Ireland's love affair with fossil fuels is an oil-soaked slippery slope
While the global conversation has increasingly focused on reducing reliance on fossil fuels like oil and gas, government action has been neither sufficient nor urgent enough.
As the world now faces the escalating impacts of this climate crisis — from drought and coastal erosion in Honduras, to storms here in Ireland — Trócaire's latest report examines Ireland's role in supporting the continued growth of this unsustainable industry, which endangers billions of lives around the world.
Launched just last Thursday, our report, 'Fuelling Injustice – Ireland's Fossil Fuel Problem', explains that the emissions from just 25 oil and gas corporations between 1985 and 2018 caused more than $20 trillion in damages, while at the same time amassing profits of $30 trillion.
Such figures starkly highlight the injustice of the situation.
Wealthier nations in the Global North, where emissions are highest, have not taken the lead in reducing their carbon footprints, instead allowing climate-harming corporations to operate primarily without regulation.
This negligence manifests as a human rights crisis across the globe, with marginalised communities—who have contributed the least to climate change—suffering the most. They face extreme weather, loss of lives and livelihoods, displacement, and hunger, pushing them deeper into poverty and amplifying existing inequalities.
Globally, governments continue to enable the expansion of this destructive industry, often at the expense of the world's most vulnerable populations.
Alarmingly, by 2030, governments collectively plan to produce more than double the amount of fossil fuels required to stay within the critical 1.5C warming limit, set by the Paris Agreement.
This completely disregards the scientific consensus, the necessity of phasing out fossil fuels to mitigate further climate impacts, and violates the agreements and obligations to protect and support those who have done the least to cause this crisis, but who are suffering the most.
Ireland's climate impact
It may not surprise many to read that Ireland is falling short of its commitments, but by how much is truly shocking. Current government policies and private sector initiatives are facilitating an increase in the country's fossil fuel demand and infrastructure, (such as plans for Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) facilities) and the proliferation of data centres.
These plans directly contradict Ireland's climate obligations and risk entangling the country in human rights abuses linked to continued high greenhouse gas emissions and excessive energy demands.
Claims that dependence on more polluting, fossil fuels is a solution to energy security couldn't be further from the truth. In reality, it only exacerbates vulnerability to geopolitical shifts and price shocks.
Right now, Earth is projected to reach a sobering 2.6 – 3.1°C of warming by 2100. However, if the rest of the world had polluted like Ireland, the world would already be at 3.6°C of warming.
Ireland is on a slippery slope to missing our emissions reduction target of 51% by 2030, with just a 23% reduction expected. Even before you consider the impacts of new liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities and the energy use of projected data centres, Ireland's ambition and delivery on climate action falls far short of our fair share.
These shortcomings alone are due to cost the country €26 billion — an alarming sign of a government failing to meet its obligations.
Ireland's role as a global financial hub further complicates the issue. With substantial investments in fossil fuel companies through Irish subsidiaries, Ireland is directly and significantly implicated in the climate crisis.
In June 2024, Irish investment firms held roughly €31.76 billion in fossil fuel assets, 91% of which were tied to companies actively expanding fossil fuel production.
The emissions linked to these investments exceeded Ireland's national emissions by a staggering 20%, underscoring the need for accountability on these activities, which is currently lacking.
The world's climate crisis
The climate crisis is fundamentally a human rights crisis, and there have been increasing calls from human rights treaty bodies for a complete fossil fuel phase-out and stringent regulations against corporations responsible for damage both at home and abroad.
In Malawi where Trócaire works, 56% of those affected by Cyclone Freddy's impacts were children. Following Cyclone Freddy, hundreds of health facilities were disrupted, while displacement camps faced limited access to sanitation and medical care, leading to a surge in the spread of cholera, malaria, malnutrition, covid-19, and other vaccine-treatable diseases.
This is what climate injustice looks like: those who do the least to cause the crisis are paying the highest price. Children, women and the world's most vulnerable are losing everything.
