logo
How Sleeping Less Became an American Value

How Sleeping Less Became an American Value

The Atlantic3 days ago

This is an edition of Time-Travel Thursdays, a journey through The Atlantic 's archives to contextualize the present. Sign up here.
In some corners of American culture, one rule applies: The less you sleep, the more impressive you are. Tech CEOs and influencers love to tout their morning routines that begin at 5 a.m. or 4 a.m. or 3 a.m. (though at a certain point we really ought to just call them 'night routines'). Many of their 'How I start my day' videos have a moralizing tone: Waking up early is inherently good, the thinking goes. And not getting much sleep is presented as a symbol of hard work: Elon Musk and many of the Silicon Valley figures who came before him have been known to brag about staying up all night because they are so very dedicated to their company or mission.
Americans have been ascribing moral value to sleep, or the lack thereof, for centuries. In 1861, an Atlantic writer railed against newspaper articles in which 'all persons are exhorted to early rising, to resolute abridgment of the hours of sleep, and the like.' Readers were told 'that Sir Walter Raleigh slept but five hours in twentyfour; that John Hunter, Frederick the Great, and Alexander von Humboldt slept but four; that the Duke of Wellington made it an invariable rule to 'turn out' whenever he felt inclined to turn over, and John Wesley to arise upon his first awaking.' The writer identified the value judgment lurking behind these examples: ''All great men have been early risers,' says my newspaper.'
America was built on a Protestant work ethic, and the idea that hard work is an inherent good has never quite left us. But the Christian ideals that dominated early American culture also helped schedule leisure into the week in the form of the Sunday Sabbath. Throughout much of the 1800s, this day of rest was enforced by individual states, but such enforcement was waning by the end of that century. Americans were so tied to this ritual, however, that some petitioned Congress to legally codify the day. Eventually, the 40-hour workweek was created under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, and workers were granted both Saturdays and Sundays as days off.
Even as leisure became part of America's legal structure, the obsession with hard work only grew, especially for higher-paid workers. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, pundits predicted that automation would lead to more leisure time. But another ideology took hold instead, one that the Atlantic contributor Derek Thompson calls workism: Adherents to this quasi-religion, most of whom are college-educated Americans, build their identities and seek fulfillment through their job.
Once the twin pillars of working a lot and sleeping a little became symbols of American achievement, those looking to stay up later became prime targets for product marketing. A nation of people trying to rebel against their body's basic instincts is a nation ready to pay for help. Coffee, for example, was successful in the U.S. in part because employers realized that caffeine would allow workers to toil longer. As time went on, the tools on offer got more varied: Now you can try an ice bath or dubious supplements or a thousand different kinds of energy drinks (some of which may give you a heart attack).
Though in recent years a majority of Americans have acknowledged that they'd feel better with more rest, the mindset that sleep equals laziness is hard to shake. When the actor Dakota Johnson said in 2023 that sleep is her ' number one priority in life,' adding that she can easily sleep for up to 14 hours, her comments went viral, and she felt compelled to issue a clarification a while later. Sure, 14 hours is a lot of sleep; tech bros somewhere are shuddering at the thought. Perhaps one day, the new brag will be to say, 'I sleep so much.' But we're not quite there yet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pack a bag or pay up: Some plastic bag bans appear to be working
Pack a bag or pay up: Some plastic bag bans appear to be working

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Pack a bag or pay up: Some plastic bag bans appear to be working

