Tesla says it started building initial versions of an affordable car, posts a steep sales decline
Elon Musk
's electric vehicle maker posted the worst quarterly sales decline in more than a decade and profit that missed Wall Street targets, but its profit margin on making cars was better than many feared.
"Tesla's disappointing results aren't surprising given the rocky road it's traveled recently. But the company maintains a strong foundation in the key growth sectors of
energy storage
, robotics, and AI-powered transportation. While traditional automakers like GM are gaining EV market share, we can expect that Tesla will continue pushing the needle on innovation if it can get a better handle on its current leadership distractions. Key challenges that will linger are supply chain risks related to its reliance on China and fierce competition from Chinese EV makers in that market.
Tesla doesn't need to choose between cars and future tech. There are technical synergies between EVs, robotaxis, energy systems, and robotics that could accelerate innovation across all fronts. The question is whether leadership can execute on this integrated vision in this fast-moving market."
Andrew Rocco, stock strategist, Zacks Investment Research, Chicago:
"Tesla delivered earnings Wednesday night that fell short of top-and-bottom line expectations slightly. Despite the earnings miss, Tesla shares were buoyed early by the fact that the bleeding in gross margins has seemingly come to a halt, with gross margins coming in at 17.2% versus Wall Street estimates of 16.5%. The gross margin beat is especially impressive when investors consider that Tesla has been offering generous incentives and lower prices to its consumers.
Coming in to the report, Wall Street expectations were dire amid a slowing core EV business and CEO Elon Musk's reputational damage on both sides of the political aisle. Nevertheless, Tesla has limped over the low bar that was a dramatic earnings miss and delivered earnings that were better than most feared.
Additionally, news broke right before the market closed that Tesla is in "early talks" with the state of Nevada to expand its
robotaxi service
. If Tesla can convince investors that it will scale its robotaxi service rapidly, shareholders will be more forgiving regarding the core EV business, as Musk and his team look to expand into new verticals, transitioning and diversifying the business."
Thomas Monteiro, senior analyst, investing.com:
"Although still far from what fundamentals would suggest for a trillion-dollar company, Tesla's latest numbers do spark some optimism, indicating that the worst is likely behind it-at least in terms of the core auto business.
Given the plethora of headwinds faced during the difficult Q2 - both internally and on the macro front - margin deterioration appears to have come in at the lower end of the curve. When combined with improving cyclical demand dynamics in markets like China and parts of the US, this suggests that full-year results might not be as dire as previously expected following the disastrous first half of the year.
This also shows that the company has weathered the tariff storm somewhat better than initially projected, optimizing the production/delivery equation in the US. While it remains unclear how much of a hit regulatory credits will take in Q3, it's evident the company will need to continue refining its production strategy elsewhere to better navigate the second half.
From this perspective, recent product announcements are aligned with those strategic needs-particularly around the highly anticipated
Model 2
. With Tesla entering the Indian market and working to regain ground in China, we view this as a potential game-changer for H2.
