F-35 Fighter Jet Towed To Hangar At Kerala Airport As UK Engineers Begin Repairs
A team of British aviation engineers arrived in Kerala to assess and carry out technical work on the advanced stealth aircraft
The visuals from the Thiruvananthapuram International Airport in Kerala showed an F-35 fighter jet being carefully towed to a hangar, marking the beginning of its repair process.
A team of British aviation engineers arrived in the state to assess and carry out technical work on the advanced stealth aircraft, which had been grounded following a reported technical snag, prompting efforts between Indian authorities and the UK to facilitate repairs.
First Published:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Reuters account on Twitter restored in India, email from the company says ‘At this time, we are no longer…'
Elon Musk-owned X has restored access to Reuters' official account in India, a day after it had been blocked due to a legal request. The main @Reuters account, followed by over 25 million users globally, was withheld in India on Saturday night. Indian users who tried to access it saw a message saying the account had been withheld 'in response to a legal demand.' However, a spokesperson for the Indian government's Press Information Bureau told Reuters that no government agency had requested the block. The official said they were working with X to resolve the issue. Another account, @ReutersWorld, which was also blocked in India, was restored later Sunday night. Announcing that the ban has now been lifted, Reuters quoted an email from X which said 'At this time, we are no longer withholding access in INDIA to your account'. Why Reuters account was banned in India Official sources told news agency PTI that a request to block Reuters' account was made during Operation Sindoor . The microblogging platform seems to have now acted on that request and blocking Reuters' account in the country. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Serbia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House Search Now Undo In an earlier email dated May 16, X had told Reuters: 'It is our policy to notify account holders if we receive a legal request from an authorized entity (such as law enforcement or a government agency) to remove content from their account.' 'In order to comply with X obligations under India's local laws, we have withheld your X account in India under the country's Information Technology Act, 2000; the content remains available elsewhere,' the platform added. X did not specify which content triggered the action, who filed the request, or why it was made. The company noted that users can contact the secretary of India's Information and Broadcasting Ministry for further action. iOS 26 Beta 2 Hands-On: Apple Finally Does It
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Narayan Murthi's Infosys HR sends warning emails to employees working more than 9 hours 15 minutes with new policy implementation
Infosys work‑hour warning emails have emerged as a stark reminder of the evolving culture within India's second-largest IT services firm. The company's HR team is now sending personalised alerts to employees who exceed 9 hours and 15 minutes of daily work, particularly during remote shifts—a marked departure from founder N. R. Narayana Murthy's push for a 70-hour workweek . By automating tracking of remote hours and issuing detailed notifications, Infosys is prioritising employee well-being, work-life balance, and long-term productivity over traditional hustle culture. As the hybrid work model becomes standard, this move highlights the rising emphasis on guarding against burnout and protecting mental and physical health. Why did the HR warn Infosys employees? In stark contrast to founder N.R. Narayana Murthy's previous support for a 70-hour workweek, India's second-largest IT services business, Infosys, has started issuing tailored warning letters to staff members who work longer than usual. An automated monitoring system has been put in place by the Bengaluru-based company, which sends out alarms when staff members work longer than nine hours and fifteen minutes per day. An employee told The Economic Times, "We have to work 9.15 hours a day, five days a week, and if we go overboard while working remotely, it sets off a trigger." The company's HR department now keeps track of remote working hours on a monthly basis and notifies employees in detail when they go beyond the allotted time. Infosys keeps an eye on remote work schedules to avoid burnout The monitoring mechanism was implemented after Infosys's 323,500 employees were given hybrid work arrangements. HR provides thorough notifications that include details regarding remote working days, total hours worked, and daily averages when excessive hours are identified. According to the company's workplace policy, which was enacted in November 2023, employees must be in the office for at least ten days every month. The HR message examined by the financial daily reads, "While we appreciate your commitment, we also believe that maintaining a healthy work-life balance is crucial for both your well-being and long-term professional success." The emails stress the advantages of putting one's health and work-life balance first for both one's own well-being and career success. Policy changes in the Indian IT sector are driven by health concerns This program comes as worries about young tech workers' health problems—especially heart problems linked to irregular eating and sleeping habits—are becoming more prevalent. Among the particular suggestions made by the company are the following: "Take regular breaks during your workday; Let your manager know if you are feeling overwhelmed or need support with reviewing priorities." In contrast to Narayana Murthy's recent claims that Indians should work 70 hours a week to boost economic growth, the proposal marks a substantial shift. The action aligns with changing workplace standards in the Indian IT industry, where long hours are becoming less important than sustained productivity and employee mental wellness.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
China far ahead of India on using AI for defence technology, says LatentAI CEO
