Eagle stock JUMPS amid woke backlash over new Sydney Sweeney jeans commercial
American Eagle shares have soared since the clothing retailer debuted a new advertising campaign starring Sydney Sweeney that some woke critics have branded 'Nazi propaganda'. Last week, the company rolled out its fall commercial lineup featuring the 27-year-old actress in various poses and scenarios with the tagline, 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans'. The obvious reference to her 'genes' didn't sit well with many people on social media, who accused the ads of being a racial dog whistle. Despite the loud backlash, the double-entendre has seemingly resonated, with American Eagle stock up more than 11 percent since last Wednesday, with a notable spike the day the commercials were released. Sweeney, who rose to fame starring in HBO 's ' Euphoria ' and 'The White Lotus,' has not publicly addressed the criticism the ads have received. In one of the most harshly denounced videos, she is seen buttoning up her jeans as she muses: 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color... my genes are blue.' A second ad saw the camera pan down Sweeney's chest as she models a plunging denim jumpsuit. 'My body's composition is determined by my genes...' she said before scolding the camera: 'Hey, eyes up here.' The adverts have divided fans, with one critic calling the clip 'one of the loudest and most obvious racialized dog whistles we've seen and heard in a while.' The phrase 'great genes' is 'historically used to celebrate whiteness, thinness and attractiveness,' which it said made 'this campaign seem to be a tone-deaf marketing move,' a Salon report on the backlash read. Taking to social media, many expressed their shock at messaging - which they aligned to Nazi propaganda. Outraged fans penned: 'So Sydney (& American Eagle) somehow expect audiences to not interpret this visual as a euphemism for eugenics and white supremacy?' 'The Sydney Sweeney American Eagle ad campaign is just modern day Nazi propaganda. Like it's wild how blatant it is. Things are weird right now, man.' But American Eagle Chief Marketing Officer Craig Brommers has a decidedly different explanation for what the company was trying to accomplish with the ads featuring Sweeney. According to Brommers, Sweeney is one of the most recognizable young people in the world. He said he and others thought putting her face in ads right before the back-to-school season would be a winning strategy. 'To be able to partner with [Sweeney] on this is saying something, and it's saying something in what has been a trickier retail environment this year, that American Eagle is still placing big bets,' he told Marketing Dive. 'We are still the jeans authority, especially for Gen Z.' Brommers stressed that he wanted American Eagle's brand to be more flashy than that of the main competition, which he named as Shein, Amazon and Walmart. The company's identity overhaul comes after its total net revenue decreased to $1.1 billion in the first quarter, a five percent year over year decline. News of this revenue hit was announced on May 29, when shares were trading for around $11.18. Throughout most of the summer, shares have been high $9 to mid $10 range. But after the Sweeney ads, American Eagle stock has fully recovered and has even gained. 'What we've also learned along the way is as talent costs have escalated, sometimes it's actually more important to place the big bets behind the biggest stars, and while those investments tend to be higher, the payback tends to be higher as well,' Brommers said.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump is winning his trade war. Only the Left-wing media refuses to admit it
The deal 'will bring stability. It will bring predictability', said EU President Ursula von der Leyen at Donald Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Scotland on Sunday. 'Stability' and 'predictability' are not words the EU typically employs when discussing anything connected with the US president. But when you lead an economic bloc that has just been comprehensively outmanoeuvred in a trade dispute, forced into a deal that even your own side says favours the US, you could be forgiven for acting out of character. The basic rate of 15 per cent that will now be charged on most European goods entering the US was perhaps not coincidentally the same rate that Trump had extracted from Japan in a similar deal last week. It is the same rate that could, pending an announced review, become a new general norm in US foreign trade relations. It is also substantially higher than the less than 2 per cent effective rate that the US charged the EU before Trump returned to office. It was 'the best we could get', von der Leyen said almost apologetically in a news conference after the deal was announced. Indeed, a hard US-imposed deadline to conclude negotiations loomed on August 1, only four days after the agreement was reached. Without the deal, US tariffs on EU imports, which form about 20 per cent of the US's total foreign purchases, would have shot up to 30 per cent across the board, with high levies on automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and other key industries in which the EU has a competitive advantage left painfully in place. In other words, Trump appears to be winning his trade war. US markets were flat on Monday, largely in anticipation of corporate earnings reports, and have risen strongly in the year to date. Wiser commentators have also come to the realisation that Trump's tariff strategy is not the economic disaster that so many of them had predicted – noting robust aggregate data and little sign that households are under pressure. The IMF's latest forecasts indicate that the US will continue to significantly outperform its developed world rivals. The president has secured commitments for considerable new investment in the US from a range of trading partners, alongside a more level playing field for American exporters. America's discredited legacy media, however, refuses to accept that there might be any advantages to the president's approach. 'Few are cheering,' said CNN of Trump's EU deal. It also felt compelled to argue that the agreement will not allow the president to escape questions about the simmering scandal around the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. For good measure, the Left-wing news network featured a human interest story claiming Trump's tariffs could 'ruin' a women's golf apparel brand. 'Questions, critiques and discrepancies are hanging over the framework agreement,' declared a sceptical New York Times analysis, apparently written by seven reporters, who accused the deal of having 'drawn plenty of grumbling' from critics just hours after its announcement. On Monday, a follow-up New York Times article warned that the tariffs could inflict higher prices for Botox, Ozempic, and other cosmetic drugs. One could argue that the former paper of record, as it is often called, knows its remaining audience, but that same day it also unironically published an article observing that doctoral graduates in economics, an academic field overwhelmingly critical of Trump's tariffs, now face poor employment prospects. In fairness, on Tuesday, it did acknowledge that the slew of deals 'has seemingly proved Mr Trump right that his tariff threats are a powerful bargaining tool ', but it couldn't resist casting doubt on whether they would prove an economic success. 