Surrey residents' view on unitary authorities has been published
The government announced in December that the two-tier council system would be abolished, with areas also having elected mayors.Nine borough and district councils in Surrey are backing a proposal for three unitary councils, while Crawley and Reigate & Banstead have also developed a plan which would see those two areas being combined.Seventy-two per cent of the residents who took part in the SCC panel in February said they agreed that councils should have more powers and funding from central government.People were also asked what outcomes they wanted from the changes, with the three top answers being: better value for money from councils when delivering services, clearer accountability and more financially resilient authorities.
'Open and transparent'
Catherine Powell, leader of the Residents' Association and Independent Group at SCC, said the information from the panel showed higher support for three authorities."I'd like to see the full survey," she told BBC Radio Surrey."I'd like to see what questions were asked, what the answers to the questions were [and] exactly what percentage of people supported which…because that is open and transparent."In his letter, Oliver, who has previously criticised a consultation by the boroughs and districts, said the panel was "broadly representative of Surrey's population"."The overall data lacked consensus with 40% disagreeing or strongly disagreeing with both two and three unitaries," he said."Therefore, our final plan includes the more in-depth and directive responses on preferred outcomes to local government reorganisation."He added that those responses had provided "a clearer understanding of what residents want… and this is what we have focused on addressing".In a statement to Parliament on 3 June, Jim McMahon, Minister for Local Government and English Devolution, said: "I am pleased to inform the House that we received proposals for unitary local government from councils in Surrey, and I will provide the House with a full update shortly."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Calls for 20mph limit on Newhaven road after girl hit by car
Residents have called for a 20mph speed limit and pedestrian crossing on an East Sussex road where a four-year-old girl was hit by a car.A petition calling for improved safety measures on Lewes Road, Newhaven, launched after the child was injured on Monday, has more than 400 was taken by air ambulance to King's College Hospital in London where she Sussex County Council wished the girl a speedy recovery and said it will consider the petition when it is received. James MacCleary, MP for Lewes, said at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday that the girl was recovering well in hospital but that residents living in the area have been "warning how unsafe these roads are" around Seaford and Porritt, who has lived on the 30mph road for 40 years, said: "It's very busy, especially in rush hour times it's a nightmare. There's nowhere to cross."There's been a few accidents on this road. It's just a race track, it's not safe for children or the elderly." Carol White, another resident, said the road was used as a "cut through instead of the A26"."I was walking to my allotment on Sunday and a car was doing 70mph in a 50mph [road] leading into the town," she said. "No-one stops to let pedestrians cross."Mark Bunker, who has lived in the road for two years, said: "It's a very busy road, it's fast. "There's a blind spot at the top which is a high risk [area] for an incident."There was a really sad incident the other day. If there was a measure that could be looked at to reduce the speed, I think that would be a good idea."MacCleary asked Prime Minister Keir Starmer if he would intervene to unblock the funding needed to make the A259 and surrounding areas PM gave his "sympathies" to the family and the added that he had heard "a lot about this road" [the A259] and knew "it needs addressing".
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her
The trouble with Kemi Badenoch is that if she sees someone lying on the ground, she can't resist the temptation to kick them. She lacks empathy, to put it politely. There she was at Prime Minister's Questions, facing an open goal for a change, and attacking the prime minister, who, even three days later, can look after himself. Then she spots the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, her lip quivering, seemingly on the brink of crying. Straight in goes the Badenoch boot – she said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and described her as Starmer's 'human shield'. After Starmer failed to confirm Reeves in post for the rest of the parliament – a tall order for any appointee – Badenoch piled on the punishment: 'How awful for the chancellor that he did not confirm she would be in post.' Surely it might have crossed the mind of the Tory leader that the reason the chancellor was displaying unusual emotion might not have been all to do with politics. Most of us, I'm sure, wondered if there'd been some other explanation, some other bad news of a personal nature, as No 10 later disclosed. Even if it was all about the welfare reform fiasco, is it right to treat parliamentary exchanges as blood sports? To revel in the misery of an adversary? To mock them personally for a show of emotion? In fact, it's emerged that in the post-PMQs huddle with the press, Badenoch's spokesman seemingly urged the journalists to go after Reeves. Asked, 'So no matter what is going on in your personal life, you should disclose that to the public?' he replied: 'I think we should find out what's going on'. I was going to say, 'We're all human,' but, giving as good as Badenoch does, there are times one wonders if she is. Through the debates about disability benefits – we're talking about some people in deep despair here – Badenoch sounded arrogant and dismissive. She implied they're all lazy. This was her message to disabled people last week, on X: 'The world owes no one a living. Millions of people cannot just sit on welfare and expect to be paid to do so. And if they don't like it, that's their problem, not the state's.' It was Badenoch at her very worst. Yes, it could work, politically, because there is a callous, wilfully ignorant strand of public opinion that resents any kind of social security system, full stop. Well, excluding the bits they're likely to use, such as the state retirement pension, thoroughly inflation-proofed under its 'triple lock'. Badenoch bangs on about welfare reform, but the biggest element is the old age pension, at three times the spending on sickness and disability benefits. Taming the welfare bill is practically impossible without doing something that hurts pensioners. But does she ever mention that? No, because they're the only demographic voting for her. I'm not sure that either her party or the public likes the Badenoch style. It can misfire, causing sympathy for the victim of her scorn rather than support for her argument. It's possible her aggressive approach to Tuesday's vote reminded some Labour rebels just how dangerous she is, and persuaded them to back the government after all. When she senselessly slagged off Starmer after the last Nato summit, where he had helped keep Donald Trump onside, she sounded negative and, as the PM put it, 'unserious'. One of her own MPs mildly rebuked her for putting party first. Badenoch doesn't connect with the public in the way Nigel Farage does, or Boris Johnson in his heyday. Robert Jenrick, who's continuing with his informal leadership campaign, is better at campaigning and forcing change on the government. Mel Stride is better in the Commons. She was fortunate this week that the government had been so useless that she had no alternative but to succeed. When she stumbles again, as she will, her party might start kicking her when she's down.
Sky News
30 minutes ago
- Sky News
CBI kicks off search for successor to ‘saviour' Soames
The CBI has begun a search for a successor to Rupert Soames, its chairman, as it continues its recovery from the crisis which brought it to the brink of collapse in 2023. Sky News has learnt that the business lobbying group's nominations committee has engaged headhunters to assist with a hunt for its next corporate figurehead. Mr Soames, the grandson of Sir Winston Churchill, was recruited by the CBI in late 2023 with the organisation lurching towards insolvency after an exodus of members. The group's handling of a sexual misconduct scandal saw it forced to secure emergency funding from a group of banks, even as it was frozen out of meetings with government ministers. One prominent CBI member described Mr Soames on Thursday as the group's "saviour". "Without his ability to bring members back, the organisation wouldn't exist today," they claimed. Mr Soames and Rain Newton-Smith, the CBI chief executive, have partly restored its influence in Whitehall, although many doubt that it will ever be able to credibly reclaim its former status as 'the voice of British business'. Its next chair, who is also likely to be drawn from a leading listed company boardroom, will take over from Mr Soames early next year. Egon Zehnder International is handling the search for the CBI. "The CBI chair's term typically runs for two years and Rupert Soames will end his term in early 2026," a CBI spokesperson said. "In line with good governance, we have begun the search for a successor to ensure continuity and a smooth transition."
