Canada ‘caved' to U.S. by dropping tax, White House says
'Absolutely,' Hassett said on Fox News Channel when asked about the talks restarting.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney called U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday evening to tell him the tax was being dropped, calling it a big victory for U.S. tech companies.
'Very simple. Prime Minister Carney in Canada caved to President Trump and the United States of America,' she said, crediting Trump's hard-line negotiating style for the shift.
'President Trump knows ... that every country on the planet needs to have good trade relationships with the United States, and it was a mistake for Canada to vow to implement that tax that would have hurt our tech companies here in the United States,' she said.
Trump had asked Canada to drop the tax at a G7 meeting in Canada earlier in June, Hassett said. 'It's something that they've studied, now they've agreed to, and for sure, that means that we can get back to the negotiations.'
Canada halted its plans to begin collecting a new digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms just hours before this was due to start on Monday in a bid to advance stalled trade negotiations with the U.S.
Canada's finance ministry said late on Sunday that Carney and Trump would resume trade negotiations in order to agree on a deal by July 21.
'Thank you Canada for removing your Digital Services Tax which was intended to stifle American innovation and would have been a deal breaker for any trade deal with America,' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick responded in a post on X.
Stocks hit record highs on Wall Street on Monday morning as sentiment in the markets rose amid optimism about U.S. trade negotiations with key partners, including Canada.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also struck an optimistic tone over the potential for 'a flurry' of trade deals ahead of a July 9 deadline, after which 10% U.S. tariff rates on imports from many countries are set to snap back to Trump's April 2 announced rates of 11% to 50%.
But Bessent, speaking on Bloomberg Television, warned that countries may not get extensions from that deadline, even if they are negotiating in good faith as he suggested previously. Any extensions would be up to Trump himself, Bessent said.
Leavitt said Trump was meeting his trade team this week to set tariff rates for those countries that weren't negotiating.
'He is going to set the rates for many of these countries if they don't come to the table to negotiate in good faith, and he is meeting with his trade team this week to do that,' she said.
Trump abruptly called off trade talks with Canada on Friday over Ottawa's digital services tax, saying it was a 'blatant attack.' He reiterated this on Sunday, pledging to set a new tariff rate on Canadian goods within the next week, which threatened to push U.S.-Canada relations back into chaos after a period of relative calm.
'We have countries that are negotiating in good faith, but they should be aware that if we can't get across the line because they are being recalcitrant, then we could spring back to the April 2 levels,' Bessent said. 'I hope that won't have to happen.'
Trade U-turn
Trump and Carney met at the G7 summit, with the Canadian prime minister saying they had agreed to wrap up a new economic agreement within 30 days.
Canada's planned digital tax was 3% of the digital services revenue a firm takes in from Canadian users above US$20 million in a calendar year, and payments were to be retroactive to 2022.
It would have impacted giant U.S. technology firms, including Amazon.com, Meta, Alphabet's Google and Apple.
The tax collection slated for Monday will be halted, a statement from Canada's finance ministry said. Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne will bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act.
Canada is engaged in complex negotiations on a new economic and security partnership with the U.S.
Rescinding the DST will allow the negotiations to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians.
🔗https://t.co/hsiDxk7JVD — François-Philippe Champagne (FPC) 🇨🇦 (@FP_Champagne) June 30, 2025
Canadian business groups applauded Carney's decision as well as the U.S. Congress' removal of a 'revenge tax' provision from Republican tax legislation, known as 899.
'The decision to eliminate the DST makes sense. This tax would have fallen on Canadian consumers, businesses, and investors in the form of higher costs and hurt our economy at a critical time,' said David Pierce, vice president of Government Relations at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce in a statement.
Some observers said Carney's decision ran counter to his campaign promises, however. Carney's Liberal party won an election in April pledging to stand up to Trump.
'It feels like we're standing down really quickly,' said Vass Bednar, managing director of the Canadian Shield Institute for Public Policy, a think tank.
Opposition Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre said Carney needs to demand concessions from Trump.
'Canadians need certainty that Liberals will put Canada First and defend Canadian sovereignty in these negotiations,' Poilievre said on X.
Canada is the second-largest U.S. trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of U.S. exports. It bought $349.4 billion of U.S. goods last year and exported $412.7 billion to the U.S., according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
Canada had escaped Trump's broad tariffs imposed in April but still faces other duties, including 50% on steel and aluminum exports to the United States.
