Social Media Ban: Parents Need To Step Up, Not The Government
It should be the parents' job to police young people's social media use, an internet law expert says. Morning Report
National is looking for new friends to support a ban on children under 16 using social media.
The party has put a member's bill into the ballot which could see New Zealand follow in Australia's footsteps.
But coalition partner ACT says the proposal is hastily drafted, simplistic and unworkable.
Online law expert Judge David Harvey said it would breach the Bill of Rights Act, a claim denied by the bill's sponsor, National MP Catherine Wedd.
If it became law it would empower parents, she said.
Judge Harvey said the breach would occur because of the right to freedom of expression.
'They [Under 16s] would be basically offline as far as that means of communication is concerned, remembering of course that the internet is primarily a system for communication so any attempt to regulate the internet has implications for freedom of expression.'
He said some of the social media harms, such as cyberbullying, concerns over body image, anxiety and depression, did not apply to all youngsters.
It was possible that some, perhaps through 'a lack of resilience' or 'difficulties to adjusting' in messaging, 'suffer some sort of problem as far as social media is concerned'.
But it was an issue that should be dealt with by their families.
He pointed out the irony that on the same day the bill was announced, the Censor's office released a report on harmful digital content.
The Censor had pointed out that young people were finding it difficult to share their concerns about online content with someone else.
'And what the Censor suggests is there should be an opportunity for educating parents ….so that kids can feel comfortable going to their parents to say 'look I've got a problem'.'
The state shouldn't be taking over the role of parents, he said.
'Do you want the government to solve every problem?'
Nor did the retired judge agree that the internet platforms were using algorithms to make their content addictive.
He said people needed to be careful using that word, he preferred to call it 'habit-forming'.
Young people were communicating with their constant use of their phones, and it was part of a dramatic change brought about by digital technology.
'That's the way they live their lives.'
'It's empowering parents'
MP Catherine Wedd who is behind the bill said it didn't breach the Bill of Rights, as claimed by Judge Harvey.
As a mother of four, she was 'living and breathing the negative impacts of social media in our communities every day'.
Parents were 'grappling and struggling' to combat its negative aspects and the government needed to do more to support them.
Parents and principals were regularly complaining about its harm, which included cyber bullying, inappropriate content being shared, exploitation and its impact on mental health.
'We have restrictions in the physical world to protect our kids, we should have them in the online world as well.'
Asked if it restricted the freedom of expression of those under 16, she said the main responsibility was to protect them from harm.
As for encroaching on parental responsibility, 'responsible parents can't necessarily control what is being served up to their kids by the social media companies, what's being shared online by others …', Wedd said.
'We're taking a responsibility …. It's giving more control to parents, it's empowering parents, it's creating a level playing field for parents.'
Regarding controls on gaming sites, Wedd said her bill mirrored what was being proposed in Australia, so it would target platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), TikTok and Snapchat.
'These are the traditional platforms where we are seeing kids and we are seeing a lot of the online harm caused by these platforms.'
The need for restrictions to gaming sites access would need to be explored.
Asked about not getting support from ACT, she said it was a complex issue that she had been working on for over a year and she had the support of the National caucus, including the prime minister.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: RNZ, CGT and Palestine
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the political bullying of RNZ, the perils of adopting a capital gains tax, and Palestinian families living in Ōtepoti. Budget cuts threat to a fearless RNZ The recent $4.6 million Budget cuts (for each of the next four years) to Radio New Zealand's annual $67 million funding should concern all those who value fearless and independent public broadcasting. It raises the possibility that RNZ is being punished for not covering the news to the government's liking. As a result of the cuts RNZ has had to lay off staff and reduce its programming. Legislation blocks politicians from interfering directly with RNZ's programme content but they may have found another way of showing the broadcaster to go easy on them "or else". To those who think this observation is simple paranoia, I offer the following: Recently, in a funding newsletter to supporters, Act New Zealand leader David Seymour spoke of his clashes with the media and his attempt to coerce them in to treating him more kindly. He went on to say " ... taxpayer-funded media don't get the message unless we send it to them. That's why we delivered a significant funding cut to RNZ in this year's Budget." Winston Peters in April, as he was being subjected to a probing interview on RNZ's Morning Report , said to his interviewer: "You're paid by the taxpayer and sooner or later we're going to cut that water off too, because you're an abuse on the taxpayer." In this year's trust survey RNZ was rated by the public as New Zealand's most trusted news brand (The Otago Daily Times was a close second). It would be a pity if our most trusted news brand is cowered by this political bullying. [Bill Southworth is a former executive director of the Journalists' Training Organisation.] Island time Sitting here on a damp Matariki day in the South I reflect on the most Anglo-Polynesian holiday in modern times and one little thing I could do to add to it. I would like to say to the New Zealand Geographic Board that in Lake Te Anau there is a group of seven impressive islands in the Middle Fiord (aka The Seven Sisters) that the Geographic Board recently labelled "Manea". In the spirit of Matariki and Anglo-Polynesians everywhere, they could be named the Matariki Islands instead. Thanks but no thanks May I thank Evan Alty (Letters ODT 23.6.25) for "allowing me to express my strong opinions". I reciprocate by extending to him the privilege of being wrong — again. The short answer to Mr Alty's question of whether I can show that social disintegration is rife (his words) in countries that adopt a capital gains tax indicates to me that he does