
Escaping Tibet: Tracing the Dalai Lama's journey
This town has been the residence of the Dalai Lama since 1959, and the spiritual epicentre of the movement for Tibetan autonomy. The Dalai Lama, the head of Tibetan Buddhism and a venerated religious figure, arrived here fleeing from Tibet, fearing for his safety under the Chinese government. He was granted political asylum by India under the leadership of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.
We trace the Dalai Lama's journey through the treacherous Himalayan terrain, and look at what prompted the escape in the first place.
Fleeing Tibet
China has a deeply complex political history, moving from the age of Chinese dynasties to Mongol emperors, again back to Chinese monarchs and feudal warlords before the gradual creation of a republic. In 1949, the Chinese Communist Party under the leadership of Mao Zedong triumphed over the Nationalist Party or Kuomingtang (KMT) founded by Sun Yat-Sen, and came to power at the Centre.
This regime sought the reunification of Tibet with China and the People's Liberation Army occupied the region in 1950. In May 1951, the two sides signed a 17-point agreement indicating that Tibet would have regional autonomy and control over political institutions and internal administration. The Chinese central government was to be responsible for foreign relations. The Chinese army was to enter Tibet for national defence purposes and gradually absorb the Tibetan forces. A Chinese military and administrative commission, as well a military headquarters, were to be set up in Tibet.
A preparatory committee was set up for Tibet in 1956, with the Dalai Lama as Chairman, the Panchen Lama as Vice-chairman, and General Chang Kuo Hua as the representative of the Chinese Government. 'In practice, this body had little power, and decisions in all important matters were taken by the Chinese authorities,' the Dalai Lama asserted in a statement to the Indian press reflecting on this time.
In 1956, the Lama made his first piligrimage to India, on the occasion of the 2,500th anniversary of the Mahaparinirvana of Buddha. Three years later, however, he returned to India as a political asylee.
Per the Dalai Lama's account to the Indian press in later years, a struggle against the Chinese government started in Tibet's Kham province towards the end of 1955, and grew more serious in 1956. In the ensuing struggle, the Chinese armed forces destroyed a large number of monasteries. 'Many Lamas were killed and a large number of monks and officials were taken and employed on the construction of roads in China and the interference in the exercise of religious freedom increased,' the Dalai Lama said.
In February 1959, relations between the Tibetans and Chinese government became more strained. The Dalai Lama was invited to a cultural show at the Chinese headquarters on March 10, but Tibetans became apprehensive that harm would befall him. Thousands gathered near the Dalai Lama's summer palace at Norbulingka, Lhasa, and prevented him from attending the function. They also demonstrated against Chinese rule in Tibet.
While negotiations were underway, reinforcements from People's Liberation Army arrived in Lhasa. On March 17, 1959 shelling took place in the direction of Norbulingka Palace, heightening fears about the safety of the Dalai Lama and other top officials.
Soon, the Dalai Lama fled from Lhasa, accompanied by officials and family. Among those with him were his 57-year-old mother, Gyuam Chemo ('Great Mother'), two sisters, and a younger brother.
Parts of Tibet came to be under the control of the anti-Chinese rebels, with rebel leader Gonpo Tashi setting up his headquarters in Lhagiar Dzong, Kham. The Lama and his entourage headed first to the south, and then, finding it difficult to break through security to Nepal and India, headed east. They traversed the Himalayan terrain, crossing the Kyichu and Tsangpo rivers, and moving through the Lhoka area, Yarlung Valley and Psonadzong before reaching the Indian border at Kanzey Mane near Chuhangmu, 15 days after leaving from Lhasa.
The Chinese had meanwhile set up up emergency frontier forces along the borders with Nepal, Bhutan, the then princely state of Sikkim, and India. Private communication was strictly censored in Tibet; The Hindu report dated March 29 said that telegrams transmitted out of Tibet were only allowed to say three words- We are safe.
