SNP's 2026 candidates 'ignore' Scottish independence campaigners
The group believe 'a lot of Yes groups are raring to go but are looking for a lead', writing in the letter that there are 'thousands of us out here who are not SNP members but are passionate about Scotland's independence and are more than willing to lend a hand and work hard' as part of the 2026 campaign.
The group were invited to a recent Berwickshire SNP branch meeting and local candidate, John Redpath, is coming to the next Yes Berwickshire meeting.
READ MORE: Scottish Government 'will need to find extra £2bn to foot welfare bill', experts say
However, to date, just four sitting MSPs have replied to the "call for unity". From the list of 2026 candidates, just one other than Redpath has responded – after The National questioned them on their lack of reply.
One member of Yes Berwickshire said there was 'only one conclusion to be drawn".
'There's an arrogance about it to me to not even get a reply from so many folk – as if we don't have a contribution to make,' they added.
Yes Berwickshire has recently joined the coalition titled 'Liberate Scotland'.
Indy4Indy, ISP, Salvo, Scottish Sovereign Research Group, and Independence Forum Scotland have all signed up to come under the umbrella.
The letter sent to SNP MSPs and candidates states: 'As we are now less than 12 months until the 2026 Holyrood elections, we at Yes Berwickshire (YB) are gearing up to a period of much more regular activity in pursuit of Scottish independence.
"For the last 16 years YB have been active with street stalls, extensive leafleting, bridge events, letters to the local and national press and more general activity and support for the cause of independence. YB has some members from political parties, but most do not belong to any party but are passionate about fighting for independence.
'YB have approached the local SNP branch and intend also to contact Alba, the Greens, and any other organisation promoting independence in Berwickshire with a view to pooling our resources in the hope of creating a more cohesive and organised campaign in our area.
"With such a large and sparsely populated area, cutting down on double or treble campaign coverage by different parties seems a sensible way forward. We have had a very good response from the local SNP and joint meetings are proposed for the near future.
READ MORE: Labour minister backs down after comparing Reform and parts of media to Nazis
'While we here hope to make progress for a united, co-ordinated and most importantly of all, effective, campaign here in Berwickshire there seems to be a marked reluctance by the SNP at national and Holyrood level to unite behind an all-encompassing campaign for independence – is this the case?
'It seems to us in Yes Berwickshire absolutely obvious that if we are to deliver an independence-supporting majority in large and un-challengeable numbers the first and most important thing, we need is a united, unified, co-ordinated and effective campaign. The most important of those characteristics is united – we need aw oor mitts tae the pump as they say.
'Is the SNP, nationally, willing to be part of, and indeed lead, that united campaign? There are thousands of us out here who are not SNP members but are passionate about Scotland's Independence and are more than willing to lend a hand and work hard for our independent, free at last, future.'
The SNP have been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Reform-led Durham county council scraps climate emergency declaration
A Reform-led council is thought to have become the first in the UK to rescind its climate emergency declaration, a move condemned as 'a very dark day' for the authority. Durham county council, which has had an overwhelming Reform majority since the May local elections, passed a motion to rescind a declaration made in 2019. More than 300 local authorities have declared a climate emergency. It voted instead to declare a County Durham care emergency, a move described as 'cynical and insulting' by the Liberal Democrat councillor Mark Wilkes. He said there was a financial case as well as an environmental case for keeping the declaration. Wilkes said the council's climate action had helped save more than £13m in the last year alone. He added that stopping work on tackling the climate crisis would risk the loss of external funding. It ran the risk of less money to invest in social care, he said. 'This is not an either-or.' During a sometimes fractious and bad-tempered debate on Wednesday, the Reform council leader, Andrew Husband, said the authority was now driven by data and common sense. 'During the Roman-occupied era not far away from County Durham, around 45AD, there is evidence of Roman vineyards along Hadrian's Wall. This is because the Roman period in Britain is known for having a relatively warm climate which would have been conducive to growing grapes. Mind, how the climate has changed,' he said. Kenny Hope, a Reform councillor, accused the Lib Dems of being in favour of adult and child slave labour. He said the mining of material for lithium batteries was 'rife with child slavery' as was the production of solar panels in China. 'I do not believe in child or adult slave labour and I believe the guys on this side of the house also do not believe in it. But I believe the guys on the other side must believe in adult or child slave labour because they have not took that into consideration,' he said. Darren Grimes, a former GB News presenter, prolific tweeter and now deputy leader of the council, proposed the motion and accused his opponents of wanting to make local residents 'colder and poorer … shame. Shame. Shame.' He said Durham was done 'with expensive virtue-signalling tripe' and said the 2019 declaration was 'a feel-good' one chasing 'net-zero rainbows while the likes of China belch out coal more than Sauron's Mordor'. Afterwards, Jonathan Elmer, one of the council's two Green members, described some of what he heard in the debate as 'bonkers'. He said the vote represented 'a very dark day' for the council. 'Eighty per cent of the population do believe in the climate emergency and want to do something about it. Durham has an administration that doesn't. They've got a head-in-the-sand, don't-look-up approach,' Elmer said. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Wilkes said he was concerned for his nine-year-old son. 'I want to know he can grow up and live in a country and on a planet that is safe. There is a personal aspect to everything, isn't there?' On Monday, the energy secretary, Ed Miliband, warned MPs about the climate crisis, saying he would explicitly call out politicians who rejected net zero policies for betraying future generations. The duration of the Durham council debate was short because of rules limiting it to 30 minutes. A move by Wilkes to have a fuller debate was voted down by Reform. The rules also meant there was no time for another motion by Grimes to strengthen what he described as free speech protections in the code of conduct for elected members. Before the debate, about 200 protesters gathered outside county hall with banners and placards highlighting the climate crisis. 'Reform is asking you bury your head in the sand,' read one. 'Our children need a healthy world,' said another.
