Bougainville advocacy group prepares record number of women for election
Photo:
Autonomous Bougainville Government
A Bougainville advocacy group that champions women in the autonomous Papua New Guinea region has been running training workshops to prepare female candidates for next month's election.
Bougainville will to the polls on 4 September.
There is a record number of women candidates, with 14 lining up in the three seats reserved for women, and also the largest number yet taking on the men in the open constituencies.
Helen Hakena, left, heads the Leitana Nehan Women's Development Agency.
Photo:
Facebook / Leitana Nehan Women's Development Agency
Helen Hakena, who heads the Leitana Nehan Women's Development Agency, told RNZ Pacific about the nature of the work her organisation has been undertaking to raise confidence levels among aspiring women politicians.
(This transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity.)
Helen Hakena:
Leitana Nehan Women's Development Agency, even before the writs were open, we were conducting training, leadership training across Bougainville for potential women candidates, to give them confidence in running for elections. We are so happy that there are 37 women candidates now contesting this election.
Don Wiseman: Yes, I actually was told by the Electoral Commissioner there are 34 women.
HH:
Yeah 34.
DW: What's the nature of the training?
HH:
What politics is about. What is politics. The role of parliamentarians and how to do manifestos. We have been running training for women on that because women lack training.
We have experienced that in the past elections few who contested knew a lot about what politics was.
We wanted to run training for more women so that they had the confidence in knowing what the responsibilities of Parliamentarians would be. So that is why and how to campaign as well.
Those are the topics that we were running for the women.
DW: One of the big issues for women in the past has been they haven't had the support from other women out in the electorates. Do you think that's changing on Bougainville?
HH:
This is changing in Bougainville. We have got great confidence in women. That is why we are working together to progress, to push women leaders who are capable of participating at the highest level decision making bodies like the parliament. It has changed over the years.
DW: There are two women at the moment in open seats. Do you think there'll be more come this next election?
HH:
There will be more? Yeah, in this election, we are hoping that there would be more, because we are seeing the interest and the confidence that men in our communities have for women, women leaders across all constituencies.
So we are looking forward to more women winning the constituency seats this time around.
DW: Now the reserved seats for women, it's not something that's going to stay in place forever. When do you think Bougainville will be ready to not have reserved seats for women?
HH:
When Bougainville is independent and we are ready, I believe in women, and I have great confidence in women contesting the same seats as men.
I believe that during the period when we are independent in the next five years, then we will be very confident in women, pulling women into those places.
DW: When Bougainville went into the last election, looking ahead at that five year period through to 2025 there had been an expectation, I think, with many, that at the end of that period, there would be independence. But is Bougainville any closer to independence than it was in 2020?
HH:
Like Bougainville now is much closer to independence than what it was in 2020 because everyone on the ground, we've had independent ready activities going on in all constituencies across Bougainville.
This shows us that people in the communities around Bougainville, we are ready for independence in 2027.
DW: What are the major issues do you think that your organization would like to see women MPs pushing in the parliament?
HH:
The major issues would be, you know, we really would like this government, if we are an independent nation, we would like a democratic government. We would like a government that would allow people their choices, to be consulted on issues affecting Bougainville during this period and the period when we are independent.
