
Diddy trial: Jurors reach verdict on four of five counts, judge indicates they'll keep deliberating
The jury said in a note to Judge Arun Subramanian received shortly after 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday that it was unable to reach a decision on the top charge, racketeering conspiracy. The note said the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy charge because there were jurors with 'unpersuadable views' on both sides.
The judge indicated that he would instruct the jury to continue weighing the charge, echoing the sentiments of prosecutors and Combs' defense team that just two days into deliberations was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts.
On Monday, jurors deliberated for more than five hours, returning several notes to Subramanian with questions, concerns, and requests.
On Tuesday, jurors requested transcripts from the testimonies of Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura, Comb's former girlfriend and Daniel Phillips, a male escort involved in a 'Freak Off' sexual event the music producer was involved in.
Specifically, they asked for Ventura's testimony on the 2016 incident where Combs is seen brutally beating his former girlfriend at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles. They also asked for her testimony regarding Combs' threat to release 'Freak Off' videos of her while they were on a flight home from the Cannes Film Festival.
They also asked for Phillips' testimony about the 'Freak Offs' he had with Ventura. Phillip had testified that the music producer had paid him to have sex with Ventura while Combs watched.
He also testified that he witnessed Combs assault Ventura in her apartment.
'I saw a liquor bottle fly across the room and hit the wall,' Phillip said. 'Then Mr. Combs grabbed Cassie by the hair and started dragging her. … Mr. Combs pulled her into the bedroom. It sounded like him slapping her.'
Jurors also asked the judge to clarify the legal definition of drug distribution, specifically whether handing over controlled substances upon request constitutes distribution.
'Referring to page 37 of the jury charge: If a recipient wants, requests, or asks for controlled substances, and an individual hands over controlled substances to the requester, has the individual who hands over the controlled substances distributed?' the jury wrote.
The jury hit a potential roadblock one hour into deliberations Monday. The foreperson sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian, saying a juror might be having issues following instructions the judge had just read to them.
Referring to Juror 25, the note said, 'We are concerned (the juror) cannot follow your honor's instructions,' the foreperson said in a note to the judge.
Subramanian responded, instructing the panel to deliberate and to follow his instructions.
The case was handed over to a jury of eight men and four women after Subramanian read instructions on the law and elements required to convict Combs.
Jurors have been provided with a laptop loaded with all of the exhibits shown in court, including text messages, photographs and videos of the sexual encounters at the heart of the case.
Combs has pleaded not guilty to one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.
The trial brought forth several former employees of Combs' Bad Boy Entertainment companies, but its most noteworthy witnesses were two of his former partners — singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and 'Jane,' a social media influencer who testified under a pseudonym.
The women said they felt pressured to engage in hundreds of sexual events, dubbed 'Freak Offs' or 'hotel nights,' with sex workers. These encounters were often filmed.
In their closing statements, the government painted Combs' criminal enterprise as his 'kingdom.'
While the prosecution presented a robust case, defense attorneys wrapped up theirs within hours, calling no witnesses.
Much of their argument rested on the theory that the accusers were consenting adults and were not forced to participate in Combs' sexual events.
They relied largely on text messages between Combs and his ex-partners to show the women were willing and even arranged for the sexual encounters at times.
Defense attorneys used their closing statements to call Combs' prosecution overkill, saying that he was being put on trial for his sexual proclivities and lifestyle choices.
The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Danity Kane's D. Woods fears Diddy's 'retaliation' as his trial nears end
D. Woods "can't wait" to put her negative experiences with Sean "Diddy" Combs, the man responsible for launching her career as part of Danity Kane, in the rearview mirror. The 41-year-old singer, born Wanita Denise Woodgett, opened up to The Cut in an interview published July 1 about how she is "using my art to process my experience" through a one-woman show, "My Living Room Self." "I can't wait until I am on the other side of all this. Maybe this is what I need to do to write a new experience. I just don't want to be in fear of his retaliation," Woods said. "We're talking in this hotel instead of my home because I don't know what he's capable of." She added that she hasn't been following Combs' trial, which is in jury deliberations as of June 30, because "I don't want to be disappointed." Woods also noted that "I'm not sure a guilty verdict will heal me. "That will happen when I sit down to talk about a project I'm doing, and there isn't a question about Puff," she added. 