These 4 Habits Could Help You Avoid Cognitive Decline, New Study Says
A new study suggests exercise, diet and regular healthcare check-ups may lower dementia risk.
That includes physical exercise—ideally six times per week—and mental exercises to keep you sharp.
Following the MIND diet, a combination of the Mediterranean and DASH diets, may also support better brain health.Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias are significant public health challenges for many reasons. More people are being affected by dementia, and the condition can bring heavy emotional, social and financial burdens. And as much as you or a loved one may want to lower your dementia risk, it can be hard to figure out where to start.
Memory decline in older adults often has multiple causes, so effective treatments ideally tackle several targets at once. While new medications that target amyloid (a group of proteins linked to Alzheimer's) show promise in slowing the disease in its early stages, they don't address other common problems like blood vessel damage in the brain, which can also contribute to memory loss. This highlights the need for better, more comprehensive treatments.
Non-drug approaches, like improving lifestyle factors, offer a safe, affordable, and accessible way to reduce dementia risk. A groundbreaking study in Finland (called the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability, or FINGER) showed that combining certain healthy lifestyle changes improved memory and thinking in older adults at risk for dementia.
To determine if the positive results from the FINGER study in Finland could also apply to a larger and more diverse group of people in the United States who are at risk for dementia, researchers studied this method's impact on brain health and thinking abilities, and the results were published in JAMA. This study was called the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk, or U.S. POINTER.
How Was This Study Conducted?
Researchers recruited subjects for this study by using electronic health records and by working with local community organizations to reach people directly. The goal was to include older adults (ages 60 to 79) who didn't have memory problems but were at higher risk of developing dementia.
To qualify, participants had to meet specific criteria regarding both lifestyle factors and risk factors. Those factors included having low physical activity levels—meaning less than 60 minutes of moderate exercise per week—and not following the MIND diet, which is designed to support brain health. As for risk factors, participants needed to meet at least two of the following conditions:
A close family member (like a parent or sibling) had memory problems.
They had health risks like high blood pressure, high cholesterol or high blood sugar.
They identified as part of a racial or ethnic group that is often underrepresented in research, such as Native American, Black, Middle Eastern, or Hispanic or Latino.
They were in the older age range (70 to 79 years old) or were male, as men are often underrepresented in dementia prevention studies.
Both groups focused on improving brain health through physical activity, cognitive activity, healthy eating, social engagement and heart health monitoring. The difference between the two groups was in how the program was delivered. The first group was the structured group, and participants in this group received extra support from trained professionals and worked closely with peer teams of 10-15 people for motivation and accountability. Participants attended 38 team meetings over two years, and meetings were led by trained navigators and specialists. They also participated in the following:
Physical exercise: 30-35 minutes of moderate-to-intense aerobic activity four times a week, plus strength and flexibility exercises twice a week.
Cognitive exercise: Computer-based brain training program three times a week for 30 minutes, plus regular engagement in other intellectually challenging and social activities.
Nutrition: Adherence to the MIND diet, which emphasizes dark leafy greens, berries, nuts, whole grains, olive oil and fish, and limits sugar and unhealthy fats.
Health monitoring: Regular check-ins (every 6 months) on blood pressure, weight and lab results.
The second group was the self-guided group. This group was more independent but still had access to resources and support from peer teams and navigators from the Alzheimer's Association. Participants received publicly available resources about healthy lifestyle changes, such as tips on exercise, diet and brain health. They only attended six peer team meetings over two years, and had their health checked once a year during clinic visits, following standard health guidelines.
This study measured brain health and thinking abilities using a global cognitive score, which combined results from three key areas: executive function, which includes skills like planning, problem-solving, and multitasking; episodic memory, which focuses on remembering specific events or experiences; and processing speed, which measures how quickly the brain can handle information. To calculate the global score, participants completed a series of brain tests during clinic visits at the start of the study and every six months for two years.
What Did The Study Find?
Both groups in the U.S. POINTER study showed improvements in overall brain function over time as measured by their global cognitive scores. After adjusting for certain factors, the structured group improved slightly faster than the self-guided group, and this difference was statistically significant.
When focusing on the different cognitive areas the researchers measured, here is what they found:
Executive Function: In planning, problem-solving and multitasking, the structured group improved more than the self-guided group, and the difference was statistically significant.
Processing Speed: In gauging how long the brain took to process information, the structured group also showed slightly greater improvement—however, this difference was not statistically significant.
Episodic Memory: As for remembering specific events, both groups improved at about the same rate, with no meaningful difference between them.
