At least 20 killed in suicide attack on Damascus church
The United Nations condemned the attack, the first of its kind in the Syrian capital since Islamist-led forces toppled longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad in December, and the first on a church since the country's civil war erupted in 2011.
Security remains one of the greatest challenges for Syria's new authorities, whom the international community has repeatedly urged to protect minorities.
The interior ministry said in a statement that "a suicide attacker affiliated with the Daesh (IS) terrorist group entered the Saint Elias church in the Dwelaa area of the capital Damascus where he opened fire then blew himself up with an explosive belt".
AFP correspondents saw first responders transporting people from the site, which was strewn with shattered wood from fittings and pews, with fallen icons and pools of blood seen on the floor. Security forces cordoned off the area.
A health ministry statement carried by state news agency SANA said 20 people were killed and 52 wounded, raising an earlier civil defence toll.
Bystander Lawrence Maamari told AFP that "someone entered (the church) from outside carrying a weapon" and began shooting, adding that people "tried to stop him before he blew himself up".
- 'Heinous crime' -
United Nations special envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen expressed "outrage at this heinous crime", calling in a statement for "a full investigation and action by the authorities".
France's foreign ministry condemned an "abject, terrorist" attack, reiterating its commitment to "a transition in Syria that allows Syrians, whatever their religion, to live in peace and security in a free, united, pluralistic, prosperous, stable and sovereign" country.
Syria's foreign ministry described the attack as "a desperate attempt to undermine national coexistence and to destabilise the country".
Ziad, 40, said from a shop near the church that he heard gunfire then an explosion, and saw glass flying at him.
"We saw fire in the church and the remains of wooden benches thrown all the way to the entrance," he said.
The blast sparked panic and fear in the church, which had been full of worshippers including children and the elderly, an eyewitness told AFP, requesting anonymity.
Several people were reported missing, with families searching desperately for their loved ones.
Assad had painted himself as a protector of minorities, who during Syria's nearly 14-year civil war were targeted by numerous attacks, many claimed by jihadist groups including IS.
After the new authorities took power, the international community and visiting envoys repeatedly urged the government to protect minorities and ensure their participation in Syria's transitional process, particularly after sectarian violence erupted in several parts of the country.
- Investigation -
Interior Minister Anas Khattab offered condolences for the victims and said that "specialised teams from the ministry have begun investigations into the circumstances of this reprehensible crime".
"These terrorist acts will not stop the efforts of the Syrian state in achieving civil peace," Khattab said according to a statement.
In an interview earlier this month, Khattab noted the security challenges facing Syria and said that IS had shifted "to studied attacks on strategic targets".
He said IS had attempted "to carry out attacks against the Christian and Shiite community" that the authorities had thwarted.
Last month, IS claimed its first attack on Syria's new government forces.
Also last month, Syrian authorities said they arrested members of an IS cell near Damascus, accusing them of preparing attacks, while another anti-IS operation in the northern city of Aleppo saw the death of one security officer and three IS members.
IS seized large swathes of Syrian and Iraqi territory in the early years of the civil war, declaring a cross-border "caliphate" in 2014.
US-backed Syria Kurdish forces defeated the proto-state in 2019, but the jihadists have maintained a presence, particularly in Syria's vast desert.
