
Opinion divided on permission for 144 new Jersey homes
Permission was also granted for eight two-bedroom bungalows, four two-bedroom apartments and eight one-bedroom flats.Developers said 45% of the new homes would be made available for social rental, while 55% would be released for discounted purchase.The application also includes a shared open space, bike parking, and changes to the road layout - including making part of La Verte Rue easier for people to walk on.
The proposals have been under development for some time, and were the subject of a parish assembly vote last summer.But some residents who wrote letters of objection claimed consultation had been insufficient.Others raised concerns about the increased pressure 128 new homes might place on local services."The schools are packed as they are," said Trent Weber, who lives nearby."Traffic is a nightmare even before we start doing these works so basically how are we going to get in, how are we going to get out, what's the plan?".
Former planning minister John Young spearheaded the development of the bridging island plan before leaving politics in 2022.He said the document - which dictates planning rules - sought to make provision for more than 4,000 new homes, needed at the time due to increases in the island's population.But Mr Young, who was speaking as new figures highlighted the island's falling birth rate, said data showed circumstances had changed."Originally I wanted to see a smaller extension of the village area," he said, "and so I do query why we needed to do such a very large development at St Peter."He questioned the impact on the Beaumont junction."I would have personally, if I'd been in office, wanted to see those number of homes kept down to a smaller number," he said.
In their planning application, developers Forge Developments and Godel Architects said the site's location would "support a reduction in the demand for travel by the private car, although it was "perhaps inevitable" traffic congestion would occur at peak times.They said there had been "repeated public consultation" and they were "confident that the level of consultation" had satisfied planning policies and regulations."The result is a first-class scheme on a rezoned site - unanimously approved by all seven members of the planning committee," they added.
16 new homes at Sion - approved
Forge Developments is also behind approved plans for 16 new, affordable homes on field T1404 in Trinity, which was also rezoned for housing in the 2022 island plan.The scheme includes three two-bedroom houses, 11 three-bedroom houses and two four-bedroom houses.As with the development in St Peter, 45% of the new homes will be made available for social rental, while 55% will be released for discounted purchase.An initial application for homes on the site was rejected by the planning committee earlier this year.
Some nearby residents raised concerns about access, traffic and impact on local services.A separate development of 37 new properties is currently being built on the other side of La Grande Route de St Jean, next to Sion Methodist Church.Bonny's Country Garden borders the site of the 16 new properties.Owner Alan Bonny said he was concerned the development would overshadow his business. "The main worry is that it's going to put a lot of shade over the tunnel where we grow. You can't grow without light," he said.He continued: "You can't build a second St Helier up in Sion. We have to spread the load a little bit."Apart from that there will be noise from the tunnels. We have to keep fans on to keep the air moving. People won't like that, they'll complain."
In comments to the planning committee, Forge Developments and Morris Architects said plans for a hedge, due to be planted on the site boundary, had been "reduced in height and form" since initial proposals were rejected in January 2025.They said a technical assessment demonstrated "extremely small overshadowing impacts" and they also had a "noise mitigation strategy".They added the proposals had been developed in consultation with the government's transport team, and the level of traffic expected would be "entirely manageable".The application was approved on condition noise testing was conducted before residents moved in.
42 sheltered housing units - rejected
While its members reached unanimous decisions on the other two proposals, Jersey's planning committee was split over plans for 42 units of sheltered housing on land next to St Joseph's Care Home in St Helier.The applicants, Aedifica JE (St Josephs) Limited, sought permission for 38 one-bed properties and four two-bed homes.
The application received 166 public comments. Many raised concerns residents of the existing care home might be adversely affected by construction of the new properties, a lack of parking spaces, and that trees would be removed."There's such a large variety of mature trees there," said environmental campaigner Sheena Brockie."It's on the outskirts of town and it would be alive with lots of different biodiversity, lots of wildlife using that space. "But it's also the community value for the people in the care home. "They're in a room, perhaps not as mobile as they used to be, and actually they're right in the midst of nature - so why take all that away and clear the land?"
