Florida AG asks Supreme Court to pave way for new immigration law
The new law, SB 4-C, makes it a state crime for people to enter Florida after arriving in the U.S. illegally and evading immigration authorities.
'Illegal immigration continues to wreak havoc in the State while that law cannot be enforced,' Uthmeier's office wrote in the application.
'And without this Court's intervention, Florida and its citizens will remain disabled from combatting the serious harms of illegal immigration for years as this litigation proceeds through the lower courts,' it continued.
Two anonymous individuals living in Florida illegally, the Florida Immigrant Coalition and the Farmworker Association of Florida, sued over the law.
U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, an appointee of former President Obama, blocked police from enforcing it indefinitely, agreeing the statute is likely preempted by federal immigration law and unconstitutional.
Florida's efforts at the Supreme Court come after a three-judge panel on the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to lift the block as the state's appeal moves forward. The state argues its law is tailored to avoid any conflict with federal immigration authorities.
'Nothing in SB 4-C poses a conflict with federal law. Just the opposite, Florida's law scrupulously tracks federal law. SB 4-C similarly does not violate the Dormant Commerce Clause, since it is un-related to economic protectionism,' Uthmeier's office wrote in court filings.
The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the plaintiffs, declined to comment.
Last year, the Supreme Court allowed a Texas law to take effect that makes it a state crime to illegally cross the Mexican border into the state, refusing the Biden administration's request for an emergency order blocking it on preemption grounds.
Florida's request adds to what is already a jam-packed emergency docket at the Supreme Court.
The justices are mulling six pending emergency applications from the Trump administration. Three ask to partially enforce the president's birthright citizenship executive order, while the others deal with his deportation policies and efforts to reshape various federal departments.
Two death row inmates set to be executed in Florida and Mississippi this week have also asked the court for emergency interventions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Federal judge sides with fired FTC commissioner in case against Trump
A federal judge on Thursday ruled that the firing of a Democratic commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) by President Trump was illegal. U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan, a Biden administration appointee, said the Trump administration's 'attempt to remove' Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 'did not comply with the FTC Act's removal protections.' 'Defendants repeatedly want the FTC to be something it is not: a subservient agency subject to the whims of the President and wholly lacking in autonomy. But that is not how Congress structured it,' AliKhan wrote in her opinion. 'Undermining that autonomy by allowing the President to remove Commissioners at will inflicts an exceptionally unique harm distinct from the mine run of wrongful termination cases,' she added. The FTC is tasked with enforcing antitrust law and consumer protection, separate from the direction of the White House. Slaughter, who was fired alongside Alvaro Bedoya earlier this year, said she's motivated to return to work. 'As the Court recognized today, the law is clear, and I look forward to getting back to work,' said Slaughter in a statement to Reuters. 'The for-cause removal protections that apply to my colleagues and me at the FTC also protect other independent economic regulators like the SEC, the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve.' However, the Trump administration stated that it would appeal the ruling, a move that could likely escalate to the Supreme Court. The Hill reached out to the White House and FTC for comment on the Thursday ruling. The White House told Reuters, 'The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the President's constitutional authority to fire and remove executive officers who exercise his authority. The Trump Administration will appeal this unlawful decision and looks forward to victory on this issue.'
Axios
6 hours ago
- Axios
Judge rules Trump firing of Democratic FTC commissioner was illegal
President Trump's firing of Democratic FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter was illegal, a federal judge ruled Thursday. Why it matters: The White House says it will appeal the decision, which will set up a Supreme Court challenge. Conservatives have long been trying to tee up a case that would weaken a precedent that has protected independent agency commissioners. Trump fired Slaughter and fellow Democratic commissioner Alvaro Bedoya in March. They both sued the administration shortly after, and Bedoya resigned from the FTC in June. What they're saying: Judge Loren L. Alikhan wrote that the "attempt to remove Ms. Slaughter from her position as an FTC Commissioner did not comply with the FTC Act's removal protections." "Because those protections remain constitutional, as they have for almost a century, Ms. Slaughter's purported removal was unlawful and without legal effect." "As the Court recognized today, the law is clear, and I look forward to getting back to work," Slaughter said in a statement. "The for-cause removal protections that apply to my colleagues and me at the FTC also protect other independent economic regulators like the SEC, the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve." The other side: "The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the President's constitutional authority to fire and remove executive officers who exercise his authority," said White House spokesman Kush Desai.
CNN
7 hours ago
- CNN
Judge rules Trump's firing of FTC commissioner was illegal
A federal judge on Thursday ruled the firing of US Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Kelly Slaughter by President Donald Trump earlier this year was illegal. US District Judge Loren AliKhan said the Trump administration's attempt to remove Slaughter did not comply with removal protections in federal law. 'Because those protections remain constitutional, as they have for almost a century, Ms. Slaughter's purported removal was unlawful and without legal effect,' AliKhan wrote. 'As the Court recognized today, the law is clear, and I look forward to getting back to work,' said Slaughter in a statement. 'The for-cause removal protections that apply to my colleagues and me at the FTC also protect other independent economic regulators like the SEC, the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve. ' The dispute over Trump's firing of Alvaro Bedoya and Slaughter in March will inevitably end up before the US Supreme Court, which ruled 90 years ago that FTC commissioners may be dismissed only for good cause, such as neglecting their duties. Bedoya formally resigned in June to take another job and is not part of the case. That ruling has protected the independence of agencies that regulate road safety, stock markets, telecommunications, monetary policy and more, shielding them from direct White House control. The Supreme Court, however, signaled it could strip that protection from agencies such as the Merit Systems Protection Board and National Labor Relations Board. Its ruling in May allowed Trump to keep two Democratic members of those boards sidelined while they challenge their terminations. The Supreme Court is led by a 6-3 conservative majority. The White House said, 'the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the President's constitutional authority to fire and remove executive officers who exercise his authority. The Trump Administration will appeal this unlawful decision and looks forward to victory on this issue.' The FTC declined to comment. AliKhan said the Trump administration wants 'the FTC to be something it is not: a subservient agency subject to the whims of the President and wholly lacking in autonomy. But that is not how Congress structured it.' The FTC, currently led by three Republicans, is structured so that no more than three of its five commissioners come from the same party.
