logo
Nvidia's China return buys time for Beijing to boost its chip drive

Nvidia's China return buys time for Beijing to boost its chip drive

CNBC4 days ago
As semiconductors have become a geopolitical hot potato over the past few years, it's no surprise that Nvidia , the leader in artificial intelligence-related chips, has been caught up in escalating tensions between the U.S. and China. When Nvidia returned to the China market last week , seemingly with the blessing of Washington, it sparked debate over the strategic implications for the U.S.' dominance in AI and China's own focus on boosting its domestic chip and tech industry. For the U.S., Nvidia's return could help cement American strength in AI globally, experts told CNBC. For China, it could buy the country time as it continues on its own path to build Nvidia rivals and keep pace with AI software development. It's a tricky relationship, underscoring the strategic importance of the graphics processing units (GPUs) that Nvidia designs and that currently underpin the world's AI. "The relationship is symbiotic but I do believe China needs the U.S. technology more at this moment in time," Daniel Newman, CEO of Futurum, told CNBC's "The China Connection" last week. Nvidia's warnings Earlier this year, the U.S. government restricted exports of Nvidia's H20 chip to China. The product, a less-advanced version of Nvidia's leading hardware, had been created to comply with previous U.S. export restrictions. Washington has expressed concerned that these chips could be used in areas such as advancing the Chinese military and China's own AI industry. Nvidia took a $4.5 billion writedown on the unsold inventory and warned the China restrictions could impact billions of dollars of potential sales. Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia, has been critical of export curbs . He has said it would be a "tremendous loss" for Nvidia not to participate in China and that rival Huawei would be able to fulfil the needs of the country in its absence. Huang has argued that the restrictions could boost China's domestic semiconductor industry and that it risks eroding America's technological edge. That message appears to have got through to the White House. Nvidia said last week that it received backing from the U.S. government to resume sales of H20 in China. How the move will benefit the U.S. From a business perspective, Nvidia is expected to gain. But for Washington, the move is more strategic. "We want to keep having the Chinese use the American technology stack, because they still rely upon it," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC last week. Nvidia has managed to gain a formidable position in the market for semiconductors required to train and run AI applications, not just because of its hardware but also because of the popularity of its software platform known as CUDA, that developers build on. This creates an "ecosystem" around Nvidia's products which has proven sticky for its users. The return of the H20 to the world's second-largest economy will "buy China time" to boost its domestic industry, according to Pranay Kotasthane, deputy director at the Takshashila Institution. "But it will also buy the U.S. companies some respite. China is Nvidia's largest market and is home to 50 per cent of AI developers according to Jensen Huang. If that path is completely closed, American firms like Nvidia will find it difficult to raise revenues and re-invest them in the next round of research and development," Kotasthane said. "It might be justifiable to restrain access to the most advanced chips but to expand the scope of the restrictions doesn't make strategic sense." China domestic chips in focus Huawei has been China's leading player in developing AI-focused chips. The country's technology companies are using some of Huawei's hardware but the firm has yet to overtake the dominance of Nvidia's latest chips. One possible outcome is that U.S. export curbs will accelerate China's domestic efforts. China has been looking to boost its domestic semiconductor industry with a particular focus on AI chips. There are a whole host of startups working on new products in the country. Nvidia's return to China could slowdown that progress. "If Nvidia's chips are made available to Chinese firms, it could weaken momentum behind domestic chip projects, cut off capital, and delay progress in domestic Chinese hardware. This retains U.S. tech influence over global AI rails," Tejas Dessai, director of research at Global X ETFs, told CNBC by email. Ultimately, it all goes back to Nvidia's software which keeps developers locked into its hardware. "Chinese model developers still prefer to use Nvidia hardware, because the domestic alternative AI stack, particularly the software development environment from Huawei is still difficult to use and lacks the depth and flexibility of Nvidia's offering," Paul Triolo, a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, told CNBC by email. Can China catch up to Nvidia? Still, China's direction of travel and its quest for domestic providers of AI chips is unlikely to change. "Eventually Chinese AI model developers will have to transitions to a domestic AI stack," Triolo said. Nvidia's chips have proved very effective at training huge AI models that require massive amounts of data to be processed. The actual running of those AI model in products like chatbots is known as inferencing. This process may require a different type of chip, which Chinese tech giants as well as startups are working on. "In chips, China's opportunity could come when the focus shifts to inference. That's when demand for lower cost, efficient processors could scale, and we believe custom chip programs from big Chinese tech companies could ultimately serve that demand," Dessai of Global X ETFs said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amid a culture of fear, a celebrated artist's most important exhibition is pulled from Smithsonian
Amid a culture of fear, a celebrated artist's most important exhibition is pulled from Smithsonian