We would really like to see an independent and democratic government, because we have fought for peace and our freedom as well, and we do not want that to be thrown out the window.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Labelling rules ease for genetically-modified food made without new DNA added, amid reform
Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The appetite for food made with the use of gene technologies will be tested in New Zealand, amid ongoing regulatory reform and an easing of food labelling requirements. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) approved updated definitions for genetically-modified (GM) food in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code in June for review, following public consultation. In late July, Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard and his Australian counterparts decided to adopt them. Food produced using new breeding techniques, including gene editing, will not need to be labelled as "GM" on the food label, if novel or new DNA was not introduced in the process. Simultaneously, the government was considering a new regulatory regime for gene technologies used outside the laboratory, after it attracted 15,000 submissions during select committee earlier this year. Minister Andrew Hoggard told RNZ last week, there was some vocal opposition to FSANZ's P1055 proposal during public consultation from those who "don't believe in [genetic engineering]." "There was still some vocal opposition, so that was taken onboard. Obviously, there was support from a lot of industry and scientific groups," he said. Andrew Hoggard said producers could still choose to disclose gene technologies to label it as such. (File photo) Photo: 123RF Hoggard said in removing the requirement, producers could still choose to disclose gene technologies used throughout production on the label. "There's nothing stopping anyone who is producing food that doesn't have any new breeding technologies to label it as such. We're not outlawing that people don't have to put these labels on." He said it came down to consumer's choice. "So if the organic sector, for example, doesn't want to allow these new breeding techniques in their production, then people who also think they don't want to consume food that's had new breeding techniques used in them, then they can just buy organic and know that 'okay, that hasn't been used'. "If this is something you're not worried about, then just go ahead shopping as normal," he said. "If it is something you are concerned about, producers who will be using the old methodologies will still be able to highlight on the packaging that, 'hey, we don't use the X, Y and Z' or 'we don't do this or that'. And you just need to go and look for that food." Hoggard said to the best of his knowledge, no health issues had been raised from the consumption of GMO products, like soya bean for example. Meanwhile, GE-Free New Zealand spokesperson Jon Carapiet said the eased labelling requirements took informed choices away from the consumer. GE-Free New Zealand spokesperson Jon Carapiet. Photo: RNZ "It's really fundamentally unethical to take away the ordinary consumer's choice in the supermarkets," Carapiet said. "It's all about trust, and to say 'we're not gonna even trust you to make your own decisions anymore'... is really wrong." He said the assertion that shoppers concerned about GM food would simply buy organic food instead was "disingenuous". "The average consumer certainly can't afford to go and buy organics on everyday basis. I wish they could, but they can't," he said. "So to say all the ordinary people of New Zealand don't deserve the right to choose, I think that's very wrong." Carapiet said supermarkets could ask their suppliers to disclose the use of gene technologies throughout production to ensure transparency and to inform shoppers about the product they were buying. "I think that in the coming months, if this does go ahead, companies will have to go above and beyond the food authority standards. "If the food authority FSANZ says 'no you can have GM crops and GE foods unlabelled in the supermarket', then it's going to be for the supermarkets to voluntarily label it." In a written statement, a Foodstuffs spokesperson said it took food safety "very seriously" and complied fully with the Australia and New Zealand Food Standards Code, including all labelling requirements. "Customers have the right to know what's in the food they're buying," they said. "As part of our supplier agreements, we require partners to disclose country of origin information, and any environmental or social claims must be accurate and substantiated." They said the same approach applied to food made using gene technologies, including GM ingredients. "Any changes to regulation in this space will be carefully reviewed, and we'll continue to ensure our labelling provides customers with accurate and transparent information, so they can make informed choices." A Woolworths New Zealand spokesperson said it will make sure its retail items complied with labelling rules. "If the labelling rules in New Zealand change then we would ensure all products comply with labelling requirements," they said. A government report on the Gene Technology Bill was expected on August 22. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Marshall Islands President warns of threat to Pacific Islands Forum unity
