Behind the Curtain: Losing by winning
Yet poll after poll suggests most Americans aren't impressed. In fact, they seem tired of all the winning.
Why it matters: Trump appears to be losing by winning. The more he does (including issues beyond his legislative wins), the more the general public, especially independents, shrug — or recoil.
This paradox is unfolding in what could be the very best chapter of his presidency, before tariffs push prices higher or midterms pose risks to his GOP majorities.
And it's being aggravated by the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, which has exposed rare cracks in Trump's decade-old MAGA movement.
What the polls say: One poll is meaningless. But a bunch of credible polls, showing the same thing, are worth paying attention to. And almost all of them show big majorities opposed to provisions of the " One Big Beautiful Bill" ... and harsh immigration crackdown ... and high tariffs ... and pardons for Jan. 6 convicts ... and wild improvisation with Russia.
Trump was underwater (more unpopular than popular) on issue after issue in a CBS News/YouGov poll out Sunday, with broad disapproval on his handling of the economy: 70% of those polled said his administration wasn't doing enough to lower prices, and 61% said it was putting too much focus on tariffs.
On the administration's deportations of immigrants in the U.S. illegally, the CBS News/YouGov poll found overall support dropping 10 points over the past five months (59% to 49%). The GOP base remains overwhelmingly supportive, but a CNN poll found a 10-point increase (45% to 55%) in U.S. adults who say Trump has gone too far on deportations.
Some Trump advisers believe the deportations are more popular than polls reflect, based on some people's unwillingness to tell pollsters their true views on the issue.
On Trump's megabill, an AP-NORC poll found more adults think the new tax and spending law will benefit the wealthy (64%) than think it helps the middle class or "people like you" (51% each). The percentage who approved of Trump's handling of government spending (38%) was down 8 points from March.
Trump's handling of the Epstein case presents the latest — and so far greatest — threat to his public image: A new YouGov poll gave Trump a net rating of -34, his worst on any major issue this term. The backlash has dragged on for more than three weeks, fueled by Trump's escalating conflict with his own MAGA base.
Zoom in: Buyer's remorse appears especially concentrated among Gen Z voters, whose extraordinary shift toward Trump in 2024 spawned existential panic inside the Democratic Party.
Trump's net approval rating among 18- to 29-year-olds has plummeted to -40 since inauguration, down from roughly even, according to pollster G. Elliott Morris.
Reality check: Unhappiness with Trump hasn't turned into popularity for Democrats. In a CNN poll out last week, just 28% of Americans had a favorable view of the Democratic Party — the low point in more than 30 years of CNN polling.
Basically, everyone dislikes everyone and everything.
Between the lines: Some of Trump's unpopularity reflects the law of thermostatic public opinion — voters demand change, then flinch when it arrives too fast or too hard, Axios' Zachary Basu notes.
Take immigration: With the border having gone quiet, scrutiny has turned to Trump's interior crackdown and the deportation of non-criminal migrants — including hundreds of thousands of noncitizens who are here legally and have lived in the U.S. for years.
MAGA hardliners may love the public spectacle of "Alligator Alcatraz." But for many middle-ground voters — including podcaster Joe Rogan — the optics are too much to stomach.
In other cases, Trump set lofty expectations that haven't been met.
The war in Ukraine, which Trump promised to end within 24 hours of taking office, rages on. So does the war in Gaza. And in a remarkable break with isolationist allies, Trump joined forces with Israel last month to bomb Iran's nuclear program.
His pledge to " rapidly drive prices down" has also hit roadblocks: Inflation ticked up in June, complicating the Fed's path to rate cuts even before a new era of global tariffs kicks in next month.
Trump's botched promise not to touch Medicaid could haunt the GOP for years: 10 million people are projected to lose health coverage over the next decade because of the megabill's steep cuts to federal health spending, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
CBO says that over the next decade, the megabill is expected to add at least $3 trillion to the national debt that Republicans once cared so much about.
Behind the scenes: In private, Trump gripes about not getting sufficient credit for defying expectations and historic norms. He's imposing his will on the nation — yet the media and even MAGA fixate on the blemishes. But what if his ideas are authentically unpopular?
A longtime Trump adviser told us the president's view is: Why don't they trust me? What more can I do?
What to watch: Trump aides are making extensive plans to showcase popular parts of the megabill — notably tax-cut extensions, plus new tax deductions for tips and overtime, and auto-interest loans for new vehicles assembled in the U.S.
But Republicans are having trouble selling the package's popular provisions because the Epstein saga has taken over. House Republicans tell Axios' Alex Isenstadt their constituents are fixated on Epstein, not the bill.
Trump lamented Tuesday on Truth Social: "We had the Greatest Six Months of any President in the History of our Country, and all the Fake News wants to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax!"
