Campaigners launch legal challenge over new Mull school
A judicial review is a type of legal case where a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public authority.Argyll and Bute council have been approached for comment.
Tracy Mayo, chairwoman of the Mull Campus Working Group, told BBC Scotland News: "This is about all our children - it affects the whole of Mull and its future sustainability and its unique island way of life."When we first learnt the terms of the bid for funding in August 2024, we immediately raised our concerns the offer didn't make sense - it seemed irrational."How we define our community appears to differ from that of our council. We have been highlighting flaws in the process for many years as have other communities."Effective partnership working fosters trust and mutual trust. We have stated all the way through this we want to work with our council but not like this."It has taken a huge amount of work to get this far. Volunteers have lost huge swathe of family time, our families have been very patient and supportive and so has the amazing community of Mull."
Mull Campus project
The location of the island's only high school has long been a source of division on Mull.Pupils living in the north go to the school in Tobermory, but the commute is more than 90 minutes for those living in the south, and most travel to Oban on the mainland, staying in hostels during the week.Funding was secured in 2023 to build a new secondary school on the Isle of Mull to replace the depilated Tobermory High School.A number of sites where the new school could be built were identified across the island.
Campaigners argued for a new secondary school to be built in a more central location such as Craignure, while keeping a primary school in Tobermory.But the council said splitting the campus would cost the authority an extra £12m, and that any further delay could jeopardise promised Scottish government funding.Ultimately councillors voted to go ahead with building the new school in the Island's main town of Tobermory, near to the existing school.Campaigners launched a petition and held protests against the decision, and the issue has been debated at Holyrood.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
'A visitor said how much fear was in the room'
A gay man has recalled the impact of one of the most controversial laws of the Challis, a former English and drama teacher, came to Nottingham from Bristol in 1988 - at the same time Section 28 of the Local Government Act came into legislation, which was later repealed in Scotland in 2000, and England and Wales in 2003, said local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales "shall not intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality".Mr Challis said he was "horrified" at the time, but added the law actually galvanised many in the gay rights movement. Mr Challis was speaking to mark the 50th anniversary of the Notts LGBT+ said: "I started teaching in the late 60s, and people didn't talk about [homosexuality] at all - it was only in '67 the law was changed to make it legal."When I was at a college of education, there were a couple of guys who came out and I felt - people generally felt - they were very brave."As time moved on, Mr Challis said there was "gradually" more tolerance and he attended his first major march in 1972 and began to build said: "There were several of us, when I was working down in Bristol, who decided we did want to set up some sort of support group."Teachers would come from as far afield as Cardiff and Plymouth."One person brought along a colleague, a woman, who did comment how much fear there still was in the room." A few years later, in the 1980s, gay men started to be affected by a mysterious first UK death from Aids was in London in 1981 - although it was only later this was confirmed to be down to an HIV-related illness. As time passed and panic grew, gay people were ushered further into the shadows by a homophobic press campaign. Terms like the "gay plague" were widely used, and people believed HIV could be transmitted by any kind of proximity to those with the virus."During the early '80s, HIV Aids became a big problem, which created its own fear," said Mr Challis. "I think campaigning as such dropped off."But when Section 28 came in I was horrified, but it really galvanised everything. It led to a wonderful big march in Manchester. "People were careful about what they said and lots of people, men and women, gay and straight, all joined in."It encouraged lots of people who opposed it to become active." Mr Challis said his school discussed the changes "positively"."It was never successfully prosecuted, but it did mean people were very careful about what they said," he said."But some people managed to keep talking, but it did put a dampener on what could be spoken between teachers and pupils."Section 28 was eventually repealed in England and Wales in 2003.
