logo
Impeachment prosecutor Chua: No legal basis for 2nd certification requirement

Impeachment prosecutor Chua: No legal basis for 2nd certification requirement

GMA Network5 days ago
The Senate impeachment court's requirement that the House of Representatives submit another certification, one stating that it is still willing to pursue the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte in the 20th Congress, has no legal basis, a member of the House prosecution panel said.
"Sa akin kasi yung second requirement na binabanggit nila, actually to be honest with you, itong nire-require po sa amin, we believe na parang medyo hindi... may problema talaga, questionable," Impeachment Prosecutor Rep Joel Chua of Manila 3rd district told reporters in an interview.
"Wala namang legal basis eh," he added.
(For me, this second requirement that they are talking about, to be honest with you, we believe that there's a problem with it; it's questionable. There no legal basis for it.)
Chua declined to comment on whether this new requirement was a "trap," as stated by Akbayan Representative Chel Diokno, who is expected to join the House prosecution panel.
But Chua said the prosecution team is studying how to comply with the requirement as it does not want to be accused of delaying the impeachment proceedings.
"But just the same, the reason why we are complying with it, because ayaw naman namin na mapagbintangan kami na [we don't want it said that] we are delaying the hearing, the impeachment hearing. So kaya nga sa feeling namin, in fact, pati yung submission ng certification na hindi naman kailangan eh, di ba?" Chua said.
(So we feel like we have to comply, including with the submission of the certificate that isn't needed, right?)
"How can we comply with the second requirement when the 20th Congress has yet to start, di ba? So maybe, pag-aaralan na lang namin kung ano yung proper na next step na gagawin namin [we will have to look into what our next proper step should be]," he added.
Chua said the House prosecution panel is extra careful with its moves.
"What is the effect if we will comply? So we have to balance everything. We have to be very careful. Baka mamaya... lahat na lang binibigyan nila ng ano. So alam mo, yung impeachment kasi hindi naman dapat sobrang higpit. [The impeachment should not be that strict.] This is not a court of law," he explained.
Chua insisted that there is no legal impediment for the impeachment trial to proceed.
"When we transmitted the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, there is always a presumption of legality. So wala kami nakikita doong [We don't seen any] legal impediment. So dapat under the Constitution , under the law, dapat they should have proceeded with the trial," he said.
On the Senate Impeachment Court's statement that it cannot convene while the House prosecutors have not yet been elected, Chua replied, "Yung sa election ng House prosecutors, while I understand na 11 ang kailangan, but then again yung siyam, yung existing na nine, puwede pa naman silang mag-function. Pwede naman kami mag-function pa eh, di ba?"
(As to the election of House prosecutors, I understand that 11 are needed, but the existing nine can still function. We can still function, right?)
Chua also believes that trial can be held even before Congress is officially constituted on July 28.
"Sa akin kasi, I believe that the Senate is a continuing body. So iba naman yung legislative function namin dito sa impeachment. Dahil dapat nagtutuloy-tuloy na ito eh. We should be proceeding with the trial already," he stated.
(The Senate's legislative function is different from its impeachment function. This should be continuing.)
Chua added that the House prosecutors will be filing motions in the next few days, including one for holding a pre-trial.
'Enough of delays'
ML Party-list Representative Leila de Lima also criticized the Senate impeachment court, saying it expects the House of Representatives to comply with its requirements even if these have no constitutional or legal basis.
"It's one ultra vires [beyond their power] act after another being committed by the Senate as an impeachment court. The Senate is treating the House's role in the impeachment like a dog-and-pony show, that the House should perform whatever it demands even if these are not found anywhere in the Constitution or its own Rules of Impeachment. We are not here for their amusement. The House is here to perform a constitutional mandate and prosecute an impeached official. The House has done and is doing its job. The Senate should do theirs as well," de Lima told GMA Integrated News.
De Lima also said the Senate should not use the House's non-submission of the second certification to justify the impeachment court's delays.
"Huwag dapat nilang ginagawang rason ng tila ba pattern of delay on the Senate's part yung supposed still non-compliance by the House of certain orders," de Lima said.
She called on the Senate to convene the impeachment court, hold the trial, and render a verdict.
"Insofar as the House is concerned, nagawa na nito ang kanyang trabaho sa pag-initiate ng impeachment complaint at pag-transmit ng Articles of Impeachment sa Senate, dahil yan ang utos ng Konstitusyon. Gawin na rin dapat ng Senado ang tatlong utos sa kanila ng Konstitusyon:
1. Convene (or re-convene as an impeachment court;
2. Hold impeachment trial; and
3. Render a verdict," de Lima said.
"Enough of delays and excuses!" she added. — BM, GMA Integrated News
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs 'One Big Beautiful Bill' into law
Trump signs 'One Big Beautiful Bill' into law