All things considered-and while we're still a ways off from seeing true fundamental support for the current share price-the outlook for the core business is looking somewhat better. This could continue to support Tesla's long-term transition into a fully AI/robotics-driven company, which appears to be where Musk is placing his bets."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Waymo to launch autonomous ride-hailing in Dallas next year
Alphabet's Waymo said on Monday it will roll out its autonomous ride-hailing service in Dallas in 2026, accelerating its US expansion as electric vehicle maker Tesla pushes to grow its recently launched robotaxi business . After years of cautious growth, Waymo has recently increased its pace, launching in new cities through partnerships with ride-hailing platforms and fleet operators. In Dallas, Waymo will operate through a new multi-year partnership with car rental company Avis Budget Group, which will manage fleet operations, including maintenance and depot infrastructure, Waymo said in a blog. Waymo currently serves more than 250,000 paid trips every week with about 1,500 vehicles in cities such as Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Austin. This year, Waymo began its service in Austin exclusively on the Uber platform, months before Tesla started a limited robotaxi trial in the city with about a dozen Model Y SUVs and a human safety monitor in the front passenger seat. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has said the company will rapidly expand its robotaxi services to other US cities and is seeking regulatory approval from California, Nevada, Florida, and Arizona. Commercializing autonomous vehicles has been challenging, with several companies such as GM's Cruise shutting down after collisions, recalls, and federal investigations. Amazon-backed Zoox is among the few still operating, preparing to launch commercial services later this year. Until Tesla's Austin trial, Waymo was the only company to operate paid driverless taxis in the United States. Rides will be available through the Waymo app. The company is also planning launches in Miami and Washington, D.C., in 2026 as part of its broader national rollout. The collaboration is part of Avis' broader strategy to evolve from a traditional rental car company into a mobility services provider.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tesla signs $16.5 billion chip supply deal with Samsung
Tesla has signed a $16.5 billion agreement with Samsung Electronics to source chips, a move that could support the South Korean firm's contract chip manufacturing unit, which has been under financial pressure, reported Reuters. The deal comes as Samsung, the world's largest memory chipmaker, seeks to increase its share in the foundry market where it trails rivals such as Taiwan's TSMC and South Korea's SK Hynix. According to Samsung, the agreement will run through the end of 2033, although it initially withheld the client's name citing confidentiality. Reuters, citing three sources familiar with the matter, confirmed Tesla as the customer. Manufacturing in Texas Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that Samsung's new semiconductor facility in Taylor, Texas, will manufacture Tesla's next-generation AI6 chips. 'Samsung agreed to allow Tesla to assist in maximizing manufacturing efficiency,' Musk said in a post on X. 'This is a critical point, as I will walk the line personally to accelerate the pace of progress. And the fab is conveniently located not far from my house,' he added. Musk also noted that the $16.5 billion figure was a minimum estimate and that actual output could be significantly higher. Samsung's Taylor facility had faced delays and lacked major clients, leading to a postponement of ASML chipmaking equipment deliveries, according to a Reuters report from October. The start of production at the plant has been deferred to 2026. Ryu Young-ho, a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities, said the order was significant for the Taylor fab, which had "virtually no customers," although it may represent a relatively small portion of Samsung's overall logic chip revenue annually. Strategic implications While a timeline for AI6 chip production was not disclosed, Musk had earlier said AI5 chips would be produced by the end of 2026, suggesting AI6 might follow in 2027 or 2028. Tesla's current AI4 chips, which power its Full Self-Driving system, are produced by Samsung, while TSMC is expected to produce the AI5 chip. The deal also highlights Tesla's shifting supplier strategy and its involvement in chip design and production efficiency. Samsung's foundry business, which manufactures logic chips for clients, currently holds just 8% of the global market compared to TSMC's 67%, according to Trendforce data. Pak Yuak, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, estimated that Samsung's foundry losses exceeded 5 trillion won (approximately $3.6 billion) in the first half of the year. The Tesla deal is expected to reduce some of these losses. It is not yet clear whether the agreement is linked to ongoing trade discussions between South Korea and the United States. A South Korean trade ministry official told Reuters he was not aware of the deal being part of any negotiations.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Apple isn't leaving China. Its footprint is getting harder to see.