Washington: Jags Kandasamy, the founder of US-based defence tech company LatentAI, sat down with HT for an interview on India's defence tech ecosystem and the use of AI in modern warfare. Kandasamy — who is partnering with Indian firms to win Indian defence contracts — highlights the bureaucratic and procedural challenges that make it difficult for global tech firms to work with India. He pointed to China's progress on deploying AI for defence purposes and argues that India needs to leapfrog ahead in defence technologies. Jags Kandasamy, the founder of US-based defence tech company LatentAI (Supplied photo) Q. What sort of projects do you intend to work on for the Indian military? So let me give you an example. At this year's Aero India, I met with a colonel in the Indian Army and he was demonstrating an indigenous capability that the Army had created, which was using computer vision on an automated weapon system to be deployed on India's borders. So you define a zone of activity and if there is human movement over there, the machine shoots them down. So in that case, they were using heavy computing and you cannot scale that weapon system the way that they had designed because of hardware limitations. That is a critical use case that our company can solve. We worked with the US Navy on a battery operated underwater vehicle with very limited space and so there were limitations on how much computing power it had. Our job was to compress and optimise an AI model to fit that limited hardware to allow the vehicle to run efficiently. We did that successfully. So that is what we bring to the table. The idea is that autonomous warfare is going to be the future. Ukraine has shown, for example, that drone warfare is here to stay. AI will be used for target recognition, surveillance, intelligence gathering and the like and there will be a lot of demands on military hardware to run AI models efficiently. We're solving that problem. Q. You're an American defence firm that has partnered up with InferQ, which is an Indian firm. We've seen a new defence tech ecosystem come up between America and India. The governments have pushed for it through new initiatives like INDUSX and IDEX. How well has it worked? Absolutely, so I was in Coimbatore last summer, and I met with Forge ventures, which is an Indian defence-focused venture firm and Vish — who heads Forge — was part of an INDUSX cohort that came over to America. So Vish is clearly plugged in with the Ministry of Defence as well as America's Defence Department over here. Vish was one who made introductions to several companies in India and our partner InferQ was one of them. That is the clear, direct path that helped me forge this relationship, Q. How is it working with the Indian defence bureaucracy as a foreign firm? Look, there are a lot of challenges that still need to be overcome. One simple thing is that we don't have a clear mechanism of obtaining clearances for a non-Indian passport holders to work with the Indian Ministry of Defence. Also the bureaucracy in India can be difficult. It takes 18-24 months to even move things forward, right? It is an absolute pain to work with bureaucracy. There are no questions about that. Transparency doesn't exist. So when we're in the US, when we submit a proposal, we know all the different steps that we have to go through and all the decision makers along the way. All of that is very transparent in the US ecosystem. In India, I don't get to see that as a foreign company. And even Indian companies don't get to see that. I am advising a couple of founders in the Indian defence ecosystem. And one guy, he almost had to shut down his company because he built a prototype that the army wanted to see built. He showed it to them. It took them two years, literally two years, to get it certified. And that is the certification. It does not mean he won a contract and then he has to wait again before he gets a contract. I actually think India can become a great proving ground for defence technology. India has the geographical distribution that no other country can have from swamps to deserts to the high range mountains and everything in between. You have a wonderful variety of landscape that one can test technology out. How can US companies leverage that? How does India make it much easier for US companies to come and do business that way? Q. How do you see the China challenge from the Indian perspective? Can you compare the levels of progress from the two sides on defence AI? My personal opinion is that, when it comes to AI applications of defence, the Chinese are like a third year PhD student while India is still in elementary school. India's defence forces have the intent to get new technologies but I don't know if they have the mechanisms they need. I was talking to a few flag officers in India. Since India doesn't have a proper battle management system today, they were looking at hardcore maps, like paper maps, to look at what things are happening. I'll tell you a story. Back in 2009-2010, I was starting another company in Atlanta, and I was approached by the Chinese Communist Party to build a company in Shanghai. They offered to provide me with resources and support for three years, including picking up the payroll costs but I would need to build the company there. Now obviously I declined but you see the way China was approaching this issue even in the 2010s. I was a big, vocal critic of this, and nobody in the US government was paying attention to this. What India needs today is a quantum leap on defence technology. India has leapfrogged in the past like with the telecom sector and it needs to do that again. Q. So what exactly is working in the Indian defence tech ecosystem? I think the IDEX platform launched by the Minister of Defence is uncovering a lot of new technologies that are being homegrown. IDEX is able to expose a lot of talent and technologies and that is important since there is a lot of talent in India and there are a lot of smart people there from a technology point of view. Q. How could India and America work more effectively together on this front? India and the US are the linchpins of democratic society for the next century and there is a threat to that. So just using that as a foundation, there are things India and America can do to work more closely here. For example, can there be reciprocity around clearances? If somebody is cleared over here in America, can they be given priority such that India does its own due diligence and provide a level of clearance that gives them access, or gives them permission to work on defence technology. That would be my first recommendation. Secondly, I was born in India but I'm now an American citizen. Now, there is always this gripe from the American side about India having a lot of Russian hardware. So how does interoperability work? Because India is not going to get rid of Russian hardware. So if we are providing our technology, how does it co-exist within the Indian ecosystem, next to a Russian system? That needs to be solved. I don't think there is a clear, easy solution. But can we define interfaces that are transparent, that protect sensitive secrets for both sides? That would be something to work on.