burs-lar/lg/smw
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gaza hostage talks stalled by Knesset recess, not IDF troop placement
It seems that Netanyahu purposely waited to pull out the Morag Corridor issue to temporarily muddy talks just a bit longer until it is closer to the Knesset recess date of July 27. Those critics of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who ignore that he has a serious and coherent ideology for his national security decisions and impute to him acting solely based on political-personal motives often miss the boat on a far more complex picture. This is especially true when talking about the big picture: Whether Netanyahu could have cut a hostage deal in a certain month as opposed to several months later. But for much smaller calculations: Regarding the timing of a hostage deal, a few days or weeks this way or that way, politics is often overwhelmingly mixed in with the specific date when Netanyahu chooses to finalize an agreement. It is true that part of why Netanyahu did not end the war and sign a full hostage deal in spring 2024 was to keep his government afloat when Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich threatened to topple him. But Netanyahu also was not satisfied ideologically that Hamas was sufficiently beaten at that point in the war (its Rafah battalions were fully intact) to end the military pressure and leave Hamas the way it was. In contrast, by the time Netanyahu flew off for Washington last week, he was mostly ready for another ceasefire deal with Hamas, for at least 60 days, and possibly for ending the war entirely. That means that a large part of the reason there has been a delay in finalizing a deal at this point, though probably not a long delay, likely has to do with the Knesset recess. In fact, pretty much all of the issues that Netanyahu and Hamas disagreed about during the last ceasefire of January to March had been resolved by the middle of last week. Back in the January-March period, Netanyahu was willing to extend the ceasefire beyond early March for the return of more hostages as long as he did not need to explicitly say this would end the war. Hamas was not willing to give over any more hostages without a much clearer end to the war being part of any new deal. Mostly Israel's 'stick' of four more months of battering Hamas has gotten it to bend on this, with the 'carrot,' which the US has used to lure Hamas into the likely new deal being a stronger guarantee from US President Donald Trump (after seeing that he could order back Israeli aircraft from attacking Iran post that ceasefire), that he will get Netanyahu to end the war after the 60 days initial ceasefire expires. Meaning, Trump is telling Hamas he will get Netanyahu to stop, whether the prime minister says so out loud or not. So Hamas is now pretty much accepting Netanyahu's terms from January-March, but suddenly, mid-week last week, a new issue cropped up. Netanyahu wants to hold on to the Morag Corridor, which now cuts off Khan Yunis (mid-southern Gaza) from Rafah (deep southern Gaza), effectively making Rafah a more Hamas-free area for Palestinian civilians. Now, there are plenty of good, serious military reasons to want to hold onto the Morag Corridor. The largest one is the displacement of Hamas's political rule from the several hundred thousand Palestinians in Rafah, something that could deeply undermine its ability to reconstitute itself militarily. Initially, the IDF told The Jerusalem Post during a visit to the Morag Corridor in April that its primary purpose was to make it easier to finish off the small remaining Hamas terrorists in Rafah. But the IDF has long dispensed with those Hamas forces (the second time the IDF has beaten Hamas in Rafah after beating a larger group of them in summer 2024). In the past, Defense Minister Israel Katz has said that the purpose of Morag is to 'increase the pressure [on Hamas] to release the hostages, and to build a bridge for the continuation of operations for defeating Hamas.' IDF sources have said that Hamas's weapons manufacturing capabilities have been hit hard by IDF actions, but that it still retains a variety of makeshift facilities. In that light, having more forces in the Morag Corridor makes it easier to act speedily against such facilities when they are discovered and before Hamas manufacturers can escape. But all of these are somewhat beside the point. Israel and Netanyahu cannot say that Morag is a make-or-break issue because they only built it in April. It was not make or break for 18 months of the war before that. And Netanyahu could have placed the issue of the Morag Corridor on the table before going to Washington to try to resolve it. Moreover, despite past statements, Katz explicitly let slip to the Post and other journalists days before Netanyahu flew to Washington that the Morag Corridor was not a make-or-break issue. IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir and most of the IDF high command do not view Morag as a reason to hold up another hostage deal. And this is Zamir, the popular IDF chief who is viewed as aggressive, not Herzi Halevi, the IDF chief of October 7 who some viewed (justifiably or not) as more passive. Rather, it seems that Netanyahu purposely waited to pull out the Morag Corridor issue to temporarily muddy talks just a bit longer until it is closer to the Knesset recess date of July 27. Netanyahu is worried that Smotrich could try to topple the government. But once the recess is about to start, and certainly once the recess starts, that threat will be postponed until the Knesset returns in late October. And once it is late October, after a 60-day ceasefire, Netanyahu can either decide to go back to war or to initiate elections on his own, which would be set for some time in 2026, which will mean he will have survived