Apple's plans to make iPhones in India, components in Vietnam, and build new hubs across Southeast Asia reflect a meaningful effort to diversify away from China. But they tell only part of the story. In March, Apple CEO Tim Cook announced a new $99 million clean energy fund during a visit to Beijing. He didn't disclose project locations or recipients—only that Apple's commitment to China was 'expanding." The announcement came just two months before Chinese regulators delayed Apple's rollout of generative artificial intelligence features, the Financial Times reported. Those developments show how even one of China's most entrenched U.S. companies may face political and commercial friction as it tries to do business in both countries. As geopolitical pressure intensifies and investors look for clarity on decoupling, Apple's recent maneuvers offer a lesson for global businesses: A company need not leave China entirely so long as it can more effectively hide itself within it. Apple's behavior over the past several years shows it recalibrating its exposure to the actors and regions in China that carry reputational or regulatory risk. But it isn't ceasing to do business in China. Rather, Apple has stepped back from some of its direct affiliations and reduced its visibility without severing its ties to the business ecosystem in China, which remains dominated by the Chinese Communist Party. This model is instructive for other multinationals operating in China and other complex authoritarian environments. Confrontation and divestment are costly. Structural opacity, by contrast, offers flexibility—and protection. Apple needs to remain in good standing with regulators on both sides of the Pacific. That has led to unusual arrangements in China's western Xinjiang region. The Chinese Communist Party's policies of mass surveillance and forced labor there have deservedly drawn international condemnation. Congress passed the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act in 2021, banning imports tied to forced labor in Xinjiang. Many Western businesses have withdrawn entirely from doing business in Xinjiang. In 2016, Apple announced that it had taken minority stakes in four wind power projects in China as part of a strategy to decarbonize its supply chain. The projects were developed in collaboration with Goldwind, one of China's largest wind turbine makers. Goldwind has strong ties to state-led infrastructure planning and to Xinjiang. The company was formerly called Xinjiang Goldwind but dropped the word from its name in 2023. Though not sanctioned by the U.S., Goldwind has faced criticism for its ties to Xinjiang from European and U.S. politicians for its suspected ties to forced labor. An investigation by the Tech Transparency Project, a nonprofit organization, and The Information, a tech and business publication, linked Goldwind to state-run labor transfer programs and construction projects involving the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a U.S.-sanctioned paramilitary entity. U.S. pressure over forced labor in Xinjiang intensified in 2020. Companies such as H&M and Nike, which issued statements addressing forced labor allegations, faced backlash on social media in China. By 2021, Apple's affiliated entities no longer appeared as shareholders in the Goldwind wind projects in Xinjiang. Corporate filings, reviewed in a Chinese business registration database, indicate that the equity stakes were transferred to subsidiaries controlled by Goldwind. Apple didn't publicly disclose the move, and no mention appeared in its environmental or investor reporting: Apple's investment shift is being revealed here for the first time. Apple didn't respond to requests for comment. The company has addressed allegations of forced labor involving Xinjiang in at least one other case, saying it regularly audits its supply chain to avoid the practice. It cut ties with a Chinese supplier that had been accused of forced labor in 2021, Bloomberg reported. Apple may have found other investing strategies that allow it to maintain relationships with Chinese entities in less visible ways. In 2018, Apple had announced it and 10 Chinese suppliers would invest $300 million in China Clean Energy Fund. That fund allows Apple's capital to reach state-linked firms and potentially sensitive regions without appearing in public filings. Among the beneficiaries of the fund, disclosed in a Chinese business registration database, is China General Nuclear Power Group, a state-owned firm added to the U.S. Entity List in 2019 for military ties. U.S. companies face sharp restrictions on doing business with companies on the list. The initial clean energy fund, designed to last just four years, ended in 2022. This year, Apple announced a successor fund worth approximately $99 million during Cook's visit to Beijing—but this time disclosed neither project locations nor recipient companies, continuing its reliance on indirect investment vehicles. This isn't a retreat from China but a careful reconfiguration—one that allows Apple to meet its clean-energy goals while addressing government sensitivities in both the U.S. and China. In 2024, Apple ranked third for China exposure of large U.S. companies in Strategy Risks SR 250 rankings; it has since dropped to 27th. Apple continues to operate at scale within China's commercial and political systems, while relying on structures that make its presence less legible to outside observers. The company meets regulatory expectations in both Washington and Beijing, while it avoids direct exposure that could invite retaliation from either. U.S. sanctions law covers physical imports from Xinjiang, but it doesn't restrict capital flows. Financial contributions routed through investment vehicles, such as the CCEF, are legally safe—even if reputational risk persists. Apple isn't exiting China. It has re-engineered its presence there to be less visible and harder for outsiders to trace. Its energy partnerships, once direct and disclosed, are now filtered through funds. In Xi Jinping's China, the companies that endure aren't the ones that speak out. The ones that endure are the ones that adapt—and recede from transparency. Guest commentaries like this one are written by authors outside the Barron's newsroom. They reflect the perspective and opinions of the authors. Submit feedback and commentary pitches to ideas@