Action
It is time for a decisive shift away from fossil fuels. Ireland can be a key player in this transition by endorsing a global Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, by prohibiting new fossil fuel infrastructure, and swiftly implementing policies that promise a just phase-out of fossil fuels domestically, and urgently reduce emissions.
Every fraction of a degree of warming holds dire consequences, making every tonne of carbon pollution critical. Ireland must urgently align with the global call for action to mitigate against catastrophic climate breakdown. It's time to hold both polluters, states, corporations, and their investors accountable.
To address our complicity in the climate crisis, Trócaire is calling on the Irish Government to implement a Climate Damages Tax on fossil fuels investments, which could generate up to €3.33 billion by 2030 and €20 billion by 2050. This would help partially address the ecological debt incurred from exceeding our fair share of carbon limits.
Additionally, leveraging public finance to compel polluters to pay for their contributions to the crisis could provide critical resources for climate finance commitments and support marginalised communities; a Climate Damages Tax and other measures available to Ireland that would make polluters pay could generate up to €9.7 billion annually.
Failing to act decisively compromises our environment and increasingly stains our moral fabric as a nation responsible for national and global human rights. The time to act is long overdue.
Sinéad Loughran is Climate Justice, Policy, and Advocacy Advisor at Trócaire
Read More
Four billion endured extra month of extreme heat due to climate change – report
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
3 days ago
- The Journal
European Commission plans to allow countries to buy their way out of missing climate targets
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION has proposed a new climate target for 2040 – but campaigners say the plan to get there contains loopholes for countries to take advantage of. The Commission has said that the new approach will give countries a 'pragmatic and flexible way' to reach the 2040 target of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 90% compared to 1990 levels. However, one climate activist said that the target is 'weakened by loopholes that risk setting back years of progress', while another said aspects of it risk 'seriously undermining the EU's credibility on climate leadership'. The EU's key milestones for climate targets up until now have been 2030 and 2050, with benchmarks for progress during the time in between left somewhat vaguer. Countries have now finally gotten a look at what progress the EU will require them to make on climate action between now and 2040. A target to reduce emissions by 90% compared to 1990 will bridge the gap between the 2030 target of 55% and the 2050 target of net zero. The Commission said that it will consider 'flexibilities' in designing future legislation and measures for achieving that 2040 target. It said these 'flexibilities' include a 'limited role for high-quality international credits starting from 2036″. Carbon credits involve an emitter of greenhouse gases, such as a country, paying for emissions reductions to be made elsewhere instead of reducing their own. It's a practice that is often criticised by activists as failing to actually lead to meaningful reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, as well as reinforcing inequalities between developed and developing countries. Advertisement Under the Commission's proposal, countries would be able to count credits for 3% worth of reductions. The Commission also said it would allow 'greater flexibilities across sectors to help achieve targets in a cost-effective and socially fair way'. 'Concretely, this could give a Member State the possibility to compensate for the struggling land use sector with an overachievement on reducing emissions on waste and transport,' it said. The target still needs to be approved by the European Parliament and by member states before it becomes official. Climate campaigners have said that leaning on practices like carbon credits would be a step backwards for climate action in Europe. Senior Scientist at Climate Analytics Bill Hare said that the 2040 climate was meant to align EU policy with the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, but 'instead, it arrives weakened by loopholes that risk setting back years of progress'. 'From 2036, up to 3% of the target can be met through international carbon credits, outsourcing Europe's responsibility rather than cutting emissions at home,' Hare said. He added that the 'flexibility across sectors' could 'hand big polluters more ways to delay real action'. 'Europe's citizens expect truth and action, not paper solutions. Positive references to the cost of inaction and a fair transition remain, but they cannot mask loopholes that widen the gap between science and policy,' he said. Sven Harmeling of the Climate Action Network said that 'buying reduction credits from other countries risks seriously undermining the EU's credibility on climate leadership and sets a dangerous precedent that could weaken ambition globally'. 'This goes against the advice of the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change and would only further delay urgently needed domestic climate action,' Harmeling said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Independent
5 days ago
- Irish Independent
Planners seek clarity on Coalition's gas reserve policy before deciding fate of Shannon LNG plan
Planners have told the Government to clarify where it stands on private liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments as they grapple with the controversial Shannon LNG application. An Coimisiún Pleanála (formerly An Bord Pleanála) has written to the Environment Minister, saying it needs to know what the Coalition's official policy is before it makes any decisions on Shannon LNG's proposal.