The bottom line: Trump advisers tell us that what will matter for the long run is how the economy is treating everyday Americans when it comes time for midterm voting in 2026, and the choice of Trump's successor in 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
11 minutes ago
- CBS News
Massapequa asks President Trump for executive order protecting Native American school mascots
A Long Island school district is asking for President Trump's help in their fight to keep their team name and mascot — the Massapequa Chiefs. The New York State Board of Regents voted to ban Native American-related mascots, team names and logos in public schools back in 2023 and issued a June 2025 deadline for rebranding, saying districts that didn't comply could lose state aid. Massapequa High School has been pushing back, and the town is asking Trump to issue an executive order that would protect Native American mascots and imagery nationwide by outlawing any such bans. "This is a national issue, and so what we're saying is instead of having these little fights everywhere, we're asking the president to get involved," Massapequa Board of Education President Kerry Wachter said. "It really goes to the heart of who we are, and they're trying not only to erase Native Americans, but they're also trying to erase our tradition." The New York State Department of Education released the following statement in response: "No school district is above the law. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York has twice rejected attempts by Massapequa and others to block enforcement of this regulation. The court made it clear: the State Education Department has a strong public interest in making sure every student learns in an environment free from discrimination and harassment. In fact, the court said the hardships 'tipped decidedly' in favor of NYSED. We remain committed to ending the use of harmful, outdated, and offensive depictions of Indigenous people. Our responsibility is to students and families; we won't trade their dignity for convenience." Trump has voiced support for Massapequa in the past. Back in April, he posted on Truth Social, in part, "I agree with the people in Massapequa, Long Island, who are fighting furiously to keep the Massapequa Chiefs logo on their Teams and School. Forcing them to change the name, after all of these years, is ridiculous and, in actuality, an affront to our great Indian population." United States Education Secretary Linda McMahon visited the district in May and said she planned to launch an investigation into the state's mascot ban. On Sunday, Trump threatened to block a deal for the Washington Commanders NFL team to return to a Washington, D.C., stadium unless the team changed their name back to the "Washington Redskins." A deal was reached between the city and the team Thursday, however.
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Key decisions that will shape rural health fund
States next year will begin tapping the $50 billion rural health fund in the GOP's tax and spending law, but questions have already arisen about how the funds will be allocated — and how much they will benefit rural providers. Why it matters: The fund aims at helping rural hospitals and providers adjust to sweeping changes in how Medicaid is financed, including limits on provider taxes and state-directed payments. But important details have to be fleshed out. What they're saying: Sen. Josh Hawley, who pushed for the fund, in part to get his vote for the megabill, said CMS will need to make sure the money "flows to hospitals that need it" and are not simply "going to states in general to do whatever they want with it." "So far, so good. I liked how it was written up," Hawley said. "But we'll want to monitor closely how the agency puts it into effect." Sen. Thom Tillis, who was one of the three GOP "no" votes on the reconciliation bill, told Axios that CMS needs to "make sure it's a fair formula for rural hospitals." "I think that that pot of money looks big, but it's not really when you consider some of the economic impacts, mainly from the state-directed payments," Tillis said. "We'll be interested to see how they interpret the law." How it works: The new law allocates $10 billion annually for the next five years, starting in 2026. The law says $25 billion is to be distributed equally among all states that submit a "detailed rural health transformation plan," which could include details on how they would use the funds. Between the lines: States can apply for the aid only once, by the end of this year. If they estimate wrong, or run into unforeseen problems, they don't get another shot at it. CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz must approve each state's application by Dec. 31. CMS has discretion to distribute the other $25 billion, based on factors such as how much of the state's population is rural and the number of rural health facilities. The CMS administrator can also consider other factors deemed appropriate. Friction point: Some of that flexibility raises questions about how CMS will proceed, said Zach Levinson, director of the KFF Project on Hospital Costs. "States will also have discretion on how they distribute funds among hospitals and other providers," Levinson said. "And they maybe will steer some dollars to non-rural areas, pending CMS approval." The concern is that some states could be favored over others, or that funding will not go to providers with the greatest needs. "There are risks of this becoming a slush fund if it's not carefully attended to and if it's not focused" on actual rural hospitals, said Jackson Hammond, a senior policy analyst at Paragon Health Institute. All the money has to be distributed by 2030 and spent by 2032. That also means much of the assistance will have already been spent before the provider tax and state-directed payment provisions take effect in 2028. The $50 billion sum also is about one-third of the $155 billion in estimated cuts to federal Medicaid spending in rural areas, per a KFF analysis.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘His income is limited': Should I pay $800 a month towards my husband's $67,000 student debt?