Boston Globe

timea few seconds ago

  • Boston Globe

Amid a culture of fear, a celebrated artist's most important exhibition is pulled from Smithsonian

And it appears that Sherald's 'Trans Forming Liberty,' her 2024 portrait of a transgender woman dressed as the Statue of Liberty, rattled museum leadership in a climate of deep hostility from the administration toward transgender people. Advertisement Installation view of Amy Sherald: American Sublime (Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, April 9-August 10, 2025). Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, 2018. (Tiffany Sage/ Tiffany Sage/ Sherald said the Portrait Gallery had proposed replacing the painting in D.C. with a video of viewers' reactions both to it and transgender issues more broadly. In a the museum countered, saying it wanted the video to accompany, not replace, the painting. Either way, no agreement could be struck, and Sherald withdrew. Advertisement 'The video would have opened up for debate the value of trans visibility and I was opposed to that being a part of the 'American Sublime' narrative,' Sherald told the New York Times. 'Unfortunately, we could not come to an agreement with the artist. We remain appreciative and inspired by Ms. Sherald, her artwork and commitment to portraiture,' the museum But even without 'Trans Forming Liberty,' it's a fair guess the show would have been under external pressures: Sherald's paintings are for the most part elegant, precise portraits of unnamed Black subjects painted life-sized. There are two exceptions in the exhibition. The first is her portrait of Breonna Taylor, a memorial image painted with dignified beauty of the innocent Black woman but weary grace. It was the exhibition's centerpiece, an emblem of the artist's larger project to build Black life into a canon of American art long indifferent to its inclusion. Artist Amy Sherald with her portrait of the late Breonna Taylor. Joseph Hyde/Vanity Fair Either one might easily raise the ire of the current administration. We don't have to look very long, or very far, to parse the current president's view of Obama's husband. On his Truth Social website this week, the 47th president posted a shockingly raw AI-generated video of former President Barack Obama being violently arrested in the Oval Office and dragged away in handcuffs. But there's more here than a simple obsessive animus, one president to another (though it's also clearly that). Advertisement The current administration's blunt enforcement of what it deems acceptable expression now touches virtually all aspects of American life. That includes media (as in the 60 Minutes lawsuit debacle), entertainment (the cancellation of 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,' a known Trump tormentor), and higher education (see the administration's roughshod bullying of Harvard and Columbia over its specious claims of antisemitism). A favorite target of the Trump administration, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts by government, private business, and educational institutions, looms over Sherald's withdrawal, too. The most recent addition to the constellation of Smithsonians, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, was one of the second Trump administration's prime targets. In a March executive order titled ' (It also singled out the Smithsonian's Museum of American Art and the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum.) In May, when Advertisement Here in Massachusetts, the National Endowment for the Arts in May refused to disburse funds already promised to the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art for 'Power Full Because We're Different,' Which brings us back to Sherald, ensnared by the strident decree of a cultural bureaucracy in deep regressive mode. To be clear: This was her decision. She chose not to compromise her integrity and intentions, which have been consistent and clear from the start. She had been making portraits of Black subjects for years when the invitation to paint Michelle Obama arrived. It is completely in tune with her core sensibility to capture her subjects simply, truthfully, as they are. Ruth Erickson from Cambridge with Jullian Kalim, 8, and his brother Cassidy Kalim, 3, looked at portraits of the Obamas at the MFA Boston in 2022. David L. Ryan/Globe Staff But the Obama portrait arrived in 2018 less as a painting than a heavy symbol amid a violent lurch in American life: From a two-term president who became a beacon of Black achievement to a political outsider openly hostile to the progress his predecessor seemed to embody. When the painting went on national tour in 2022, along with Kehinde Wiley's portrait of the former president, it drew crowds, including Advertisement But is pulling back, in this moment, this place, defiance or acquiescence? That's a larger question that artists, thinkers, and institutions are grappling with in every corner and context. Either way, it's an outcome enjoyed primarily by just one person, and we know who that is. Murray Whyte can be reached at

