
Inside rare bird's life nesting in Glasgow University tower
The project recently announced that the happy couple Bonnie and Clyde had two chicks, Jack and Victor; however, they've experienced a recent tragedy.
Unfortunately, one of the chicks, Jack, contracted Bird Flu and had to be put to sleep to ease his suffering.
The remaining chick, mum, and dad are doing well, though, and the team say they're 'carrying on with their usual antics'.
John Simpson, 62, from the Glasgow Peregrine Project (Image: Colin Mearns) READ MORE: Mack rebuild 'at risk' from 02 ABC plan says Glasgow School of Art
Bonnie and Clyde are the only pair of Peregrines in the city. They are part of a population of only 1,000 across the country, with numbers dropping in the West Coast especially.
Local recorder for The Scottish Ornithologists' Club, John Simpson, helped establish the project, which is run alongside the University and several other conservation groups, including the RSPB.
John's been studying Peregrines for over 45 years and has a real passion for the birds and helping spread awareness and engagement.
Speaking about the project, John, 62, said: "It's the bizarrest thing on the planet, these peregrines sitting at the top of the tower, it's like something out of Batman.
"And then their view! It's like the tea towel of Glasgow, all the landmarks are laid out in front of them.
"We always joke that it's the most prestigious address in the city. You're in the penthouse suite.
"Gilbert Scott Tower, University of Glasgow, you're in the West End, you know, it would cost you a fortune to get a house up there.
"And there we have the city's apex predator nesting, it's phenomenal."
Pictured at left is Clyde, right, Victor (Image: Colin Mearns) READ MORE: Plans for O2 ABC site recommended to councillors despite 'negative impact'
John explains that peregrines are at the top of the city's food chain and will feast on "public enemy number one, the pigeon," among other things.
They can get a bit of bad press for their diet, but John hopes that people coming to see the raptors will have their opinions changed.
He explained: "If it were lions or tigers or leopards, they wouldn't be getting the same bad press for some reason or other. But this is our apex predator in the city.
"This is a remarkable opportunity to get people engaged in looking at ecology and the breeding biology of these birds."
Mum, Bonnie and Dad, Clyde, have had a few chicks every year, and when two male chicks were born in April, their names came very quickly.
John said: "The mum's named after Bonnie Scotland and the dad, River Clyde.
"So when we were ringing the chick and found out it was two males, someone shouted out 'Jack and Victor', and we thought - perfect, bang on... two lads living up Osprey Heights."
Inside rare bird's life nesting in Glasgow University tower (Image: Colin Mearns) READ MORE: Glasgow university graduate 'set to join Love Island line up'
Caring for the birds is no easy task. With each venture up to their nest via abseil costing the project £2,500, they keep their visits as few as possible.
They did rush to try to help Jack, and an emergency abseil took place in an attempt to save him.
Now the solo chick in the nest, Victor, is getting plenty of attention from Bonnie and Clyde and has started flying around the campus.
He'll be there for a few months while he grows into an adult, and people have been flocking to see the trio.
The project runs regular watches (Image: Colin Mearns) They run weekly peregrine watches on Saturday from 10am - 12noon, and also provide scopes and binoculars to view the peregrines.
The watches are located outside of the Hunterian Art Gallery and are free for anyone who wants to catch a glimpse of the rare birds.
