logo
Is shared ownership worth it? Pros and cons to be mindful of

Is shared ownership worth it? Pros and cons to be mindful of

Yahoo16-06-2025

First-time buyers using the government-backed shared ownership scheme may find it easier to get on the property ladder, but should be aware of multiple issues that can come with these properties – including high maintenance costs, punitive charges and difficulties when coming to sell.
Young buyers have become increasingly reliant on such schemes in recent years – especially since the closure of the Help to Buy scheme – with high house prices leaving many unable to buy without support.
Currently, buyers purchase between 10pc and 75pc of a property using a mortgage, and pay monthly rent on the remainder, which is owned by a housing association or other third party.
Shared ownership was designed to help buyers achieve their dream of home ownership much sooner. It can deliver on this, but many buyers also find the scheme has many hidden pitfalls.
What is a shared ownership property?
Difficulties selling shared ownership
The cost of staircasing
Shared ownership FAQs
Buying a shared ownership property is a way of vastly reducing the cost of taking that first step on to the property ladder. If you don't earn enough to qualify for a mortgage on the full price of a home, this scheme offers first-time buyers a way to buy just part of a property − between 10pc and 75pc − then pay rent on the rest.
You only need to put down a deposit on the share that you are buying, which means that if you purchase 25pc of a home worth £230,000, you would have to find just 5pc of £57,500 (a quarter of the total value) for the deposit, i.e. £2,875. You then take out a mortgage for the remainder of the 25pc and pay rent on 75pc of the property.
Buyers have the option later to purchase the remaining portion of their home in stages, gradually reducing their rent as they do. This is called 'staircasing'.
To be eligible for the scheme you must not already own a home, and must earn less than £80,000 a year as a household, rising to £90,000 in London. You must also be a first-time buyer or if not meet another eligibility requirement – such as owning a home in the past but being unable to afford to buy one now.
Some of the people who have been hardest hit by the cladding scandal are leaseholders in shared ownership schemes. Because of the way their leases are set out, they now face paying 100pc of remediation works despite only owning a fraction of their properties.
These costs could exceed the total amount that owners have in their homes, leaving them in negative equity.
Properties must be sold via the housing association you're renting from, which usually involves paying hundreds of pounds to market the property. At the same time, since you also own a portion of it, you need to pay a solicitor to deal with the legal side of selling. Combined, this can make selling up very expensive – especially if it takes a long time to sell.
If the housing authority fails to sell the property, it can move to the open market – but you'll have to pay to market it yourself.
Homeowners can lower their monthly rent by purchasing a greater share of the property – known as staircasing – but this has historically been expensive. However, since April 2021, buyers have been given the option to buy further shares in 1pc instalments.
Buying back a stake in a home could be costly, as borrowers have to fork out fees for instructing a survey, legal costs and any stamp duty. But, as the rent you pay tends to be linked to inflation, increasing the proportion you owe may shield you from rising rents. That said, you'll have to weigh it against mortgage costs – which are also markedly higher than they were a few years ago.
What's more, if you need to move your mortgage in the process of staircasing, you should be wary of any early repayment charges.
Despite possibly only owning a small proportion of the property, under the shared ownership scheme property owners are responsible for 100pc of the maintenance costs for their homes – given that many shared ownership properties are in blocks of flats, which can come with hefty annual maintenance fees and service charges, this can add a significant expense.
Shared ownership properties can have issues that could mean owners might not get the price they want when they come to sell.
The property's lease can be a major issue, with prices tending to plummet if there is less than 80 years left on the lease.
Since 2021, shared ownership properties have been offered on leases of 990 years, rather than 99 years or 125 years, but the new rules have done little to protect the investments of those who bought beforehand.
While shared ownership has its drawbacks there are also positive elements to the scheme:
Makes home ownership more accessible: The main appeal of using shared ownership is that it is far more accessible than full ownership as a way to get on to the property ladder. As you are only buying part of a property the deposit required is much smaller and overcomes the issue of saving that is a serious hurdle for many first-time buyers.
There's a chance to make a profit when you sell: As you own part of your home through the scheme, you will benefit form any increase in property value. This gives shared ownership an advantage over renting and the chance to make a profit when you come to selling.
You can increase ownership over time: While you begin only owning a portion of your property, the shared ownership scheme lets you work your way to full ownership via a process called staircasing. This is where you gradually increase the equity you hold in the property, reducing the amount you need to rent, all the way to becoming the 100pc owner and freeholder.
Buying a property through a shared ownership scheme does not protect you from paying stamp duty land tax. There are two options for how you pay, either in stages or for the full value of the property.
If you opt to pay in stages, this means you may have to make an initial stamp duty payment for the portion of the property you are buying, possibly plus an additional amount based on the rent you will be paying on the remainder of the property. You do not have to pay any stamp duty unless you are buying or own 80pc of the property, but your bill may be larger than you expect as your steps to 80pc may be included, rather than just your most recent increase.
You can choose to pay the stamp duty due on the whole value of the property upfront. This means there is no further stamp duty to pay when you increase your equity.
The rules around stamp duty on shared ownership properties are complicated. More granular information can be found on the government website.
It's generally not allowed to sublet a shared ownership property unless you have explicit permission from the landlord, or you own 100pc of the property. You may be able to sublet a room if you are still living in the property. The 'key information document' that comes with your home will provide details on the rules for letting it out.
Shared ownership properties can be more difficult to sell than properties purchased in the traditional way. You will usually need to give the freeholder the right to find a buyer before you put the property on the open market, although the buyer will need to be interested in owning through shared ownership. Once it sells you will receive a share of the price in proportion to the part you own.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Assura Group Rejects KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Takeover Bid in Favor of Competitor $2.4 Billion Offer
Assura Group Rejects KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Takeover Bid in Favor of Competitor $2.4 Billion Offer