not receive the ODT nor watches or reads the news. The best performing countries without a CGT are Singapore and Switzerland. The rest who adopt a CGT appear to be economic basket cases, where productivity is declining and debt is rising exponentially, e.g. Australia, USA, UK and Canada. New Zealand is on its way. That is not to say that a CGT is the sole determinant for the decline of social and economic wellbeing throughout the "free" world — but it helps. Countries that adopt a low tax regime appear to succeed in most economic and social aspects. Mr Alty is a retired solicitor who presumably sold his advice. He would then present his clients with a hefty invoice. Those in the business of farming (by way of example) rely on building and growing their asset despite the vagaries of the marketplace. They can't present an invoice to their customers. New Zealand adopts a CGT at its peril. Eschew indifference, embrace doing right thing My grandmother was a nine-months-old baby on an immigrant ship heading to Palestine from East Europe in 1933, escaping the horrors to come. Today Palestinians are facing starvation and death and hardly have anyone to turn to. Palestinian families living here in Ōtepoti have begged the government for visas to let them bring their loved ones to safety, only getting dismissive responses claiming "it's complicated". This is the same government that eased the laws to fast-track wealthy investors into New Zealand. Is this the kind of country we want to be? Turning away desperate people knocking on our door pleading for help? Palestinians in our community can't sleep at night haunted with dread. We live in an extremely cynical and morally bankrupt world, our governments are failing. They are counting on you to stay indifferent. Don't give them the satisfaction. The right thing to do is simple. No big tax changes seem likely Tony Fitchett's response (Letters, 30.6.25) to Gerrard Eckhoff's fevered dissertation on the evils of taxation hits every button and should be required reading for politicians in particular. However, the prognosis for the realisation of Mr Eckhoff's worst nightmares is not good. Earlier this year two senior Labour MPs, Barbara Edmunds and Deborah Russell, embarked on a road trip to enlighten Labour Party members on the subject of capital gains and wealth taxes. The double-act was carefully crafted to make it clear that some form of CGT, but not too extensive, was a possibility, but wealth taxes were off the table. Just too difficult. Don't even ask about inheritance tax, we were instructed as the show began. More recently the Labour finance spokesperson has been noticeably coy about what and when a policy might be revealed, except to suggest that the end result should be fiscally neutral. A depleted tax-pack of cards will be shuffled a bit. How exciting. Clearly the fiscal anorexia that afflicts the present government is unlikely to be addressed by the next one, of whatever stripe. Local body choices White elephant in the room: homeless people camping out in shop doorways and tenting on the Oval. The candidates who honestly intend to care for our most vulnerable citizens will get my vote. Clean waterways, lower rates, new infrastructure and impressive new libraries are all well and good. Society will be judged on how we care for our weakest members. At the moment we're failing miserably. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
Pacific News In Brief For 1 July
Article – RNZ A round-up of news from around the region, including Niue government announcing its budget for 2025. Niue – budget Health, education, social welfare and government salaries have receives a boost in the Niue government's new NZ$12.5 million (US$7.6m) deficit budget. Last week, the island's finance minister announced the largest expenditure of the government is to cover the salaries of its workforce and the cost of social services. TV Niue reported the health department gets the highest increase in this budget of more than $880,000, a 26 percent boost. Cook Islands – firearms Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown has announced several new initiatives aimed at enhancing firearm regulation and safety across the Pa Enua (outer islands). Cook Islands News reported this includes the resumption of police-issued ammunition and plans to simplify the driving licensing process for tourists. Speaking in parliament, Brown confirmed that the Cook Islands Police has reinstated its role as the official supplier of ammunition to the Pa Enua. The move is expected to assist island communities in managing issues such as wild animal control. Papua New Guinea – chicken East Sepik Governor Allan Bird has raised concerns over a drop in chicken sales nationwide. Bird said the government banned the importation of frozen chicken from Australia and New Zealand with the pretext of protecting the Papua New Guinea industry from foreign competitors and diseases. He said it was a short-sighted decision and now as imported chicken stock runs out, the impact is being felt around the country. He said imported chickens retail at about 22 kina ($US5.33) per kilo, while locally produced chickens retail at about 40 kina. Bird said local chicken production will remain expensive because the chicken feed is imported and 80 per cent of the cost of producing a chicken is the feed cost. Samoa – festival A large Samoan festival – the Teuila Festival – has been cancelled this year. The festival, which features cultural performances and the Miss Samoa pageant, has been cancelled to avoid a timing clash with Samoa's general election. The Miss Samoa pageant has been rescheduled, to run from 27 October to 9 November. Fiji – ICC Fijian Nazhat Shameem Khan has been elevated to the topmost prosecutorial position at the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Fiji Times reported the Office of the Prosecutor at the ICC has announced that deputy prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan and Mame Mandiaye Niang have taken over leadership, following prosecutor Karim Khan KC's temporary leave of absence. In May Khan, who is British, stepped aside pending the outcome of a United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services investigation into alleged misconduct. Nazhat Shameem Khan is a Fijian diplomat and former judge. Fiji/PNG – anniversary Fiji's Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka is poised to attend Papua New Guinea's 50th independence anniversary celebrations in Port Moresby on 16 September. Local media reports Rabuka praising his PNG counterpart James Marape for his leadership in strengthening the region and expressed Fiji's commitment to maintaining strong diplomatic ties with PNG. Fiji and PNG established diplomatic relations in 1975 and continue to build on their traditional, political, and economic partnership.