Plastic bag bans and fees have spread across the United States, and new research says they're doing a good job at cutting down on litter, although some rules work better than others. In places where they are in effect, plastic bag policies led to a 25% to 47% reduction in the amount of disposable, thin plastic bag litter as a proportion of the items collectioned during cleanups of America's shorelines, a study released in the journal Science in mid-June, found. In 2023, about one-in-three Americans lived in a place where some type of plastic bag regulation was in place. "Overall, we see a significant decrease in the percentage of plastic bags in coastal cleanup efforts," in areas with some type of plastic bag policy in place, said Kimberly Oremus, a professor of marine science and policy at the University of Delaware and one of the paper's co-authors. But the bans have a history of controversy too. Previous research highlighted loopholes in the laws that can keep bans from working well. Meanwhile, about 20 states have passed laws banning any plastic bag bans at all, under the argument that they preempt local control. The conservative American Legislative Exchange Council created a model bill for preemptively banning such bans in 2015. Some plastic bag bans work better than others The researchers collected information on 611 different plastic bag policies nationwide. Of those, the most common was complete bans, which made up almost 60% of policies. The next were partial bans, 31%, which usually banned thin film bags but allowed for thicker plastic bags. The least common, 8.5%, were policies that charged for bags. But that policy, which typically charges between 5¢ to 25¢ per bag, was most effective in lowering the amount of plastic bag waste found along shorelines. Complete bans on plastic bags at certain types of stores, often groceries and large retailers, also worked, but less well. Least effective were partial bans on thin film plastic bags that allow exceptions for thicker bags. Some areas with plastic bag policies in place also allow their use for take-out food and in restaurants but not in stores. "Our hypothesis is that people treat the thicker bags as single-use, even though they're not supposed to be," said Oremus. Additionally, the longer a policy had been in place, the less plastic bag litter was found, according to the study. What has previous plastic bag ban research found? The paper gives a better understanding of previous research and studies, which have sometimes found that plastic bag rules can backfire, creating more absolute plastic litter rather than less. In New Jersey, a 2024 study funded by plastic bag manufacturers found that while the number of single-use plastic bags sold declined by 60% after a bag ban took effect in 2015, the number of alternative plastic bags increased. The same thing has happened in California. The year its bag ban was passed, Californians threw away 157,385 tons of plastic bags. In 2022 that had increased to 231,072 tons, according to the report. Politicians in the state said this was because of a loophole in the original bill that allowed the sale of thicker, reusable plastic bags at the checkout stand. To fix it, beginning in 2026 California stores will only offer paper bags or washable reusable bags. Why are plastic bags a problem in the environment? There's no question that disposable plastic bags are convenient. That's why they've become so popular. The first one-piece polyethylene shopping bag was created by a Swedish company in 1962. The 1965 patent was for a "bag with handle of weldable plastic material." These bags didn't appear in U.S. grocery stores until 1979, edging out paper bags because they were significantly cheaper for grocers. By the 2000s they were everywhere, including in the landscape, harming marine animals when they got in waterways. They can be a significant problem. "Plastic bags, especially the thin plastic bags, travel very easily in the wind and wanter," said Anna Papp, an environmental economist at Columbia University. "Because of that, their impact on animals and ecosystems can be outsized." 'When a plastic bag escapes into the environment, animals can see it as a food source and ingest it. It can cause entrapment and entanglement," Shelie Miller, professor of sustainable systems at the School for Environment Sustainability at the University of Michigan, told USA TODAY last year. An app called Clean Swell allows cleanup crews to track the entanglement of dead or injured fish, birds and animals. The researchers found somewhere between a 30% to 37% reduction in entangled animals in shorelines near plastic bag policies. The data isn't fully clear because plastic bags aren't the only thing that causes entanglement, they said. "We find suggestive evidence that the occurrence of entanglements decreases when these policies are in place," said Papp. How did researchers figure out if plastic bag bans work? The researchers took advantage of a natural experiment. The environmental group Ocean Conservancy sponsors thousands of beach, river and lake cleanups every year. It also built a simple to use app called Clean Swell that allows cleanup groups to record information about the trash they collected. Papp and Oremus took advantage of the fact that there's a patchwork of bans and fees for plastic bags – they found 611 individual policies across the nation. Then they combined that with cleanup data from around the country between 2016 and 2023 in 182 ZIP codes. Next they combined this crowdsourced citizen-scientist data from 45,067 shoreline cleanups recorded in the Clean Swell app. Plastic bags were the fifth-most common item found in shoreline cleanups, after cigarette butts, food wrappers, plastic bottle caps and plastic beverage bottles. On average, plastic bags made up 6.7% of items collected in 2023. That allowed them to look at the differences between a specific area before and after a plastic bag policy was enacted, as well as a natural control group when they looked at areas that have never had any plastic bag policies. When they looked at the numbers of bottles and straws, they found those items did not decrease, indicating that plastic bag policies were at work rather than simply changes in what was entering the environment.

She got into 5 colleges with mom's help. Now, who decides?
She got into 5 colleges with mom's help. Now, who decides?

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

She got into 5 colleges with mom's help. Now, who decides?