The structured program seemed to have the biggest impact on participants who started the study with lower cognitive function. However, the structured program worked similarly well regardless of participants' sex, age or heart health at the start of the study. Additionally, the effects of the structured program were the same for people with or without the APOE ε4 gene, which research has linked to a higher risk of Alzheimer's disease.
In summary, the structured program provided the most benefit for executive function and was especially helpful for participants who started with lower cognitive abilities. Other factors like age, sex and genetic risk didn't seem to change how effective the program was.
This study has a few limitations to consider. First, the results might not apply to everyone because the study only took place at five sites, included participants specifically at higher risk for cognitive decline and required a significant two-year commitment from participants. Second, the study wasn't designed to measure whether the interventions could prevent cognitive impairment or dementia, so those outcomes remain unknown.
It's also worth noting that the self-guided group wasn't a true 'no-intervention' control group, as they still received some resources and support. Plus, participants knew which group they were in, which could have influenced their behavior or results. Additionally, it's unclear how long the benefits of the structured program will last, how easily it could be scaled up for larger populations or how meaningful the improvements are in the long term.
How Does This Apply to Real Life?
This study highlights the power of lifestyle changes when it comes to supporting brain health and reducing the risk of memory decline. It shows that combining regular exercise, a brain-healthy diet, mental stimulation and social engagement may make a real difference, especially for people at higher risk of dementia.
The structured program, which provided extra guidance and support, was particularly effective in improving skills like planning, problem-solving and multitasking. This observation suggests that having a clear plan and access to professional support may help people stick to healthy habits and see better results. But the self-guided group, which had more flexibility, showed improvements, proving that small, consistent changes in daily life can still benefit brain health.
This means that adopting healthier habits like staying active, following the MIND diet, engaging in mentally challenging activities, and staying socially connected can be a practical and accessible way to protect brain health. While the study focused on older adults at risk for dementia, the findings are a reminder that it's never too early or too late to start making positive changes.
Our Expert Take
A study recently published in JAMA provides valuable evidence that lifestyle changes can play a significant role in supporting brain health and reducing the risk of cognitive decline. In particular, these findings highlight the potential of combining regular exercise, a brain-healthy diet, mental stimulation and social engagement to improve cognitive health, especially for those at higher risk of dementia.
Both structured and self-guided programs led to improvements in overall brain function, with the structured program showing slightly greater benefits, particularly in areas like planning, problem-solving, and multitasking. Importantly, the study also demonstrated that even small, self-guided changes can make a meaningful difference, making these strategies accessible to a wide range of people.
Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Experiment Recreates The Universe's Very First Chemical Reactions
The first chemical reactions in the wake of the Big Bang have been recreated for the first time in conditions similar to those in the baby Universe. A team of physicists Led by Florian Grussie of the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (MPIK) in Germany has reproduced the reactions of helium hydride ion (HeH+), a molecule made from a neutral helium atom fusing with an ionized atom of hydrogen. These are the first steps that lead to the formation of molecular hydrogen (H2); the most abundant molecule in the Universe and the stuff from which stars are born. The new work, therefore, elucidates some of the earliest processes that gave rise to the Universe as we know it today. Related: The First Molecular Bond in The Universe Has Finally Been Detected in Space The birth throes of the Universe some 13.8 billion years ago produced a hot, dense soup of fundamental particles simmering at temperatures too high for atoms to form. It took about 380,000 years for nuclei and electrons to lose enough energy to congeal into the very first elements. Those elements were the lightest the periodic table has to offer; about 75 percent hydrogen, 25 percent helium, and trace amounts of lithium. Hydrogen continues to dominate the Universe's ingredient list today, as clouds of molecular gas that give birth to the stellar furnaces from which the heavier elements are born, either through fusion or violent explosions. None of that, however, could happen without HeH+ – a molecule that scientists believe played a huge role in cooling the Universe enough so that the molecular clouds could contract enough to attain the density required to collapse under their own gravity to form the seeds of baby stars. That's because HeH+ has a comparatively large separation between its positive and negative charges. In the presence of an electric field, a molecule with a large charge separation undergoes an energy shift that helps dissipate heat, which means HeH+ theoretically played a key role in paving the way for the formation of the first stars. The researchers performed their experiments at the Max Planck Institute's Cryogenic Storage Ring, a facility designed to perform experiments in a vacuum environment at temperatures just a