Obama should be out there more countering Trump in 'moment of crisis,' MSNBC panelist says
"I know he's done being president, and many will say he doesn't owe us anything else, but I think if we are in a moment of crisis, and you've ever led this country, you should still care about this country enough to be out there. I've had this crazy thought that if every time Donald Trump did something crazy or said something crazy, Barack Obama should have a press conference or something," Shaniqua McClendon, the vice president of political strategy at Crooked Media, said during MSNBC's "The Weekend."
McClendon agreed with Obama's recent suggestion that Democrats should "toughen up," but urged the former president to get out there more himself as someone who served as president.
"He is someone who can command attention. And so part of where I don't think it's fair is, most Democrats are not Barack Obama. They can't command attention the way he can. And we're in a media environment that even if you are fighting, if no one hears you, it's not worth anything. People listen to him. So I do think it's fair," McClendon continued.
During a July fundraiser, Obama suggested members of the party should stop complaining so much.
"I think it's going to require a little bit less navel-gazing and a little less whining and being in fetal positions. And it's going to require Democrats to just toughen up," Obama said at the fundraiser, according to excerpts obtained by CNN. "Don't tell me you're a Democrat, but you're kind of disappointed right now, so you're not doing anything. No, now is exactly the time that you get in there and do something."
MSNBC host Catherine Rampell wondered if Obama would be accused of sucking up all the oxygen if he was out there more.
"He probably would be accused of that. But those people are not pushing through right now," McClendon said.
She suggested some Democrats, such as Reps. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., were breaking through, but most were not.
"The point now is that we are in a really dire situation… Our rights are being taken away every day. And if Barack Obama is someone who can push back on that and at least get people to pay attention to the fact that that's happening, it matters a lot. And so, yeah, I think that is not an argument, I wish that was the thing we had to worry about," she added.
Hosts of "The View" criticized Obama's advice, arguing that Democrats had been out there fighting against Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump calls Epstein saga a Democratic ‘con job'
President Trump late Thursday took another job at Democrats over the furor around his administration's handling of the files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, calling the controversy a 'con job.' 'The Radical Left Democrats are doing everything in their power to distract and obfuscate from our GREAT six months of service to America, results of which many are saying is the BEST six months in Presidential history,' Trump posted to Truth Social. He continued, 'They have gone absolutely CRAZY, and are playing another Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax but, this time, under the guise of what we will call the Jeffrey Epstein SCAM.' 'As things are revealed and, I hope will take place quickly, you will see that it is yet another Democrat CON JOB,' the president added. 'Hopefully, the Grand Jury Files will put an end to this HOAX.' Trump last week directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to request the release of grand jury testimonies from the disgraced financier and his charged co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. The move came after pressure from Democrats and conservatives alike, including some from his own MAGA base, for more transparency in the case. On Wednesday, a judge declined the Department of Justice's (DOJ) request. Even with extensive public demand and time to review the request, U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg said, 'The Court's hands are tied.' The president has argued that unsealing the documents will not appease critics and asked why those on the left did not release the files when former President Biden was in office and the Democrats held a majority in the Senate. The public has also pressed DOJ for more transparency following the release of the Trump administration's memo which concluded Epstein did not keep a 'client list' and that the convicted sex offender's 2019 death in his jail cell would still be ruled a suicide. A new survey from Emersen College Polling released Friday shows that more than 50 percent of voters disapprove of how the administration handled the probe — spurring fears over whether the issue could come into play during the 2026 midterms. An earlier Fox News poll also found that 60 percent of GOP voters believe the government is not being transparent about the files. Some Republicans in Congress have also split with Trump on the Epstein file controversy, which the president has attempted to move on from in recent days, to no avail. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) — who pushed a vote on a resolution to call for the Trump administration to release more files on Epstein until after the August recess — told CBS News in an interview Thursday that the case is 'not a hoax.' A notable contrast to Trump's 'witch hunt' claims. Johnson has been trying to calm lawmakers from both sides of the aisle who are demanding Trump's DOJ for more information. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been a staunch critic of the president, said he will lead a bipartisan resolution, which will be co-sponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), to force the administration to release everything. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche also met with Maxwell on Thursday and is expected to continue his questioning on Friday. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) also issued a subpoena for the embattled socialite, believing he will depose her on Aug. 11.
