Welcome back to Country: PM's big statement as parliament opens
As Parliament prepares to sit for the first time since the election, Mr Albanese has delivered to rebuke to ex-Liberal leader Peter Dutton,
Mr Dutton spent the dying days of the campaign whinging about the ceremony and claiming it was 'overdone.'
After securing a huge majority, the Prime Minister has made it clear he strongly supports the cultural practice.
'The welcome to country is such a powerful way to begin a new parliament,'' Mr Albanese said.
'Like a lot of the more positive things about our nation, we shouldn't take it for granted. This ceremony didn't take place until 2007 and was controversial in 2007.
'It is not controversial today. Nor should it be.'
Mr Albanese said it was a 'respectful' way of beginning the 48th Parliament.
'What a welcome to country does is holds out like a hand warmly and graciously extended. An opportunity for us to embrace and to show a profound love of home and country,'' he said.
'It is a reminder as well of why we all belong here together, that we are stronger together and we belong.
'We keep walking, together. With every step, we feel the echoes through history, the footsteps nearly a century distant from us now of every First Nations person who trekked to the opening of the first
Parliament House down the hill.
'The footsteps of the members of the stolen generations who came to this place 17 years ago now to hear the words that they needed to hear 'I'm sorry'.
Former Liberal leader Peter Dutton famously boycotted the National Apology to the Stolen Generations in 2008. He later apologised years later.
'Uttered by an Australian Prime Minister on behalf of the Australian nation. That was a day of catharsis, built on courage and grace,'' Mr Albanese said of Kevin Rudd's apology.
'Ultimately, it was a day of togetherness and a reminder of our great potential and promise as a nation.'
Liberal frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Peter Dutton have previously backed scaling back the use of Welcome to Country ceremonies, with Senator Price warning people are 'sick if it'.
Speaking at a Voice to parliament No campaign event in 2023, former Prime Minister Tony Abbott also said he is 'getting a little bit sick of Welcomes to Country because it belongs to all of us, not just to some of us'.
'And I'm getting a little bit tired of seeing the flag of some of us flown equally with the flag of all of us,'' he said.
'And I just think that the longer this goes on, the more divisive and the more difficult and the more dangerous that it's getting now.'
Senator Price has described the tradition as 'divisive'.
'There is no problem with acknowledging our history, but rolling out these performances before every sporting event or public gathering is definitely divisive,' she said.
'It's not welcoming, it's telling non-Indigenous Australians 'this isn't your country' and that's wrong. We are all Australians and we share this great land.'
She said 'around the country' there were some people whose 'only role, their only source of income, is delivering Welcome to Country'.
'Everyone's getting sick of Welcome to Country,'' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
8 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Eye-watering cost to negotiate Victorian Indigenous treaty revealed amid government push to expand powers of state Voice
The Daniel Andrews and Jacinta Allan Labor governments have invested almost $400 million on negotiating a treaty with Indigenous Australians, with experts warning the costs could continue to mount. The Victorian government's Yoorrook Justice truth telling inquiry handed down its final report in early July after four years of proceedings and claimed the state had been illegally occupied and that Victoria's First Peoples had been subjected to genocide. The commission also made 100 wide-ranging recommendations to the Victorian government including providing Indigenous Australians with tax relief, financial reparations and called on the state to finalise a treaty agreement. The treaty, which was previously in negotiation stages is now set to progress to parliament, with Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan and the state's First People's Assembly confirming that legislation to pass the agreement would be tabled after the winter break. However, a fresh investigation into Victorian government budget papers found that the former Andrews government and the current Allan government had spent a total of $382 million on treaty deliberations alone over the past ten years. The bulk of the hefty sum was spent establishing the Treaty Authority, which has been touted as an 'independent umpire' that adjudicates negotiations. Members of the Treaty Authority tasked with deliberating with First Nations elders and community leaders were raking in salaries as high as $388,000 per year according to The Herald Sun. It is believed the state government also spent significant amounts of cash in aiding Indigenous group to prepare for briefings and presentations to official forums. A Victorian government spokesperson refused to verify the Herald Sun's $382 million figure but reiterated that $308 million had been poured into treaty discussions since the 2020-2021 state budget. Analysis by the Institute of Public Affairs revealed that the near $400 million sum was in fact a conservative estimate, and that between July 2016 and June 2025 727 meetings had been held between the state government and Indigenous groups to get a treaty agreement off the ground. The think tank stated that if the current trajectory held the callosal number of meetings would climb to 968 by June 2026. This comes to an average of 100 meetings per year since July 2016, or a meeting being held every two to three business days. The IPA's investigation into Victoria's budget documents futher uncovered that the Andrews-Allan Labor governments combined spending into Indigenous related initiatives, including treaty, truth-telling and state Voice measures equated to $776 million over the past decade. The IPA's Research Fellow Margaret Chambers said the Allan government needed to be transparent with the Victorian people and release a detailed summary of spending on Indigenous related policies. Ms Chambers also pressed the government to reveal its treaty plans and slammed Premier Allan for dividing the Victorian people. 'The Victorian government is not being honest and upfront with Victorians about its plan to divide the community on racial grounds,' Ms Chambers told the Herald Sun. 'With a Treaty scheduled to be finalised inside the next 12 months, and despite the volume of secret meetings over the past decade, very little is known about what this treaty will entail. 'Any Treaty will fundamentally change Victoria's legal structure and will likely require already financially stretched Victorian taxpayers to pay billions of dollars to activists aligned to the Allan government.' A joint statement released by the government the states First People's Assembly in early July stated the draft Treaty has been settled behind closed doors after a lengthy consultation phase and that Victoria's First People's Assembly would be made permanent. The state is also negotiating separate Treaties with local Indigenous communities.
ABC News
8 minutes ago
- ABC News
Premier David Crisafulli's Rockhampton rowing commitment for 2032 Olympic Games a message to regional Queensland
They say the two don't mix, but there's a lot of politics in sport, and even more sport in politics. It's hardly been more apparent than this week. Who would've thought a croc-infested Central Queensland river would become such a flashpoint in the journey to the 2032 Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games? The "mighty Fitzroy", in the words of Queensland Premier David Crisafulli, is slated to host rowing and canoeing in 2032. Not so mighty in the eyes of national and international rowing bodies, which have expressed concerns over whether it meets technical requirements. Good luck convincing the government of that. The premier and his deputy have repeatedly said if it's good enough for local kids, it's good enough for "Pierre from Paris" (at times in a bad accent). When asked on Wednesday about what would be done about the Fitzroy's croc population for the Games, Jarrod Bleijie first responded, "What crocodiles?". For reference, a government monitoring program from 2016 to 2019 found there were 0.2 crocodiles per kilometre in the Fitzroy River. How do you like those odds, Pierre? When pushed on the issue, Mr Bleijie snapped back with a gold medal sound bite. "These things are not jumping on canoes and downing things, just like Jaws is not downing the surfers when the surfers surfed in Tahiti for the Olympic and Paralympic Games." Prehistoric apex predators aside, the river has verifiable issues around its length and current. While technical assessments have begun, the decision on whether the Central Queensland waterway is suitable ultimately lies with World Rowing, not the Queensland government. So that's the sport of it all, what about the politics? Standing behind the premier on the banks of the Fitzroy on Wednesday were Donna Kirkland and Nigel Hutton, the LNP members for Rockhampton and Keppel, respectively. The first-time MPs clinched their electorates on the back of massive swings against Labor. Central Queensland was Labor heartland, and the October election was the first time since 1932 that the party lost the seat of Rockhampton. The LNP came to government through the regions, where concerns about youth crime were more acute than in the south-east. Of Labor's 36 seats, just three are outside of south-east Queensland. Its return to power can only be found through wins in the regions, something the premier and his government are distinctly aware of. Mr Crisafulli's commitment to rowing in Rocky is a commitment to its constituents, repaying the faith they've shown the LNP. And if the Fitzroy is deemed not up to scratch, that'll come from an international body, conveniently absolving the premier of blame. Maybe Pierre from Paris will cop another spray. Politicians trying their hand at sport is etched into Australian folklore. Peter Dutton kicking a footy into a camera and cutting the operator's head, Scott Morrison tackling a small child, John Howard's failed bowling attempt. Mr Crisafulli, a former television journalist, is no stranger to the spotlight. But he's cautious with his carefully cultivated image and brand, reticent to join that storied group. When the opportunity arose this week to take to the river to experience what rowing might be like, he instead sent his sports minister. Watching from a boat alongside, Mr Crisafulli saved himself from any potential embarrassment or puns from eager journalists. It's not the first time the premier has opted out of sporting endeavours, his pre-election small target strategy extending to what his media team would allow him to do for the cameras. Perhaps he'll become more intrepid in the future if his firm grip on the electorate waivers.
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
The two-timing Chinese act that made a complete fool of Albo's charm offensive as the world again sits on the brink of all-out war
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's recent six-day visit to China has once again raised hard questions about Labor's stance on our relationship with Beijing, which runs in parallel to our allied commitments to the US, the UK and other core security partners. Trade was on top of the PM's China agenda, despite renewed fears of Beijing's plans to resolve the Taiwan dilemma by force. Australia finds itself in a far more complex region than was envisaged a decade ago, a fact the recent talks seem to largely neglect. From 'undefeated combat brotherhood' to loose security triangles The problem with understanding the current geopolitical setting - who is your friend, who is your ally, and who is your foe - is no longer straight and clear as it used to be. We have truly entered the phase of geopolitical fluidity when old norms and rules are no longer set in stone. A need for an adaptive approach is of growing relevance when it comes to assessing allied dynamics in the Indo-Pacific, particularly with respect to our geopolitical rivals. The Moscow-led allied relationship between Russia and North Korea continues to progress and mature, as was noted during the visit of Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to the country on July 12. During his meeting with the North Korean counterpart Choi Son-hui, Lavrov described the bilateral strategic treaty as "the basis of undefeated combative brotherhood". The alliance between the two nuclear-armed autocratic states will have to form a part of any future strategic calculus vis-a-vis power dynamics in northeast Asia and beyond. It is also worth reminding ourselves of China's close strategic relations with both Moscow and Pyongyang. Following his stopover in North Korea, Lavrov travelled to China to hold a series of strategic talks with his counterpart Wan Yi, even though he spoke to him just days before at the ASEAN summit in Malaysia. Although, it's too soon to look at this trio through the prism of a formed triangular security partnership, such as the 2023 Camp David agreement between the US, South Korea and Japan, the intensity of at least Russia-China high level contacts is telling and should not be dismissed as it happened to date. I doubt anyone imagined five years ago that Russia-North Korea rapprochement would reach current levels and that DPRK troops would see combat in the eastern European theatre of war. Being trapped in a set of self-comforting perceptions in such a dynamic and fluid geopolitical environment is a road with a dead end. What also requires closer attention is another emerging allied security triangle, China-Pakistan-Iran, in which Beijing is claiming a leadership role. It is a well-documented fact that China has close strategic ties with both countries, just like there is a close relationship between Islamabad and Tehran. Over the past two months, these deepened ties were put to the test during two major regional crisis, a near-war between India and Pakistan, and the 12-day war between Israel, the US and Iran. During the latest round of hostilities between New Delhi and Islamabad in May, Beijing was believed to be supplying Pakistani military not just with armaments and training but also with operational intelligence. According to the Depurty Chief of the Indian Army Lieutenant-General Rahul Singh, Islamabad received 'all possible support' from its de-facto ally, including 'live inputs' on India's defensive layout. Aside from political declarations, Beijing's military support for Iran during its latest open clash with Israel last month was more evasive. Yet, it had a limited footprint. During the intensive phase of the conflict, Chinese aircraft were believed to be delivering defence supplies into Iran, while an electronic warfare vessel was operating in the Gulf area, possibly tracking the trajectory of Israel's aerial and missile missions. In early July, the 47th Naval Escort Task Force of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), while operating in the Red Sea, was involved in a dangerous standoff with a German surveillance aircraft. This action could be perceived as a covert show of support for the Iran-backed Houthi militants, which stepped up their spectacular strikes against western shipping of the coast of Yemen. Pakistan was bolder in its support of the Iranian regime, by also escalating its political rhetoric with references to its nuclear capability and promises to offer its neighbour a de-facto extended deterrence. It is doubtful that the Chinese authorities were blissfully unaware of Pakistan's war of words over Israel. In the future, this triangular relationship may mature into a more substantive organisational structure. No appetite to 'discuss hypotheticals' This message from Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, was designed to be a bold response to equally bold messaging from Pentagon and the White House, which are seeking a clear commitment to a possible war contingency in the Taiwan Strait from Australia and Japan. 'The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance…', Mr Conroy said. Clearly, Canberra was reluctant to engage in warmongering rhetoric prior to the PM's visit to China. This is all very well. But what is equally clear is that while Albanese prioritises trade with China, others like Minister Lavrov are busy discussing a whole range of strategic matters. 'The importance of strengthening close coordination between the two countries [China and Russia] in the international arena…. jointly respond to the challenges brought about by a turbulent and changing world," read extracts from the statement issued by the Chinese Foreign Ministry following Lavrov-Wan Yi talks. At the same time, Canberra finds it completely normal to engage in political fencing with our key security and defence ally, instead of securing a sit-down meeting between the PM and US President Donald Trump. Labor's ongoing balancing act may have worked in the past when the world's geopolitical dynamics were different. But not now, when geostrategic competition between great powers and respective allies gave way to power contests and conflict. Dr. Alexey Muraviev is Associate Professor of National Security and Strategic Studies at Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.