Irish Times
24-06-2025
- Irish Times
We can't afford to let the climate crisis get swallowed up in the culture wars
Last week brought grim news about climate change , with the latest scientific assessments recognising that the 1.5 degree temperature increase, which was set as a goal in the Paris climate agreement, will now inevitably be breached. Another critical study showed that the climate impacts from what we have already put into the atmosphere will hit home far quicker and harder than most earlier models had predicted. Perhaps the scariest thing was that the news cycles barely paused to register these developments, as if people are too stunned by everything else going on in the world to notice. Or that they've heard it all before and prefer to believe those sceptical political voices who are sowing division and doubt for their own short-term electoral gain. In this vital decade of change, we are like a football team going into half-time 3-1 down, against a side that is full of certainty and mocking derision. There is a real risk the focus will turn to just managing the damage and not on making the evolutionary leap we need to make to address the root cause of the crisis. While the sceptics are full of swagger, I don't believe they will win out in the end. The vast majority of people are still deeply worried about the issue and want it addressed. It is not as if there can be any winners in this contest because every country is at risk. And that underlying common cause should help us turn things around. READ MORE Although the situation is dire and global emissions continue to rise, the one score in our favour is that some core climate solutions are coming much faster than predicted. Clean energy technologies such as solar and battery power are expanding at an exponential pace. We can also see how quickly biodiversity bounces back when good, nature-based solutions are put in place. Change is hard, but once ramped up we can increasingly see how it will help us all build healthier and stronger local communities, while also addressing the global threat. The three scores against us are all own goals that can be overturned given the right political will. The first relates to the fact that while investments in the clean and green revolution are happening in the US, Europe and China, the rest of the developing world, where the investment is needed most, is lagging behind. We know we need to raise $1.3 trillion (€1.1 trillion) of climate finance in developing countries each year to close that gap. Agreeing the necessary commitments and mechanisms to deliver this finance should not be an impossible task, given it amounts to less than 1 per cent of the $115 trillion global economy. Failure to deliver should not be a negotiating option. The second own goal is that some political parties and businesses are delaying the transition to protect their profits or shore up their electoral base. The solution here has to be to stick to the commitments and transparency mechanisms already required under the Paris climate agreement. We need to start here at home by agreeing to the targeted 90 per cent reduction in emissions by 2040, which the European Commission has proposed. At the same time, we should support international trade and investment agreements that favour countries and businesses who are joining the effort. [ Capitalism is incompatible with any kind of human flourishing on this planet Opens in new window ] The third and perhaps most critical thing we need to reverse is the way in which the climate issue has become part of a wider cultural war. We need governments to ensure that there is a just transition so that no one is left behind and the public has faith in what is happening. This will help the political centre to hold. We will also need a wider perspective because the cultural war has deep foundations, which cannot simply be ignored. No amount of economic argument or technological optimism alone is going to motivate us to meet the scale of the challenge ahead. It is time for artists, philosophers and theologians to stand up and help inspire and direct our actions. We need an alternative narrative that better addresses the underlying fears the reactionary side is able to feed off. That fightback could start today in London, where the Brazilian COP presidency is hosting the first of six global ethical stock-take events to look creatively at how we can tackle disinformation and promote new business models and cultural and spiritual perspectives. [ There are several ingenious tacks we can take to help cut our emissions Opens in new window ] Brazil is putting forward a concept it calls the 'mutirão', which comes from its indigenous culture and signifies a community coming together to work on a shared task, much like our own tradition of working on a meitheal. If we can get the culture right, then people will show up – and the politics and policies will surely follow.
