HHS staffers sue over ‘hopelessly error-ridden' layoffs
Fired HHS employees are suing the Trump administration for illegally terminating thousands of employees in the federal health department's spring restructuring based on incorrect records.
Seven affected staffers filed the lawsuit, which seeks class-action status, Tuesday in a D.C. district court against the HHS, the Department of Government Efficiency and other agencies and top leaders in the Trump administration.
The lawsuit seeks monetary damages for HHS employees who were let go with termination notices that contained errors. Lawyers estimate that most of the roughly 10,000 employees who were fired during the April reduction-in-force, or RIF, would be members of the class.
The HHS began notifying employees that they would be laid off on April 1 as part of a departmental restructuring, amid the Trump administration's larger push to drastically reduce the federal workforce.
The process was quickly dogged with questions about its legitimacy, with many affected staffers noting that termination notices included incorrect performance scores, office names and other information.
Healthcare Dive has reported extensively on the potential illegality of the RIF, including paperwork issues, the closure of congressionally mandated offices and inconsistencies with how the Trump administration decided which employees to terminate.
Now, a group of terminated HHS staffers are suing over the 'hopelessly error-ridden' personnel records that were used to underpin the cuts.
Performance ratings, which range from 1 to 5 and are assigned to federal staff to appraise their performance, were frequently wrong on RIF notices, the workers allege in their suit. In addition, employees' paperwork had seemingly random codes determining their eligibility for the RIF, and informed them that their entire division was being terminated when it wasn't.
Such errors are a major point of concern, given that data affects whether a specific employee should have been caught up in a RIF, their severance pay and the availability of stopgap healthcare coverage — and can affect future career prospects.
HHS' actions violated the Privacy Act, which gives individuals recourse if an agency acts on the basis of inaccurate personnel records, according to the suit.
An HHS spokesperson declined to comment, citing the ongoing litigation. However, the agency in the past has blamed siloed and disorganized recordkeeping for discrepancies in RIF paperwork.
'It is, of course, little solace to these Plaintiffs that they were fired because of 'siloed' recordkeeping. Nor is it any comfort to know that many of them had been fired by 'mistake,'' the lawsuit reads. 'For these Plaintiffs, HHS's intentional failure to maintain complete and accurate records before making life-changing employment decisions was a clear violation of the law.'
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has publicly acknowledged that mistakes were made during the restructuring due to the agency's desire to move quickly, and pledged to reinstate staff who were improperly let go. The HHS has since rescinded RIF notices for hundreds of employees. However, the secretary has brushed off ongoing concerns about the cuts and failed to provide a comprehensive accounting of the layoffs.
'Because the decisionmakers at these agencies were working with such flawed data, they barely knew who they were cutting,' Clayton Bailey, a lawyer at the Civil Service Law Center, which is bringing the suit, said in a statement. 'These employees suffered the consequences.'
The RIF was supposed to go into effect early June. However, the firings were paused after a California federal judge issued an injunction in a separate lawsuit over the administration slashing the federal workforce without Congress' say-so.
A group of states are also suing the Trump administration seeking to undo the HHS cuts, arguing the department's critical health work has been stymied as a result of the restructuring.
Many affected workers remain on administrative leave.
Recommended Reading
HHS layoffs may be illegal, legal experts say
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
More ICE Deaths ‘Inevitable' as Detention Numbers Soar
Deaths in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention centers look set to surpass the previous year's total, with three months still to go. With 12 people confirmed to have died while in ICE custody since October 2024, when the current Fiscal Year began, the number has already matched the previous year's total. Human rights groups are warning more are certain. "These deaths are clearly attributable to the Trump administration's increased and aggressive detention policies, and I have no doubt that when more complete investigations take place, it will likely provide information that these deaths were likely preventable," Eunice Cho, senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) National Prison Project, told Newsweek. The latest death came on June 26, when 75-year-old Cuban national Isidro Perez, in the country for decades, passed away in a hospital after suffering a heart issue while in a Miami ICE facility. In response to that news, President Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan told reporters outside the White House: "People die in ICE custody." To be sure, ICE detention centers are not alone in experiencing deaths of detainees, with the the U.S. prison system — at both federal and state levels — frequently reporting deaths among inmates. In 2019, the mortality rate across the prison system was 259 per 100,000 inmates, based on Department of Justice figures showing 4,234 deaths in prisons at state and federal level nationwide. By comparison, the mortality rate of ICE detainees at the current numbers would work out to about 21.3 deaths per 100,000 people. The ICE population also has a far quicker turnaround than the prison system. In fiscal year 2022, running from the previous October through September 2022, three people died in ICE detention – the lowest number since reporting was mandated by Congress in 2018. The highest recent yearly death total came in 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, with 21 deaths across the agency's various facilities. Those facilities are often run by private companies contracted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). ICE repeatedly says that