You can follow the project on social media to see regular updates from the nest and beyond, and find out more on their website, here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
4 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Emmerdale fans hit out at dullest villain in soap's history
Cain Dingle (Jeff Hordley) and Tracy Shankley (Amy Walsh) have now revealed their new plot to find out who killed Nate Robinson, leaving John on edge. Meanwhile, he then found Owen Michaels (Simon Haines) unconscious during a home visit, but left him to die, as he came up with a plan to attempt to frame him for Nate's death. Instead of calling an ambulance and getting help, John wrote a note on Owen's laptop, 'confessing' he killed Nate. 8 Most Iconic British Soap Characters of All Time Emmerdale fans slam 'boring' villain John Sugden on ITV soap But viewers don't seem too impressed with John's tactics as many on Reddit claim he is the 'most boring 'serial killer/villain' they've ever seen'. Someone's post on the r/emmerdale subreddit said: 'I know this sounds super morbid but c'mon, am I alone in thinking we've been waiting ages for him to get really 'villian-y'?!' They added: 'I've been waiting for this man to go full-on psycho, otherwise, we've just suffered along with this boring story for close to a year now to watch him squirrel around the village with rolled up sleeves 24/7, act like a weirdo, and talk about how great of a medic he is??' This fan agreed: 'You nailed it! He's BORING.' Another wrote: 'I think he bores himself, hence the need to feel that high of bringing folks to the brink of death and then playing hero to revive them.' One person commented: 'His rolled up sleeves are the most interesting thing about him.' While this profile responded: 'Yes, he is so boring easily the dullest and most uninteresting serial killer in soap history.' However, some disagree and think John is an 'interesting' character. This viewer explained: 'The weird need to be a saviour, the fact you can tell he feels guilty about his actions (especially Nate) yet can't bring himself not to do it again or hand himself in. Soaps That Have Won the Most Awards 'I've enjoyed the slow burn and seeing how his actions have managed to go undetected so far. 'I'm very much looking forward to seeing the truth come out and how he reacts and how the rest of the village will react too.' Also in agreement, one viewer shared: 'I enjoy him! He's a quieter, calmer, different kind of villain'. They revealed the character is better than the 'usual' sort of villain the soap has become known for, 'with dramatic murders, unrealistic kidnappings, and over-the-top hostage situations'. The fan continued: 'Of course I say this and John's probably going to kidnap somebody at some point. Hopefully not though. 'But I enjoy that they're playing it like he's just a desperate guy who does kind of bad things for selfish reasons. I think the hero complex angle is quite fresh for soap. 'We are getting a decent insight into his guilt and feelings and such through the helpline calls and just his whole haunted demeanor, which adds to the complexity. I guess it's just not that engaging for some people. 'Maybe it's missing a bit of backstory to tell us why he's like this, I'm not sure.' Recommended reading: This person, who is also a fan of John, said: 'I like him. He's not written or acted like your typical soap villain, which makes him interesting to me. I think if he hadn't been paired with Aaron - who brings down every character he's tied to - his reception would have been better.' Someone else who enjoys John's character chimed in: 'I like him, think he's quite nuanced and layered - hate him but that's what makes him enjoyable.' How do you feel about John Sugden on Emmerdale? Let us know if you think he's a good soap villain in the comments below.


Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
Acclaimed thriller hailed as a ‘masterpiece' now available to stream
One of the greatest horror films of all time has been made available to stream for free on BBC iPlayer. Directed by Nicolas Roeg from a story by Daphne Du Maurier, Don't Look Now is widely regarded as a pivotal work in the genre. It stars the late, great Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie as John and Laura Baxter, two parents grieving the recent death of their young daughter. The pair visit Venice, where John is helping to renovate a dilapidated church. While there, they meet a pair of elderly sisters—one of whom claims to be a psychic. John struggles with the idea that she's seeing the spirit of his recently drowned daughter but seems to be experiencing nightmarish visions of his own, leading to that shocking twist. After first terrifying audiences in 1973, Don't Look Now is streaming for free, where it can traumatise viewers afresh. Don't Look Now currently sits with a healthy 93% 'fresh' score on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, with critics describing it as a 'masterpiece' and a 'classic' of the genre. Little White Lies has called it 'calculated perfection,' while The Times described it simply as 'genius.' In 2002, prominent film critic Roger Ebert gave the film a glowing five stars, calling out the film as 'a masterpiece of physical filmmaking.' Upon its release, the film was overshadowed by controversy surrounding its infamous sex scene. As Roeg cuts between images of John and Laura getting ready for dinner, the camera also shows the pair in bed together in a raw and intimate sex sequence. Its visual style led to persistent rumours that these were scenes of real, unsimulated sex between its actors… speculation that continues today. 