Marshall Islands President Hilda Heine, flanked by Speaker Brenson Wase, right, and parliament Chaplain Rev. Lawson Matauto, at Monday's opening session of parliament where she delivered strongly worded remarks supporting Taiwan's participation as a development partner in the Pacific Islands Forum Photo: Wilmer Joel Leaders of the three Pacific nations with diplomatic ties to Taiwan are united in a message to the Pacific Islands Forum that the premier regional body must not allow non-member countries to dictate Forum policies - a reference to the China-Taiwan geopolitical debate. Marshall Islands President Hilda Heine, in remarks to the opening of parliament in Majuro Monday this week, joined leaders from Tuvalu and Palau in strongly worded comments putting the region on notice that the future unity and stability of the Forum hangs in the balance of decisions that are made for next month's Forum leaders' meeting in the Solomon Islands - just three years since the organization pulled back from the brink of splintering. Marshall Islands, Palau and Tuvalu are among the 12 countries globally that maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan. At issue is next month's annual meeting of leaders is being hosted by Solomon Islands, which is closely allied to China, and the concern that the Solomon Islands will choose to limit or prevent Taiwan's engagement in the Forum, despite it being a major donor partner to the three island nations as well as a donor to the Forum Secretariat. President Surangel Whipps Jr Photo: Richard Brooks China worked to marginalize Taiwan and its international relationships including getting the Forum to eliminate a reference to Taiwan in last year's Forum leaders' communique after leaders had agreed on the text. "I believe firmly that the Forum belongs to its members, not countries that are non-members," said President Heine Monday in parliament's opening ceremony. "And non-members should not be allowed to dictate how our premier regional organization conducts its business." Heine continued: "We witnessed at the Forum in Tonga how China, a world superpower, interfered to change the language of the Forum Communique, the communiqué of our Pacific Leaders…If the practice of interference in the affairs of the Forum becomes the norm, then I question our nation's membership in the organization." She cited the position of the three Taiwan allies in the Pacific in support of Taiwan participation at next month's Forum. Tuvalu's Prime Minister Feleti Teo Photo: LUDOVIC MARIN "There should not be any debate on the issue since Taiwan has been a Forum development partner since 1993," Heine said. Heine also mentioned that there is an "ongoing review of the regional architecture of the Forum" and its many agencies "to ensure that their deliverables are on target, and inter-agency conflicts are minimized." The President said during this review of the Forum and its agencies, "it is critical that the question of Taiwan's participation in Forum meetings is settled once and for all to safeguard equity and sovereignty of member governments."
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Brazil police place former President Bolsonaro under house arrest
By Ricardo Brito , Reuters Former President Jair Bolsonaro faces charges that he conspired with dozens of his allies to overturn his 2022 electoral loss. Photo: Mateus Bonomi / AFP Brazilian authorities placed former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing trial on charges of plotting a coup, under house arrest, in a move that could escalate tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes issued the arrest order, saying in his decision that the right-wing firebrand did not comply with judicial restraining orders imposed on him last month. Bolsonaro is facing charges that he conspired with dozens of his allies to overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Moraes also banned Bolsonaro from receiving visits, with exceptions for lawyers and people authorized by the court, and use of a cell phone either directly or through third parties. A press representative for Bolsonaro confirmed that he was placed under house arrest late afternoon on Monday and that a cell phone had been seized. In a statement, Brazil's federal police said it had complied with the Supreme Court's orders for house arrest and to seize cell phones, though it did not name the target of the operation. The restrictions on Bolsonaro had been imposed over allegations that he courted the interference of Trump, who recently tied steep new tariffs on Brazilian goods to what he called a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro, his ideological ally. The house arrest order follows over two years of investigations into Bolsonaro's role in an election-denying movement that culminated in riots by his supporters that rocked Brasilia in January 2023. The unrest drew comparisons to the riots at the US Capitol after Trump's electoral defeat in 2020. In contrast with the tangle of criminal cases which mostly stalled against Trump, Brazilian courts and investigators moved swiftly against Bolsonaro, threatening to end his political career and fracture his right-wing movement. Bolsonaro's son Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian congressman, moved to the US around the same time the former president's trial kicked off to drum up support for his father in Washington. The younger Bolsonaro said the move had influenced Trump's decision to impose new tariffs on Brazil. Trump last month shared a letter he had sent to Bolsonaro. "I have seen the terrible treatment you are receiving at the hands of an unjust system turned against you," he wrote. "This trial should end immediately!" Washington late in July hit Moraes with sanctions, accusing the judge of authorizing arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Bolsonaro's house arrest. However, Trump's tactics may be backfiring in Brazil, compounding trouble for Bolsonaro and rallying public support behind Lula's leftist government. In an interview with Reuters last month, Bolsonaro called Moraes a "dictator" and said the restrictive measures against him were acts of "cowardice." - Reuters
