US refuses to budge on 15 percent trade tariff imposed on NZ
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Trade Minister Todd McClay has spoken with the United States trade representative to make the case against increased tariffs, but Jamieson Greer appears unlikely to budge.
On Friday,
the US announced a new 15 percent tariff on exporters
, which McClay called a "blunt tool".
Speaking to delegates at the National Party conference in Christchurch, McClay said he spoke to Greer on Saturday morning.
"I made the case that it is not reasonable and it should not be happening to New Zealand, and it is going to be harmful for some of our exporters, and we would ask them to look at that and reconsider it," he said.
However, Greer had made it clear that President Donald Trump had made a decision, if a country had a trade deficit with the United States, it would be hit with the 15 percent tariff, wherever they were.
Top trade diplomat Vangelis Vitalis will travel to Washington on Sunday, while McClay intended visiting in coming weeks.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said New Zealand had underscored it did not believe tariffs were good for the world economy.
"The reality is, as a small trading nation, our job is get out there and hustle, and create opportunities for New Zealand businesses," he said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a few seconds ago
- NZ Herald
Red tape slows New Zealand's adoption of biological farming products
Total alcohol consumption has been falling over recent years, though data on home consumption aren't yet available. Demand for dairy products has increased across the board, not just those targeting older consumers. Adoption of autonomous vehicles on-farm is not yet apparent (topography on a typical New Zealand farm might prove a deterrent). The last of the top five was about on-farm usage of 'biologicals'. These were described as natural products which 'can enhance plant growth and health by improving nutrient uptake, pest resistance and soil health'. This description resonates with the increased interest in achieving more (or at least the same) for less. Much has been written about the potential benefits of 'biologicals' and there's a growing view that more 'natural' options such as biologicals can replace 'chemistry'. The products tend to fall into one of three categories: bio-fertilisers (providing nutrition such as nitrogen), bio-stimulants (enhancing growth) and bio-pesticides (providing crop protection). The most advanced in terms of use and proof within a productive system are the bio-pesticides. Many countries are already using formulations not yet approved in New Zealand. Following Bayer's exit from research because of regulatory delays, there are now concerns that other companies will follow suit. The New Zealand market is small in comparison with markets in other countries, where new active ingredients are being embraced, and the cost-benefit analysis isn't stacking up here. Last month, Kent Davies, the commercial unit leader for this area for Corteva, told Agriculture Minister Todd McClay that New Zealand farmers used to have access to the latest and best innovations. This reflected a regulatory approval framework that ensured timely evaluation. In the last five years, however, New Zealand has slipped from being a world leader, resulting in other countries getting earlier access, Davies said. He stated that the regulatory process in Australia was roughly two years from submission to approval, whereas in New Zealand, regulatory delays resulted in a process that took upwards of three years. Corteva is a global leader in developing and commercialising new active ingredients, particularly in the biological sector. For any company to release a new product on the market, a functioning, reliable and timely regulatory system is critical for it to recoup the investment made. That investment is millions of dollars. It ensures that new products are safe and do what is claimed – and meets the requirements of regulators, conditions of registration, sector codes of conduct, and policies and programmes. The Animal and Plant Health Association New Zealand (Aphanz) is the peak industry association of companies that make, sell and distribute animal and crop health products, including biologicals. The Aphanz's global member companies spend an estimated annual US$3.8 billion ($6.43b) on crop protection research and development before the release of any new product. By 2030, another US$4.32b will be spent on biologicals (and another US$2.32b on precision and digital technologies). This money is more than New Zealand has in its total national research budget, let alone that for agriculture. More data indicate that companies' expenditure on research and development takes the bulk of the funding but registration costs now account for 13.9% – almost double the costs from 1995. This explains the concern about whether companies will stick with New Zealand. If they leave, so will their developments. All regulators have rigorous internationally accepted guidelines that are designed to ensure the safety of any product introduced. While all countries are focused on reducing exposure to hazards, some are not invoking the precautionary principle as much as in New Zealand. Road cones are an example. The New Zealand Environmental Protection Authority, with a vision of 'An environment protected, enhancing our way of life and the economy', explains the precautionary principle as: 'If we're unsure, we pause and say no for now.' However, a recent paper from the University of Massachusetts states that 'precautionary principle-based decisions reflect outdated science and risk-management principles' and 'failure to use updated science and decision science may result in more harm than good'. New Zealand regulatory bodies, the Aphanz and its member companies all want the same thing – a system that allows New Zealand farmers and growers to have access to a broad suite of new developments. Farmers and growers want access so that they can continue to support a vibrant economy. The Government is committed to change and is serious about supporting innovation in New Zealand. Time is ticking while other countries move ahead. This doesn't bode well for the export economy.