Tense and uncomfortable conversations can arise when parents dominate the discussion of where their kid goes to college. From Gayatri Patil's point of view, it wasn't an option for her daughter to attend college outside Arizona. The teenager, Mikiha Gadagkar, 17, had a different idea. Gadagkar spent her teenage years in Phoenix earning a 4.0 grade point average and loaded up on extracurricular activities, including speech, debate and photography. She wanted to make herself attractive for highly ranked economics and political science college programs – both near and far from home. Is college worth it? Here are the majors college grads say they regret the most The hard work paid off when she got into five schools, including Arizona State and the University of Virginia. And so began the tense conversation that rattles so many American households after the initial celebration of college acceptance letters: Who decides which college the student will attend? Get ready for frustration and emotional blackmail. More: Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned. Gadagkar told her mom she wanted to attend a college near Washington D.C. She wanted a"change of pace" and a new environment with opportunities to attend law school. But Arizona State University was still her mother's top choice. "I want her to stay close," she said. "I tried emotionally blackmailing her, saying 'I'll give you home cooked food, drive you and do your laundry' during the time of her acceptances." The family's discussions illuminate the tense and uncomfortable conversations that can arise when parents want a say in where their kids go to college. 'Sometimes it's a bad ending' The Arizona family's story is one Matthew Riley's heard before. Often, wealthy parents pay Riley, a director and senior admissions consultant at Ivy Academic Prep, to help guide their kids when applying for college. They come from two types of families: One set of parents allows their kids to take the lead on where they attend college. Those families are better at acknowledging that it is the student's life and ultimately their decision, he said. The other type is more strict. They are "controlling helicopter types" who tell their children they must apply to a certain college or pursue a certain degree, he said. "They usually say 'You will study computer science and will apply to five or 10 schools," he said. "Those are always rough to see. Sometimes students say 'Ok, my parents understand me' and sometimes it's a bad ending.' It can get ugly." Sometimes those disagreements are harmful to a young person's well being, he said. He recalled a case from last year. The student wanted to to get a degree in business or political science at George Washington University or American University, but his parents insisted he attend a university with a prominent tech program, he said. "He was passionate about government and interned with the state representative in his home state." he said. "But his parents said 'No, we're computer scientists and programmers who work for a big corporation, and you will do the same.'" That student succumbed to his parent's wishes. But during his first year, he "felt out of control" and experienced anxiety and depression, Riley said. Is college worth it? Americans say they value higher education, but it's too expensive for many Parents who work in technology, engineering or medical fields are more likely to want to pressure their kids into a certain school "in hopes for them to follow in their footsteps," he said. "The parents are affluent, both are professionals, both are educated and they control the finances," he said. Who should decide? Traci Lowenthal, a licensed clinical psychologist, helps guide families through conversations about college. "There's a fine line between having these thoughtful and open conversations and creating pressure," she said. Creating realistic expectations and timing is important to avoid putting feelings of pressure on a child, she said. They should discuss whether a family can afford college and if the young person will have to fund school themselves with loans. And they should decide together whether a student can live with independence across the country or if they are better suited staying near home. Often, parents and students open up about their real feelings about college after it's too late and the student has been shoehorned into a school that's not right for them, Lowenthal said. Or parents reveal uncomfortable financial realities after a student has set their sights on a school they can't afford. That can cause a rift. But they can be avoided. Families should discuss college options during a high schooler's freshman and sophomore years when "tensions aren't already high," Lowenthal said. Earlier conversations offer young people a head's-up about their options, family finances and parental expectations − before they start applying to schools. It can help to alleviate potential feelings of disappointment or betrayal. "Sometimes I see a student get into an amazing school and there's literally no way they can go," she said. "So in the midst of getting rejections and acceptances, the parent tells them they can't go and the student asks: How come you kept this from me?" She encourages students to do their own research to share with their parents. "It's tough. Because if your parent is like 'You have to go to my alma mater or this prestigious school,' the student has to find a way to be really honest about that and say, 'I know this is a great school, but I think this would be a better fit," she said. Lowenthal advises parents to consider the needs and desires of their child ahead of their own. "It's really hard to not want them to do what they want you to do," she said. "But this is a unique individual and not an extension of us as people." One of the arguments Gadagkar used in trying to win her mom over to the University of Virginia was telling her how high school counselors had shown which programs might best align with her career ambitions. After learning she had guidance from other adults, Patil decided to hear her daughter out. More: Have student loans? This part of the Trump tax bill won't apply to you "My mom really let me take the lead in those conversations," Gadagkar said. "It was more of me saying, kind of, how I felt and her giving her thoughts on those. I'm really grateful for that because it made it a lot less stressful." But Patil was still not fully convinced Virginia was the right option. "I studied in India, so the process here was very new to me," she said. Mom: 'I think we are happy with this decision' Gadagkar ultimately decided to attend her mother's first pick, Arizona State University, two hours from home. The teen received a scholarship that made ASU more affordable than the University of Virginia. And she'll be able to pursue economics and political science while honoring her mother's wishes. But she still thinks about what moving to Virginia would have been like. "It's definitely a change of pace since this entire year I had developed a mindset that I was going out of state," she said. "This is not what I necessarily expected. But after attending orientation, I'm feeling good." Patil, her mother, is elated Mikiha will be nearby. But she said she had warmed to the idea of sending Mikiha to the East Coast − if the option had been affordable. "I think we are happy with this decision," Patil said. Contact Kayla Jimenez at kjimenez@ Follow her on X at @kaylajjimenez.

Horror and forgiveness: getting over Vietnam
Horror and forgiveness: getting over Vietnam

Boston Globe

time6 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Horror and forgiveness: getting over Vietnam

I always assumed that napalm strikes, some of which I called in myself from American warplanes, burned the enemy, leaving what GIs called 'crispy critters.' That's what war does. It desensitizes. Then came the photo after I'd returned to 'the world,' as we called civilian life. No words can convey that impact. Seven years ago, I took my wife on a visit to Vietnam. To judge from what we saw of a bustling economy and the welcoming attitude shown to us, all is forgiven. Dave Griffiths Mechanic Falls, Maine

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store