FCC to Appoint a Babysitter to Make Sure CBS Isn't Anti-Trump
FCC to Appoint a Babysitter to Make Sure CBS Isn't Anti-Trump

Gizmodo

timea few seconds ago

  • Gizmodo

FCC to Appoint a Babysitter to Make Sure CBS Isn't Anti-Trump

The Federal Communications Commission finally approved an $8 billion merger between Paramount and Skydance on Thursday after several changes at CBS that were widely seen as efforts to placate President Donald Trump. Part of the deal will apparently require an ombudsman to check the media company's supposed political biases. And FCC commissioner Brendan Carr has been doing the rounds to brag about how he's getting people on TV to be nicer to the MAGA movement. 'They made commitments to address bias and restore fact-based reporting. I think that's so important,' Carr told Newsmax's Greg Kelly on his show Thursday night. 'I mean, look, the American public simply do not trust these legacy media broadcasters. And so, if they stick with that commitment, you know, we're sort of trust-but-verify mode, that'll be a big win.' Carr went on to explain that CBS had committed to 'ending invidious forms of DEI,' a pretext Trump has used to purge the federal government of anyone who isn't white and male in leadership positions. Kelly said that he had heard the media company was going to do something 'different' with 60 Minutes, claiming that a shift to 'fact-based' reporting would be a 'cultural shock' to CBS. 'One of the things they're going to have to do is put in an ombudsman in place for two years,' Carr said. 'So basically a bias monitor that will report directly to the President. So that's something that's significant that we're going to see happening as well.' Before the second Trump era, it would've been seen as a ridiculous violation of the First Amendment to have some kind of monitor making sure the media was being nice to the president. And to have that monitor reporting directly to the most powerful person in the country makes the entire situation that much worse. Trump sued CBS News over a '60 Minutes' interview with the Democratic nominee for president, Kamala Harris. Trump falsely claimed the interview had been deceptively edited, though legal experts claimed the lawsuit was ridiculous and should've been laughed out of court. Instead, Paramount, which owns CBS News, decided to settle with Trump for $16 million, a move characterized by late-night host Stephen Colbert as a 'big fat bribe.' CBS announced Colbert's show would be cancelled just a couple of days after he levied the criticism in a move that Trump celebrated. Kelly asked Carr if TV networks are allowed to be 'woke' if they wanted to be, and Carr didn't answer the question, instead pivoting to insist CBS was simply making a business decision by cancelling Colbert. Kelly said that Colbert had 'insulted President Trump in an unfunny manner,' while acknowledging that the comedian had also insulted his own employers, something Kelly suggested was beyond the pale, saying that he was 'biting the hand that feeds' him. 'You know, we had people like Johnny Carson and Jay Leno and Letterman, they were given a real big platform to succeed,' Carr said, ignoring the fact that every late-night show in history has made fun of the sitting president incessantly. 'And now he's, you know, staring irrelevance in the face and clearly he's not taking it very well,' Carr continued about Colbert, 'But again, this is a business decision for these companies to make and they've apparently made the decision that no, this really isn't working out for them.' Colbert was number one in his time slot, but late-night shows have indeed faced significant headwinds as advertisers flee traditional broadcast media. Letterman's ratings in the 1990s were roughly equivalent to Colbert's ratings today, something that was noted on CNBC Friday morning, where Carr continued his media tour. Carr was asked by CNBC about comments from the sole Democrat remaining on the FCC commission, Anna Gomez, who called the merger approval a 'cowardly capitulation to this Administration.' Carr was asked if there was a quid pro quo, something he didn't directly address. 'Now listen, if you step back, what's happening here is I think President Trump is fundamentally reshaping the media landscape,' Carr said without answering the question. 'And the way he's doing that is when he ran for election, he ran directly at these legacy broadcast media outlets, ABC, NBC, CBS. For years, government officials just allowed those entities with execs sitting in Hollywood and New York to dictate the political narrative.' After Carr made numerous references to Colbert, CNBC host Carl Quintanilla pointed out that Colbert is a comedian, not a journalist. 'Well, I think what's interesting about all of this is these late-night shows, not just the Late Night show, but across the board, they have such a storied history,' Carr said. 'And it's sad to see what's happening to Colbert. They obviously can't get it done. They're not making money over there.' 'But I think they need a course correction,' Carr continued. 'And frankly, I think the media industry across this country needs a course correction. Again, the American people simply do not trust the mainstream media.' Gizmodo reached out to CBS and the FCC for comment, and we will update this piece when we receive a reply. It couldn't be clearer that the FCC is a political arm of the Trump regime, dictating what's allowed to be discussed on TV. And Americans will find out soon enough what that looks like in practice, as Trump will now appear to have veto power over what gets broadcast on CBS.