individuals in its charge receive high-quality medical assessments and care, including 24-hour emergency medicine. But several independent reports over recent years, including from the ACLU and Robert F. Kennedy Center for Human Rights, have given a very different picture of the conditions facing detainees who are awaiting immigration hearings or deportation. In 2024, the ACLU outlined a lack of oversight when it came to ICE detention deaths, suggesting evidence may have destroyed and highlighting efforts to blame low-level employees for the incidents. The organization, working alongside others, found that many deaths were likely preventable, should medical care have been more readily accessible. "People are dying preventable deaths in [Homan's] direct custody," Cho said. "People are dying because of the lack of constitutionally required medical care that should be provided to anybody in government custody." A year later, far more people are being placed in ICE detention. Since January, the Trump administration has been increasing its efforts to arrest and detain illegal immigrants. While Congress has allocated funding for around tens of thousands of more beds in the current tax bill, the number of detainees stood at roughly 56,300 as of mid-June. "There's never been a time where immigration detention hasn't been deadly, so it's just inevitable that the more people we detain, the more people who are going to die," Anthony Enriquez, the vice president of U.S. advocacy and litigation at RFK Human Rights, told Newsweek. ICE is struggling with limited capacity and resources to fulfill its mission of millions of deportations. In addition to the new funds being allocated to the agency by Congress, the White House is trying other novel ways to expand capacity, from repurposing Guantanamo Bay to new detention center contracts issued for private companies GEO Group and CoreCivic, to the new so-called "Alligator Alcatraz" in southern Florida. Following a tour of the new detention facility on Tuesday, which includes bunkbeds stacked together in wire-fenced cages, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem praised the standards on offer. "Alligator Alcatraz can be a blueprint for detention facilities across the country. It will provide DHS with the beds and space needed to safely detain the worst of the worst," she posted on social media. All of this is to deliver on the president's promise of mass deportations. Trump returned to the White House promising upwards of 11 million immigrants without legal status would be deported, targeting the "worst of the worst" first. Records have shown that a large share of those currently in detention do not have a criminal record, but civil immigration offenses instead. "A lot of people misunderstand the purpose and the nature of immigration detention, and they think that if it's a detention center, then it's a jail, and if it's a jail, then that means this is someone who has already been found guilty of some type of bad act and should be serving a punishment," Enriquez said. "But in fact, many of the people in immigration detention do have lawful status to be here in the United States." Cho, of the ACLU, told Newsweek that ICE was not exercising discretion with respect to those it was now detaining. Because more people are remaining in detention when they previously would have been released, the situation is leading to a "deterioration of conditions in custody," he said. "My fear is this trajectory is only going to increase," Cho said. "That is because Congress is on the cusp of passing a new reconciliation bill that is providing $45 billion to the expansion of immigration detention in the country, and I want to compare that to the current $4 billion that ICE already receives every year for its already massive immigration detention system. "This amount of money is going to provide ICE with the ability to not only double, triple, quadruple the capacity of people who are being held in immigration detention, it is going to allow a system that is larger than the entire federal Bureau of Prisons population put together, under the care of someone like Tom Homan who has expressed total disregard for the fact that people are dying in custody." Newsweek reached out to ICE via email Tuesday for comment on the increase in deaths and measures being taken to prevent any more. The agency did not reply before publication. Related Articles California Man in US for Over 35 Years Detained at Car WashDonald Trump Could Let Millions of Illegal Immigrants Stay in USAOC Warns of ICE 'Explosion' After Trump Bill PassesTrump Administration Sending Hundreds of Marines to Florida to Help ICE 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
UN records 613 killings in Gaza near humanitarian convoys or aid distribution points run by US group
DEIR al-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israeli airstrikes killed 15 Palestinians in Gaza early on Friday, while another 20 people died in shootings while waiting for aid, the hospital morgue that received their bodies told The Associated Press. Meanwhile, the U.N. human rights office said on Friday it has recorded 613 killings in Gaza near humanitarian convoys and at aid distribution points run by an Israeli-backed American organization since it first began operations in late May. Spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said the rights office was not able to attribute responsibility for the killings. But she said 'it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points' operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Those killed in Friday's strikes included eight women and one child. Nasser Hospital said of those who were killed in shootings, two died near aid distribution sites in Rafah and 18 were waiting for trucks to deliver supplies elsewhere in southern Gaza. Israel's military did not immediately provide comment on the strikes. Israel's military said a soldier was killed in combat in the north of Gaza and it was investigating. Over 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza. The recent killings took place as efforts to halt the 21-month war appeared to be moving forward. Hamas said Friday that it was holding discussions with leaders of other Palestinian factions to discuss a ceasefire proposal presented to it by Egyptian and Qatari mediators. Trump said Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. Hamas will give its final response to mediators after the discussions have concluded, the statement said. The Health Ministry in Gaza said the number of Palestinians killed in the territory has passed 57,000. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count, but says more than half of the dead are women and children. The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. According to Palestinian witnesses and Gaza's Health Ministry, several hundred people have been killed or wounded by Israeli troops when trying to reach the aid sites since they opened in May. The military has repeatedly said it's fired only warning shots, denies deliberately firing towards civilians, and says it's looking into reports of civilian harm. ___ Kullab reported from Jerusalem. Julia Frankel contributed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Black America Web
