Strange red nova deaths of shrouded stars investigated by 'stellar Sherlocks'
The name "Intermediate Luminosity Red Transients" or "ILRTs" might not be an astronomical term you are familiar with, but these rare, brightness-shifting stars have been quite the mystery in astronomical terms.
Now, a team of cosmic detectives, who have dubbed their work "A Study in Scarlett" after the Arthur Conan Doyle novel that first introduced the world to Sherlock Holmes, may have finally cracked the case.
The stellar Sherlocks from across the globe suggest that ILRTs are stars that don't just erupt when they reach the end of their lives but experience "truly terminal" and destructive supernova explosions.
"Following the discovery of three new ILRTs in 2019, we seized the opportunity to study and better understand these phenomena," team leader and National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF) researcher Giorgio Valerin said in a statement. "We have, therefore, collected data for years through telescopes scattered around the world and even several telescopes in orbit.
"We have also resumed the observation campaign of NGC 300 OT, the closest ILRT ever observed, at 'just' six and a half million light-years from us."
The ground-based instruments used included La Palma, La Silla, Las Campanas, and Asiago, while data was also collected from space-based telescopes, including the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory (SWIFT), and the Spitzer space telescope.
ILRTs have been somewhat confusing because their brightness is between that of novas, stellar explosions that stars survive, and "classical" supernovas in which a massive star is destroyed, leaving behind a neutron star or a black hole.
The team reached their findings by observing the evolution of four ILRTs. They hoped that this would help them determine whether the star survives these explosions or is completely wiped out.
The key to solving this mystery was observing ILRTs like NGC 300 OT over long periods of time.
"The first images of NGC 300 OT date back to 2008, and in this work, we have observed it again to study its evolution after more than ten years," Valerin said. "The analysis of the images and spectra collected during these observing campaigns has allowed us to monitor the evolution over time of our targets, obtaining information such as the brightness, temperature, chemical composition, and gas velocities associated with each ILRT we have studied."
The Spitzer observations of NGC 300 OT showed this ILRT dimming to a tenth of the brightness of the progenitor star that created this eruption over the course of seven years. Spitzer's images of NGC 300 OT ended when they faded below the detection threshold of this NASA space telescope, which retired in 2020.
Just as Holmes made his name investigating many cases, the team had another set of ILRT data to peruse.
Analyzing JWST observations of the ILRT AT 2019abn located in the nearby galaxy Messier 51 (M51), they found that this transient is declining in brightness in such a way that it is likely to meet the same fate as NGC 300 OT by becoming fainter than its progenitor star.
From this information, the team concluded that ILRTs are explosions that see the total destruction of a star. That is despite the fact that ILRTs appear to be significantly weaker than "classical" core-collapse supernovas.
The question is, how do they remain fainter than similar supernova events?
The team of cosmic detectives suggests that a defining factor in the make-up of ILTRs could be a dense shroud of gas and dust that surrounds the progenitor stars.
This cocoon is heated to temperatures as great as around 10,300 degrees Fahrenheit (5,700 degrees Celsius) over just a few days. The peak in temperature corresponds with a peak in brightness for the ILRT.
As this happens, the gas in this stellar shroud accelerates to speeds as great as 1.6 million miles per hour (700 kilometers per second), which is around 1,000 times as fast as the top speed of a Lockheed Martin F-16 jet fighter.
"This speed is decidedly lower than that of an exploding supernova, which often reaches 10,000 kilometers per second [22 million mph],' team member and INAF researcher Leonardo Tartaglia said. "Yet, we believe that the star may have really exploded, throwing material at thousands of kilometers per second in every direction, but that this explosion was partially suffocated by the dense blanket of gas and dust around the star, which heats up as a consequence of the violent impact."
Thus, the launch of material from around the stellar progenitors of ILRTs can explain how they decrease in brightness over long periods of time.
The team termed this phenomenon an "electron capture supernova" a type of stellar explosion that has been long theorized but had not been believed to have been observed.
Electron-capture supernovas have been of great interest to astronomers because they seem to mark a boundary between stars of around 10 solar masses and more that explode in supernovas to leave behind black holes and neutron stars, and stars with masses more like the sun that don't "go nova" but fade away as white dwarf stellar remnants.
Related Stories:
— Dead stars within supernova explosions could solve the dark matter mystery in 10 seconds
— Could a supernova ever destroy Earth?
— Hubble Telescope sees rare supernova explosion as a violent 'pale blue dot' (image)
"We are finally seeing the events that separate stars destined to explode as classical supernovas from stars that will slowly fade away as white dwarfs," Valerin said.
