IND vs ENG 4th Test: 'What is Sai Sudharsan's fault?' — Former India cricketer backs recall as Karun Nair's flaws exposed
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Former cricketer Navjot Singh Sidhu has openly questioned Nair's inclusion, urging the team management to give promising youngster Sai Sudharsan another opportunity.
Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel.
Nair, making a highly anticipated comeback to Test cricket after eight years, has failed to make a mark, scoring just 131 runs in six innings at an average of 21.83. Despite showing glimpses of his strokeplay, the 33-year-old has not been able to convert starts into match-defining innings.
Did Sai Sudharsan confirm his India Playing XI spot on eve of the match?
'Karun Nair has played three Test matches. He is a very promising cricketer, but his technical weakness has been exposed,' Sidhu said on his YouTube channel. 'The big question is whether you will go to win or to build a team. When you think of winning, I think what is the fault of Sai Sudharsan?'
Poll
Should Sai Sudharsan replace Karun Nair in the Test XI?
Yes, he deserves a chance No, Nair should be given more opportunities
Sidhu also praised Sudharsan's recent form, saying: 'You have one of the most promising players of India who won the Orange Cap. Yes, there is no connection whatsoever between IPL and Test cricket, but he was in form. Technically, one of the soundest low-gravity batsmen, whose hand-eye co-ordination and head is always completely above the toe, and a left-hander. Why shouldn't he come to the team?'
23-year-old Sudharsan made his Test debut in the first match of the series, scoring 0 and 30, and has been benched since.
Shubman Gill explosive press conference: Hits back at England and big revelation on India Playing XI
However, India captain Shubman Gill came out in support of Nair, expressing confidence in his abilities. 'He didn't bat at his number in the first game and we have had conversations with him, and he will turn it around,' Gill said during the pre-match press conference.
Gill emphasised that Nair remains an integral part of the batting group, especially after the retirements of Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli from the format.
With India facing a must-win scenario, the team's middle-order combination will be under the scanner — and Nair's performance, if picked, could well define his second coming.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘He should have asked his bowlers to bowl underarm like Greg Chappell': Ashwin takes a dig at Ben Stokes' draw offer and sledging Jadeja
The final day of the fourth Test between India and England in Manchester saw its share of controversies as England captain Ben Stokes showed frustration over Indian batsmen Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar refusing a handshake and draw offer with one hour remaining. While Jadeja and Sundar stitched an unbroken 202-run fifth-wicket partnership to end England's hopes of victory, Stokes targeted them verbally, asking Jadeja: 'You want to get a Test hundred against Harry Brook?' With Stokes opting to bowl part-timers Harry Brook and Joe Root in the mandatory last hour, former Indian spinner Ravichandran Ashwin sarcastically suggested Stokes should have gone further. 'I am actually disappointed. He (Ben Stokes) should have asked his bowlers to bowl underarm like Greg Chappell. It would have looked nice. Please don't talk about the spirit of cricket, sportsmanship. This is ridiculous,' Ashwin said on his YouTube channel Ash Ki Baat. 'What is the rule? If both captains believe the game cannot head towards a result, they can agree to a draw. One captain wanted to close it out. Why? First, he didn't want to tire his bowlers. Second, 'I am frustrated. You should also not be happy.' The second point isn't in the rules. According to the first point, India was right. If I were captain, I would have played all 15 overs.' While Stokes cited protecting his frontline bowlers from fatigue and injury, the incident drew reactions from across the cricketing world, including Indian coach Gautam Gambhir, who defended India's right to bat. At the start of the final hour, Jadeja was on 89 and Sundar on 80. Both went on to complete centuries—Sundar's maiden Test hundred and Jadeja's fifth. Ashwin called Stokes' behavior 'double standards.' 'Double standards. They defined it in the last ten minutes today. You're frustrated you can't win, so you fight with your players, punch the ball, do whatever. But by offering a handshake, you're saying, 'I'm frustrated, so you also don't get a hundred. You also go crying.' How is this fair? He's battled since morning against Archer, Hoggard, Gough, Flintoff. Should he leave his century? Your question was, 'Do you want a century against Harry Brook?' No, he wants a century. Bring Steve Harmison, bring Flintoff! They wouldn't say no. You're bowling Harry Brook—that's your mistake, not ours.' Stokes exchanged words with Jadeja, while England openers Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett also sledged the Indian pair. Crawley was heard telling Sundar: 'F***ing hell Washi, get on with it,' with Jofra Archer adding: 'If you wanted a hundred, you should have batted like it earlier.' Sundar reached his maiden Test ton before the teams agreed to a draw after five overs. Ashwin mocked Crawley's comments, declaring the result an 'Indian win': 'Zak Crawley told him, 'If you wanted 100, you should have batted quicker.' That's his choice. You want quick runs and get out at 70? That's your game. Zak Crawley or Ben Stokes, if you were batting, would you leave your hundred for the 'spirit of the game'? I feel like laughing. It's crazy. That's why I say this isn't a draw, it's an Indian win.'