'My gaze shifted to the actors, and I was riveted. By their shifting positions, it was clear to me they were no longer simply acting: they were f***ing on camera,' wrote Producer Peter Bart in his 2011 memoir, Infamous Players: A Tale of Movies, the Mob (and Sex). However, the stars have always rejected such allegations, with Sutherland denying that Bart was even in the room at all. In the production notes for the film's 4K re-release, cinematographer Anthony B. Richmond echoed Sutherland's denial, saying: 'We did a good job; it's very real. People still say they actually made love, but they didn't.' Meanwhile, Christie's boyfriend at the time, actor Warren Beatty, reportedly tried to prevent the film from being released, so outraged was he by the infamous sex scene. In April 2015, it was announced that the film would be getting a remake, to the chagrin of Hunger Games star Sutherland. Speaking in a sweary interview with Metro, the actor described the prospect of a remake as 'shameful.' More Trending He explained: 'Don't embarrass yourselves by participating in it. It's bulls**t. It was a piece of work indelibly written by Nicholas Roeg. 'Why would they do it? It's just people trying to profit off the back of something that's very beautiful. It's shameful. They should be ashamed of themselves.' A decade on, and the remake has not yet resurfaced. Might it be dead in the water? Watch Don't Look Now on BBC iPlayer. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Richard Osman reveals he pined for wife for a year before meeting on BBC show MORE: All 5 episodes of 'captivating' war drama streaming on BBC after agonising wait MORE: Major stars and Hollywood icons who've appeared in Casualty from Tom Hiddleston to Kate Winslet


The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Emmerdale fans hit out at dullest villain in soap's history
Meanwhile, he then found Owen Michaels (Simon Haines) unconscious during a home visit, but left him to die, as he came up with a plan to attempt to frame him for Nate's death. Instead of calling an ambulance and getting help, John wrote a note on Owen's laptop, 'confessing' he killed Nate. 8 Most Iconic British Soap Characters of All Time Emmerdale fans slam 'boring' villain John Sugden on ITV soap But viewers don't seem too impressed with John's tactics as many on Reddit claim he is the 'most boring 'serial killer/villain' they've ever seen'. Someone's post on the r/emmerdale subreddit said: 'I know this sounds super morbid but c'mon, am I alone in thinking we've been waiting ages for him to get really 'villian-y'?!' They added: 'I've been waiting for this man to go full-on psycho, otherwise, we've just suffered along with this boring story for close to a year now to watch him squirrel around the village with rolled up sleeves 24/7, act like a weirdo, and talk about how great of a medic he is??' This fan agreed: 'You nailed it! He's BORING.' Another wrote: 'I think he bores himself, hence the need to feel that high of bringing folks to the brink of death and then playing hero to revive them.' One person commented: 'His rolled up sleeves are the most interesting thing about him.' While this profile responded: 'Yes, he is so boring easily the dullest and most uninteresting serial killer in soap history.' However, some disagree and think John is an 'interesting' character. This viewer explained: 'The weird need to be a saviour, the fact you can tell he feels guilty about his actions (especially Nate) yet can't bring himself not to do it again or hand himself in. Soaps That Have Won the Most Awards 'I've enjoyed the slow burn and seeing how his actions have managed to go undetected so far. 'I'm very much looking forward to seeing the truth come out and how he reacts and how the rest of the village will react too.' Also in agreement, one viewer shared: 'I enjoy him! He's a quieter, calmer, different kind of villain'. They revealed the character is better than the 'usual' sort of villain the soap has become known for, 'with dramatic murders, unrealistic kidnappings, and over-the-top hostage situations'. The fan continued: 'Of course I say this and John's probably going to kidnap somebody at some point. Hopefully not though. 'But I enjoy that they're playing it like he's just a desperate guy who does kind of bad things for selfish reasons. I think the hero complex angle is quite fresh for soap. 'We are getting a decent insight into his guilt and feelings and such through the helpline calls and just his whole haunted demeanor, which adds to the complexity. I guess it's just not that engaging for some people. 'Maybe it's missing a bit of backstory to tell us why he's like this, I'm not sure.' Recommended reading: This person, who is also a fan of John, said: 'I like him. He's not written or acted like your typical soap villain, which makes him interesting to me. I think if he hadn't been paired with Aaron - who brings down every character he's tied to - his reception would have been better.' Someone else who enjoys John's character chimed in: 'I like him, think he's quite nuanced and layered - hate him but that's what makes him enjoyable.' How do you feel about John Sugden on Emmerdale? Let us know if you think he's a good soap villain in the comments below.