Ex-Iranian president did not die in latest Iran-Israel war
"Breaking news! Helicopter crash / According to the report, the plane carrying Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi exploded (June 24)," partly reads the Tagalog-language caption of a Facebook post shared on June 25.
It displays an image that appears to be from a TV report, with screenshots of comments plastered all over it. The Tagalog-language chyron says, "Foreign leaders offered their condolences after the death of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi."
The posts circulated after Iran retaliated against Israel's major bombardment campaign on June 13 targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites and killing top officials (archived link).
Residential areas have also been hit in the fighting, with the health ministry in Tehran reporting at least 627 civilians killed and 4,900 wounded (archived link).
Iran's retaliatory attacks on Israel have killed 28 people, according to official figures.
While Iran and Israel have been locked in a shadow war for decades, their 12-day conflict was by far the most destructive confrontation between them (archived link).
A US-proposed ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding June 30 (archived link).
US President Donald Trump had accused both countries of violating the ceasefire he announced late June 23, but hours later he said that it was in effect.
Several other users re-shared the circulating TV report as recent, and comments on the post indicate some users were misled.
"Maybe this is just a show. Because Iran attacked last night," one user said.
Another wrote: "Haha smell something fishy. Why did he die? Because they lost to America".
But the widely shared image is from a news report in May 2024.
Keyword searches of the news chyron found that the Philippine broadcaster News5 uploaded the report on its verified TikTok page on May 21, 2024 (archived link).
The report originally aired on the May 20 newscast of News5's Frontline Pilipinas (archived link).
Its video caption said in Tagalog: "The president of Iran was killed in a helicopter crash. The Iranian foreign minister also died from the accident."
Visuals shared in the false post corresponded to the 1:06 mark of News5's video.
AFP reported the helicopter apparently made a "hard landing" in the Dizmar forest between the cities of Varzaqan and Jolfa in Iran's East Azerbaijan province, near its border with Azerbaijan, under circumstances that remain unclear (archived link).
Former health minister and long-time parliamentarian Masoud Pezeshkian replaced the late Raisi after winning the 2024 presidential polls (archived link).
The election was called early following the death of the ultraconservative president Raisi, and took place amid heightened regional tensions and domestic discontent (archived link).
AFP has debunked other false information on the Iran-Israel war here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
DOJ Says Harvard Committed 'Violent' Civil Rights Violation
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Harvard University committed "violent violations" of U.S. civil rights and is "among the most prominent and visible breeding ground for race discrimination," according to a new letter sent Monday to the higher education institution by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ), alongside a federal interagency task force. Why It Matters The agency findings against Harvard by the joint task force could carry major implications for both federal oversight of higher education and institutional accountability, in addition to federal funding. President Donald Trump and his administration has taken aim at the prestigious university, including earlier this month signing a proclamation blocking nearly all foreign students from entering the United States to attend the Ivy League institution. Graduates gather as they attend commencement ceremony at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on May 29, 2025. Graduates gather as they attend commencement ceremony at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on May 29, 2025. RICK FRIEDMAN/AFP via Getty Images What To Know The letter, delivered jointly to Harvard President Alan Garber, states that the task force has found that the university engaged in a "violent violation" of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act due to what officials called deliberate indifference and, at times, willful participation in antisemitic harassment targeting Jewish students, faculty, and staff on campus. Federal investigators stated that unless Harvard implements significant changes immediately, the Ivy League school risks losing all federal financial privileges, potentially jeopardizing its access to research grants and other U.S. government resources. The probe, led by the HHS Office for Civil Rights, concluded that the university's response to antisemitic incidents constituted both neglect and active complicity, violating statutory protections against discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. Citing the Supreme Court's opinion in Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard (2023), federal officials alleged that Harvard remains "among the most prominent and visible breeding grounds for race discrimination." The investigation concluded that Harvard's failure to adequately protect Jewish students reflects broader, systemic issues within the institution. The HHS notice warned that continued federal funding for Harvard may violate U.S. law unless the university addresses these issues decisively. The joint letter argued, "Any institution that refuses to meet its duties under federal law may not receive a wide range of federal privileges," underscoring the possibility that Harvard—if found noncompliant—could lose critical federal funding and grants. Officials said that the situation at Harvard represents not simply a failure to address specific incidents, but a structural climate that has allowed antisemitism to persist, prompting