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
'What's with the English?' — Karthik, Vaughan weigh in on Stokes vs Jadeja-Washington handshake drama
England captain Ben Stokes speaks with Ravindra Jadeja in Manchester. (Getty Images) NEW DELHI: Tempers flared and opinions clashed long after India and England shook hands at Old Trafford, as the handshake that didn't happen earlier became the main talking point following the drawn fourth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy. With India recovering from 0/2 in their second innings to end Day 5 on 425/4, centuries from Ravindra Jadeja (107*) and Washington Sundar (101*) helped them not only save the Test but dominate the final day. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Yet, what caught the world's attention was the decision by Jadeja and Sundar to deny Ben Stokes ' offer of an early draw with an hour to go — a move that irked the England captain, who responded with sarcasm: 'You want to make a hundred against Harry [Brook]?' Poll Was Day 5 of the fourth Test more about India's resilience or England's missed opportunities? India's resilience England's missed opportunities That didn't sit well with former Indian wicketkeeper Dinesh Karthik. 'What's with the English?' he asked during a post-match discussion with Michael Vaughan on Cricbuzz. 'At Lord's, they didn't want to come to bat, didn't want to field after a point. And now here, they wanted to shake hands early. How does that sit well with you?' India stay alive, England frustrated after draw; handshake drama at Old Trafford and more Vaughan, to his credit, took a measured stance: 'Oh, if I'd have been India, I'd have done exactly the same. You've fought the entire day, taken blows, worn bouncers from Archer. You get to 85, you stay out there. Shubman's smile from the balcony said it all.' Karthik continued, 'Look, at lunch, India were down and out. People thought they'd be rolled over. But Gill and KL steadied things, then Jadeja and Washington finished it brilliantly. Even the lowest scorer after ducks — KL Rahul — got 90!' Vaughan agreed, noting how England, too, wouldn't have acted differently: 'If we had a young player on 85, no way would we have come off. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Swelling and internal bleeding in the brain, help this baby Donate For Health Donate Now Undo We'd have said, 'Get your hundred, then we'll shake hands.' That's just the truth.' Gautam Gambhir fiery press conference: Slams critics, big update on Jasprit Bumrah, Karun vs Sai He even found humour in the moment: 'I will say this — Harry Brook might need to work on his front shoulder if he wants to keep bowling off-spin!' With the series standing at 2-1 in England's favour, the Oval is next. But thanks to Day 5's stubborn resistance and the post-match back-and-forth, the fire has been well and truly lit for the finale. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘That was Ben Stokes behaving like a spoiled kid': Sanjay Manjrekar on last hour drama in Manchester Test
With the Shubman Gill-led Indian team eking out a draw against hosts England on the final day of the Manchester Test, as Gill, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar hit centuries, the fourth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar series saw plenty of drama. With one hour remaining, England skipper Ben Stokes approached Jadeja and Sundar, offering a handshake to signify a draw. However, the two Indian batsmen refused, forcing the match into the mandatory last 15 overs. This led to a verbal spat between Stokes and his teammates targeting Jadeja and Sundar, but both Indian batsmen would complete their centuries before agreeing to the draw five overs later. Former Indian cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar termed England captain Ben Stokes a 'spoiled kid' over the incident, believing the England captain could have 'handled things better.' 'Okay fine, he's unhappy that the players haven't walked off, he'll have to manage his overs carefully with the main bowlers already exhausted from bowling long spells the whole day. But throwing lollipops in the air and showing a bit of grumpiness out there, that was Ben Stokes behaving like a spoiled kid. I can understand him being surprised that India wanted to continue… but everything won't go as per your wishes, he should've handled that better. It was Ben, the hero, the champion that I admire, on that occasion behaving like a spoiled kid,' Manjrekar said during the post-match show on JioHotstar. Jadeja and Sundar stitched together an unbeaten 203-run partnership for the fifth wicket, keeping India's hopes alive in the series, with England leading 2-1 with one Test remaining. It was Jadeja's fifth Test hundred, while Sundar scored his maiden Test century with a knock of 101 runs on Sunday. Former England cricketer Jonathan Trott believes that if England were in the same situation as the Indian batsmen, they would have walked off after being offered the draw at the start of the last hour. 'Common practice in England, and Ben Stokes' mentality is that there are no personal milestones. If you're offered to end the game earlier, it's taken. In his (Stokes') mind, the game's done. I don't think England would have had personal milestones on their mind—that's just my view. Maybe if somebody was close to a maiden century, it would have been a bit different. You could tell by Ben Stokes' reaction that if they were in the same position, they probably would've shaken the Indian captain's hand if offered—if Shubman Gill had approached the English batsmen in the same scenario, they would've walked off. That's what Test cricket's about. It's played hard, it's played fair, but there's also a code and an ethos that the game is played with equal respect for each other,' Trott told JioHotstar. Stokes defended his offer, stating it was a decision made to protect his frontline bowlers. 'We were willing to take it as far as we possibly could and throw everything at them, but it got to that point where there was only one result left on the table. I wasn't going to risk any of my frontline bowlers in a situation like that, especially with a quick turnaround,' Stokes told the BBC.
