US air strikes on Iran were absolutely necessary, says Patel
It followed Operation Midnight Hammer last month, an air raid when US defence forces attacked Iranian nuclear sites near Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan.
UK Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any potential British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies.
'Two weeks have passed since the US air strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities,' shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti said.
Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel (House of Commons/PA)
'Does the minister have an assessment of their impact, and what is his response to the Iranian regime now prohibiting co-operation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) and their inspectors leaving Iran?
'Given Tehran's refusal to co-operate, is the minister and the department in discussions with the partners about snapback sanctions being applied (by reinstating UN sanctions on Iran removed through the 2015 Iran nuclear deal) and other measures?
'Is he concerned that demonstrates that Iran will continue to pursue nuclear weapons and their entire programme?
'And with the information received from discussions with America, Israel and other intelligence partners, will the Government finally come off the fence about those strikes and agree with this side of the House that they were absolutely necessary?'
Mr Falconer replied: 'I won't provide, I'm afraid, a detailed commentary from the despatch box on the extent of damage from the strikes, for reasons that I'm sure (Dame Priti) and the rest of the House will understand.
'I can confirm we are in discussions about the snapback mechanisms. As the Prime Minister (Sir Keir Starmer) has said, as the Foreign Secretary (David Lammy) has said, as I have said, we cannot see Iran get a nuclear weapon – snapback is an important lever.
'We're talking with our E3 partners and indeed the Americans about what role snapback can play.
'We hope to see a diplomatic solution. That is ultimately the most enduring way to ensure that Iran does not get a nuclear weapon, but we will continue to consider all diplomatic tools including snapback.'
US defence forces attacked Iranian nuclear sites near Fordo (Maxar Technologies via AP)
Andrew Murrison referred to comments which Defence Secretary John Healey made on social media website X, when the Cabinet minister said the 'US has taken action to alleviate the grave threat that Iran poses to global security'.
The Conservative MP for South West Wiltshire told the Commons: 'The Defence Secretary correctly has said that Operation Midnight Hammer has alleviated a grave threat, but the Attorney General appears to be less clear and wonders if it was illegal, whilst the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary appear to sit on the fence.
'Sorry to put the minister on the spot – does he agree with the Attorney General or with the Defence Secretary?'
Mr Falconer replied: 'The Defence Secretary and the Attorney General are doing rather different roles, and I don't think they're in disagreement – and in any case, collective responsibility would bind them both and indeed me.'
The Foreign Office minister, whose portfolio includes the Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan, also referred to a 'gap' in the law which independent reviewer of state threats legislation Jonathan Hall identified in a 2025 report.
Mr Hall recommended that the Government should be able to issue 'statutory alert and liability threat notices' against foreign intelligence services.
'By way of example, this strong power would be available for use against the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps', he wrote, referring to the Iran-backed organisation.
It would be a 'new proscription-type power', similar to existing terrorism legislation used to ban organisations such as Hamas and National Action, the reviewer said.
When Labour MP for Newcastle-under-Lyme Adam Jogee asked Mr Falconer to 'elaborate a little more on what that means', the minister replied: 'A state in this case has proved a persistent threat in the UK using methods unlike those usually employed by a state.'
He said the Government was 'seeking to fill' the gap in the law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Failed attempt to house asylum seekers on former Lincoln airbase cost at least £48m
Home Office accounts have revealed £48m was wasted on a plan to house asylum seekers on a former Lincoln airbase. In March 2023, it was announced RAF Scampton was to house 2,000 migrants as part of proposals by the previous Conservative government to reduce the reliance on hotels. The scheme was met with widespread anger and disbelief in the local area. Plans were scrapped in September as part of an election pledge by the new Labour administration. Nobody was ever housed at the site – the former home of the Dambusters – despite millions being poured into the project. The level of losses have recently been published in the Home Office's accounts for the last year. It also showed costs could have ballooned as high as £180m if the project had been pursued for another three years. The government has previously admitted that a total of around £60m was spent on the site, of which £48.5m has been recorded as a loss. Lincoln MP Hamish Falconer told ITV News: "I'm honestly furious. I've been opposed to this plan since the very beginning. We always said this wasn't going to work for lots of obvious reasons. "I saw the site, just about a month ago, and I could not believe - with fury - all the NHS spending that has gone on in Scampton for a plan that was never going to work. That money should have gone on Lincoln County Hospital. "What we want to see is the site used for proper commercial purposes. It should be bringing in jobs. It should be reflecting the heritage of RAF Scampton. "Obviously, there is an issue in relation to asylum seekers that needs to be dealt with, but RAF Scampton should be for different purposes and that's what I've always said." Sarah Carter, from Save Our Scampton, said: "We're nearly a year down the line and we're still none the wiser what's going to happen here. "All that money wasted, and they're still wasting it. It's just haemorrhaging money, and we want an end to this so we can stop spending the money and so we know what's going to be happening." Backed by West Lindsey District