most of his term. It is also possible that Netanyahu still is trying to use Morag to avoid a deal to further uproot Hamas's political control over the Palestinian civilian population – and to keep his government stable for deeper into 2026. But most of the signals from Netanyahu – as well as the leak from Katz and the clear position of Zamir – point to a relatively imminent deal. If this is how it plays out, it would be virtually identical to the delay of the last ceasefire with Hamas by a few weeks. That ceasefire could have started in early January, but instead started only on January 19 – since Netanyahu wanted the deal signed as close to Trump's inauguration day as possible. So while it is simplistic to say Netanyahu over several months has only made decisions based on politics, it is quite possible that IDF soldiers and Palestinian civilians who are killed in Gaza in this short period over the coming days could have been saved if the political calendar was not a critical factor in reaching the exact date for a deal.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Report: Israel willing to withdraw more troops from Gaza
Israel has presented a new proposal in indirect talks over a ceasefire in the Gaza conflict, according to a media report. The Jewish state is now willing to withdraw more troops from the Gaza Strip during the ceasefire than previously offered, the Times of Israel newspaper reported on Monday, citing an Arab diplomat. Indirect negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas in the Qatari capital Doha have recently stalled. A key sticking point is the differing views on the extent of the Israeli troop withdrawal, particularly from the southern Gaza Strip. Israel had previously been adamant that its forces remain in a relatively large area, including a three-kilometre-wide buffer zone along the border with Egypt near Rafah, as well as the so-called Morag Corridor, which separates Rafah from Khan Younis, the next second city in the coastal strip. Hamas, however, has demanded the withdrawal of Israeli forces to the positions they held before the collapse of the last ceasefire in March. Under the newly reported proposal, Israel would reduce its military presence to a 2-kilometre-wide buffer zone along the southern border near Rafah. However, according to the Arab diplomat cited by the Times of Israel, it is doubtful whether this concession will lead to a breakthrough in the negotiations. Israel's wish to maintain its military presence in southern Gaza is linked to plans by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to establish a camp there for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, media reports say. Critics describe this as an internment camp that could ultimately lead to forced deportation. Israel, however, refers to it as a "humanitarian city" intended as a base for the "voluntary departure" of Gaza's residents. Israel's war on Gaza, which followed the October 7, 2023 terrorist attacks by Hamas and other Islamist militants, continues to lead to consternation at the United Nations. UN Secretary General António Guterres said in New York on Monday: "We all condemned the horrible, terrible attacks of Hamas, but what we are witnessing Gaza is a level of death and destruction that has no parallel in recent times." ----------------------------------------------------------- Israel hat Medienberichten zufolge bei den indirekten Gesprächen über eine Waffenruhe im Gaza-Krieg einen neuen Vorschlag vorgelegt. Das Land wäre nun bereit, während der Feuerpause mehr Truppen aus dem Gazastreifen abzuziehen als bisher angeboten, berichtete die Zeitung «Times of Israel» unter Berufung auf einen arabischen Diplomaten. Die indirekten Verhandlungen Israels mit der islamistischen Hamas kamen in der katarischen Hauptstadt Doha zuletzt nicht von der Stelle. Ein Hauptgrund sind unterschiedliche Auffassungen über das Ausmaß des israelischen Truppenabzugs vor allem aus dem Süden des Gazastreifens. Israel hatte bislang darauf bestanden, dass seine Streitkräfte in einem relativ großen Gebiet verbleiben. Dieses würde eine drei Kilometer breite Pufferzone entlang der Grenze zu Ägypten bei Rafah sowie den sogenannten Morag-Korridor einschließen, der Rafah von Chan Junis trennt, der nächsten größeren Stadt im Küstenstreifen. Die Hamas verlangt den Rückzug des israelischen Militärs auf die Positionen, die es vor dem Zusammenbruch der letzten Waffenruhe im März eingenommen hatte. Dem nunmehr kolportierten Vorschlag zufolge würde Israel für sein Militär nur mehr noch in eine zwei Kilometer breite Pufferzone entlang der Südgrenze bei Rafah beanspruchen. Nach Darstellung des arabischen Diplomaten, auf den sich die «Times of Israel» beruft, ist jedoch zu bezweifeln, dass dieses Zugeständnis einen Durchbruch bei den Verhandlungen bringen wird. Israels Beharren auf dem Verbleib seines Militärs im Süden des Gazastreifens steht Berichten zufolge mit Plänen der Regierung von Ministerpräsident Benjamin Netanjahu im Zusammenhang, dort ein Lager für Hunderttausende Palästinenser errichten zu wollen. Kritiker sprechen von einem Internierungslager, das langfristig auf eine Zwangsdeportation hinauslaufen könnte. Israel spricht von einer «humanitären Stadt» als Ausgangsbasis für eine «freiwillige Ausreise» der Bewohner von Gaza.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Israel Strikes Syria After New Clashes Involving Druze Minority
Israel launched attacks in southern Syria on Monday after deadly clashes that involved the Druze community, a minority group that the Jewish state has pledged to protect. The Israel Defense Forces struck several tanks advancing toward Suwayda province, where confrontations broke out Sunday and persisted into Monday. 'The IDF struck the tanks in order to prevent their arrival to the area,' the army said on Telegram.