RNZ News
30 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Businesses urged to bypass free MBIE employment mediation service due to wait-list
There is currently a seven-week waiting list to access the Ministry of Innovation, Business and Employment's mediation service. Photo: 123RF An employment lawyer is advising businesses to bypass the government's free employment mediation service. There was currently a seven-week waiting list to access the Ministry of Innovation, Business and Employment's mediation service, which was supposed to be a way to avoid drawn-out disputes between employers and their employees. "Don't wait," Rotorua employment lawyer Michelle Urquhart said, adding the cost of accessing private services was well worth it given the risks associated with leaving a dispute to fester. MBIE advised availability was limited due to high demand and apologised for the inconvenience, though wait time was an improvement from the peak 11-week wait in February. "There has been a sustained demand for employment mediation services, with a 12 percent increase in mediations delivered in 2024/25 compared to the previous year," MBIE director Pele Walker said, adding full-day mediations rose by 25 percent over the past three years, which reduced overall mediator availability. "Mediators report that the complexity of issues being brought to mediation has increased, contributing to longer sessions and more time needed to reach resolution." Urquhart said it was more than an inconvenience for businesses, as the longer it took to resolve an issue the more complicated and costly it became. "Having to wait more than two months for mediation - which is meant to be an early intervention service - is far from ideal in the current economic environment," Urquhart said. She said the delay means an increasing number of businesses were turning to independent specialists - or not dealing with the issue at all. "The second option is a lose-lose for both parties," she said, given current labour market conditions. "No one wants to be looking for a new job. For an employer, it can cost up to 1.5 times a person's salary to replace them, including recruitment, onboarding and lost productivity." She said the parties involved in a dispute should seek help quickly, even if they have to pay to use private services. "A dispute will initially impact the people directly involved, but it doesn't take long for it to start impacting wider teams, productivity, morale and ultimately, the bottom line. "Getting on top of the concern early, having calm conversations, and developing a resolution plan that works for everyone is critical to moving forward before too much damage is done." Urquhart said businesses could find a private employment mediator online through the Arbitrators and Mediators Institute or the Resolution Institute. MBIE also offered an early resolution service with most cases resolved within 15 working days, though urgent cases, such as those involving strikes or collective bargaining, continued to be prioritised.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Labour asks Auditor-General to investigate electoral roll complaints
Labour's Duncan Webb wants the Auditor-General to investigate reports of enrolment issues at the Electoral Commission. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Labour MP Duncan Webb has asked the Auditor-General to investigate reports of enrolment issues] at the Electoral Commission. Last week, RNZ spoke to voters who reported they had been moved off the Māori roll, or could not find themselves on any electoral roll. The Electoral Commission has responded, saying it was likely those who could not find their details online were on the "dormant role". The dormant role lists voters who have lost touch with the commission and need to update their address before their record shows up on Chief Electoral Officer Karl Le Quesne has been adamant the commission is not changing people's enrolment details without their consent. But prospective voters, such as former journalist Taryn Utiger, have told RNZ she updated her details as recently as a month ago and still could not find her record. When RNZ approached the Electoral Commission about Utiger's case, it said it could not comment on an individual's enrolment record. Webb wrote to the Office of the Auditor-General on Monday afternoon, asking for an investigation to "resolve any doubt on the matter one way or the other". He said he had received reports of enrolment issues himself that he could not dismiss on the basis of the comment provided by the commission. "It appears that there are two possibilities as to how this is occurring. First, there have been people inappropriately placed on the dormant roll. "Second, the information technology system adopted by the Commission has a poor human interface that makes it error prone or unusable," the letter reads. On the dormant roll, Webb said he wanted the Auditor-General to check the commission was only placing people on this role when it needed to. "I am concerned that the steps that the Commission is taking under s 89G(2) are not sufficiently rigorous to ensure that people are not being placed on the dormant roll inappropriately. "While the Commission notes that "we will try to contact you by email or text to ask you to update your details" it is not clear how this is done, or what efforts are used to ensure that the best contact details are used. I also note that in the current era an email or text with a "click on this link" message is unlikely to be responded to," the letter reads. On the technology system, Webb said it was unreasonable to expect people to locate their electoral record online by using their exact name and address. "I am concerned that this is a practical hurdle that inappropriately obstructs people seeking to update or confirm their enrolment. In particular, address information is now auto-populated in an accepted format in almost all applications. "If the Commission is using software which cannot recognise that Avenue and Ave are the same, or that Saint Albans and St Albans are the same suburb, this is a very significant flaw in the system, "For the Commission to expect electors to remember how they spelt such words, or whether they included a suburb or only their city/town in the address, is an example of an unworkable and outdated human interface of the technology." Webb said it was clear the enrolment system was not working as expected and a detailed inquiry was required to establish exactly what issues, if any, there were. "The integrity of the electoral system is fundamental to our democracy. Your inquiry will ensure continued confidence in the system." The Commission said it was taking people's concerns seriously and anyone with questions about their enrolment could call freephone 0800 36 76 56 or email enquiries@ "We continue to monitor our systems and they are running as they should be. In the week to Sunday 3 August we received 38,435 enrolments and updates and 91 percent of these were online." "It's good that people are checking their enrolment details, and we understand the frustration when you can't find your record. We have heard the feedback and will look at how we can improve the experience for people. "The search on our website to find your enrolment record is strict to maintain voter privacy and ensure that a person can only see the record we hold for them." The Office of the Auditor-General confirmed it was considering whether or not it would carry out any inquiry work, including whether the issues raised by Webb fell within its mandate. "We cannot comment further while this process is under way," a spokesperson said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
