logo
Family of missing Sydney teenager issue desperate plea for help

Family of missing Sydney teenager issue desperate plea for help

9 News30-06-2025
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here The family of a western Sydney teenager who has been missing for a week have issued a desperate plea for help from the public. Aanisha Sathik, 18, left home near Park Road in Auburn about 1pm on Monday, June 23, with no phone or money. Police believe Sathik may have walked south on Harrow Road and entered Norman Park in Auburn about 3pm that same day. Aanisha Sathik, 18, left home near Park Road in Auburn at around 1pm on Monday. (9News) She is described as being of Indian/Sub-Continental appearance, 180 centimetres tall, of slim build, with long black hair in a bun and brown eyes. Sathik was last seen wearing a black hooded jumper, long black pants with cream pinstripes, white shoes, and gold earrings. Police have tracked her last known movements via CCTV when she was seen on the corner of Woodburn Road and Stone Street in Berala. Police and family hold concerns for Sathik's welfare. Police have tracked her last known movements via CCTV, (9News) Sathik's father asked the public for help. (9News) Her father tearfully asked the public for help. "Please find my daughter very soon," he said. "We are asking you at home for help." NSW Police Superintendent Robert Toynton urged members of the community to be on the lookout for the missing teenager around homes and backyards. Sydney
missing persons
New South Wales
national
Australia
police
NSW police CONTACT US
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Your honour, it was an honour: My courtroom victory
Your honour, it was an honour: My courtroom victory

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Your honour, it was an honour: My courtroom victory

This story is part of the July 19 edition of Good Weekend. See all 16 stories. Outside the courtroom, I kneel on the floor, wracked with tension. Anxiety puts me close to the ground, nearing foetal position, while on the other side of a door, a policeman views bodycam footage of the incident, my fate swinging on the variable scales of justice. Earlier, I'd sat among other defendants as a magistrate heard an array of misdemeanours, each one met with a corresponding punishment. A young Indian student, studying AI by day and delivering pizzas at night, nabbed driving while his licence was suspended after an earlier speeding breach. A woman caught drink-driving (she blew .113). A man with family in tow, facing the music after riding his black BMW motorbike at 90km/h in a 60km/h zone: three-month loss of licence and $500 fine. Here, on a Monday morning, is the ­everyday drama of the courts, all of us finding ourselves on the wrong side of the law, for one reason or another, and processed now as a job lot. Some dress up for the occasion. A mum sits with a daughter who bats flamboyant false eyelashes; three young men, perhaps foot­ballers, wearing blue suits that pull too tight across the shoulders, sip water as lawyers with product in their hair lean into them, looking as though they're hatching a conspiracy. Most of us accused come as we are. A bloke seated beside me says he's been here before; lost his licence a while back, but is now trying to repeal an old intervention order: 'I was a dick 10 years ago. But I'm not a dick now.' Around a campfire in the mountains, my eldest boy once asked: 'Dad, have you ever