few degrees above absolute zero, around -267 degrees Celsius (-449 Fahrenheit), mimicking the conditions of deep space. There, they carefully studied interactions between HeH+ and a hydrogen atom with one extra neutron in its nucleus, known as deuterium. An interaction between HeH+ and deuterium generates a neutral helium atom and a molecule consisting of one neutral hydrogen atom and one charged deuterium atom (HD+), with lower energy levels than the original components. Within the storage ring, the researchers fired two beams of particles; one with HeH+ molecules, the other with neutral deuterium. They changed the speed of the two beams to alter the energy at which the particles collided as a proxy for temperature to see if temperature played a role in the reaction rate. It did not. The rate at which the reaction took place remained steady, regardless of the proxy temperature – suggesting that the role HeH+ played in the early Universe did not decline as cooling unfolded, and that its role in the formation of the first generation of stars was a significant one. "Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues," physicist Holger Kreckel from the MPIK explains. "The reactions of HeH+ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early Universe than previously assumed." The research has been published in Astronomy & Astrophysics. Related News Scientists Just Admitted Nobody Really Gets Quantum Physics First Quantum Bit Made of Antimatter Captured in Physics Breakthrough Gold Does Something Unexpected When Superheated Past Its Melting Point Solve the daily Crossword


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Macquarie to Buy Stake in Portuguese Hospital Group Luz Saude
Macquarie Group Ltd. is set to buy a minority stake in Portuguese hospital operator Luz Saude SA, outbidding rivals CVC Capital Partners Plc and KKR & Co., according to people familiar with the matter. Sydney-based Macquarie agreed to purchase about 40% of Luz Saude from Fidelidade-Companhia de Seguros SA, a Portuguese insurer controlled by Chinese conglomerate Fosun International Ltd, said the people, who asked not to be named because the information is confidential. The deal could be signed in the coming days and would give Luz Saude an enterprise value of more than €1 billion, one of the people said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Crushers to slashers: Dinosaur bite styles reveal evolution's many paths
A new study finds that meat-eating dinosaurs followed remarkable evolutionary paths regarding their skull design and feeding style. In a new study published in Cell, researchers from the University of Bristol investigated the largest carnivore dinosaurs, the Theroposa family. The T. rex is the most iconic member of that group, and it is also famous for producing the largest bipedal carnivore in Earth's history. 'Carnivorous dinosaurs took very different paths as they evolved into giants in feeding biomechanics and possible behaviors,' said Andrew Rowe of the University of Bristol, UK. The new study explores how the skulls of these bipedal meat-eating giants evolved and offers intriguing insights into a way of life that exists no longer. These dinosaurs are big, but what does that mean about their skulls? A new study out of the University of Bristol analyzed the bite strength of 18 species of carnivorous dinosaurs. Study authors Andrew Rowe and Emily Rayfield wanted to know how bipedalism influenced skull biomechanics and feeding techniques. Experts already knew that although this group of dinosaurs reached similar sizes, predators evolved at different times and in disparate parts of the world. And their skulls reflected that. Study authors wanted to dive in and assess how these skulls compared. What is the relationship between their body size and skull biomechanics? A snapshot of how carnivores developed Rowe and Rayfield used 3D technologies, including CT and surface scans, to analyze skull mechanics, quantify feeding performance, and measure bite strength across 18 species of theropod, according to a press release. The Tyrannosaurus rex skull was optimized for quick, strong bites like a crocodile. However, its evolutionary path was different from that of other giant predatory species, such as spinosaurs and allosaurs, which walked on two legs. It had weaker bites and instead specialized in slashing and ripping flesh. 'Tyrannosaurs evolved skulls built for strength and crushing bites, while other lineages had comparatively weaker but more specialized skulls, suggesting diverse feeding strategies even at massive sizes. In other words, there wasn't one 'best' skull design for being a predatory giant; several designs functioned perfectly well,' says Andrew Rowe from the University of Bristol. But the Tyrannosaurids, like the T. rex, experienced higher skull stress. 'But in some other giants, like Giganotosaurus, we calculated stress patterns suggesting a relatively lighter bite. It drove home how evolution can produce multiple 'solutions' to life as a large, carnivorous biped.' Does size matter? But size didn't necessarily matter in this case. Some smaller therapods experienced more stress than some of the larger species due to increased muscle volume and bite forces. 'The findings show that being a predatory biped didn't always equate to being a bone-crushing giant. Unlike T. rex, some dinosaurs, including the spinosaurs and allosaurs, became giants while maintaining weaker bites more suited for slashing at prey and stripping flesh,' concludes a press release. 'I tend to compare Allosaurus to a modern Komodo dragon in terms of feeding style,' says Rowe. 'Large tyrannosaur skulls were instead optimized like modern crocodiles with high bite forces that crushed prey. This biomechanical diversity suggests that dinosaur ecosystems supported a wider range of giant carnivore ecologies than we often assume, with less competition and more specialization.' Solve the daily Crossword