Perhaps the team would agree with Holmes' words from The Sign of the Four: "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth!"The team's research was published across two papers on March 7 in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
This star escaped a supermassive black hole's violent grips — then returned for round 2
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A distant supermassive black hole may have bitten off more than it can chew! Not only did the star it selected for a stellar meal escape its clutches, but it came back for a second encounter! Evidence of the death-defying star was spotted in the form of a flare that was followed by a near-identical second flare around two years later (700 days). The double-flare has been given the designation AT 2022dbl. The team behind this research ruled out the possibility that it was caused by two stars being devoured by this black hole, leaving them to conclude the flares came from two "bites" of the same stellar snack. The discovery is the first evidence of a star escaping a destructive encounter with a supermassive black hole and then coming back to let it take a second bite. The big question is, did the star survive to return for a second rematch with the black hole? It could therefore change our view of so-called "tidal disruption events" or "TDEs" in which black holes rip apart stars and devour their remains, indicating this could just be the first act of a longer cosmic performance. Some black holes prefer a lighter meal Supermassive black holes with masses equal to that of millions or billions of suns dwell at the heart of all large galaxies. TDEs occur when unfortunate stars wander too close to these cosmic titans and experience their immense gravitational influence. This generates terrific tidal forces within the star that simultaneously squash it horizontally while stretching it vertically. This process, vividly known as "spaghettification," results in shredded stellar pasta, some of which falls around the black hole, wrapping around it like spaghetti around a fork, and is gradually fed to it. The rest of this material is blasted out from around the supermassive black hole. The material that remains swirls around the black hole at incredibly speeds, generating friction that causes bursts of light, and the ejected material also flares. These flares last weeks to months, illuminating the region around the supermassive black hole, allowing it to be studied. However, over the last decade, some TDEs have been observed that don't behave the way scientists would expect. That is because both the temperature and brightness of some TDEs have been lower than expected. AT 2022dbl could explain this by implying that some black holes like to savour their stellar meals rather than immediately and totally destroying them. The team now wants to know if the third time is the charm for this daring star. If it survived its second black hole encounter, the star will swoop back toward the black hole, causing a third flare around 700 days after the second. "The question now is whether we'll see a third flare after two more years, in early 2026," team member and Tel Aviv University researcher Iair Arcavi said in a statement. "If we see a third flare, it means that the second one was also the partial disruption of the star. "So maybe all such flares, which we have been trying to understand for a decade now as full stellar disruptions, are not what we thought." Related Stories: — New kind of pulsar may explain how mysterious 'black widow' systems evolve — Hear 'black widow' pulsar's song as it destroys companion —NASA X-ray spacecraft reveals secrets of a powerful, spinning neutron star Should a third flare not erupt in two years, it would indicate that the star's second encounter with the black hole was fatal. Should this be the case, the similarity between the first flare and the second one would imply that non-fatal and fatal TDE flares, or partial and full disruptions, look the same. That is something that scientists had previously predicted but have never evidenced with observations. "Either way, we'll have to rewrite our interpretation of these flares and what they can teach us about the monsters lying in the centers of galaxies," Arcavi concluded. The team's research was published on July 1 in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
This camera was 370 million miles away when radiation fried the electronics. What NASA did next literally saved the mission
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As a photographer, I've known the horror of opening images to find them corrupted – but I imagine that feeling pales in comparison to what NASA felt when Juno, a spacecraft orbiting Jupiter 370 million miles away, began returning corrupted images from a radiation-fried camera. Launching another camera isn't exactly an option, considering the total costs of the Juno spacecraft and mission sit a $1.13 billion, and it's not like there's a camera repair shop on Jupiter. So what did NASA do? NASA took a risk and intentionally overheated the camera in an attempt to save it. Juno, a spacecraft studying Jupiter, successfully completed its primary mission in 34 orbits. But as the spacecraft continued to study the planet, around the 47th orbit, the images that Juno sent back were beginning to show signs of sensor damage. Nine orbits later, and nearly all of the images that Juno was sending back were corrupted, with lines running through the images and more graininess than normal. NASA scientists theorized that the damage was due to radiation. JunoCam – which is a color, visible light camera – is housed in a 'radiation vault' lined with titanium, NASA says, but Jupiter has some of the most intense radiation in the Solar System. Essentially, that camera is traveling through radiation as strong as 100 million X-rays. Based on clues, NASA researchers believed that the damage to the camera was in a voltage regulator. But how do you repair a component integral to a camera's power supply from 370 million miles away? NASA turned to a little-understood process called annealing, a procedure for heating up a material for a certain length of time, then allowing it to cool. Annealing has been shown to alter materials like silicone, an essential component in a camera's sensor and electronics. 