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Youth MPs accuse govt of 'censoring' them
By Russell Palmer and Giles Dexter of RNZ The protocols followed for this year's Youth Parliament are the same as previous years, the Ministry of Youth Development says, after accusations of censorship. However, the email sent to one Youth MP carries the subject line "changes required", and stated the ministry "have had to make some changes". Some of the Youth MPs involved say they will not be suppressed and the issue has fuelled the fire to make their voices heard. The Labour Party has criticised the approach taken after some Youth MPs were asked to remove parts of their speeches, because some of their speech lacked political neutrality by criticising "this government". Changes recommended included the removal of general mentions of the Treaty Principles Bill, funding for Māori and Pasifika, and Pay Equity. Speeches about "youth voice" and "freedom of speech" were also edited. In a written statement, Ministry of Youth Development general manager John Robertson said the same protocol had been followed as was used in 2022, and the feedback provided on the Youth MPs' speeches was "generally focused on supporting them to convey their arguments clearly and effectively, and in keeping with the non-partisan approach of Youth Parliament". "We also advised some Youth MPs that changes were required to their speeches to avoid putting themselves at risk. Youth MPs are not protected by parliamentary privilege. This means young people could be held liable if the contents of their speech raise concerns around defamation, copyright, privacy, contempt of court, or broadcasting standards. "However, as noted above, the final decision about what they say is made by the Youth MPs." Robertson said the ministry had in some cases told the Youth MPs "it is your decision around what your speech does and does not contain". "From here, it is your choice how you use [our] feedback. You are the one stepping up to speak and we fully respect your right to shape your speech in the way that feels right to you." However, the email RNZ has seen did not include such a statement. The ministry confirmed it had provided feedback to "about half of the 80 young people who will deliver speeches", and that they were shifting from the approach used in 2019 and 2022 of livestreaming the speeches to instead sending the recordings to the participants after the event. This was "due to resourcing constraints... the participants are welcome to share this footage with others, and online", the ministry said. Minister for Youth James Meager said the speeches were not censored. "We do not censor the speeches of Youth MPs. We provide feedback, and in some cases suggest changes for them to consider, but we have been clear to all Youth MPs that they make the final decision about the content of their speech." He provided a written statement, much of which matched the ministry's statement word for word. However, the Youth MPs spoke to reporters at Parliament with one - Thomas Brocherie, a spokesperson for Make it 16 (a group pushing for a voting age of 16) - said the approach taken to the speeches was diluting the value of the Youth Parliament. "We have been told to not argue on either side of contentious issues such as the pay equity reforms or the Treaty Principles Bill for the excuse that they are current topics in the current Parliament. This is not just illogical, it is censorship," he said. "We cannot say we value democracy unless we actually show and prove we value democracy. Silencing the stakeholders of the future does not value democracy." Another Youth MP Nate Wilbourne, a spokesperson for Gen Z Aotearoa, said rangatahi were being silenced and censored. "We've been told to soften our language, to drop key parts of our speeches and to avoid criticizing certain ministers or policies. This isn't guidance. This is fear-based control." Brocherie said the emails being titled "changes required" was "not at all a suggestion, that is blatant editing, they want us to change something to suit their purpose, to suit their agenda". Youth MP Lincoln Jones said they were provided with "a PDF of edited changes... delivered to our inbox, and that was the expected requirement, that we speak that speech". "It's honestly like they've gone through with it with a microscope to find any little thing that might be interpreted wrong against, I guess, the current government." Some of them sent responses to the ministry asking for clarification about the changes. "And what did we get? An automatic copy and pasted reply that is not at all in the principles of what Youth Parliament is," Jones said. "They claim to listen to us, they claim to want to uplift us, they send us an automatic copy and pasted response on the thing we have three minutes to speak about. That's not good enough." He said the experience had encouraged him even further to put himself forward to become an MP. "It honestly fuels that fire within me, and I think for all of us to put it out there and to make our voices heard."