My husband is 40 and I am 44. When we got married a year ago, I was aware that he had about $67,000 in student-loan debt as well as credit-card debt from living paycheck-to-paycheck. He never consolidated his student loans and they all have varying interest rates between 5% to 8%. I did not have him consolidate the loans as there were potential benefits under the Biden administration for him not doing so. In the meantime, I was able to get him to change his spending habits and pay off all his credit cards by helping him understand the principles behind how interest and payments work. He also has his own business, which has a small financial footprint supported by his income. As for myself, my income allowed me to purchase a house in 2020 with a 2.6% interest rate. I am able to pay all the bills to support us both and then some. Wall Street braces for deluge of Treasury bills, a crucial test of market demand Why Tesla analysts are mostly upbeat about earnings, but investors aren't happy 'If I was writing the checks at Coke, I wouldn't write the check for this,' one expert says about cane-sugar Coke Related: The 5 huge changes coming for student-loan borrowers and colleges under GOP megabill I have stopped short of paying for his business, his car payment and health insurance. Yes, there are a few incidentals he also helps support for our family, such as food, but his income is limited due to his new business and part-time work. I would like to grow my retirement and emergency funds some more, but I am very aware of my husband's student-loan debt, which he is not paying down in a timely manner. I graduated with about $57,000 worth of student loans in the early 2000s. A modest lifestyle on an income that rarely topped $15 per hour and low rent helped me pay off my own student-loan debt in 10 years. I have been working for the same company for over 15 years and I have built a career path that has led me to making almost six figures annually. I have an estimated retirement income of about $6,500 per month. I believe I can contribute about $800 per month to paying off my husband's student-loan debt. From what I understand, I am not legally responsible for his student debt, which was all taken out by him before we were married. We also keep our bank accounts separate so that if something should happen where the government lands on student loans, my income is in no way touched and all the normal bills could be paid like normal. Am I better off paying toward my husband's student-loan payments, or should I take this monthly amount and invest it elsewhere? Thank you for your kind attention. Student Loans Are Killing Us All Don't miss: 'Why am I so afraid to retire?' I'm 60 and lost $1.2 million in a divorce. Can I rebuild my life? I have a funny feeling you're going to do what you're going to do. But since you asked… You married this man, who may be a wonderful guy, and appear to be paying the lion's share of the bills. You are now considering crossing that imaginary line and helping him pay off other extraneous expenses, and are now giving serious consideration to paying off his student debt. Paying your husband's bills won't teach him to make smarter financial decisions in the future, nor will it help you in your own retirement goals. The fact that he would actually accept $800 a month from you to pay off his student debt also gives me pause. It tells me: He ain't gonna change his financial habits. You are not responsible for these loans, as I'm sure you are aware, given that they were taken out before your marriage. So I wonder why you have the 'disease to please' or, in this context, the 'fret about his debt,' and see it as much your obligation to pay off as his. Why do you see his debts as your duty to pay? You don't have to pay his bills. You don't have to make up the shortfall because his business is not performing. You don't have to take money from your own retirement fund in order to pay off his student loan because he didn't do what you did —live far below your means and work a $15-an-hour job. You didn't clear your own loan so you would have the time/money to clear his debts. If you paid off this loan solo — let's say your husband became overwhelmed with other expenses, which would not be so farfetched given his current and previous financial situation — it would take you more than 10 years and end up costing you nearly $100,000, including roughly $33,000 in interest. If you and he paid $800 each, it would take half that time (five years) and cost just over $76,000, including $9,000 interest. Related: My husband and I are 40. I have $200,000 in student debt, while he has $600,000 in retirement savings. Are we in trouble? It's important to see what you are giving up by paying your husband's debts: Let's say you invested $800 a month in the S&P 500 SPX for 10 years and 4 months — the same amount of time it would take you to pay off his student loan alone. At an average annual return of 7%, compounded monthly, you would end up with $138,000 for your retirement and/or emergency fund by the time you're 54. Nice work, if you can get it. If you do the math, it makes more sense for you to invest that $800 and tell your husband that he should put together a plan to pay his student loan just like you did. If you don't pay his student loans, it doesn't mean that you don't love him. It doesn't make you a bad person or an uncaring or unsympathetic partner. It does make you somebody who values their own financial independence and intends to lead by example. Let me share a story with you that I have not thought about in many years. When I was a kid, I had a paper route. It was, you might say, my first job in journalism. I finished school early on a Wednesday afternoon and I delivered newspapers for exactly one penny per paper. It sounds like I grew up in Dickensian times, but it was Ireland before the economic boom. It was my first taste of earning my own money and it felt bloody great. One week, I finished my paper route shortly after lunch and my friend who lived on my street neglected to do his route until late in the day, so I suggested helping him. It never occurred to me to ask for money and, if he did offer, I refused. Either way, I arrived home empty handed feeling pretty good about my good deed. My mother went through me for a short cut. She told me I should not have done half of his route in addition to my own. That's a roundabout way of saying: Allow your husband to deliver his own newspapers. Related: My daughter has $500K in med-school expenses. Can my wife and I afford to pay it off? My daughter has $500K in med-school expenses. Can my wife and I afford to pay it off? Can my husband contest his late brother's $600K will? He experienced oxygen deprivation due to COPD before he died. I have early Alzheimer's and my husband has stage 4 kidney disease. We just inherited $50K. How can this help us? . 'I'm already up $45,000 in about an hour' — Reddit traders boast about wins as meme-stock mania returns Dow cuts dividend in half in reaction to 'lower-for-longer' earnings The S&P 500 just did something it's only done four times in 50 years. Here's what happened next. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