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Assura Group Rejects KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Takeover Bid in Favor of Competitor $2.4 Billion Offer

KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR) one of the best stocks in a . An iconic financial building in the background, with silhouettes of busy bankers walking past in the foreground. Recently, on June 24, 2025, Assura Group, based in the UK, rejected KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR)'s final bid of $2.3 billion in favor of a competitive offer of $2.4 billion from Primary Health Properties (PHP). The decision materialized after months of competitive bidding, eventually leading to the Assura board's decision to take up PHP's offer, considering it more favorable for shareholders. KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR) was ultimately outbid, despite having previously secured a tentative agreement. This represents a significant setback for KKR in its efforts to acquire Assura. This decision is a reflection of the company's strategic ambition as well as industry competition. Regardless of the setback, analysts remain positive about KKR's fundamentals, given 12 'Buy' ratings and a consensus price target suggesting over 16% upside. The company is focused on targeted acquisitions and growth-inducing investments as a private equity and real estate investment firm, leading to a strong position in a growth stock portfolio. While we acknowledge the potential of KKR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 10 Best Marketing Stocks to Buy Right Now and 10 Best Cybersecurity Stocks to Invest in Under $20. Disclosure: None

UK Releases Draft Sustainability Reporting Standards, Seeks Input
UK Releases Draft Sustainability Reporting Standards, Seeks Input