'Really stomach-turning': Danity Kane's Aubrey O'Day and D. Woods chat about Diddy trial D. Woods 'wasn't surprised' by Dawn Richard, Cassie's lawsuits against Diddy Though Woods came forward to accuse Combs of verbal abuse in the Investigation Discovery docuseries "The Fall of Diddy," she hasn't filed a lawsuit. Her former girl group colleague Dawn Richard is the only one to have sued Combs, alleging sexual assault, trafficking and labor violations, among other claims. Richard also testified against Combs in May, as his trial was underway. "I was surprised she spoke out, but I wasn't surprised to hear the allegations," Woods said of Richard's lawsuit. She also went on to comment on Cassie Ventura Fine's bombshell 2023 lawsuit that kicked off the criminal investigation into Combs' alleged criminal enterprise. "Even with Cassie, I wasn't surprised. I believe he's capable of that," she said. "I've seen how he's intimidated a room. I've seen him throw chairs at people." Woods added, "When that news came out about Cassie's lawsuit, I was like, 'I've been trying to tell y'all, but you didn't want to believe me.' Now, maybe my experience can be accepted." D. Woods contemplated suicide after Diddy fired her from Danity Kane Woods' alleged experiences with Combs during MTV's "Making the Band" included the mogul body-shaming her and screaming threats over the phone after her bandmates turned down a performance. She tearfully told The Cut about feeling suicidal and struggling to make music after Combs fired her and Aubrey O'Day in 2008, in what she's previously described as an act of retaliation. "By 2012, I was suicidal. By 2017, I had planned it out," Woods said. "I still have some of my suicide notes. I want to remember exactly what I was thinking and feeling. One of my letters was something like, 'It seems no matter what I give, nobody's interested. They just want Danity Kane or they've written me off. I'm a has-been. I'm a one-hit wonder.'" Speaking about her career in more current terms, Woods said, "I've done so much more since Danity Kane that should be celebrated and recognized. I was recently on tour with Teddy Riley, and people say, 'You're just a backup dancer now.' "I was having the time of my life. But in some people's mind, Danity Kane is the best thing that I'm ever going to do." If you or someone you know may be struggling with suicidal thoughts, you can call or text 988, or start an online chat with the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, which provides free and confidential services 24/7.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs jury decides on some counts; verdict not yet known
By Jack Queen and Luc Cohen NEW YORK (Reuters) -The jury at Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking trial has reached a verdict on four of the five counts the music mogul faces, the judge overseeing the case said on Tuesday, without revealing the outcome. After two days of deliberation, the jury reached a verdict on four charges: two counts of sex trafficking and two of transportation to engage in prostitution, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian announced. But the judge said the jury had not been able to reach a verdict on a fifth charge, racketeering conspiracy, because jurors had "unpersuadable opinions on both sides." He instructed the jury to continue deliberating on the racketeering conspiracy count. The jury will resume deliberations at 9 a.m. EDT (1300 GMT) on Wednesday. Combs, 55, had pleaded not guilty to all five counts. If convicted of sex trafficking or racketeering, the former billionaire known for elevating hip-hop in American culture could face life in prison. Before Subramanian read the jury's note, Combs rubbed his eyes and rested his face against his palm while seated at the defense table with his lawyers huddled around him. One defense lawyer, Brian Steel, rubbed Combs' shoulder. Two of Combs' other defense lawyers put their arms around each other. The partial verdict comes after a seven-week trial in which two of the music mogul's former girlfriends testified that he physically and sexually abused them. Prosecutors say Combs was charged with racketeering because for two decades he used his business empire to force two of his romantic partners to take part in drug-fueled, days-long sexual performances sometimes known as "Freak Offs" with male sex workers in hotel rooms while Combs watched, masturbated and occasionally filmed. His lawyers acknowledged that the Bad Boy Records founder, once famed for hosting lavish parties for the cultural elite in luxurious locales like the Hamptons and Saint-Tropez, was at times violent in his domestic relationships. But they said the sexual activity described by prosecutors was consensual. JURY ASKS TO REVIEW CASSIE'S TESTIMONY Earlier on Tuesday, the jury asked to review portions of the testimony of the rhythm and blues singer Casandra "Cassie" Ventura, who testified that Combs forced her to take part in "Freak Offs" throughout their decade-long relationship. The 12-member jury asked to review Ventura's testimony regarding a 2016 incident at an InterContinental hotel in Los Angeles, when a surveillance camera captured footage of Combs kicking and dragging Ventura in a hallway. Jurors saw the security camera footage several times throughout the trial. Prosecutors say that at the time of the incident, Ventura was attempting to leave a "Freak Off," Combs' term for a drug-fueled sex marathon in which he would watch Ventura have sex with a paid male escort while he masturbated and sometimes filmed. Prosecutors say that conduct amounted to sex trafficking because Combs used force and threats to cut off financial support or release sex tapes of Ventura to coerce her to take part in the performances, and because the escorts were paid. Combs' defense pointed to tender and sexually explicit text messages that Ventura sent Combs throughout their relationship to bolster their argument that she took part in the "Freak Offs" because she loved Combs and wanted to make him happy. They say the violent 2016 altercation stemmed from a dispute about Combs' relationship with another woman. Prosecutors charged Combs with racketeering conspiracy because they say his employees facilitated his abuse by setting up hotel rooms for "Freak Offs" and procuring illegal drugs for the sex parties. The defense argued that Combs kept his personal and professional lives separate, and that the drugs were for his personal use.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Does Bryan Kohberger's Anticipated Plea Deal Mean for His Trial? Here's What's Next for the Idaho Students Murder Suspect