Times
16 hours ago
- Times
Public sector bigger than before Covid under SNP
Scotland's public sector will remain more bloated than it was before the pandemic even if SNP ministers hit a target requiring some departments to cut one in eight jobs, experts have warned. IPPR Scotland, a think tank, said a promise to protect and in some cases expand frontline roles while finding overall staffing reductions of 0.5 per cent by 2030 would mean exposed departments have to slash 20,000 posts to plug a projected spending gap approaching £5 billion. However, even if the target is met this would 'not undo the increases in devolved public services since 2019', according to separate analysis published by the Fraser of Allander Institute, based at the University of Strathclyde. The institute's independent economists also downgraded their growth forecasts for the Scottish economy and predicted 0.8 per cent growth this year, and just 1 per cent in 2026. This is despite ministers claiming Scotland is a 'modern, high-growth country', an assertion the IPPR analysis said 'might be generously described as optimistic'. Before Holyrood went into recess for the summer, the finance secretary, Shona Robison, outlined the need to tackle a £2.6 billion shortfall in day-to-day resource spending and £2.1 billion deficit on capital projects, which she blamed on 'Westminster austerity'. However, critics lambasted the SNP for 'years of gross financial incompetence', with a significant proportion of the black hole explained by the creation of more generous devolved welfare payments and a ballooning and increasingly well-paid public sector. The wage bill for the devolved public sector is close to £30 billion, which is about 55 per cent of the block grant funding from Westminster. Public sector pay is projected to reach £32 billion by 2029-30 even if the overall workforce shrinks. The Fraser of Allander Institute said that although some of the increases in staffing were accounted for by the creation of Social Security Scotland to administer new devolved welfare payments, this did not account for most of the rapid expansion. 'It's laughable for SNP ministers to claim Scotland is a high-growth country based on the facts,' the Scottish Tory MSP Craig Hoy said. 'The reality is we're a high-tax, low-growth nation as a direct result of their policies. 'The nationalists' addiction to a bloated, inefficient public sector is the reason nobody has faith in their ability to make the cuts needed to plug the huge black hole they have created in Scotland's finances.' Hoy added: 'Their failure to fully pass on the rates relief available to businesses south of the border, coupled with them making Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK, explains why the growth rate here is even lower than the anaemic rate Keir Starmer is presiding over.' There were about 590,000 public sector workers in Scotland in 2024, representing 22 per cent of the workforce. The proportion is lower than in Northern Ireland and Wales but far higher than in England, where 17 per cent of workers are employed by the state. The size of the public sector workforce in Scotland grew by 11 per cent between 2017 and last year, with average public sector pay almost 5 per cent higher than the UK as a whole. Robison said last week that reducing overall staff numbers by 0.5 per cent, largely through 'natural attrition and recruitment controls', could lead to £700 million of savings. Compulsory redundancies, she said, could be used as a 'last resort', reversing a long-standing ban. A 0.5 per cent reduction in the 550,000 workers for devolved functions would mean 11,000 full-time jobs being cut. However, the IPPR said that as frontline jobs, which account for the vast majority of roles, were being protected, the axe would fall heavily on those that were not. 'Taken together, that would mean the rest of the devolved public sector facing staffing cuts of around 3 to 3.5 per cent per year or a drop of about 13 per cent by 2029-30,' a blog co-authored by IPPR Scotland director Stephen Boyd said. 'That amounts to around 20,000 jobs. 'Can the public-sector backroom bear cuts of that scale? Does the distinction between frontline and backroom make any sense? Are there really thousands of backroom public-sector roles that can be replaced by technology over the next four years? 'The Scottish government risks finding out that the answers to these questions are unlikely to be the ones they need to achieve a pain-free balancing of the budget.' Ivan McKee, the public finance minister, said: 'It is clearer than ever that Scotland's economy is being impacted by challenging global trading conditions and uncertainty, conditions mirrored across the rest of the UK.' McKee added: 'We are taking ambitious steps to grow the economy by pursuing new investment, building export potential and driving and capitalising on the Scottish innovation at the forefront of many key global industries. 'But we are doing all of this without the full economic powers of independence that are needed to fully address the issues facing Scottish businesses. We need decisive action from the UK government to counter the damaging economic impacts of Brexit and business uncertainty. This includes reversing its decision to increase employers' national insurance contributions which, as the Scottish Chambers of Commerce has highlighted, is severely damaging business confidence, investment, growth and jobs. 'As set out by the finance secretary last week, savings rising to £2.6 billion in 2029-30 will ensure funding can be targeted at frontline services such as the NHS, social security, action to eradicate child poverty and other priorities. This includes our commitment to reduce annualised Scottish government and public bodies' corporate costs by 20 per cent over the next five years.'