government intervention to uphold civil rights standards. The letter was signed by senior officials from DOJ, the General Services Administration, HHS, and the Department of Education. Harvard's Response Harvard University, in a statement provided to Newsweek following the issuance of the letter, called the institution "far from indifferent on this issue" of antisemitism and "strongly disagrees with the government's findings." "Antisemitism is a serious problem and no matter the context, it is unacceptable," the statement says. "Harvard has taken substantive, proactive steps to address the root causes of antisemitism in its community. "In responding to the government's investigation, Harvard not only shared its comprehensive and retrospective Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias Report but also outlined the ways that it has strengthened policies, disciplined those who violate them, encouraged civil discourse, and promoted open, respectful dialogue." It added that the university "has made significant strides to combat bigotry, hate and bias," and that it is not alone in confronting the ongoing challenge. Harvard's summary of actions and commitments, per its own Task Force on Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias, outlined multiple initiatives currently being undertaken. Some include strengthening academic and residential life and including more Jewish student representation; supporting belonging and promoting respectful dialogue; and updating campus use rules and other procedures. The letter claimed Harvard did not dispute the factual findings. The officials argued that the university's "inaction in the face of these civil rights violations is a clear example of the demographic hierarchy that has taken hold of the University." Details of the Investigation and Findings The HHS Office for Civil Rights found that Jewish and Israeli students at Harvard reported a climate of bias, harassment, and fear. The official notice outlined that "the majority of Jewish students reported experiencing negative bias or discrimination on campus, while a quarter felt physically unsafe." Specific incidents included assaults, being spit on, and students hiding their kippahs or Jewish identity out of fear. In addition, antisemitic symbols and imagery were widely circulated at Harvard, including images depicting a dollar sign inside a Star of David and stickers showing an Israeli flag altered with a swastika. Campus protests extended beyond peaceful assembly, with the task force citing demonstrations that, according to the agencies, "included calls for genocide and murder and denied Jewish and Israeli students access to campus spaces." The campus experienced a "multiweek encampment" at its center, purportedly instilling fear and disrupting academic life for Jewish and Israeli students. Disciplinary actions for those involved in these encampments and protests were described in the notice as "lax and inconsistent," with none of the charged students facing suspension and some university leadership criticizing the process as "not fair" and "not right." Potential Consequences for Harvard The notice specified that Harvard may "continue to operate free of federal privileges," but with the clear implication that all U.S. taxpayer funding—including research grants and student aid—could be withdrawn. The joint task force said the intervention was driven not only by documented harm to individuals, but by the historic dangers of ignoring antisemitism, invoking the Holocaust as a historic warning. Calls for Immediate Reform One in four American adults now exhibiting prejudice toward Jewish people and skepticism about antisemitism—an increase of 26 million people compared to 18 months ago—according a study released in May by the Foundation to Combat Antisemitism. "The enclosed document serves to focus Harvard on the need for meaningful and immediate reform and fulfill the requirement under law that Americans cease funding discriminatory institutions," the letter read. "Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government." What People Are Saying Roz Rothstein, co-founder and CEO of StandWithUs, an international nonpartisan education organization that supports Israel and fights antisemitism, to Newsweek: "We are encouraged that DOJ and OCR utilized Harvard's own Antisemitism Task Force report to determine that Harvard is in violation of Title VI and issued an actual finding of violation. "This is necessary for any further action by the federal government, including withholding of funding, and a welcome development in the enforcement of Title VI. We look forward to seeing what steps Harvard's administration will take next to bring itself into compliance with federal law and finally make its campus one where Jewish and Israeli students not only find physical safety but equal protection under the law." Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general for civil rights at DOJ, stated in the letter: "Harvard's inaction in the face of these civil rights violations is a clear example of the demographic hierarchy that has taken hold of the University. Equal defense of the law demands that all groups, regardless of race or national origin, are protected." The letter further stated, "That legacy of discrimination persists with Harvard's continued anti-Semitism." Josh Gruenbaum, commissioner of the Federal Acquisition Service, U.S. General Services Administration, joined the co-signatories warning of immediate consequences: "Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government." What Happens Next Harvard University now faces a deadline to take actions requested by the task for or risk losing all federal funding, as outlined in the notice. Federal agencies have indicated that unless "meaningful and immediate reform" is demonstrated, enforcement actions—which could include cutting off federal research grants and support—will proceed. Continued monitoring and potential further government action are expected as the situation develops.