Intel Laying Off Tens of Thousands of Employees: CEO Memo
Intel Laying Off Tens of Thousands of Employees: CEO Memo

Entrepreneur

timea few seconds ago

  • Entrepreneur

Intel Laying Off Tens of Thousands of Employees: CEO Memo

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan stated that the layoffs followed a "systematic review" of the company's headcount and spending. At the end of 2024, Intel had 108,900 employees. Now the chipmaking giant is planning to cut over 33,000 jobs to cut the workforce to 75,000 employees by the end of the year. Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, 65, said in a memo to staff on Thursday that Intel is implementing a plan to reduce its workforce by 15%. The layoffs are in addition to the approximately 21,000 roles (about 20% of Intel's workforce) the company let go from April to June, which mainly focused on cutting down layers of middle management. Intel previously announced in August that it was laying off 15% of its workforce, or over 15,000 employees, last year. Related: Intel Requires Employees to Work From the Office More Often: 'This Action Is Necessary' In its second-quarter earnings report released on Thursday, Intel reported a sixth consecutive quarterly loss of $2.9 billion, nearly double its $1.6 billion loss at the same time a year earlier. The increased loss was mainly due to restructuring costs of $1.9 billion due to job cuts. Tan stated in a conference call with analysts and investors following the report that over the past three months, he had completed "a systematic review" of Intel's headcount and spending. "Our goal is to reduce inefficiencies and redundancies and increase accountability at every level of the company," Tan stated on the call. "We need to right-size and scale back the company." Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. Photographer: Annabelle Chih/Bloomberg via Getty Images Tan, who was previously CEO of chip software company Cadence Design Systems from 2009 to 2021, is now tasked with turning Intel around after three years of declining revenue. He became Intel's CEO on March 18, replacing former CEO Pat Gelsinger. Intel faces competition from rival companies like Nvidia, which captured a greater share of the AI chip market. Nvidia had between 70% and 95% of the market share for AI chips last year, compared to Intel's less than 1%, per CNBC. Related: How Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Transformed a Graphics Card Company Into an AI Giant: 'One of the Most Remarkable Business Pivots in History' However, Intel is trying to catch up. The company plans to launch more efficient chips later this year to better compete with Nvidia and other rivals, per The Wall Street Journal. Intel stock was down over 7% this past month, but up nearly 2% year-to-date. Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store