GMA Network

time2 days ago

  • GMA Network

Trump signs 'One Big Beautiful Bill' into law

US President Donald Trump gestures after signing the sweeping spending and tax legislation, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, at the White House in Washington, DC, US, July 4, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump signed into law a massive package of tax and spending cuts at the White House on Friday, staging an outdoor ceremony on the Fourth of July holiday that took on the air of a Trump political rally. With military jets flying overhead and hundreds of supporters in attendance, Trump signed the bill one day after the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved the signature legislation of the president's second term. The bill, which will fund Trump's immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent, and is expected to knock millions of Americans off health insurance, was passed with a 218-214 vote after an emotional debate on the House floor. "I've never seen people so happy in our country because of that, because so many different groups of people are being taken care of: the military, civilians of all types, jobs of all types," Trump said at the ceremony, thanking House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune for leading the bill through the two houses of Congress. "So you have the biggest tax cut, the biggest spending cut, the largest border security investment in American history," Trump said. Trump scheduled the ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House for the July 4 Independence Day holiday, replete with a flyover by stealth bombers and fighter jets like those that took part in the recent US strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran. Hundreds of Trump supporters attended, including White House aides, members of Congress, and military families. After a speech that included boastful claims about the ascendance of America on his watch, Trump signed the bill, posed for pictures with Republican congressional leaders and members of his cabinet, and waded through the crowd of happy supporters. The bill's passage amounts to a big win for Trump and his Republican allies, who have argued it will boost economic growth, while largely dismissing a nonpartisan analysis predicting it will add more than $3 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. While some lawmakers in Trump's party expressed concerns over the bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voted against it, joining all 212 Democrats in opposition. The tense standoff over the bill included a record-long floor speech by House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who spoke for eight hours and 46 minutes, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would strip low-income Americans of federally-backed health insurance and food aid benefits. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin predicted the law would cost Republicans votes in congressional elections in 2026. "Today, Donald Trump sealed the fate of the Republican Party, cementing them as the party for billionaires and special interests - not working families," Martin said in a statement. "This legislation will hang around the necks of the GOP for years to come. This was a full betrayal of the American people. Today, we are putting Republicans on notice: you will lose your majority." —Reuters

Republicans muscle Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill through Congress
Republicans muscle Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill through Congress

GMA Network

time3 days ago

  • GMA Network

Republicans muscle Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill through Congress