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Tories end their term on a high
Labour woes mean Tory smiles. The Conservatives have ended the parliamentary session on a (reasonable) high, after last week's benefits debacle. At the shadow cabinet yesterday, frontbenchers were treated to a presentation by Mark McInnes, the new chief executive, and Paul Bristow – the only real success story from May's local elections. This evening, it was the turn of Kemi Badenoch to address the 1922 Committee for their final meeting before the summer recess. Badenoch's speech was an upbeat affair. She pointed to the U-turns secured on welfare, grooming gangs and winter fuel. Progress was highlighted in a number of key areas, after the shambles of the last election. Following the betting scandal, the Tories have now rebuilt their candidates' team. Social media has been overhauled; a new external agency has been brought to offer advice. There was much talk of the importance of principles unlike the (implicitly) populist Reform. Little reference was made to the recent local elections, in which the party won 15 per cent of the vote. The Tory leader also used her speech to set out a plan for the next three months. She urged attendees to return to their constituencies this summer, to get their name out there and ensure that Nigel Farage does not dominate the airwaves. Then there will be conference, when the party's new stance on membership of the ECHR will be revealed. Badenoch told MPs a variation of the same formulation she has used many times previously. She is prepared to leave the ECHR if it is deemed necessary. But, she stressed, it will not act as a magic bullet for any of Britain's current woes. She noted too that the last time the Tories were in opposition, the 1998 conference was a much more gloomy than 1997, owing to the distraction of the leadership contest. Badenoch told her MPs that she wanted to see all 120 of them in Birmingham this October. Around 70 had piled in today to Committee Room 14 to hear her speech. Thirty seconds of applause greeted her arrival, while questions were a mix of fawning and politeness. James Cleverly fulsomely praised Kemi Badenoch's leadership while Edward Leigh inquired about Lord Wolfson's role in deciding the ECHR policy. Afterwards, it was back to the shadow cabinet room for farewell summer drinks. A positive, if slightly pedestrian, end to a long term. After a tricky 12 months for the Tories, that is no bad thing.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Legal rights without enforcement are merely political ornaments
For some time now, I've argued that legal reform, by itself, cannot deliver sovereignty. Now, with Andy's letter, it seems RSS recognises that as well: that the legal route must be paired with political mobilisation capable of exerting real pressure on the British state. READ MORE: UK ministers told to increase Scottish Government borrowing limits This is important because we must be honest about the nature of law itself. Legal scholars from HLA Hart to Carl Schmitt have stressed that law does not rest on morality or even democratic will – it rests on enforceable authority. And in the UK, that authority is centralised in Westminster. The Scotland Act – our entire devolution framework – is Westminster law. It can be amended or repealed at will. That's not a flaw in the system. That is the system. International law offers no guaranteed escape route. Instruments like the UN's human rights covenants are politically useful, but not enforceable within the UK. The Supreme Court made this crystal clear in 2022. Even the Kosovo precedent – often cited by independence supporters – didn't rest on legal entitlement, but on facts created on the ground, then recognised by other states. READ MORE: Richard Murphy: I called out BBC Radio Scotland for bias – here's how it went That's why I keep returning to civil resistance, direct action, and mass mobilisation. Legal rights without enforcement are political ornaments. In systems based on parliamentary sovereignty, change does not come from what's written down. It comes from what people are willing to do. Ireland understood this. Lawyers or polite resolutions didn't carry the Irish revolution – it was driven by a living relationship between the people and political actors who were willing to act. Sinn Fein, the Irish Volunteers, Cumann na mBan, and the unions moved in coordination, across multiple fronts. They built their institutions, asserted authority, and forced the British state to confront a new reality. And yet in Scotland today we're left with a political class that either won't or can't rise to that level. The SNP govern like they are managing devolution, not ending it. The Greens talk radical, but avoid confrontation. Even Alba, for all their rhetoric, have not led any real mobilisation. The people are ready, but the parties are not leading. READ MORE: Yes supporters need to avoid the rhetoric of nihilism and despair So yes – legal groundwork matters. However, unless it's backed by civil resistance, direct action, and a willingness to escalate, it remains just that: groundwork. Scotland must now confront a simple question: are we still asking, or are we preparing? If we are serious about being sovereign, then we must act like a sovereign people – by organising internally, building strategic alliances and, if every constitutional route is shut down, being willing to keep revolution on the table as a last resort. In constitutional history, when law becomes a barrier to justice, the people reserve the right to act outside it. That principle should remain part of our strategy, not discarded, but held in reserve. James Murphy Bute