'Much of this would have happened anyway', sniffed the lead editorial in the Wall Street Journal of the EU's commitment to invest hundreds of billions more in the US. Pointing out that EU investment increased by about $200bn from 2023 to 2024, it joylessly observed that 'those investment inflows will increase the US trade deficit because of balance-of-payments accounting'. Perhaps some of these criticisms will be proven correct. But it is not hard to detect an unwillingness among the president's detractors to accept any upside to his approach, or to acknowledge when their own gloomy predictions have been proven disastrously wrong. Not all observers are so down in the mouth. ' The stock market is at record highs … I don't see a country in a depression … And I would have thought … that these tariffs were going to f‑--ing sink this economy by this time, and they didn't,' admitted the liberal American comedian and political commentator Bill Maher, a sometime Trump critic who has a record of giving the president credit when it is due. If the rest of the news media wants to recover ground among the 69 per cent of Americans who say they place little or no faith in it, its practitioners should recognise a good thing when they see it.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Myleene Klass recalls the horrifying moment Harvey Weinstein offered her a sex contract to make her famous and reveals her fear of being unable to escape his advances
Myleene Klass has recalled the horrifying moment Harvey Weinstein offered her a sex contract in a bid to make her famous. The singer, 47, who has made these allegations in the past, once again touched on the uncomfortable subject during a candid interview on Paul C Brunson's We Need To Talk podcast. Speaking to Paul, Myleene told how she met the disgraced Hollywood mogul, now 73, during the 2010 Cannes Film Festival where working as a reporter for CNN in Cannes and was later invited by him to lunch, where he was said to have propositioned her. She told how the shock encounter left her 'utterly devastated' and fearing how she'd escape his advances. The Oscar-winning producer's years of sexual misconduct spanning more than 80 accusers was exposed via a series of stories in the autumn of 2017, eventually spurring sex assault prosecutions and contributed to the rise of the #MeToo movement across the globe. She said of meeting Harvey: 'I interviewed him because I was in Cannes, I was working for CNN, as I did for nine years. We were trying to show, because it was a behind the scenes working, we were trying to show how do you get a movie from its infancy of a say I don't know an inception or a script to the big screen. 'And then I met Harvey at a party and I did a mini interview with him in the press run and then after that he came and found me and I gave him the bare bones of what we were covering. 'To the point that I was so convinced that we were going to have a work meeting. We were going to actually have it as an interview that I even said, "should I bring the crew? or is this the meeting for you know the preliminaries just to pad out what it is we're going to be discussing?" and he's like, "It's fine don't bring the crew" The former Hear'Say star then went on to reveal that during her one-to-one interaction with Harvey, he laid out his intentions with her, and when asked by Paul to clarify, she said: 'Well, it's "you have sex with me and I'll make you famous". ' 'And I said, "I'm already famous in the areas I want to be.' She then recalled how he listed all the movies she could be in and all the actresses she could be like, before she once again declined his offer, telling him: 'Well, I don't want to be in movies.' Myleene then confirmed to stunned host Paul that Weinstein was very clear in what he was offering, before stating: 'I believe every woman that came forward 'cause I sat there. I was utterly devastated 'cause I didn't know if I was going to get out.' When asked how she escaped, Myleene became emotional as she shared: 'I said we'd be in touch. I made it very businesslike, I suppose. I just I got out. Lunch finished and I got out.' During her one-to-one interaction with Harvey, he laid out his intentions with her, and when asked by Paul to clarify, she said: 'Well, it's "you have sex with me and I'll make you famous"' Myleene then confirmed to stunned host Paul that Weinstein was very clear in what he was offering, before stating: 'I believe every woman that came forward 'cause I sat there. I was utterly devastated 'cause I didn't know if I was going to get out' The classical star added: 'Any woman would tell you it's fight or flight, isn't it. any woman wo's been in that position where someone is being predatory, they don't have to come with a weapon. We feel it in our gut, were know immediately when we're in danger.' Myleene previously spoke about the encounter in 2017, when she named Harvey as the man who had offered her a 'sex contract' over lunch by whispering his name in Alan Titchmarsh's ear during a TV interview. Myleene originally refused to name Weinstein as the man responsible during an interview on The Alan Titchmarsh show, but when pushed on his identity she leaned over and whispered his name in the gardener's ear. Titchmarsh began the interview in 2010 by saying: 'You're extraordinarily good-looking; you're very desirable.' He then asked: 'What's this I read in the paper today about this Hollywood star propositioning you across a table?' She then explained about 'this contract that was offered to me once by a - I've got to be careful how I say it - but somebody very well known in Hollywood.' When Titchmarsh asked if it was a 'big Hollywood star', Myleene says yes. She said when she was doing a 'pre-interview interview', a 'PA arrived, and two bodyguards, and some other guy - and I just felt, This doesn't feel very natural, and he then proffered a contract.' Weinstein's personal assistant, she said, was holding the contract while Weinstein explained its contents. At one point in the interview she appeared to almost pronounce an 'H' before stopping herself and stressing: 'I'm really trying not just to say the name'. Titchmarsh then asked about the nature of the contract, joking: 'Was he suggesting an extra-murial [sic] affair?' She replied: 'Yes, he was. Bingo.' When Titchmarsh pressed her to reveal Weinstein's identity, Klass refused, explaining: 'I don't know what good would come from it.' But she then whispered it into the former Ground Force presenter's ear, to which he replied: 'No!' He added: 'I'd never have thought it of him. Really? Gosh.' Klass then said she told him, 'I'm not that kind of girl - but we were only on starters so I thought, I'm going to miss dessert now - ruined my dinner!' Harvey is currently