Council, Scampton Holdings wants to develop the site. They're keen to push ahead with its regeneration plans to create a hub for heritage, aviation, defence and space. In a report shared with ITV News - the company said the project would bring in £5m every year to the local visitor economy, support more than 750 jobs, and generate an estimated £25m. Sally Grindrod-Smith is heavily involved in the West Lindsey District Council's plans for the regeneration with Scampton Holdings. She said: "I hear on a daily basis how frustrated the community are. You can see the site is deteriorating rapidly and there's real concerns over whether we'll be able to bring this back into use. "We've worked hard to make sure there are still investors interested, and our development partners are ready to go. "The council are committed, and we're ready to go once the home office get ready to sell the site." A Home Office spokesperson said: 'A review carried out in September 2024 determined that, due to decisions taken by the previous government, the costs associated with the Scampton site had surged well beyond initial estimates and no longer delivered value for money for taxpayers. 'The cost of exiting this site was minimal compared to the projected minimum £180 million required to keep it running until March 2027.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Letter: Malcolm Dean obituary
As a young researcher trying to understand the British media's obsession with social security 'scroungers' in the 1970s I came to appreciate the invaluable answers that the Guardian journalist Malcolm Dean gave to my endless questions. He was a crucial resource in my studies, later published in book form as Images of Welfare (1982). Over subsequent years we had frequent conversations, many of which surfaced, I'm sure, as 'academics are saying …' inserts into his social policy leaders. His own book, Democracy Under Attack (2011), was an informed insider discussion of the ways social policy matters reached public awareness through the media. His experience, knowledge and insight are much missed, and his generous contribution to my own understanding will always be deeply valued.
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Police should release immigration information about charged suspects
The Reform UK leader said that he 'absolutely' believes that information should be made available by police forces. It comes as Mr Farage and the youngest council leader in the country, George Finch, have claimed there has been a 'cover-up' of details about an alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. Two men who are reportedly Afghan asylum seekers have been charged in relation to the alleged incident in the Warwickshire town. Asked at a press conference on Monday whether the police should release the names, addresses and immigration status of people after they have been charged with an offence, Mr Farage said: 'What caused unrest on our streets after Southport last year was us not being told the status of the attacker. 'That led to crazy conspiracy theories spreading online.' Pushed later on whether the details should be published, Mr Farage said: 'I absolutely think that they should.' At the same press conference, Mr Farage linked a perceived lack of information from police about what happened in Nuneaton to what happened in Southport last July, telling a Westminster press conference that he wanted to discuss a 'cover-up that in many ways is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings last year'. He later told the event: 'It is not … in any way at all a contempt of court for the British public to know the identity of those who allegedly have committed serious crimes. 'I felt that in the wake of the Southport attacks, and I feel that ever more strongly today.' Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was arrested on July 26 and charged the next day with rape, according to Warwickshire Police. He appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court last Monday and has been remanded in custody. Mohammad Kabir, 23, was arrested in Nuneaton on Thursday and charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape of a girl under 13, the force added. He appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court on Saturday and has been remanded in custody. Warwickshire Police did not deny a Mail On Sunday report which said Mulakhil and Kabir are asylum seekers. In a statement, the force said that once someone is charged with an offence, they follow national guidance, which 'does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status'. Mr Finch, the 19-year-old leader of Warwickshire County Council, told Monday's press conference that he was 'begging' for information about the two to be released in the wake of the charges. He said he had emailed the council's chief executive to say that he wished to speak to the police force and urge them to release information about the men's immigration status. Mr Finch also said he later had written a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and the chief constable of Warwickshire Police which called for the immediate release of the immigration status of the two. Mr Finch said he would be working to 'fight against' houses of multiple occupancy (HMOs) that are housing 'illegal immigrants' and also claimed that Reform UK need to 'change things' and are 'the last line of defence against the blob, the cover-ups'. In his letter to Ms Cooper, published on X on Sunday, Mr Finch claimed that a 'cover-up' of immigration status 'risks public disorder breaking out on the streets of Warwickshire'. 'Having my ear to the ground locally, it is clear that there is much appetite for protests to take place across the county,' the letter adds. Asked if police should release the ethnicity of people charged with offences, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said the police and courts were operationally independent but the principle was to be 'as transparent as possible'. He said: 'We've always said and continue to say that transparency is important. 'That is our position. For police up to central government, we should always be as transparent as possible when it comes to cases.' He added: 'This is clearly a deeply upsetting and distressing case which the public are right to feel shocked and angry about. In relation to this case, the individuals have been charged and we are now in a live investigation.'