been to prison?' Children are intuitive. My boys know I'm wary of authority, ask questions, am unafraid to make a stand against what I think is unjust. And fair cop; often enough I do look a bit jailbirdy. I tell him a truth: I have been locked up inside a prison van, at a protest in the city. It's still unclear if I was accused of 'obstructing the police' or 'obstructing the peace' (both hogwash). I joined a schoolteacher dressed as a bumblebee, among other detainees. My only crime was to be wearing a bright orange roadworker's shirt. All of us were released later in parkland, like relocating possums. And I've had plenty of days in court. One case heard in Sydney was dismissed after my opening line: 'The day after the AFL Grand Final last year, I caught a plane to Delhi.' Sydney had won the game; lawyers on the door out surmised the judge was a Swans supporter. It was the pettiest of traffic infringements. One school holiday I took my two boys and a friend's son to the Melbourne Magistrates' Court – as evidence, of sorts. While my restless assistants crawled under the seats, a court clerk approached, asked my name, expedited the case. The matter was a parking fine, ­incurred outside my boys' primary school while delivering a six-metre length of slotted PVC pipe for a mint 'drip garden' I was building beneath the drinking taps. Penalty waived. I've written a letter to a council contesting a fine, outlining the differences between a ­barrier kerb and a semi-mountable kerb, and never heard back. And I've jogged the breadth of a CBD, bursting through the court doors as my case was about to be heard, out of breath before one of our best-known magistrates. We had a chat, and your honour, it was an honour. I was let off. Three cans from the back of my ute had fallen onto the freeway, allegedly. That morning I was carrying 3639 other cans, 736 PET bottles and 17 liquid paperboard boxes, all trussed in large plastic bags. Children at various schools had collected them – along with glass bottles – and I'd helped with the sorting and counting, encouraging them to find ways to understand numbers. We'd had fun, and each week I'd documented the activity for their newsletters. Our goal was to raise $5000 for an Afghan refugee family, 10 cents at a time, through a container deposit scheme. The highway patrolman was wholly uninterested in our enterprise. Loading Before the court, I suggest an error in the police account: my payload was indeed 'tied down properly', but in tightening a winch strap, I may have pinched a hole in a bag. Bodycam footage was observed; the source of the alleged three loose cans is inconclusive. Shown the footage, my first thought: 'Geez, I looked trim last winter.' Then I see myself scouring the roadside, picking up more cans, straight after the senior ­constable pulled me over to write out a $288 ticket. I collected litter as he watched, gun on hip. Wording on the preliminary brief – a statement of alleged facts – is amended, and back in the court, the judge seems to warm to my plight. A conversation is started, there is to-and-fro, and she suggests I plead guilty and the court could use its power of discretion. In a suburban courtroom on a Monday morning, I am the only defendant to be let off the hook. I've had my say and, turning to leave, all are smiling, including the magistrate. Here is kindness, an understanding, and I tell her I could hug her, but that would be inappropriate. Yes, it would, she says.