Bryan Kohberger was arrested in December 2022 in connection with the killings of four University of Idaho students, who were found stabbed to death in their off-campus home one month earlier On June 30, News Nation reported that the Idaho murder suspect had reportedly accepted a plea deal connected to the killings Under the proposed plea deal, if confirmed at a July 2 hearing, Kohberger will formally enter guilty pleas, waiving his right to a jury trial and accepting four consecutive life sentencesOver two and a half years after Bryan Kohberger was arrested in connection with the killings of four University of Idaho students, the former Ph.D. student has reportedly agreed to plead guilty to all counts of murder. In November 2022, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Ethan Chapin were stabbed to death in an off-campus rental home in Moscow, Idaho, where two of their roommates were home and unharmed. The following month, Kohberger was charged with four counts of murder and one count of felony burglary. While prosecutors initially indicated that they planned to seek the death penalty, NewsNation senior correspondent Brian Entin reported on June 30 that Kohberger agreed to plead guilty — which would ultimately change the trajectory of the trial. Following the announcement, president of West Coast Lawyers Neama Rahmani told PEOPLE that the plea deal is "shocking," calling it a "huge win" for the defense team. "There was overwhelming evidence of his guilt, including his DNA on the knife sheath, cell site evidence the night of the murders, video surveillance of his white Hyundai Elantra, and Amazon purchase of the murder weapon," Rahmani said. "There was no possibility of him being acquitted." Rahmani went on to call the plea deal a "complete 180 after two and a half years of litigation." So, what does Bryan Kohberger's plea deal mean for his trial? Here's what's next for the Idaho murder suspect. In December 2022, Kohberger was charged with four counts of murder and one count of felony burglary in connection with the killings of four University of Idaho students. On Nov. 13, 2022, Goncalves, Mogen, Kernodle and Chapin were stabbed to death at their off-campus home at 1122 King Road, where two other roommates resided and were unharmed. Before Kohberger's Instagram account was removed, PEOPLE reviewed his profile and found that he had followed the accounts of Goncalves, Mogen and Kernodle, though none of them followed him back. An investigator familiar with the case told PEOPLE that he had sent a series of messages to one of the victims just two weeks before they were killed. "He slid into one of the girls' DMs several times but she didn't respond," the source told PEOPLE. "Basically, it was just him saying, 'Hey, how are you?' But he did it again and again." According to the case's probable cause affidavit, which was reviewed by PEOPLE, authorities linked Kohberger to the case when his DNA was found on a sheath of the knife used in the murders that was left at the scene. The affidavit also alleged that a cell phone associated with Kohberger pinged in the area of the 1122 King Road residence several times before the night of the murders. Additionally, a source familiar with the investigation told PEOPLE that Kohberger also had photos of one of the female victims on his phone, though it was not specified whether they were taken by him or pulled from social media. On June 30, ABC News reported that a letter had been sent to the victims' family members that announced Kohberger had accepted a deal to plead guilty to all charges, including four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. If the proposed plea deal is confirmed by the judge, Kohberger's guilty plea means he will waive his right to a jury trial — where he could have faced the death penalty if convicted — and accept four consecutive life sentences plus up to 10 years on the burglary charge. According to ABC News, he would also waive his appeal rights. Rahmani told PEOPLE that there is one other direction the case could go: "The only other possibility is Attorney General Pam Bondi stepping in, charging Kohberger with federal murder, and seeking the death penalty like she did with Luigi Mangione because Kohberger crossed state lines, stalked the victims, or some other federal nexus." Following the announcement that Kohberger planned to accept a plea deal, the Goncalves family wrote on Facebook that they were "beyond furious at the State of Idaho" for the "unexpected" deal, adding that the state had "failed us." In a separate Facebook post, the Goncalves family shared an official statement in which they said the Latah County Prosecutor's Office "mishandled the plea deal." "They vaguely mentioned a possible plea on Friday, without seeking our input, and presented the plea on Sunday. Latah County should be ashamed of its Prosecutor's Office," the statement read. "Four wonderful young people lost their lives, yet the victims' families were treated as opponents from the outset. We weren't even called about the plea; we received an email with a letter attached." The statement continued, "After more than two years, this is how it concludes with a secretive deal and a hurried effort to close the case without any input from the victims' families on the plea's details. Our family is frustrated right now and that will subside and we will come together as always and deal with the reality that we face moving forward." Kaylee's sister Aubrie also shared a personal statement in which she expressed anger on behalf of the other three families. "We've believed in the process. We've had faith in the system. But at this point, it is impossible not to acknowledge the truth: the system has failed these four innocent victims and their families," she wrote on Facebook, adding that the victims "deserve to be remembered for who they were in life, not only for the tragedy of their deaths." "But before that can truly happen, they deserve justice. Nothing less. The introduction of this plea deal, just weeks before the scheduled trial, is both shocking and cruel," Aubrie wrote, explaining that they "could have had the time to understand it" and "prepare for it emotionally" had it not been introduced with "mere weeks left." Kohberger's trial — in which prosecutors indicated they would pursue the death penalty — had initially been scheduled to begin on Aug. 11, 2025 (after the original fall 2023 trial had already been delayed). However, if the plea deal is accepted in court on July 2, Kohberger will not go to trial and will instead accept the life sentences outlined in the deal. Read the original article on People