Forbes

time4 hours ago

  • Forbes

UK Releases Draft Sustainability Reporting Standards, Seeks Input

Long exposure photo from Big Ben in sunrise getty On June 25, the United Kingdom's Department for Business and Trade released a draft of sustainability reporting standards for the UK. The proposal implements guidelines on climate-related risk and greenhouse gas emissions reporting, at a time when other jurisdictions are considering reducing requirements. The consultation period is open until September 17, with the final requirements set to be published by December. The International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation, the organization that drafts financial reporting standards used in 168 jurisdictions, began drafting sustainability reporting standards in 2021, through the International Sustainability Standards Board. The IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards were released in June 2023. National regulatory agencies were then tasked with amending the standards to comply with national laws. The IFRS Sustainability Standards are divided into two reporting tiers. IFRS S1 establishes sustainability disclosure requirements, while IFRS S2 sets out specific climate-related disclosures to be used along with IFRS S1. Both focus on a company's governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and target, as they relate to either sustainability or climate. The UK initially required sustainability reporting in 2022. Following the release of the IFRS Sustainability Standards, in May 2024, the Department of Business & Trade began the process of converting the standards to work with national law. On June 25, the Department released the 'exposure draft of UK Sustainability Reporting Standards: UK SRS S1 and UK SRS S2." The draft states, 'making the transition to an economy that is climate resilient and sustainable is essential for long-term economic growth. One of the 5 missions of this government is to make the UK a clean energy superpower – delivering clean power by 2030 and accelerating to net zero. This will support growth through the creation of hundreds of thousands of good jobs across the UK and protect our economy from the future price shocks that reliance on fossil fuels creates, while delivering a range of social and health benefits.' The UK is using a phased approach to adopt sustainability reporting requirements, starting with the proposed draft. The second 'focuses on providers of assurance over sustainability- related financial disclosures following the conclusion of the Financial Reporting Council's (FRC) recent market study on this theme.' The third 'published by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero – seeks views on the government's manifesto commitment on the theme of transition planning.' The Department of Business & Trade's draft includes six proposed amendments to the ISSB Standards. Amendments 1 - 4 were proposed by UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee, known as TAC in the document. Amendments 5 & 6 were proposed by the UK Sustainability Disclosure Policy and Implementation Committee, known as PIC in the document. The amendments are as follows. Amendment 1 - IFRS S1 included 'transition relief' that allowed companies to delay sustainability reporting during the first year. While the reporting would still take place, it would not be in alignment with the existing financial reporting requirements. The proposal removes that relief. 'The TAC concluded that allowing entities to disclose sustainability-related information at a later time compromises the principle of 'connectivity' with the financial statements and other narrative reporting.' Amendment 2 - In addition to transition relief, IFRS S1 also allowed companies to only report climate-related risks the first year, delaying the broader sustainability reporting until the second year in a 'climate-first' approach. The draft proposal extends that relief to the first two years. In practice, for year 1 companies will be required to report 'climate-related risks and opportunities except Scope 3 emissions.' In year 2, 'all climate-related risks and opportunities including Scope 3 emissions.' In year 3, 'climate-related risks and opportunities, Scope 3 emissions, and wider sustainability-related risks and opportunities.' Amendment 3 - IFRS S2 requires companies to use the Global Industry Classification Standard when reporting 'financed emissions.' There are GHG emissions attributed to 'loans an investments made by an entity.' The proposal allows flexibility in the usage of GICS, changing the language to give companies the option to use the standard of choice. 'The TAC recommended that entities should be able to use any appropriate classification standard – which could be GICS or an alternative standard that they use within existing reporting practices. The use of an existing classification could allow for increased connectivity with existing reporting. A requirement to use GICS, if not already used, could also impose an unnecessary additional cost.' Amendment 4 - The ISSB Standards were effective January 1, 2024. However, the UK did not implement them by that timeline. As a result, the draft removes the effective date, allowing for voluntary usage until required by law or regulation. Amendment 5 - The ISSB Standards require companies to use industry-specific standards for the 'disclosures of financially-material sustainability information' as provided by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. However, the SASB was created in 2011 to draft standards for use with reporting to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result, the choice of language is specific to the SEC. The ISSB is updating those standards, with an anticipated release in July, but for now, the draft takes issue with the use. Further, the draft states 'the detailed content of the SASB materials had not been through the same level of due process as the ISSB Standards. The PIC also observed that the TAC's stakeholder engagement found mixed feedback on the SASB materials, with many UK organisations supporting voluntary (rather than mandatory) use.' To resolve the issues, the proposal changes the standard from 'shall' to 'may', providing flexibility to companies to use the SASB standards if they feel it is the best option. Amendment 6 - Referring back to the transition releif addressed in Amendments 1 & 2, the PIC wants to clarify that relief is tied to the date standards become mandatory, not when companies begin voluntary reporting. 'The PIC agreed that it wanted to facilitate use of the reliefs for any mandatory reporting while avoiding penalising any early voluntary reporters.' The Department provided 20 consultation questions for interested parties to address via an online form. Responses are due by September 17. The draft states that the new UK Sustainability Reporting Standards will be finalized in autumn 2025. Expect to see the final draft in early December.

UK business confidence levels hit highest since 2015, Lloyds says
UK business confidence levels hit highest since 2015, Lloyds says

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK business confidence levels hit highest since 2015, Lloyds says

LONDON (Reuters) -Confidence levels among British employers hit a fresh nine-year high this month as companies became more optimistic about the outlook for the economy, according to a survey published on Monday. The Lloyds Bank Business Barometer rose by one point to 51%, the highest since November 2015, adding to an 11-point jump in May following a tumble in April when U.S. President Donald Trump announced a big jump in import tariffs, many of which have since been suspended. The survey's measure of economic optimism touched a 10-month high, rising by a point after a 16-point increase in May. Hann-Ju Ho, senior economist at Lloyds Bank Commercial Banking, said a rise in hiring intentions - with 60% of firms expecting higher staffing levels in the coming year - suggested employers were starting to prepare for future growth. The Bank of England is watching Britain's jobs market closely as it tries to gauge how much inflation pressure remains in the economy. Governor Andrew Bailey said last week that he saw signs of a slowdown in the labour market, due in part to the government's tax increase for employers, which began in April. But the Lloyds survey showed wage growth expectations rose for a second month in a row, with 36% of respondents forecasting average pay increases of 3% or more. Separate figures published by jobs website Adzuna showed UK staff vacancies edged down in May from April but rose by 0.5% compared with May last year, the third such increase in a row after more than a year of falls. "May reinforced the sense that the job market in the UK is gradually regaining its footing," said Andrew Hunter, co-founder of Adzuna. The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) said its gauge of expectations among businesses about the economy over the next three months were less negative than in May but remained weak after the tax increase on employers and geopolitical upheaval. "Companies are still grappling with higher employment costs, cautious spending behaviour on the part of households and increasing global uncertainty," said Alpesh Paleja, the CBI's deputy chief economist. (Writing by William Schomberg;Editing by Helen Popper) Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store