US House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain (R-MI) speaks after the US President Donald Trump's sweeping spending and tax bill passes, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., July 3, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump 's tax-cut legislation cleared its final hurdle in the US Congress on Thursday, as the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved a massive package that would fund his domestic agenda and push millions of Americans off health insurance. The 218-214 vote amounts to a significant victory for the Republican president that will fund his immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent and deliver new tax breaks that he promised during his 2024 campaign. It also cuts health and food safety net programs and zeroes out dozens of green energy incentives. It would add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Despite concerns within Trump's party over the 869-page bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voting against it, following an overnight standoff. The bill has already cleared the Republican-controlled Senate by the narrowest possible margin. The White House said Trump will sign it into law at 5 p.m. ET (2100 GMT) on Friday, the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Republicans said the legislation will lower taxes for Americans across the income spectrum and spur economic growth. "This is jet fuel for the economy, and all boats are going to rise," House Speaker Mike Johnson said. Every Democrat in Congress voted against it, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would leave millions uninsured. "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans, is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in an eight-hour, 46-minute speech that was the longest in the chamber's history. Trump kept up the pressure throughout, cajoling and threatening lawmakers as he pressed them to finish the job. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" he wrote on social media. Though roughly a dozen House Republicans threatened to vote against the bill, only two ended up doing so: Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, a centrist, and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a conservative who said it did not cut spending enough. Marathon weekend Republicans raced to meet Trump's July 4 deadline, working through last weekend and holding all-night debates in the House and the Senate. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday in a 51-50 vote that saw Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote. According to the CBO, the bill would lower tax revenues by $4.5 trillion over 10 years and cut spending by $1.1 trillion. Those spending cuts largely come from Medicaid, the health program that covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would tighten enrollment standards, institute a work requirement and clamp down on a funding mechanism used by states to boost federal payments - changes that would leave nearly 12 million people uninsured, according to the CBO. Republicans added $50 billion for rural health providers to address concerns that those cutbacks would force them out of business. Nonpartisan analysts have found that the wealthiest Americans would see the biggest benefits from the bill, while lower-income people would effectively see their incomes drop as the safety-net cuts would outweigh their tax cuts. The increased debt load created by the bill would also effectively transfer money from younger to older generations, analysts say. Ratings firm Moody's downgraded US debt in May, citing the mounting debt, and some foreign investors say the bill is making US Treasury bonds less attractive. The bill raises the US debt ceiling by $5 trillion, averting the prospect of a default in the short term. But some investors worry the debt overhang could curtail the economic stimulus in the bill and create a long-term risk of higher borrowing costs. On the other side of the ledger, the bill staves off tax increases that were due to hit most Americans at the end of this year, when Trump's 2017 individual and business tax cuts were due to expire. Those cuts are now made permanent, while tax breaks for parents and businesses are expanded. The bill also sets up new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime pay, seniors and auto loans, fulfilling Trump campaign promises. The final version of the bill includes more substantial tax cuts and more aggressive healthcare cuts than an initial version that passed the House in May. During deliberations in the Senate, Republicans also dropped a provision that would have banned state-level regulations on artificial intelligence, and a "retaliatory tax" on foreign investment that had spurred alarm on Wall Street. The bill is likely to feature prominently in the 2026 midterm elections, when Democrats hope to recapture at least one chamber of Congress. Republican leaders contend the bill's tax breaks will goose the economy before then, and many of its benefit cuts are not scheduled to kick in until after that election. Opinion polls show many Americans are concerned about the bill's cost and its effect on lower income people. — Reuters

Group calls for good governance, transparency amid VP Sara impeachment issue
Group calls for good governance, transparency amid VP Sara impeachment issue

GMA Network

time4 days ago

  • GMA Network

Group calls for good governance, transparency amid VP Sara impeachment issue

Several senator-judges vote in favor of returning the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte to the House of Representatives, after the Senate convened as an impeachment court earlier in the day, on June 10, 2025. Joseph B. Vidal/OSP An anti-corruption group on Thursday called for transparency and good governance in public service amid the issue of Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment. In a press release, Democracy Watch Philippines (DemWatch) said it has convened student leaders from 16 universities and various youth-led non-government organizations in Metro Manila to promote good governance as well as to urge the youth to partake in civic engagement and political participation. 'Transparency isn't just a buzzword—it's the frontline of accountability. If we don't know what our leaders are doing, how can we hold them responsible? If public service is cloaked in secrecy, can we still call it democratic?' DemWatch convenor Lloyd Ian Zaragoza said in a press release. 'We must understand who these politicians are and what they are scared of. It's actually the voters. It's us, the people, who hold the power to elect and are empowered to hold them accountable,' he added. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5 with more than 200 congressmen endorsing the verified complaint against her, which has been transmitted to the Senate for her impeachment trial. The Senate sitting as an impeachment court however voted last June 10 to return to the House of Representatives the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte without dismissing or terminating the case. Duterte entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' Zaragoza, meanwhile, pointed out that the issues surrounding the impeachment case were supposedly muddled by misinformation. He cited the importance of empowering the youth as the next generation of voters to raise awareness on relevant social issues and put public pressure on leaders to serve honestly. 'You are not a silent generation. You are asking the hard questions. You are calling out injustice. You are not here to inherit a broken system—you are here to help fix it,' said Zaragoza. — BM, GMA Integrated News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store