'We knew annealing can sometimes alter a material like silicon at a microscopic level but didn't know if this would fix the damage,' Jacob Schaffner, a JunoCam engineer from Malin Space Science Systems in San Diego, said. 'We commanded JunoCam's one heater to raise the camera's temperature to 77 degrees Fahrenheit — much warmer than typical for JunoCam — and waited with bated breath to see the results.' After overheating the camera, JunoCam began sending back cleaner images. But after a few more orbits, continuing to venture further into the radiation with each pass, the images began returning with defects once again. No amount of post-processing was able to recover the data, Michael Ravine, the JunoCam Instrument Lead, said, but Juno was due to orbit near the moon Io at the time. The team, keen to photograph one of Jupiter's moons and continue gathering visual data from the mission, tried one more thing. 'With the close encounter of Io bearing down on us in a few weeks, it was Hail Mary time: The only thing left we hadn't tried was to crank JunoCam's heater all the way up and see if more extreme annealing would save us,' Ravine said. Test images showed improvement after the first week, then, finally, as Juno was making its close approach to Io, the camera returned images nearly as good as the day the spacecraft's first images were taken, allowing researchers to capture images of Io. Io is one of 95 moons on Jupiter, but NASA says the moon is the most volcanically active space in the solar system. Repairing the camera allowed Juno to photograph the volcanoes dotting the surface. This Hail Mary move happened in December of 2023, but NASA recently presented the data at an engineering conference earlier this month. Since using the process to repair Juno's camera, the team has also used it to repair other components aboard Juno. The team expects that the process could be used to maintain spacecraft as well as satellites in the future. Juno has now orbited Jupiter 74 times and is beginning to show signs of further radiation damage. But, the annealing allowed researchers to catch a glimpse of the moon Io and continue photographing the planet. Not bad for long-distance camera repair. You may also like Browse the best lenses for astrophotography or take a look at DCW's top picks for the best tripods.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Alien: Earth creator says the upcoming sci-fi show will dedicate more screentime than any of the movies to the Xenomorph, Facehuggers, and a few new creatures: "I am trying to re-mystify Alien"
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Get ready Alien fans, because the first TV show in the franchise is set to have even more Xenomorphs, Facehuggers, and creatures than ever before, with more screentime than the monsters were allowed in previous movies. "We're seeing more [of the] Xenomorph than any of these movies," Alien: Earth director Dana Gonzales to Collider. "All the movies, if you really study them, are like, 20 frames, two seconds, they show the Xenomorph. We have huge sequences where all you're seeing is the Xenomorph." But the Xenomorph has had a little upgrade, as creator Noah Hawley said, "I always felt like it was the least effective when it looked like a guy in a suit," pointing out that the Xenomorph in the original movie can look a little too human at some points. "It's very black in the movie. I wanted to play into more of the bug-like quality of it, so maybe it falls a little more in the roach coloration." Oh, and it can jump too. Director Gonzales explained how with new stunt techniques and wirework, the team was able to "fly the Xeno around," and feature the monster in its full glory rather than only showing parts of it, like so many of the Alien movies do. "So it's not so much just coming out and scaring you and having that kind of jump scare," said Gonzales. "It's literally flying through the air. It's chasing. There's a lot that supports the fact that you see it, and I don't know if those other films had that." As well as the Xenomorph, the show will include a bunch of different creatures. The series begins with a team of space explorers aboard the USCSS Maginot, researching five different Alien lifeforms, including the Orchid, the Eye Midge, the Facehugger, and the Xenomorph. However, when the spacecraft crash-lands on Earth, the creatures are set loose. In the most recent Alien: Earth trailer, we saw a baby Xenomorph, a strange flower-bud-like creature, and an infected goat. But just because you have seen some of those creatures before, don't expect to know exactly how they operate. "I am trying to re-mystify Alien," said Hawley. "So much of what made that first movie and the second movie so horrifying was that every time you thought you knew what the lifecycle of this creature was, it just got worse… I've tried to come up with ways that the show returns that sense of, 'What's going to happen next? That's so gross!'" Alien: Earth stars Sydney Chandler, Alex Lawther, Samuel Blenkin, Essie Davis, Adarsh Gourav, Kit Young, Timothy Olyphant, and more. Alien: Earth premieres on FX and Hulu in the US on August 12, and will start streaming on Disney Plus in the UK from August 13. For more, check out our list of the best alien movies, and keep up with the most exciting upcoming shows. Solve the daily Crossword