Reporting by Kanjyik Ghosh in Bengaluru and Promit Mukherjee in Ottawa; additional reporting by Susan Heavey in Washington and Anna Mehler Paperny in Toronto; Writing by Caroline Stauffer; editing by Christopher Cushing, Michael Perry, Paul Simao, Mark Heinrich and Marguerita Choy, Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Brazil hosts BRICS summit, eager to avoid provoking Trump's ire
RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — Brazil will play host to a summit of the BRICS bloc of developing economies Sunday and Monday during which pressing topics like Israel's attack on Iran, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and trade tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump are expected to be handled with caution. Analysts and diplomats said the lack of cohesion in an enlarged BRICS, which doubled in size last year, may affect its ability to become another pole in world affairs. They also see the summit's moderate agenda as an attempt by member countries to stay off Trump's radar. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva will have some of his priorities, such as debates on artificial intelligence and climate change, front and center for the talks with key leaders not in attendance. China's President Xi Jinping won't attend a BRICS summit for the first time since he became his country's leader in 2012. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who will make an appearance via videoconference, continues to mostly avoid traveling abroad due to an international arrest warrant issued after Russia invaded Ukraine. Debate over language on hot-button topics The restraint expected in Rio de Janeiro marks a departure from last year's summit hosted by Russia in Kazan, when the Kremlin sought to develop alternatives to U.S.-dominated payment systems which would allow it to dodge Western sanctions imposed after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. A source involved in the negotiations told journalists Friday that some members of the group want more aggressive language on the situation in Gaza and Israel's attack on Iran. The source spoke under the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the matter publicly. 'Brazil wants to keep the summit as technical as possible,' said Oliver Stuenkel, a professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation think tank and university. Consequently, observers expect a vague final declaration regarding Russia's war in Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East. As well as suiting Brazil, a watered-down and non-controversial statement may be made easier by the absences of Putin and Xi, Stuenkel said. Those two countries have pushed for a stronger anti-Western stance, as opposed to Brazil and India that prefer non-alignment. A Brazilian government official told The Associated Press Thursday that the group is expected to produce three joint statements and a final declaration, 'all of which less bounded by current geopolitical tensions.' The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the summit's preparations. João Alfredo Nyegray, an international business and geopolitics professor at the Pontifical Catholic University in Parana, said the summit could have played a role in showing an alternative to an unstable world, but won't do so. 'The withdrawal of Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and the uncertainty about the level of representation for countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are confirming the difficulty for the BRICS to establish themselves as a cohesive pole of global leadership,' Nyegray said. 'This moment demands high level articulation, but we are actually seeing dispersion.' Brazil skittish in light of Trump tariffs Brazil, the country that chairs the bloc, has picked six strategic priorities for the summit: global cooperation in healthcare; trade, investment and finance; climate change; governance for artificial intelligence; peace-making and security; and institutional development. It has decided to focus on less controversial issues, such as promoting trade relations between members and global health, after Trump returned to the White House, said Ana Garcia, a professor at the Rio de Janeiro Federal Rural University. 'Brazil wants the least amount of damage possible and to avoid drawing the attention of the Trump administration to prevent any type of risk to the Brazilian economy,' Garcia said. While Brazil will continue to advocate for the reform of Western-led global institutions, a cornerstone policy of the group, the country wants to avoid becoming the target of tariffs — a predicament it has so far largely escaped. Trump has threatened to impose 100% tariffs against the bloc if they take any moves to undermine the dollar. Other leaders shun the summit Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Egypt's Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi will also be absent. Those two countries joined the BRICS in 2024, alongside Ethiopia, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates. Saudi Arabia has been invited and is participating in member discussions, but it has yet to send its confirmation letter. As well as new members, the bloc has 10 strategic partner countries, a category created at last year's summit that includes Belarus, Cuba and Vietnam. That rapid expansion led Brazil to put housekeeping issues — officially termed institutional development — on the agenda to better integrate new members and boost internal cohesion. Despite notable absences, the summit is important for attendees, especially in the context of instability provoked by Trump's tariff wars, said Bruce Scheidl, a researcher at the University of Sao Paulo's BRICS study group. 'The summit offers the best opportunity for emerging countries to respond, in the sense of seeking alternatives and diversifying their economic partnerships,' Scheidl said. For Lula, the summit will be a welcome pause from a difficult domestic scenario, marked by a drop in popularity and conflict with Congress. The meeting also represents an opportunity to advance climate negotiations and commitments on protecting the environment before November's COP 30 climate talks in the Amazonian city of Belem.
Canada News.Net
3 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Bob Vylan's ban by US is message to those promoting antisemitism
WASHINGTON, D.C.: The Trump administration has made public a visa decision that would usually be kept private. It did this to send a strong message when it cancelled the U.S. visas of a British punk-rap band called Bob Vylan. The U.S. Deputy Secretary of State, Christopher Landau, posted on social media that the band's visas were revoked because of what he called a "hateful tirade" at the Glastonbury music festival. At the festival, the band's frontman had led the crowd in chanting "Death to the IDF" (Israel Defense Forces). British police are investigating whether a crime was committed during that performance. The band denies any antisemitism and says they are being punished for speaking out against the war in Gaza. They said they are being "targeted for speaking up." The U.S. government does not normally discuss individual visa decisions publicly. Laws like the Immigration and Nationality Act and privacy rules usually prevent this. Exceptions are sometimes made for foreign officials or their families when they are banned for corruption or human rights issues. But the Trump administration has been more public when it comes to revoking visas of people accused of supporting hate or violence, especially if the speech is seen as antisemitic or pro-militant. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said the administration wants to show it has firm rules for who is allowed to enter the country. She said, "Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors." She explained that the band's public behavior crossed a line, so the government decided to make their visa cancellation public. This case is part of a broader effort to cancel visas of people accused of antisemitic or pro-Hamas activity. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said earlier this year that about 300 visas had already been cancelled for such reasons, and that more would follow. Most of those cases were not made public. One that was publicized involved Rumeysa Ozturk, a student in Massachusetts. She was detained after writing an article criticizing Tufts University for not condemning Israeli actions in Gaza. Her visa was cancelled, and U.S. officials said her stay in the country would have adverse effects on foreign policy. Public visa bans for political reasons are not new in the U.S. In the past, famous people like actor Charlie Chaplin in the 1950s and singer John Lennon in the 1970s also faced visa problems. Amnesty International said in 2020 that the U.S. has a long history of using visa bans to block people with political views the government disagrees with, especially during the Cold War.
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: EV momentum slows in North America as global adoption accelerates
Watch CTV's Colton Praill reports on reduced EV incentives in the U.S. and pushback in Canada, while other countries charge ahead with electric vehicles.