6 hours ago
- Black America Web
Trump Administration Cuts Funding For Black Infant Health Research, Labeling It A DEI Initiative
Source: Cultura Creative / Getty It would surprise absolutely no one that infant mortality rates in America are disproportionately high among Black babies, or that Black and Latino babies are more vulnerable than their white counterparts to serious, life-threatening illnesses such as upper respiratory infection (URI). Of course, anyone who has been paying attention to our current political climate would be equally unsurprised to find that, under the Trump administration, medical research that seeks to understand why Black children suffer these health issues so often is under attack, because the results of that research might hurt white people's feelings. In other words, Black babies might have to die in order to placate white fragility. According to The Cincinnati Herald, a federally funded study exploring why Black babies in Detroit are disproportionately born prematurely has been abruptly terminated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), apparently, because the study focused on the effects of stress associated with racism and poverty, and how that stress might alter gene function and contribute to adverse birth outcomes — or as the Trump administration defines it, DEI. From the Herald: In termination letters sent to researchers, the NIH claimed the project relied on 'artificial and non-scientific categories' linked to DEI and asserted it did not 'enhance health or advance science.' Researchers behind the project strongly contest that explanation, calling the decision politically motivated. The cancellation aligns with a broader initiative by the Trump administration to dismantle DEI initiatives across the federal government, including within health and science agencies. Numerous projects focused on minority and LGBTQ health have been defunded under the same rationale. So, a bunch of so-called medical authorities from the same administration that gave the position of a Secretary of Health and Human Services to RFK Jr. — who thinks Black people don't need vaccines as much as white people because we have super negro immune systems — have canceled funding for this research, because, in their non-medical opinions, any research tied to racial disparities is 'non-scientific.' Actual medical experts, of course, say differently. 'Health-related social needs are health care,' said Dr. Alex Peahl, an OB-GYN at the University of Michigan and co-director of the Partnering for the Future Clinic. 'And if we want to improve the health of pregnant people and their families, we have to care for every part of their lives, not just the clinical pieces.' Peahl noted that access to prenatal care is inseparable from issues like lack of transportation, food insecurity and other external stressors that disproportionately affect Black people. 'It is really hard to come to your prenatal visit if you don't have a car, or to take a medication if you don't have food on the table,' she explained. And it would be nice if the administration of President Donald Trump cared about any of that, but it does not. Source: MEHMET ESER / Getty In April, Trump signed an executive order that essentially made housing discrimination easier by requiring federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), to stop using 'disparate impact' data to identify discriminatory policies and practices that disproportionately harm certain groups. Days before signing that order, Trump signed a similar order discouraging school administrators from using 'disparate impact' data to address racial disparities in disciplinary actions taken against students. In other words: Trump decided researchers can't use data involving racial disparities to study potential racial discrimination because, in his mind and that of his ilk, anything that addresses systemic racism against anyone but white people is a diversity, equity and inclusion effort. Hell, also in April, the Trump administration ended a wastewater settlement for a mostly Black Alabama town, erroneously calling it 'environmental justice as viewed through a distorting, DEI lens' because the case addressed environmental racism. So, a whole town full of Black people has to continue living with well-documented wastewater sanitation issues all because a White House full of white nationalists is far more invested in silencing calls for racial justice than it is in correcting racial injustice (again, except for fictional racial injustice against white people). Anyway, according to the Herald, the research team in Detroit, which is currently scrambling to secure private funding so it can continue its work, has 30 days to appeal the NIH decision. Last month, a federal judge ruled that the agency's funding cuts to minority health research were illegal and an example of 'government racial discrimination' like nothing the judge had ever seen. Unfortunately, that ruling could also be appealed by the Trump administration. The very idea of correcting systemic racism in America makes white conservatives deeply resentful, and Black health continues to suffer because of it. Sad. SEE ALSO: Op-Ed: We Should All Be More Concerned That Trump Keeps Threatening To Deport US Citizens Trump's DOJ Investigates University Of California Over Effort To Recruit Racially Diverse Faculty SEE ALSO Trump Administration Cuts Funding For Black Infant Health Research, Labeling It A DEI Initiative was originally published on