Hamilton Spectator
2 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Republicans and independents have warmed on Supreme Court since 2022 abortion ruling: AP-NORC poll
WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans' views of the Supreme Court have moderated somewhat since the court's standing dropped sharply after its ruling overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, according to a new poll. But concern that the court has too much power is rising, fueled largely by Democrats. The survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that about a third of U.S. adults have 'hardly any confidence at all' in the court, but that's down from 43% three years ago. As the new AP-NORC polling tracker shows, about half of Americans have 'only some confidence' in the court, up from 39% in July 2022, while a relatively small number, about 1 in 5, have 'a great deal of confidence,' which hasn't shifted meaningfully in the past few years. The moderate increase in confidence is driven by Republicans and independents. Still, views of the nation's highest court remain more negative than they were as recently as early 2022, before the high-profile ruling that overturned the constitutional right to abortion. An AP-NORC poll conducted in February 2022 found that only around one-quarter of Americans had hardly any confidence in the court's justices. Persistent divide between Republicans and Democrats The partisan divide has been persistent and stark, particularly since the Dobbs ruling, when Democrats' confidence in the nine justices plummeted. The survey shows Republicans are happier than Democrats and independents with the conservative-dominated court, which includes three justices appointed by President Donald Trump, a Republican. Few Republicans, just 8%, view the court dimly, down from about 1 in 5 in July 2022. For independents, the decline was from 45% just after the Dobbs ruling to about 3 in 10 now. The views among Democrats were more static, but they are also slightly less likely to have low confidence in the justices, falling from 64% in summer 2022 to 56% now. In recent years, the court has produced historic victories for Republican policy priorities. The justices overturned Roe, leading to abortion bans in many Republican-led states, ended affirmative action in college admissions, expanded gun rights , restricted environmental regulations and embraced claims of religious discrimination. Many of the court's major decisions from this year are broadly popular, according to a Marquette Law School poll conducted in July. But other polling suggests that most don't think the justices are ruling neutrally. A recent Fox News poll found that about 8 in 10 registered voters think partisanship plays a role in the justices' decisions either 'frequently' or 'sometimes.' Last year, the conservative majority endorsed a robust view of presidential immunity and allowed Trump to avoid a criminal trial on election interference charges . In recent months, the justices on the right handed Trump a string of victories, including a ruling that limits federal judges' power to issue nationwide injunctions . Katharine Stetson, a self-described constitutional conservative from Paradise, Nevada, said she is glad that the court has reined in 'the rogue judges, the district judges around the country' who have blocked some Trump initiatives. Stetson, 79, said she is only disappointed it took so long. 'Finally. Why did they allow it get out of hand?' she said. Growing concerns the court is too powerful Several recent decisions were accompanied by stinging dissents from liberal justices who complained the court was giving Trump too much leeway and taking power for itself. 'Perhaps the degradation of our rule-of-law regime would happen anyway. But this court's complicity in the creation of a culture of disdain for lower courts, their rulings, and the law (as they interpret it) will surely hasten the downfall of our governing institutions, enabling our collective demise,' Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote when the court ruled on nationwide injunctions. The July AP-NORC poll found a growing similar sentiment. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults now say the court has 'too much' power in the way the federal government operates these days. In April, about 3 in 10 people were concerned about the court's power. The shift is largely due to movement among Democrats, rising from about one-third in April to more than half now. Debra A. Harris, a 60-year-old retired state government worker who now lives in Winter Haven, Florida, said the court's decisions in recent years 'just disgust me to my soul.' Harris said the court has changed in recent years, with the addition of the three justices appointed by Trump. 'I find so much of what they're doing is based so much on the ideology of the Republican ticket,' Harris said, singling out last year's immunity decision. 'We don't have kings. We don't have dictators.' George Millsaps, who flew military helicopters and served in Iraq, said the justices should have stood up to Trump in recent months, including on immigration, reducing the size of the federal workforce and unwinding the Education Department. 'But they're bowing down, just like Congress apparently is now, too,' said Millsaps, a 67-year-old resident of Floyd County in rural southwest Virginia. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,437 adults was conducted July 10-14, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at .
Fox News
3 minutes ago
- Fox News
SCOOP: Key GOP group starts work on 2nd 'big, beautiful bill' for Trump
FIRST ON FOX: House Republicans are already discussing contours for a potential second "big, beautiful bill" advancing President Donald Trump's agenda. The Republican Study Committee (RSC), the 189-member-strong group that acts as a de facto "think tank" for the House GOP, is launching a working group to look at what a second budget reconciliation bill would look like, Fox News Digital has learned. It's the largest organized effort so far by congressional Republicans to follow through on GOP leaders' hopes for a second massive agenda bill. "We must capitalize on the momentum we've generated in the first 6 months of a Republican trifecta in Washington," RSC Chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital. "To fulfill the promises we made to the American people, conservatives must begin laying the groundwork for the second reconciliation bill to ensure we continue to drive down the cost of living and restore America's promise for future generations." House Republicans left Washington on Wednesday to kick off a five-week recess period, where they're readying to sell the benefits of their first massive agenda bill to their constituents. Meanwhile, Pfluger also directed lawmakers part of the new working group to begin reaching out to colleagues, conservative senators, and GOP organizations about potential policy proposals for a new bill, Fox News Digital was told. The goal of the new group is to create a framework for what a second "big, beautiful bill" could look like, and to recommend that framework to GOP leaders. The first bill was a massive piece of legislation advancing Trump's agenda on taxes, the border, immigration, defense, and energy. It made much of Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) permanent, while imposing new work requirements on Medicaid and food stamps, among other measures. After passing the House and Senate, Trump signed it into law during a celebratory event on the Fourth of July. But the political fight to get just one reconciliation bill took Herculean political efforts across both the House and Senate, with debates and even heated arguments ongoing for months before the bill passed. Notably, however, Republicans did get the legislation to Trump's desk by July 4 – meeting a goal that many in the media and even within GOP circles thought impossible. The budget reconciliation process allows the party controlling the White House and both chambers of Congress to pass massive partisan policy overhauls, while completely sidelining the other side – in this case, Democrats. Reconciliation bills can pass the Senate with a simple majority rather than 60 votes, lining up with the House's own passage threshold. But the legislation must adhere to a specific set of rules and only involve measures related to fiscal policy. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told "Sunday Morning Futures" earlier this month that he was eyeing multiple reconciliation bills. "With President Trump coming back to the White House, and us having the responsibility for fixing every metric of public policy that Biden and Harris and the Democrats destroyed over the previous four years – so the big beautiful bill was the first big step in that," he told host Maria Bartiromo. "But we have multiple steps ahead of us. We have long planned for at least two, possibly three, reconciliation bills, one in the fall and one next spring."