The Dalai Lama crossed over into India on March 31. The details of his entry were shared by the then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in an address to Parliament: the government received a message from Shillong dated March 31 evening. that an emissary with a message from the Dalai Lama had arrived at the border check-post at Chutangmu in the North-East Frontier Agency, on March 29, stating that the Dalai Lama had sought political asylum. On the evening of March 31, the Dalai Lama, with a small party of 8, crossed over into Indian territory.
His first stop was Tawang, in the remote Kameng division in the North-East Frontier Agency, where India's largest Buddhist monastery is located, 10,000 feet above sea level, in dense forests inaccessible via helicopter or plane.
At the monastery, monks and devotees welcomed him with salutations and celebratory drum beats. 'Rows and rows of butter lamps guttered in the sanctum sanctorum, which resounded to the recitations of the Buddhist tenets,' a report in The Hindu said.
The retinue then passed through Bomdilla. It was met by officials, included P.N Menon of the Ministry of External Affairs, and Capt. Harmandar Singh, Political Officer of Kameng Frontier division. A contingent from Assam Rifles was guarding the area through which the Dalai Lama passed.
He arrived in Tezpur on April 18, and discussed several arrangements for his stay with Mr. Menon. Presspersons gathered from all over the world in Tezpur, eager to cover the Dalai Lama's story. He made his first public appearance at a reception held at Darrang District college grounds, addressing the press and charging China with interference in the internal affairs of Tibet despite the 1951 agreement.
Following this, he caught a special AC train to Mussoorie, passing through Siliguri, where his brother's wife, niece, and nephew, who were staying in Darjeeling, entered the special coach to see him. He was also received by the Maharajakumar of Sikkim and sister, and the mother and wife of the Prime Minister of Bhutan.
The Dalai Lama finally arrived in Mussoorie on April 21, having journeyed for 35 days and crossing around 1,500 miles. He was put up in the Birla House, where Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Sardar Patel had stayed in the past. On April 24, the Dalai Lama met Prime Minister Nehru.
In the succeeding years, India received and granted asylum to thousands of Tibetan refugees. Since 1960, the Dalai Lama has been in Dharamshala, which has earned the epithet Little Lhasa. He has established a 'Tibetan government-in-exile,' now known as the Central Tibetan Administration, with a 'Draft Constitution for Future Tibet.' There is also a Tibetan Parliament in Exile (TPiE), made up of 45 MPs who are elected representatives of the diaspora in India, Australasia, Europe, and the U.S., and meet for bi-annual sessions in Dharamshala.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
Google terminates thousands of YouTube channels as part of investigation into China-linked influence operations
Google has terminated thousands of Youtube accounts and channels posting content that possibly originated from coordinated networks of hostile state operations and were intended to influence watchers' views on key geopolitical issues. 'We terminated 2,598 YouTube channels and blocked 1 domain from eligibility to appear on Google News surfaces and Discover as part of our ongoing investigation into coordinated influence operations linked to the PRC. The coordinated inauthentic network uploaded content in Chinese and English about China and US foreign affairs. These findings are consistent with our previous reports,' noted Google in its Threat Analysis Group (TAG) updates bulletin for the month of June. Meanwhile, U.S. news outlet CNBC noted that YouTube in the second quarter had removed about 11,000 channels and other accounts that were associated with state-linked propaganda campaigns from China, Russia, and other regions. This is not the first time Google has taken action against such content. The internet giant noted in the same bulletin that in May it had terminated 3,592 YouTube channels as part of its investigation into coordinated influence operations linked to China.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
a minute ago
- First Post
'Stopped war': Trump again makes a claim India has repeatedly refuted on 4-day Pakistan clash
Trump has once again claimed credit for 'stopping war' between India and Pakistan, this time saying he intervened to prevent a nuclear conflict. His remarks have drawn sharp criticism from the Congress, which questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence on the matter. read more US President Donald Trump has once again claimed credit for averting a war between India and Pakistan, drawing sharp criticism from the Congress, which questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi's continued silence on the matter. Speaking at a reception at the White House on Tuesday (July 23, 2025), Trump said, 'We stopped wars between India and Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda.' He further claimed that five aircraft were shot down during the India-Pakistan confrontation and that the situation was close to spiraling into a nuclear conflict. 