logo
Matter's elusive dark twin: Most expensive substance in the universe

Matter's elusive dark twin: Most expensive substance in the universe

Indian Express5 days ago
In 1930, theoretical physicist Paul Dirac was trying to reconcile quantum mechanics with Einstein's theory of relativity when his equations hinted at something strange: the existence of a 'mirror' particle identical to the electron, but with opposite charge. Its implications made him uneasy — that every particle has an antiparticle, and that perhaps the whole of nature is constructed in this way.
Dirac's calculation wasn't to be a mere mathematical quirk. Two years later, American particle physicist Carl Anderson found the positron, the electron's antimatter twin, in cosmic ray experiments. It was a moment of rare scientific poetry: a particle predicted by pure mathematics, then seen in nature.
Antimatter sounds like something from science fiction. And indeed, it has captured the imagination of writers from Star Trek (where it powers warp drives) to Angels and Demons (where it threatens to obliterate Vatican City). But antimatter is very real, though vanishingly rare in our universe. Whenever a particle meets its antiparticle, they annihilate in a flash of energy — converting all their mass, as per Einstein's , into pure light. That property makes antimatter the most energy-dense substance imaginable. A single gram could, in theory, produce as much energy as a nuclear bomb.
But if it's so powerful, why don't we use it? And why don't we see it everywhere?
Here lies one of the deepest mysteries in cosmology. The Big Bang, as we understand it, should have created equal amounts of matter and antimatter. But for reasons not yet fully known, the early universe tipped the scales ever so slightly toward matter — by just one part in a billion. That tiny excess is what makes up everything we see: stars, galaxies, people, planets. The rest annihilated with its antimatter counterpart in the early universe.
Physicists are still trying to understand why the universe has this imbalance. One possibility is that antimatter behaves slightly differently than matter — a tiny asymmetry in how particles decay, known as CP violation. Experiments at CERN and Fermilab are probing these effects, but so far, no definitive explanation has emerged.
The reality of antimatter: not just theory
Despite its elusiveness, antimatter isn't merely theoretical. We make it — routinely. In fact, hospitals around the world use positrons (antimatter electrons) every day in PET scans. The 'P' in PET stands for 'positron,' and the scan works by injecting a radioactive tracer that emits positrons. When these encounter electrons in the body, they annihilate and emit gamma rays, which are detected to create precise images of tissues.
Physicists at CERN's Antimatter Factory even trap anti-hydrogen atoms, composed of an antiproton and a positron, in magnetic fields for a few milliseconds at a time, to study their properties. The dream is to answer a simple but profound question: does antimatter fall down like regular matter, or does it somehow respond differently to gravity? Early experiments suggest it falls the same way, but the precision isn't yet conclusive.
Energy source or weapon?
Harnessing antimatter sounds like a sci-fi superpower, and indeed, the energy from matter-antimatter annihilation could, in theory, power spacecraft far more efficiently than any rocket we've built. But there's a catch: antimatter is mind-bogglingly expensive. Producing a single gram would cost about $60 trillion using today's particle accelerators. Worse, storing it safely is a nightmare. Let it touch anything, and boom, it annihilates.
That hasn't stopped the speculation. NASA has funded studies on antimatter propulsion, suggesting it could one day shorten interstellar travel. But for now, it remains out of reach, a gleaming prize at the edge of possibility.
Antimatter in space
Cosmic rays from deep space occasionally strike Earth's upper atmosphere, producing short-lived showers of antimatter particles. The International Space Station even carries an instrument called the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, scanning for signs of antimatter nuclei that could hint at entire regions of the universe made of antimatter — a speculative idea, but one not yet ruled out.
Neutron stars and black hole jets may also generate antimatter in tiny amounts, adding to the cosmic fireworks. But overall, the universe appears matter-dominated. Why nature chose this option, why there's something instead of nothing, remains among the deepest riddles in physics.
Final Reflections
In Star Trek, antimatter is a tame servant of human ambition. In reality, it's a fleeting, elusive shadow of the particles we know. Dirac's equations suggested a universe with perfect symmetry, but nature, like a mischievous artist, left a flaw in the mirror.
The story of antimatter reminds us that physics isn't just about numbers or formulas. It's about imagination, daring, and a relentless curiosity about the hidden sides of reality. Somewhere in the collision of matter and anti-matter lies a spark — of annihilation, yes, but also of wonder.
Shravan Hanasoge is an astrophysicist at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought
Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought

Economic Times

time9 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought

The universe may not be heading for an eternal stretch into emptiness, as once assumed. According to new findings from two of the largest astronomical surveys — the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) — the mysterious force known as dark energy could be changing. That shift, if real, has serious consequences. Instead of expanding forever, the universe might one day contract. Scientists now believe a complete reversal could start within 10 billion years, ending in a collapse known as the Big Crunch. These conclusions come from a new theoretical study, currently in preprint and awaiting peer review, that presents a bold reinterpretation of how cosmic forces years, physicists assumed dark energy was steady and uniform, based on a simple number called the cosmological constant in Einstein's general relativity. But the latest analysis challenges that view. The study, reported by introduces two components behind dark energy: the cosmological constant and a particle known as the axion. Axions are hypothetical ultralight particles that rarely interact with matter. Yet, they could fill the universe and account for much of its current accelerated expansion. The cosmological constant, by contrast, is a fixed energy value in empty space. But in this model, it's not positive. It's team behind the research explained their reasoning clearly. 'We are living in a temporary period of accelerated expansion,' they wrote. 'It is heavily driven by the axion field.'Right now, axions are doing most of the work in keeping the universe expanding. But over time, these particles are expected to lose their influence. Once they fade, the negative cosmological constant will begin to dominate. This shift would decelerate the universe's expansion could not only stop but happens next? According to the model, gravity would begin to pull everything back in. Galaxies would start to draw closer, merge, and collapse into each other. Temperatures would rise. Space would grow smaller, hotter, and the final act, all matter and energy would compress into a single point — a singularity. This collapse, termed the Big Crunch, is effectively the reverse of the Big Bang. The study predicts the beginning of this reversal could occur in 10 billion years. The contraction would then take another 10 billion years to complete. The full lifespan of the universe, under this model, would be about 33.3 billion already 13.8 billion years into that DES and DESI surveys have mapped millions of galaxies to measure how the universe expands over time. These surveys are central to modern cosmology, offering one of the most detailed views of the universe's large-scale recently, all observations supported the idea that dark energy was constant. But the new data show signs that it might be insight gave rise to the axion-dark energy model, or aDE, a theoretical framework that incorporates both axions and a changing cosmological explained by 'One of the most striking findings in the new study is the possibility that the cosmological constant — which reflects the energy density of space itself — may be negative.'The study's authors are careful not to overstate their findings. The model, while compelling, is still under review and not confirmed.'These are preliminary findings,' the researchers acknowledged. They stress that deeper space surveys and next-generation telescopes will be crucial for testing whether dark energy really does evolve with the idea is already sparking serious debate among physicists. If it holds, it would force scientists to rethink the universe's timeline — and its theories go further. They suggest the Big Crunch might not be the absolute that final singularity could trigger another Big Bang. A fresh cycle. A new universe. Though these ideas remain speculative, they reflect just how much we still don't understand about the nature of now, the only certainty is that the universe might be less predictable than once believed. As astronomers dig deeper into the skies, the answers we get may continue to surprise us.

Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought
Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought

Time of India

time9 hours ago

  • Time of India

Our universe might have an expiry date and it's sooner than we thought

What the new model proposes Live Events Big Crunch: The opposite of the Big Bang The evidence behind the claim Still just a theory, for now (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The universe may not be heading for an eternal stretch into emptiness, as once assumed. According to new findings from two of the largest astronomical surveys — the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) — the mysterious force known as dark energy could be shift, if real, has serious consequences. Instead of expanding forever, the universe might one day contract. Scientists now believe a complete reversal could start within 10 billion years, ending in a collapse known as the Big Crunch These conclusions come from a new theoretical study, currently in preprint and awaiting peer review, that presents a bold reinterpretation of how cosmic forces years, physicists assumed dark energy was steady and uniform, based on a simple number called the cosmological constant in Einstein's general relativity. But the latest analysis challenges that study, reported by introduces two components behind dark energy: the cosmological constant and a particle known as the axion. Axions are hypothetical ultralight particles that rarely interact with matter. Yet, they could fill the universe and account for much of its current accelerated cosmological constant, by contrast, is a fixed energy value in empty space. But in this model, it's not positive. It's team behind the research explained their reasoning clearly. 'We are living in a temporary period of accelerated expansion,' they wrote. 'It is heavily driven by the axion field.'Right now, axions are doing most of the work in keeping the universe expanding. But over time, these particles are expected to lose their influence. Once they fade, the negative cosmological constant will begin to dominate. This shift would decelerate the universe's expansion could not only stop but happens next? According to the model, gravity would begin to pull everything back in. Galaxies would start to draw closer, merge, and collapse into each other. Temperatures would rise. Space would grow smaller, hotter, and the final act, all matter and energy would compress into a single point — a collapse, termed the Big Crunch, is effectively the reverse of the Big Bang The study predicts the beginning of this reversal could occur in 10 billion years. The contraction would then take another 10 billion years to complete. The full lifespan of the universe, under this model, would be about 33.3 billion already 13.8 billion years into that DES and DESI surveys have mapped millions of galaxies to measure how the universe expands over time. These surveys are central to modern cosmology, offering one of the most detailed views of the universe's large-scale recently, all observations supported the idea that dark energy was constant. But the new data show signs that it might be insight gave rise to the axion-dark energy model, or aDE, a theoretical framework that incorporates both axions and a changing cosmological explained by 'One of the most striking findings in the new study is the possibility that the cosmological constant — which reflects the energy density of space itself — may be negative.'The study's authors are careful not to overstate their findings. The model, while compelling, is still under review and not confirmed.'These are preliminary findings,' the researchers acknowledged. They stress that deeper space surveys and next-generation telescopes will be crucial for testing whether dark energy really does evolve with the idea is already sparking serious debate among physicists. If it holds, it would force scientists to rethink the universe's timeline — and its theories go further. They suggest the Big Crunch might not be the absolute that final singularity could trigger another Big Bang. A fresh cycle. A new universe. Though these ideas remain speculative, they reflect just how much we still don't understand about the nature of now, the only certainty is that the universe might be less predictable than once believed. As astronomers dig deeper into the skies, the answers we get may continue to surprise us.