Your honour, it was an honour: My courtroom victory
Your honour, it was an honour: My courtroom victory

The Age

time3 days ago

  • The Age

Your honour, it was an honour: My courtroom victory

This story is part of the July 19 edition of Good Weekend. See all 16 stories. Outside the courtroom, I kneel on the floor, wracked with tension. Anxiety puts me close to the ground, nearing foetal position, while on the other side of a door, a policeman views bodycam footage of the incident, my fate swinging on the variable scales of justice. Earlier, I'd sat among other defendants as a magistrate heard an array of misdemeanours, each one met with a corresponding punishment. A young Indian student, studying AI by day and delivering pizzas at night, nabbed driving while his licence was suspended after an earlier speeding breach. A woman caught drink-driving (she blew .113). A man with family in tow, facing the music after riding his black BMW motorbike at 90km/h in a 60km/h zone: three-month loss of licence and $500 fine. Here, on a Monday morning, is the ­everyday drama of the courts, all of us finding ourselves on the wrong side of the law, for one reason or another, and processed now as a job lot. Some dress up for the occasion. A mum sits with a daughter who bats flamboyant false eyelashes; three young men, perhaps foot­ballers, wearing blue suits that pull too tight across the shoulders, sip water as lawyers with product in their hair lean into them, looking as though they're hatching a conspiracy. Most of us accused come as we are. A bloke seated beside me says he's been here before; lost his licence a while back, but is now trying to repeal an old intervention order: 'I was a dick 10 years ago. But I'm not a dick now.' Around a campfire in the mountains, my eldest boy once asked: 'Dad, have you ever been to prison?' Children are intuitive. My boys know I'm wary of authority, ask questions, am unafraid to make a stand against what I think is unjust. And fair cop; often enough I do look a bit jailbirdy. I tell him a truth: I have been locked up inside a prison van, at a protest in the city. It's still unclear if I was accused of 'obstructing the police' or 'obstructing the peace' (both hogwash). I joined a schoolteacher dressed as a bumblebee, among other detainees. My only crime was to be wearing a bright orange roadworker's shirt. All of us were released later in parkland, like relocating possums. And I've had plenty of days in court. One case heard in Sydney was dismissed after my opening line: 'The day after the AFL Grand Final last year, I caught a plane to Delhi.' Sydney had won the game; lawyers on the door out surmised the judge was a Swans supporter. It was the pettiest of traffic infringements. One school holiday I took my two boys and a friend's son to the Melbourne Magistrates' Court – as evidence, of sorts. While my restless assistants crawled under the seats, a court clerk approached, asked my name, expedited the case. The matter was a parking fine, ­incurred outside my boys' primary school while delivering a six-metre length of slotted PVC pipe for a mint 'drip garden' I was building beneath the drinking taps. Penalty waived. I've written a letter to a council contesting a fine, outlining the differences between a ­barrier kerb and a semi-mountable kerb, and never heard back. And I've jogged the breadth of a CBD, bursting through the court doors as my case was about to be heard, out of breath before one of our best-known magistrates. We had a chat, and your honour, it was an honour. I was let off. Three cans from the back of my ute had fallen onto the freeway, allegedly. That morning I was carrying 3639 other cans, 736 PET bottles and 17 liquid paperboard boxes, all trussed in large plastic bags. Children at various schools had collected them – along with glass bottles – and I'd helped with the sorting and counting, encouraging them to find ways to understand numbers. We'd had fun, and each week I'd documented the activity for their newsletters. Our goal was to raise $5000 for an Afghan refugee family, 10 cents at a time, through a container deposit scheme. The highway patrolman was wholly uninterested in our enterprise. Loading Before the court, I suggest an error in the police account: my payload was indeed 'tied down properly', but in tightening a winch strap, I may have pinched a hole in a bag. Bodycam footage was observed; the source of the alleged three loose cans is inconclusive. Shown the footage, my first thought: 'Geez, I looked trim last winter.' Then I see myself scouring the roadside, picking up more cans, straight after the senior ­constable pulled me over to write out a $288 ticket. I collected litter as he watched, gun on hip. Wording on the preliminary brief – a statement of alleged facts – is amended, and back in the court, the judge seems to warm to my plight. A conversation is started, there is to-and-fro, and she suggests I plead guilty and the court could use its power of discretion. In a suburban courtroom on a Monday morning, I am the only defendant to be let off the hook. I've had my say and, turning to leave, all are smiling, including the magistrate. Here is kindness, an understanding, and I tell her I could hug her, but that would be inappropriate. Yes, it would, she says.

Bus driver who hit and killed man outside RAC Arena will plead guilty
Bus driver who hit and killed man outside RAC Arena will plead guilty

Sydney Morning Herald

time4 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Bus driver who hit and killed man outside RAC Arena will plead guilty

A Transperth bus driver who hit and killed 45-year-old father Praveen Matcha as he crossed the road outside RAC Arena last month has told a Perth court he will plead guilty and be sentenced next week. The Indian-born man known only as Rajiv, 37, appeared in Perth Magistrates Court on Friday for the first time to face two charges of careless driving causing death, grievous bodily harm or bodily harm over Matcha's death and injuries to a second person. Rajiv's lawyer Katherine Dowling told the court her client was ready to be sentenced but understood prosecutors and the magistrate needed to see footage of the incident caught by the bus' cameras. The footage was described in court as 'quite shocking'. The bus was turning onto Milligan Street from Wellington Street around 6.15pm on June 20 when it hit Matcha, pinning him under the vehicle. He died at the scene. Friends described him as the 'light in every room, known for his infectious smile, laughter, and the way he always encouraged us to be more and achieve more.' 'Whether you've known him for 15 years, nine months or ten days, you know how deeply he cared for us,' they said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store