logo
Ctrl + Alt + Escape: The 14-Hour Dilemma

Ctrl + Alt + Escape: The 14-Hour Dilemma

New Indian Express11 hours ago

The Karnataka government recently proposed amendments that could impact the workforce behind the IT capital of India. The proposal allows for up to 12-hour workdays, inclusive of overtime. The government has cited 'ease of doing business' as one of the reasons and clarified that it won't override the 48-hours-per-week limit that already exists. But IT unions have complained that it could be tantamount to 'modern slavery', diminish work-life balance, and cause mental agony and stress.
What do I think of the entire issue? Honestly, as I get older, I realise that it isn't necessary to have opinions on everything. I don't belong to the IT world and have never really had a steady desk job in the last two decades. I make my living as a writer, far removed from the worlds of salaries, appraisals and hikes. So, I don't intend to 'IT-splain' my point on behalf of my IT brethren and sisterhood. At the same time, I can't feign ignorance of the anxiety-filled state of affairs in the IT domain. ChatGPT and AI – futuristic, sci-fi boons for writers like me – are a huge threat to traditional IT jobs. There is the threat of global layoffs. A potential World War III is simmering as we speak, and might soon engulf the world. These are all legit fears lurking in the world we inhabit.
Then, there's the issue of traffic that citizens of Bengaluru have to uniquely endure. If working hours are pushed to 12 hours and the average commute takes 2 hours, that's 14 hours of a day engulfed in work. And it's not like we get to enjoy premium commuting services to help us rejuvenate ourselves and prepare for the day. There's the honking, the dust, and the diabetes-inducing sweetness of RJs that one must endure. In such a scenario, what can employees do? Some forces – governance, policy, and rules – are above our social jurisdiction.
When nothing works, we have each other as human beings. The IT industry brothers and sisters must come up with innovative ways to battle this scenario. The only way the Bengaluru IT crowd can fight back is by doing what they do best – building apps through innovation. Start selling office chairs with inbuilt massage facilities. Create an underground carpooling service for sleep-deprived coders. So that when we go home, we have people who understand our plight – a shoulder to cry on, an ear to vent to. HR-approved 'self-therapy' sessions that are basically nap sessions approved by the employer. Take a leaf from our brothers who drive autos and taxis. They are constantly speaking to each other on the phone so that they can stay awake, and have a friend to navigate the tricky lanes of life together. Create a self-help group of people who call each other during work hours so you can walk about in the office, pretending to be 'on a call'.
To quote a certain Mr. Guevara – 'Revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall.' Of course, Mr. Guevara had no idea that the word 'apple' would signify an electronics giant. But greater miracles have occurred in human history. In fact, one occurred a few weeks ago when the entire city came out to celebrate! To paraphrase (and twist) a famous quote – 'First, they came for the Testers, and I said nothing. Then they came for the UI/UX team, and I said nothing. Then they came for the scrum masters, and I said nothing. Finally, they came for me during my one-hour 'billable' lunch – and there was nobody left to speak for me.'
(The writer's views are personal)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘He Could Have Asked ChatGPT To Rewrite': CEO Under Fire For ‘Plagiarising' Post On AI
‘He Could Have Asked ChatGPT To Rewrite': CEO Under Fire For ‘Plagiarising' Post On AI

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

‘He Could Have Asked ChatGPT To Rewrite': CEO Under Fire For ‘Plagiarising' Post On AI

Last Updated: Vihan Pratap Singh, the founder and CEO of Blackrose, a quantitative trading firm based in Gurgaon, shared the post on LinkedIn. An Indian startup founder is facing backlash online after Internet users discovered that his viral post on artificial intelligence (AI) was not original. The post, which seemed like a thoughtful reflection on AI and its impact on the human brain, was copied from a US-based CEO. Vihan Pratap Singh, the founder and CEO of Blackrose, a quantitative trading firm based in Gurgaon, shared the post on LinkedIn. In it, he described a conversation with a Computer Science graduate from IIT Bombay. The graduate, according to Singh, struggled to find basic words while speaking. 'Like his brain was buffering," Singh wrote. When asked what was wrong, the IIT graduate allegedly replied, 'Sometimes I forget words now. I'm so used to having ChatGPT complete my thoughts that when it's not there, my brain feels… slower." The post warned about the long-term effects of AI. Singh claimed that tools like ChatGPT are doing more than helping people work—they may be changing the way we think. 'We're running the first large-scale experiment on human cognition," he said. 'What happens when an entire generation outsources their thinking?" But the internet soon found that these were not his words. The entire post was copied, almost word for word, from Greg Isenberg, a Florida-based entrepreneur and CEO of Late Checkout. Isenberg had written the same reflection back in December 2024, but mentioned a Stanford graduate instead of an IIT graduate. Singh changed that detail but left the rest of the post the same. The plagiarism was exposed by X user Shobhit Bakliwal. He posted screenshots of both versions side by side. 'This guy straight up stole the post and added IIT-B CS grad," Bakliwal wrote. Social media users were quick to criticise Singh. One wrote, 'There's a reason he is the Founder and CEO of his one-person company." Another said, 'He could have at least asked ChatGPT to rewrite this text." As of now, Singh has not responded to the plagiarism claims. First Published:

OpenAI is shutting down for the next week; Chief Research Officer Mark Chen warns employees: Meta knows we are …
OpenAI is shutting down for the next week; Chief Research Officer Mark Chen warns employees: Meta knows we are …

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

OpenAI is shutting down for the next week; Chief Research Officer Mark Chen warns employees: Meta knows we are …

Sam Altman, CEO, OpenAI OpenAI is implementing a rare company-wide shutdown next week to give employees time to recharge after months of grueling 80-hour workweeks, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter as reported by Wired. The temporary closure comes as the ChatGPT maker fights to retain top talent amid Meta's aggressive $100 million recruitment offers. The shutdown is an uncommon move for the ChatGPT-maker, which has maintained what sources call intense operational schedules, with employees working 80 hours a week, as the AI giant races to develop artificial general intelligence. Only executives will continue working during the break, sources confirmed to Wired. Meta capitalizes on OpenAI's talent fatigue Chief Research Officer Mark Chen warned staff in an internal Slack memo that Meta would likely exploit the shutdown period to pressure OpenAI researchers into making quick decisions. "Meta knows we're taking this week to recharge and will take advantage of it to try and pressure you to make decisions fast and in isolation," Chen wrote, in the memo as seen by Wired. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Soluções confiáveis para centros de dados IA Siemens Energy Saiba Mais Undo The timing proves critical as Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has successfully recruited seven OpenAI researchers in recent weeks, including key contributors to the company's reasoning models. Meta's superintelligence lab has hired Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Xiaohua Zhai, and Trapit Bansal , a foundational contributor to OpenAI's o1 model. OpenAI to recalibrate compensation strategy OpenAI leadership is "recalibrating comp" and exploring "creative ways to recognize and reward top talent," Chen announced. The company's response comes after CEO Sam Altman revealed that Meta offered some staffers signing bonuses exceeding $100 million, though recent defectors have disputed these specific figures as "fake news." Despite the financial pressure, Altman maintains that "none of our best people have decided to take them up on that," attributing retention to OpenAI's superior innovation capabilities and mission focus. The company plans to shift away from frequent product launches toward achieving artificial general intelligence as its primary objective. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

To Sam Altman's "Poaching" OpenAI Talent Charge, Meta CTO's "Dishonest" Reply
To Sam Altman's "Poaching" OpenAI Talent Charge, Meta CTO's "Dishonest" Reply

NDTV

time3 hours ago

  • NDTV

To Sam Altman's "Poaching" OpenAI Talent Charge, Meta CTO's "Dishonest" Reply

Meta has hit back at OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for alleging that the Mark Zuckerberg-led company is offering $100 million compensation packages to poach AI researchers. During an all-hands company meeting last week, Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth debunked Mr Altman's claim that Meta was paying "$100 million signing bonuses" and "more than that" in compensation to recruit OpenAI workers on its AI superintelligence team, according to The Verge. "Sam is just being dishonest here," Mr Bosworth, 43, claimed during the meeting. "He implies we are doing this action for everyone. You see, the market is booming. It's not really hot." Mr Altman recently expressed his happiness that none of OpenAI's "best people" decided to join Meta. During an appearance on the Uncapped podcast last week, Mr Altman further stoked controversy, claiming Meta "started making giant offers to a lot of people on our team." "You know, like $100 million signing bonuses, more than that (in) compensation per year," he claimed. Three leading OpenAI researchers - Xiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer - each denied receiving a $100 million bonus for joining Meta, claiming it was "fake news" on X (formerly Twitter). hey all, couple quick notes: 1) yes, we will be joining Meta. 2) no, we did not get 100M sign-on, that's fake news. Excited about what's ahead though, will share more in due time! cc @__kolesnikov__ and @XiaohuaZhai. — Lucas Beyer (bl16) (@giffmana) June 26, 2025 "Sam is known to exaggerate, and I know exactly why he is doing it, which is because we are succeeding at getting talent from OpenAI," Mr Bosworth said. The ChatGPT creator is engaged in a fierce battle with Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, to create cutting-edge artificial intelligence. Mark Zuckerberg, 41, has recently intensified his efforts to develop superintelligence-AI that is more intelligent than humans in terms of knowledge, memory, and reasoning. The company reportedly invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI and established a new AI lab aimed at obtaining "superintelligence." Meta has acquired the services of former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman and Daniel Gross, the CEO of Safe Superintelligence, a $32 billion AI business. Trapit Bansal, a key AI researcher who has worked with OpenAI since 2022 and helped develop the company's initial AI reasoning model, reportedly departed the company for Meta on Thursday, according to TechCrunch.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store