Times
16 hours ago
- Times
Scotland told to learn from England's NHS ‘doctor in pocket'
SNP ministers have been told they must 'learn lessons' from England's NHS app, after Sir Keir Starmer outlined plans for a supercharged version before Scotland's has even launched. The prime minister promised patients south of the border 'a doctor in your pocket' as part of plans to make the technology, which has already been in use in England for more than six years, an 'indispensable' part of everyday life. Wes Streeting, the UK health secretary, has said the technology will become 'critical national infrastructure' for Britain, offering health advice and including detailed digitised patient records and potentially live video chats with consultants and bespoke health coaching. In contrast, an app for the Scottish health service, first announced in 2021, is not expected to launch on a trial basis until December. Its functionality will be severely restricted initially, when its sole practical purpose will be allowing dermatology patients in just one area, Lanarkshire, to receive appointment letters. The lack of progress in Scotland has been branded a 'national embarrassment' with the SNP facing questions over why it did not seek to adapt England's technology for the devolved health service, rather than insisting on developing its own version. Stephen Kerr, the Tory MSP, said: 'The Scottish government's approach to delivering a simple NHS app for patients has been expensive, incompetent and frankly insulting to those who just want reliable access to their own health records and services. 'They have spent £17 million with nothing meaningful delivered except delays, excuses and a narrow pilot limited to one specialty in one health board. 'Instead of wasting yet more time and money reinventing the wheel for separatist political reasons, ministers should work constructively with the UK government to give people in Scotland access to the NHS app that is already up and running in England. 'Patients deserve joined-up systems that work — not a vanity project stuck in perpetual development.' The NHS app in England, which has 35 million users, already allows patients to book appointments at GP services, order prescriptions and manage hospital appointments. Denmark introduced a digital system two decades ago. This week, Starmer told an audience of frontline NHS staff in east London that private industries had revamped their offerings dramatically around apps and that the NHS should be no different. He said: 'We will transform the NHS app so it becomes an indispensable part of life for everyone. It will become, as technology develops, like having a doctor in your pocket, providing you with 24-hour advice, seven days a week.' The 'supercharged' version of the app is promised in England by 2028, with other goals including video calls with consultants, AI advice on symptoms and personalised lifestyle advice and health coaching. Meanwhile, the app in Scotland, the functionality of which remains unclear, is not set to fully roll out nationally until 2030. Chris Williams, vice chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners Scotland, said that although 'we have waited a long time,' he remained supportive of the approach taken by Scotland to develop its own app, citing the 'significant differences' in how NHS systems and records are structured. He said he did not believe it would be possible for the NHS England app to 'simply be used in the Scottish healthcare setting' and that different priorities would make it 'less applicable'. He added: 'There are lessons to be learned from the English example and avoiding creating extra pressure in general practice, especially in regard to managing the lifelong records of patients, that in some cases will contain historical information with language and terminology that belongs in the past. 'People in Scotland currently have 24/7 access to information about health and services via the NHS Inform website. We understand that there is a review taking place of the NHS Inform website that will lead to improvements to ensure that information is relevant, up-to-date and checked by subject matter experts.' A Scottish government spokesman said: 'The NHS England app was developed to support England's NHS trusts and is configured specifically to their IT infrastructure. We have, however, already engaged extensively with NHS England and with other health systems, to explore how we can take learning from other approaches in developing our service. 'Scotland's planned online app is for both health and social care and we will launch it in Lanarkshire by the end of 2025. National rollout will commence through 2026, and we will publish a national rollout plan later this summer.'