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
These Maps Show Where Trump's 'Big Beautiful' Bill Will Cancel Clean Energy
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Analysis of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" Act (OBBBA) nearing final votes in Congress shows that the legislation based on President Donald Trump's agenda threatens 4,500 clean energy projects, putting hundreds of thousands of jobs at risk and likely adding billions of dollars to annual energy costs for Americans within five years. "It's terrible," Robbie Orvis, senior director of modeling and analysis at the clean energy think tank Energy Innovation, told Newsweek. "It's potentially hundreds of billions in investment that will be vaporized and the long-term ramifications for U.S. manufacturing are potentially very negative." Energy Innovation used its peer-reviewed energy policy simulator to model the effects of the termination of clean energy tax credits and other elements of the legislation that emerged from the House. The final form of the bill is yet to be determined, and many clean energy industry leaders had hoped the bill might be improved in their favor in the Senate. But clean tech trade groups have been critical of Senate action so far, with the Solar Energy Industries Association calling the Senate version "a direct attack on American energy." OBBBA Clean Energy Jobs Lost Analysis by Energy Innovation produced this map showing the states that stand to lose the most jobs due to the bill's cuts to clean energy tax credits. Analysis by Energy Innovation produced this map showing the states that stand to lose the most jobs due to the bill's cuts to clean energy tax credits. Courtesy of Energy Innovation The OBBBA's blow to clean energy comes on top of a slowdown in clean tech investment in the first months of the Trump presidency, with more than two dozen major projects canceled or cut back. Maps shown here produced by Energy Innovation and researchers at the Wellesley College Environmental Studies Department show how canceled projects, lost jobs and higher prices could affect each state. The Energy Innovation analysis showed that by 2030, the bill could result in the loss of 840,000 jobs associated with renewable energy deployment and the manufacturing of clean technology, batteries, EVs and the services and supply chains that support that work. Incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 have stimulated at least $321 billion in new private energy and manufacturing investments, analysts said. Solar, wind and batteries, especially, have seen phenomenal growth in the U.S., accounting for more than 90 percent of the new generating capacity to the nation's electric grid last year, according to the Energy Information Administration. Renewable energy and battery storage have become the cheapest and fastest way to add power to the grid as electric companies scramble to meet surging demand. By adding costs to those energy sources, the OBBBA will drive up electricity prices, Orvis said. Energy Innovation energy cost increase Analysis by Energy Innovation shows how much energy costs are likely to increase due to effects of the OBBBA. By raising costs of renewable energy and batteries, the analysts found, the legislation will increase the... Analysis by Energy Innovation shows how much energy costs are likely to increase due to effects of the OBBBA. By raising costs of renewable energy and batteries, the analysts found, the legislation will increase the use of more costly fossil fuels. More Courtesy of Energy Innovation "The energy bill impacts are quite large," he said, so much so that he and his colleagues ran multiple cross-checks to make sure the numbers were right. The Trump administration wants to boost the use of fossil fuels to generate electricity. Rising demand for natural gas will drive up its price, the analysis found, pushing power bills higher. Not only do electricity bills shoot up in the analysis, but the bill's removal of incentives for EVs will add to long-term transportation fuel costs, Orvis said. The energy bill increases vary around the country but hit especially hard in some states like South Carolina, where the analysis showed annual energy bills growing by $770 million across the state. The Trump administration's work to dismantle federal climate policy and clean energy support has already had a dramatic impact on the lean tech sector, according to research by Wellesley College Professor of Environmental Studies Jay Turner. "It's a dark cloud of uncertainty which has led to the highest level of cancellations, delays and rollbacks that we've seen since 2010, which is how far back our tracking goes," Turner told Newsweek. "We've seen levels of cancellations and slowdowns that are more than five times greater than what we've seen in any other time period." Turner and his students maintain a comprehensive map of clean tech investments and developments in the U.S. called "The Big Green Machine." Since Trump took office, however, the green map has shown a lot of red, the color indicating cancellations, delays and postponements of announced projects. Big Green Tracker Clean Energy Cancellations Wellesley College researchers have documented 29 clean energy projects that have been canceled, postponed or cut back since President Donald Trump took office, putting more than 21,000 potential jobs at risk. Wellesley College researchers have documented 29 clean energy projects that have been canceled, postponed or cut back since President Donald Trump took office, putting more than 21,000 potential jobs at risk. Courtesy of Wellesley College Environmental Studies Dept. Since Inauguration Day on January 20, 29 clean energy projects have been canceled, paused or scaled back, affecting $21.6 billion in private investment and putting 21,287 potential new jobs at risk. Four of those project delays came since the OBBBA passed the House on May 20. Turner said the "battery belt" states of the Southeast and Midwest that had seen growth in battery manufacturing have taken the biggest hits so far. "These are investments that were meant to give the U.S. a foothold in one of the fastest growing industries in the world," Turner said. "And that's the sector where we've seen the most slowdown in the last six months." Turner had identified four major battery projects that have been put on hold in the last five months in Georgia, Kentucky and South Carolina—all states that Trump won in the 2024 election. One of the ironies of the highly partisan tilt to recent federal energy politics is that Republican lawmakers are poised to end policy that has primarily benefitted their states and districts. Although the IRA was championed by a Democratic president and passed without a single Republican vote in Congress, most of the clean energy investments the law triggered have landed in red states, Turner's work showed. Turner spoke with Newsweek while he was on a multi-state research road trip to visit recent clean energy development sites and to hear from industry leaders. "People are saying, 'I don't know what's going to happen,' there's so much uncertainty about what happens next," Turner said. "It's just a very difficult environment to be making long-term decisions about major manufacturing investments and all of this at the same time that many other parts of the world are investing deeply in these advanced technologies." The Energy Innovation analysis showed that, on a per capita basis, many of those battery belt states will suffer some of the biggest losses under the OBBBA as well, as higher costs for EV and grid storage battery makers will make it harder for them to compete with other countries. "You can see there's a big drop-off and the battery belt states are the ones that receive the brunt of that," Orvis said. He said the upshot will be a reduced ability to bring clean tech manufacturing to the U.S., giving battery and EV makers elsewhere a big advantage. A recent report from the International Energy Agency found that the bulk of global energy investments now go to clean energy and electrification rather than into new fossil fuel development, with more than $2 trillion flowing into clean tech and power grids. Orvis said he feared that the U.S. policy turn away from clean energy would cede that global market to others. "China is sitting there, I'm sure, just watching this with delight," Orvis said. "It's handing it to them on a silver platter."
Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gen Z Drives Sharp Decline in American Pride: Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. While millions of Americans will celebrate the founding of the United States this week with fireworks or cookouts, those July 4 festivities will be set to a backdrop of declining national pride driven by Gen Z, according to a new poll. Why It Matters American national pride reached a record low in a new Gallup poll released on Monday. The survey found wide generational and partisan differences in American patriotism, which has declined across the board over the past few decades. It found particularly low levels of national pride among Gen Z, an increasingly important age group in elections. The youth vote shifted rightward in the 2024 race, with President Donald Trump gaining new ground among voters between the ages of 18 and 29, according to election data. What To Know Only 58 percent of Americans reported feeling very or extremely proud of their country, according to a Gallup poll conducted from June 2 to June 19. That's the lowest point since 2001, when the pollster began asking the question in its surveys. That drop is largely fueled by Gen Z voters, only 41 percent of whom said they are proud to be an American in an average of polls from 2021 to 2025. This compares to 58 percent of millennials, 71 percent of Gen X, 75 percent of baby boomers and 83 percent of the Silent Generation. American flags decorate the National Mall in front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 1, 2025. American flags decorate the National Mall in front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 1, voters have also seen their sense of national pride plummet after Trump's reelection last year; only 36 percent of Democrats said they are proud to be an American, down from 60 percent in 2024. Among Republicans, 92 percent said they are proud to be an American, compared to 85 percent in 2024, the poll found. Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, told Newsweek it's unsurprising that national pride has dropped among young voters. "Young voters tend to be idealistic in their outlook, and when they look at American politics these days, there's much to be frustrated with and to be disillusioned by," Panagopoulos said. "For young voters, that is especially acute because it's their foray into political life in America." Across the board, American pride has dropped in part because Americans are increasingly believing that politicians are unable to come together to solve people's everyday problems, Panagopoulos said. What People Are Saying Jeffrey M. Jones of Gallup wrote in the survey's report: "At the beginning of the 21st century, U.S. adults were nearly unanimous in saying they were extremely or very proud to be Americans. But that national unity has eroded over the past 25 years due to a combination of political and generational changes. Democrats today are much less likely than in the past to express pride in their country; in fact, their national pride has hit a new low. Additionally, Generation Z and millennials are much less proud of their country than their elders are." Northeastern University Professor Costas Panagopoulos told Newsweek: "It's quite worrying in part because America is what it is because of our ability historically to come together as a nation to solve national and even global problems. And if we cannot unite as a country to do that around our identity as Americans, it is problematic. What's happening right now in America is that Americans across the board appear to be replacing their sense of national identity with their allegiance to partisan identity, or what appears to be happening is that our partisan identities are surmounting our national identity as Americans." What Happens Next July 4 will likely see celebrations across the country, despite a decline in patriotism. Future political developments could determine whether patriotism makes a comeback.