A cosmic mystery: Is China building the world's biggest telescope?
A cosmic mystery: Is China building the world's biggest telescope?

Mint

time15 hours ago

  • Mint

A cosmic mystery: Is China building the world's biggest telescope?

Astronomer Robert Kirshner investigates some of the universe's biggest questions: What happens when a star explodes? Is the universe still expanding? He recently added a new mystery to the list: Is China quietly building the world's biggest telescope? He would like to know, because he leads a rival telescope project in the U.S. There are clues. In January, state-owned Nanjing Astronomical Instruments said on social media that it won a $22 million bid for a dome to surround a 48-foot telescope. In an April social-media post, students visiting a science institute mentioned researchers showing them mirror arrangements for such a telescope. And a top Chinese astronomer told state media he wanted to finish the telescope before he retires. Yet Chinese officials haven't directly acknowledged the observatory, which would threaten American technological leadership and potentially give Beijing a military advantage. 'You would expect, normally, some kind of chest thumping," said Kirshner, a Harvard emeritus professor. The leading Chinese astronomer and his institute, a national research organization that appears to be in charge of the telescope, didn't return requests for comment for this article. If China is building the big scope, that raises another question. 'Why the hell are they doing that?" said Matt Mountain, head of the nonprofit organization that manages observatories, as well as the Hubble and James Webb space telescopes, for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Mountain has two hypotheses. First, astronomical advances benefit both scientific and military purposes, as astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson highlighted in his book 'Accessory to War." Huge telescopes can look at military satellites, not just stars and planets. The second hypothesis: Beijing is investing in astronomy to inspire children to enter the sciences—so it can surpass the U.S. in a couple of decades. 'Astronomy is an entry-level drug for science, technology, engineering and math," said Mountain. American institutes are the New York Yankees of modern astronomy. By Kirshner's count, 18 of the 23 astrophysics-focused Nobel Prize winners in the last half-century worked in the U.S. While space telescopes such as the James Webb get more attention these days, those on the ground still matter. They are easier to service and much bigger, offsetting disadvantages such as light pollution and atmospheric distortions. Bigger telescopes mean sharper images, making it easier to determine the distance between faraway objects, Kirshner said. Astronomers can then discover more planets orbiting stars in the Goldilocks temperature range that could support life. The Hubble and Webb space telescopes have mirrors with diameters of about 8 feet and 21 feet, respectively. The four biggest ones currently on Earth—one in Spain and three in the U.S.—are all roughly 33 feet in diameter. If China completes a 48-foot telescope soon, it would be the world's biggest, unless a delayed 128-foot European telescope in Chile is finished first. Kirshner's Thirty Meter Telescope group, an international project with U.S., Canadian, Indian and Japanese institutions, proposes a 98-foot telescope on Hawaii's Big Island. Instead of making one massive mirror, which would require mountain transport and the construction of an unfeasibly huge furnace, it would use 492 hexagonal segments, each 4.7 feet wide. These giant telescopes cost roughly $1 billion to $2 billion, Mountain said, and costs rise with size. They also take years to build. Drawing on political rather than scientific wisdom, Kirshner realized it would help make the case in Washington for big-telescope funding if he could show China was building one too. Kirshner's best sources have been Chinese-speaking peers who informally confirmed the development of a telescope site in the Tibetan Plateau, in China's southwest. Mountain says Chilean astronomers told him China was also exploring a Southern Hemisphere observatory in Chile. Armed with the information, Kirshner met congressional staffers and National Science Foundation officials. He ran into a roadblock in May, when President Trump proposed to Congress that the NSF's annual budget be cut to $4 billion from $9 billion. Trump's science and technology adviser said then that scientific progress had stalled in some fields and more federal money wouldn't necessarily mean more scientific impact. In its budget request, the NSF proposed advancing only the Giant Magellan Telescope, which is backed by a California-headquartered consortium. At 83 feet wide, the Magellan would be bigger than China's but smaller than Kirshner's proposed telescope. Like the European telescope, this observatory would be in Chile. The Magellan's location would leave China with the Northern Hemisphere's biggest telescope. Earth's curvature means each hemisphere offers different views. Kirshner got a reprieve in mid-July. A Senate spending committee recommended minimal cuts to the NSF, and said it supported both the Magellan project and Kirshner's Thirty Meter Telescope. Kirshner called on Congress to endorse what he called a 'vigorous response to China's efforts." Write to Stu Woo at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store