'It was going back and forth. I called them and said, 'No more trade. If you do this, it's not going to be good.' They're both powerful nuclear nations, and that would have happened. I stopped it,' Trump asserted. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD #WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "We have stopped wars between India and Pakistan. They were probably going to end up in a nuclear war. They shot down five planes in the last attack. It was back and forth, back and forth. I called them and I said no more trade if you do… — ANI (@ANI) July 23, 2025 The congress said that this marks the 25th time in the past 73 days that Trump has repeated his claim of preventing a war between the two South Asian neighbours. Reacting to the remarks, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh took a swipe at PM Modi, saying while Trump has made a 'silver jubilee' out of his claim, the Indian prime minister remains conspicuously silent. 'He has trumpeted his claim 25 times in 73 days, yet the Prime Minister of India has not uttered a word—choosing instead to travel abroad and destabilise democratic institutions at home,' Ramesh said in a post on X. He also slammed the Modi government for refusing to give firm dates for a parliamentary debate on the Pahalgam-Sindoor issue, adding that the PM has not committed to responding in the House. Trump also expanded his list of purported diplomatic achievements, claiming the U.S. had 'taken out Iran's entire nuclear capability' and stopped conflicts in Kosovo and Serbia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump has frequently credited his trade diplomacy for de-escalating global tensions, there has been no official confirmation from New Delhi or Islamabad regarding his role in the alleged ceasefire or the reported aerial engagement.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
a minute ago
- First Post
India-UK FTA: A bold new trade era set to take off
As Prime Minister Narendra Modi undertakes his fourth visit to the United Kingdom this week, the economic relationship that India has with the country has come into focus afresh. Both countries are going to sign a free trade agreement (FTA) during the PM's visit, which is his first since Keir Starmer came to power. The signing of the FTA will mark the culmination of three-year-long negotiations, a process that started in the year 2022 and saw both countries iron out significant differences to achieve a mutually beneficial deal. Once operational, this trading agreement is expected to boost India-UK bilateral trade from its current volume of $55 billion to $120 billion by 2030. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The UK remains a key economic partner for India and is also the sixth-largest investor in India, with cumulative investments of around $36 billion. India itself is a key contributor to the British economy, with at least 1,000 Indian companies operating in the country, employing more than one lakh people, with a total investment of $20 billion. Inking an FTA with an emerging economic powerhouse like India is significant for the UK, and maybe this is why they have called it their 'biggest and economically most significant' bilateral agreement since exiting the European Union. For India, this FTA is equally important, as the country is an important market for Indian exports—one with which it also enjoys a modest trade surplus. The FTA is also crucial because it is one of those agreements that India has signed after overhauling its approach to trade liberalisation under the leadership of PM Modi. In 2014, when Modi came to power, one of the first things on his priority list was to review the existing trading arrangements that India had with countries across the world. Prior to this, the previous government had indiscriminately signed FTAs regardless of whether they were securing market access for Indian products or not. Within a decade, India had signed trade agreements with Singapore, ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, among others. This one-sided economic liberalism did provide the UPA coalition with an image of a progressive government that was doing a 'lot' for the country's economy, but by the time they went out of power, India's trade deficit with key countries—including China (with which there was no FTA but just ambitious bilateral trade targets)—had zoomed to unsustainable levels. The India-ASEAN FTA particularly faced a huge domestic backlash because it made India a dumping ground for cheap offerings, while Indian products struggled to survive. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Naturally, the issue of the trade deficit and India's lack of capacity to compete in the global market was of grave concern to the Modi government, which preferred to adopt a strategic approach to FTAs—one that focused on securing market access for Indian products on a reciprocal basis. This was more than evident when his government put a pause on signing FTAs till 2021 and even withdrew from the China-dominated Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Though Modi faced a lot of flak from his detractors—who called him a socialist, a protectionist, and considered his move to not sign FTAs as adversarial to India's economic interest—he did not budge, as if he knew what was best to protect the country's economic interests. While a strategic pause was put on signing new trading agreements and a careful review of the existing ones was being undertaken, his government took concrete steps on one very important front—building India's indigenous manufacturing capacity so as to compete effectively at the global level. The spirit of Aatmanirbhar Bharat, the early launch of the 'Make in India' program, and the game-changing Production-Linked Incentive Scheme were some of the essential steps that were taken before actually boarding the FTA wagon again. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Along with this, the government was also planning a new approach to integration with the global economy, where emphasis was on using this integration to boost India's economy and not just become a market open to exploitation by much more developed countries. When India signs the FTA with the United Kingdom this week during PM Modi's visit, the changed approach to bilateral trading arrangements would be more than visible. Because this time, it has literally put in unprecedented efforts to negotiate a favourable deal with a much-developed economy. The FTA with the UK is set to provide duty-free access to 99 per cent of Indian goods, with key sectors such as automobiles—including electric vehicles—engineering goods, sports goods, and even services benefiting. Most importantly, India, being a labour-intensive economy, will gain access to a wide market, particularly for its leather products, apparel and footwear, toys, marine products, and gems and jewellery. In the last decade, the Modi government's efforts to revive the electronics sector—making it a leading engine of the country's manufacturing story—will be suitably rewarded by this trade deal, as electronics exports from India to the UK have already surged from $450 million in 2020 to $1.7 billion in 2023. India's textiles sector will also benefit from the FTA, which already exports knit apparel and raw materials worth Rs 1.5 billion to the United Kingdom annually. The sheer scope of job creation due to a boost in these exports is going to be huge, with the country's large and cost-wise globally most competitive labour force finding meaningful avenues for employment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Interestingly, India has also allowed for liberalisation in the auto sector—but on a strictly reciprocal basis and that too with well-thought-out caution in place in the form of a quota-based easing of tariffs. This will definitely provide traction to Indian automakers in the UK market, unlocking newer opportunities for them. Another interesting aspect of the trade deal is India's access to the British public procurement market. This means Indian firms will be handed non-discriminatory treatment while applying to fulfil public procurement tenders floated by the UK government. While the exact figures for the UK's total procurement are not available, it is estimated to be an opportunity worth hundreds of billions of pounds that Indian suppliers can now readily tap into. In return, India has also allowed UK-based businesses to participate in public procurement contracts—but only in non-sensitive sectors, with a caveat that they must have at least 20 per cent Indian content. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Along with other wins, a crucial victory for Indian negotiators is the provision for exemption from UK's social security contributions in the form of the Double Contributions Convention Agreement (DCCA). Due to this, Indian workers who are temporarily in the UK—and their employers—will not have to contribute anything towards social security in the country, thus leading to savings of around 20 per cent of their salaries. This will set a good precedent for other developed countries to follow with India. India's unexplored side as a tough negotiator has really come to the fore through this deal, as India has also secured exemption for sensitive agricultural products such as dairy products, apples, cheese, oats, etc., which would have collapsed due to fierce competition from British products in the category. Even sensitive industrial goods that need protection before they can compete globally—such as plastics, optical fibres, TV camera tubes, etc.—have also been excluded from the deal. On certain other goods, India has agreed to cut duties only on a gradual basis over a longer period of time. This also includes liquor, where duties will be reduced only over a period of ten years so as to protect the domestic market. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This week, when PM Modi signs the FTA with the UK, it will not only signal India's new-found willingness to integrate with the global market, but it will also demonstrate its resolve to do it only on beneficial terms. The days of signing FTAs for the sake of appearing liberal and seeking validation from economists are over for India. This dispensation has shown that it is willing to walk the talk of trade liberalisation with the developed world—but only when it also boosts the country's own economy. The agreement is an example of India's growing assertiveness in the domain of foreign economic policy, and other developed countries who are looking to seal a deal with India must duly take note of it. The author is a New Delhi-based commentator on geopolitics and foreign policy. She holds a PhD from the Department of International Relations, South Asian University. She tweets @TrulyMonica. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD