Homeowners could find it easier to remortgage or reduce their mortgage term
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said the shake-up is part of reforms to mortgage rules to help people navigate their financial lives.
The FCA is removing guidance that has 'served its purpose' to reduce the regulatory burden on firms.
Under the changes, borrowers could find it easier to reduce their mortgage term, helping to lower the total cost of borrowing and reduce the risk of repayment extending into retirement, the regulator said.
It is removing a requirement for a full affordability assessment when reducing the term of a mortgage, but lenders are still expected to consider affordability where they choose to use the changes.
For example, firms must act to avoid causing foreseeable harm and must monitor and regularly review the outcomes customers are experiencing, the regulator said.
People should also find it easier to switch to a new lender to remortgage, if they wish to, helping them to access cheaper products.
Consumers could see their choice improved by allowing for simpler affordability assessments, where a proposed remortgage is on similar terms to an existing contract, but more affordable than a new deal indicated by a customer's existing lender.
The FCA expects many borrowers to continue to benefit from regulated mortgage advice.
Lenders are expected to consider what is appropriate to identify consumers who need advice or other support.
Emad Aladhal, director of retail banking at the FCA, said: 'We are helping more people navigate their financial lives by supporting those who can afford to buy a home and supporting competition in the mortgage market.
'Consumer needs have changed over recent years, and our rules are changing too.
'Today's changes support growth by simplifying some of our rules, saving consumers time and money, while ensuring they still benefit from advice, where needed.
'We want lenders to use these changes to innovate and better serve aspiring homeowners and existing borrowers.
'These reforms are another significant step in our mortgage rule review, which we're delivering quickly.
'They are supported by the strong protections we've already put in place for consumers in the mortgage market.'
The regulator said reform of the mortgage market is possible due to the continuation of high standards, such as the Consumer Duty, which requires lenders to put customers at the heart of what they do, as well as effective affordability checks and support for people in financial difficulty.
The FCA's policy statement said regulatory reforms introduced after the 2008 financial crisis have improved standards across the mortgage market, with overall mortgage arrears and repossessions remaining low by long-term standards.
The regulator said that, while changes are voluntary for firms, supporting sustainable home ownership and a competitive mortgage market is a collective responsibility.
Changes to mortgage rules were included in the FCA's letter to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer earlier this year, linking with the Government's aims to support economic growth.
As part of its wider mortgage rule review, the regulator has opened a public discussion on the future of the mortgage market.
It is inviting feedback until September 19 2025.
Many lenders have recently made changes enabling some people to potentially borrow more, following clarification from the regulator.
Paul Matthews, senior director of risk at leading financial services consultancy Broadstone, said: 'The FCA is taking significant steps to make it easier for consumers to make changes to their mortgages and get better support on their available options.
'The easing of regulation will allow lenders greater flexibility to innovate in the market.'
Charles Roe, director of mortgages at UK Finance, said: 'The FCA's reforms are a welcome step to help lenders respond more effectively to customer needs and widen access to homeownership.
'Their optional nature means that firms can apply them in line with their own risk appetites. By reducing regulatory friction and enhancing switching flexibility, the reforms will enable the mortgage sector to continue to support the Government's growth agenda, by supporting both new and existing mortgage customers.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Buy now, pay later shake-up explained as shoppers face being refused credit
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has just announced that buy now, pay later is going to be fully regulated from July, 2026 - here is what you need to know In recent years, a new form of 'free' credit has revolutionised the way we Brits shop. It's simple, popular and you can use it to buy pretty much anything you can think of, from clothes to cars. Buy now, pay later (BNPL) credit is available at virtually every online store you visit. Retailers love it, because it allows us all to buy more than we can afford. It also makes us more likely to commit to buy what's in the online basket, rather than walking away if money is tight that month. Credit firms love it as they get paid in a variety of ways for offering this type of lending on behalf of retailers. And many readers love it too, as I find out every time I write about my BNPL concerns when I criticise aspects of the industry! But those concerns are justified. BNPL allows, or even encourages people to 'sleepwalk' in to debt, by making it easier to purchase things we neither want or need – and can't afford. It's been used for silly, frivolous purchases like pizza. And most concerningly, some firms have been worryingly quick to lend to people massively in debt, or to pass on outstanding balances to debt collectors far too quickly. So it's good news that the regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has just announced that BNPL is going to be fully regulated from 15 July, 2026. The FCA has also announced a whole range of new rules and requirements for the industry to tackle some of these concerns. Here's my guide to how BNPL works. Get the best deals and tips from Mirror Money WHATSAPP GROUP: Get money news and top deals straight to your phone by joining our Money WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. What is buy now, pay later credit? BNPL works by giving you a short-term loan, with or without interest, so you can buy goods or services even if you can't afford to pay the full price up front. Retailers have been actively pushing BNPL credit and you'll be hard pressed to find one that doesn't offer BNPL when you shop online. There are three main types of BNPL credit. Limited instalments The most well-known form of BNPL deal works by letting you pay in a limited number of instalments interest-free – usually in three payments. This means you can buy things up front that you may not have the money for in full at point of purchase. However, you have committed to buy. This is unregulated at the moment. Try before you buy This is where you have a short period of time – usually 30 days but sometimes as low as 14 days – to 'inspect' goods before committing to buy them. These deals allow you to try things on, check goods out and see if they work for you before committing to buy. However, if you don't return the goods on time, you could find you've bought them. Bear in mind the 14 days just mirrors your existing online shopping rights under the Consumer Rights Act. This is unregulated at the moment. Credit agreements These deals are closer to the older credit deals in that you pay in instalments over a longer period and pay interest. This isn't as high as some retailers charged in the past – it's usually less than credit card interest - but is still higher than a standard bank loan. How popular is buy now, pay later lending? There are lots of different types of regulated credit agreement out there. These include: Personal loans Overdrafts Car finance Short term, high interest loans (formerly payday lending, but over longer periods of time) Catalogue credit Regulated BNPL loans Unregulated buy now, pay later loans are referred to by the regulator as 'Deferred Payment Credit (DPCs) – and they are massively popular. It's estimated that around 11 million people used BNPL credit last year alone for short term borrowing. That's 20% of all adults (up 3% from the year before). However, 1.1 million people had over £500 outstanding on their unregulated BNPL loans. Just under 10% of people used BNPL to pay for essential goods, like food or utility bills. What happens if you can't pay? While BNPL firms may not charge debt interest, many readers have reported that businesses are quick to pass on debts to debt collectors who have a whole range of penalties and pressure tactics they can apply – and they can register financial debts with credit reference agencies. Worryingly, this can happen for relatively small sums. What do the new rules say? According to the FCA, from next year businesses offering BNPL will have to: Carry out upfront checks to make sure people can repay what they borrow. Offer 'fairer and faster access to refunds' You'll also have the right to complain to the Financial Ombudsman like other regulated forms of credit. At present, BNPL firms are rather vague about the checks they undertake to see if you can afford to borrow money. With most forms of lending the business will undertake a 'soft' or 'hard' credit check to see if you can afford to borrow. Soft checks don't go on to your credit file, hard ones do. If the lender doesn't check your credit file, it won't know how much you've borrowed – which means you might be hopelessly in debt and they won't know. You might also have multiple BNPL loans too. At the height of the payday lending frenzy, the average number of loans per borrower was seven. So people were drowning in debt and just getting in deeper. These new proposals will mean that stricter affordability checks will be required which should identify people who are overstretched financially and are already in debt. The FCA estimates that over the next decade, this will mean that people will be £1.8 billion better off. Assuming that they don't borrow money elsewhere instead, that is.
Times
2 days ago
- Times
Tom Hayes has industry ban dropped after rate-rigging appeal
Britain's financial regulator has ended its attempt to ban Tom Hayes from working in the financial services industry after the Supreme Court overturned a conviction of the former star trader associated with the Libor rigging scandal. The Financial Conduct Authority said on Friday that it would take no further action against Hayes, 45, the first trader ever jailed for interest rate rigging. The regulator also said that it would end a trading ban it previously imposed on Carlo Palombo, 46, a former Barclays trader who was separately sent to prison in 2019 following a trial for manipulating Euribor, another rate. Both former traders had their convictions overturned this week. • Love, Libor and loss: the Kafkaesque ordeal of Tom Hayes The UK Supreme Court unanimously allowed Hayes's appeal on Wednesday, quashing his 2015 conviction of eight counts of conspiracy to defraud by manipulating Libor, a now-defunct benchmark interest rate. Hayes, a former star trader at UBS and Citigroup, became the face of the affair when in 2015 he was sentenced to 14 years, reduced to 11 on appeal, after being convicted of rigging Libor. He spent about five and a half years in prison and had fought over the past decade to clear his name. Palombo was sentenced to four years in 2019 for manipulating Euribor and left prison in 2021. 'I always believed that it would happen,' Hayes said after the Supreme Court overturned his conviction. 'This wasn't a gamble for me.' The court quashed the conviction after deciding that the judge who presided over his trial misdirected the jury about a central element of the case. The judge had incorrectly said the jury was not allowed to consider commercial interests in the submissions, the Supreme Court said, and that 'undermined the fairness of the trial'. The traders argued that they were wrongly prosecuted for what were normal commercial practices in order to appease public anger towards the banking system over the 2008 financial crisis. The FCA had sought to ban Hayes from trading but the ban was postponed after the regulator was ordered by the Upper Tribunal to stay its move. The regulator said it was ending action against Hayes and overturning a ban on Palombo because the overturned convictions formed the basis upon which the regulator took its action.
Times
2 days ago
- Times
FCA finalises ban on ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley over Epstein links
The City regulator has finally banned Jes Staley from holding top jobs in financial services after the former Barclays boss threw in the towel in his fight with the watchdog over his links to the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Staley, 68, took the Financial Conduct Authority to court to overturn its plan to ban him but failed to clear his name, as the Upper Tribunal last month sided with the regulator and ruled that Staley's conduct had amounted to 'a serious failure of judgment'. He had the option to try to appeal against the court's decision but the deadline to seek permission to fight on passed earlier this month. As a result, the FCA this week published its final notice, which implements the prohibition on Staley holding senior management roles in the industry that the regulator first proposed more than two years ago. It also formally imposes a £1.1 million fine on the former bank boss, which he must pay by August 6. The FCA had originally planned a £1.8 million penalty but the court reduced this to take account of deferred shares from Barclays that Staley had subsequently been forced to relinquish because of the controversy. It brings to an end a legal battle that engrossed the City of London and Wall Street, where Staley, an American, was also once a big player. During the trial this year, the Upper Tribunal heard how Staley had told Epstein they had a 'profound' friendship and had referred to the sex offender as 'uncle Jeffrey' in an email to one of his daughters. Under cross-examination by the FCA's barrister, Staley, who is married, also told the court that he had once slept with a member of Epstein's staff. Staley had worked for most of his career at JPMorgan Chase and it was while running its private bank that he came to know Epstein, a financier who was a client of the division. In 2015 Staley became one of the most influential figures in British finance when he took charge of Barclays, the FTSE 100 bank he ran until 2021. After Epstein died in a US prison cell in 2019 awaiting trial on charges of sex-trafficking minors, the FCA asked Barclays about the nature of Staley's relationship with him. The resulting letter from the bank was at the heart of Staley's courtroom battle with the regulator. In it, the bank said that Staley 'did not have a close relationship' with Epstein and that his last contact with the paedophile was 'well before he joined Barclays'. These statements, which were approved by Staley, were misleading, according to the FCA, which said the former Barclays boss had 'acted with a lack of integrity'. The Upper Tribunal agreed with the regulator's findings. The FCA did not allege that Staley was involved in Epstein's crimes. • Jean-Noel Alba, who was previously deputy chief executive of the asset manager H20, has been banned from working in financial services and fined more than £1 million by the City regulator. The Financial Conduct Authority said he had misled it during an investigation into H20, including by asking junior colleagues to create minutes of meetings that had not occurred and by drawing up due diligence research on investments years after those investments had actually been made.