In planning documents, the applicants said: "Trees have been central to the design process from the start and have clearly had a substantial influence to the design and layout. "The submitted plans show the retention of the majority of trees, including the best trees on site as well as large areas of green space".They added: "Whilst it is fully understood that any construction work within a care home setting will be undesirable, with careful consideration the impacts can be understood and managed."Two members of the planning committee backed the application, but four refused it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Cotswold council criticises government housing targets
Cotswold council leaders say speculative developers are "honing in on greenfield sites" following the Government's new "moronic" housing government's changes to the way housing targets for each area are calculated mean Cotswold District Council's housing needs have more than Cotswolds are in desperate need of affordable housing to help retain the district's around 80% of the land is protected for its natural beauty and distinctive character. According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Cotswold District Council is among many authorities told they will have to allocate more land to accommodate thousands of new homes each leader Mike Evemy told a meeting on 16 July he would write to Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner setting out the Cotswold District's unique Evemy said: "In December 2024, new government housing targets were imposed on this district."A district where 80% of the land, 790 square miles, is designated national landscape. Now we have a housing target of 1,036 new homes per year up from 420." Former council leader Joe Harris described the target as "moronic" and blasted the Government for putting the Cotswold District in an "impossible position". He said he could not believe the Labour government's housing targets when they were released in December. Cllr Harris added: "They've doubled our target, so that means a thousand homes a year, predominantly going in areas that are in the 20% not in the area of outstanding natural beauty."It is madness and it has definitely been done on a spreadsheet by civil servants somewhere, I hope. Because no politician could put their name to this, quite frankly."


BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Controversial Kings Heath low traffic scheme set for expansion
Birmingham City Council is pushing ahead with the second phase of a divisive Kings Heath traffic scheme, with new 20mph speed limits and one-way streets suburb's Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) has previously split opinion, with restrictions banning through traffic on certain streets proving particularly council said it wanted to reduce traffic in residential neighbourhoods to try to make it safer for people to walk and it also acknowledged the scheme had been "controversial" and there were "strong feelings both in favour and against." So far, so-called modal filters have been introduced to the west of Kings Heath High Street and a section of York Road has been proposed second phase of the scheme would deliver the "planned full expansion" to the east of the High Street and into south would also mitigate the displacement of traffic caused by the "previous partial implementation of the scheme".According to a council report, the second phase would be split into four packages:Revision and consolidation of the temporary measures located mostly to the west of the High measures to the east of the High Street including new modal filters, one-way streets, and traffic calming.20mph speed limit across the project area, including all boundary roads, and traffic calming measures along Coldbath of a bus gate on Addison Road and reinstatement of the right turn from Vicarage Road onto A435 Alcester Road. 'Strong opinions' At a meeting on Tuesday, cabinet members at the Labour-run council agreed to approve the full business case for the first two MacDonald, an NHS doctor appointed road safety commissioner by West Midlands mayor Richard Parker, welcomed the leader at Birmingham City Council, Sharon Thompson added "I think everybody is broadly in agreement that to do nothing is not an option."But the Birmingham Conservative Group said it would scrap the LTN in Kings Heath if it took control of the council, saying the scheme made it harder for many residents to visit high street cabinet member for transport, Majid Mahmood, acknowledged the project had "sparked strong opinions", adding that was why the council had "held seven rounds of consultation, listened to feedback and crucially made changes to the design." This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Brittany Ferries: 'Morel's comments are ridiculous'
A ferry company has hit back at claims made by Jersey's economic development minister, that problems with the inter-island ferry service are due to Guernsey ending the joint tender process before Jersey had made its decision. A spokesperson for Brittany Ferries, which won the Guernsey contract, said there must be "something in the deputy's water" after the comments from Deputy Kirsten made the comments after DFDS, Jersey's ferry operator had to cancel several inter island sailings because of tide and staffing Ferries described Morel's comments as "ridiculous." Initial plans for a single provider to serve both islands were disrupted last year when Guernsey announced they had chosen Brittany Ferries before Jersey had made it's decision. Jersey later chose DFDS leaving the two islands with separate DFDS was selected as Jersey's ferry operator, Morel said while an inter-island service wasn't a formal part of the tender process it was something the company understood it would have to asked if in hindsight an inter-island service should have been a formal part of the ferry tender process, Morel said: "What happened is that Guernsey ended the joint process and we had to go alone on our own process which meant we couldn't include Guernsey in that. So it's a moot point."Guernsey controls its own port and as I understand it prioritises the use of its port for that operator so it wasn't possible for us without having any of the information they had to include it in the tender process."It's had an effect on the inter-island service." In response to the minister's comments, Brittany Ferries said in a statement: "There must be something in the deputy's water. There can be no other explanation for such a ridiculous response to the withdrawal of DFDS inter-island services."No doubt, Jersey residents and businesses will see through this for what is."Just a reminder: the reason DFDS were disqualified from the first bid process was a clause that allowed them to change schedules on whim, up prices at their convenience and change service levels with impunity.""Et voila, Deputy Morel: all your chickens are coming home to roost."DFDS has been contacted for a comment.