Rishi Sunak ‘honoured' to become prostate cancer charity ambassador
Former prime minister Rishi Sunak has said he is 'honoured' to become an ambassador for a prostate cancer charity.
He will support Prostate Cancer Research's campaign to introduce a national screening programme for men at high risk of the disease.
Last Thursday Mr Sunak met workers at the laboratories of British cancer diagnostics company Oxford BioDynamics, where they are working on a new blood test.
The EpiSwitch PSE test can detect prostate cancer with 94% accuracy, which is a 'significant improvement' on the most commonly used PSA test, Prostate Cancer Research said.
The former Conservative leader said he was honoured to 'support the charity's mission to revolutionise diagnosis and treatment'.
He added: ' Men tend to ignore pain hoping it'll go away rather than going to see the GP, and that's a part of the reason why prostate cancer is now the most commonly diagnosed cancer in males in the UK.
'We can do something about that. It is clear from a trial that I funded when I was in office, that early detection saves lives.
'Catching the cancer early drastically improved survival rates, however that survival rate drops by half if it's caught late.
'A targeted national screening programme will help save many lives.'
The MP for Richmond and Northallerton added: 'I hope my work as ambassador for Prostate Cancer Research will encourage more men to be able to speak about their experience with prostate cancer and get a screening test which will hopefully prevent further needless deaths.'
Last month in the Commons, he pressed the Government to consider increasing screenings for prostate cancer for high-risk groups.
More than nine out of 10 men who receive a positive EpiSwitch PSE result will have prostate cancer confirmed, said Iain Ross, executive chairman of Oxford BioDynamics.
This can 'significantly cut' the number of 'expensive and unnecessary MRI scans' and invasive prostate biopsies, he added.
Oliver Kemp, chief executive of Prostate Cancer Research, said Mr Sunak's 'ongoing support for our mission to revolutionise prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment is invaluable'.
He said: 'Rishi's advocacy will help us drive forward innovative research, challenge health inequalities, and ensure that more lives are saved.'
The EpiSwitch test is an example of 'groundbreaking innovation' that could 'transform early detection' and improve outcomes, he said.
Research that benefits patients aims to build a future where 'a prostate cancer diagnosis is no longer something to fear', he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Kids 'may end up with smaller brains' after spending time in front of TVs
Children addicted to TV and phone screens could end up with smaller brains, according to scientists who analysed thousands of youngsters Youngsters glued to TV screens could end up with smaller brains and lower intelligence, scientists say. Parents are being warned to limit children's screen time after a study found children who watched television and used smartphones, tablets and computers, had lower IQs. While children who exercised in their spare time were likely to be more intelligent and had a larger brain volume, according to the research. 'Although certain digital activities (educational games) may yield cognitive benefits, overall evidence indicates that excessive passive and multitasking screen behaviours undermine cognitive development,' the study in the journal Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, said. The study used databases from across Europe that contained information from thousands of children on IQ, screen use and physical exercise. They analysed the data to find the link between leisure time habits, intelligence and intracranial volume (ICV) - a marker for brain size. Larger ICV has been linked to superior intelligence. Children's screen time use has rocketed in recent years with the average amount of time British children aged five to 15 spend on screens rising from nine hours a week in 2009 to 15 hours a week in 2018. According to the World Health Organization, children need to sit less and play more. They believe there should be no screen time for children under one year of age. For those aged two years, screen time should be no more than one hour a day and 'less is better'. The researchers looking at the IQ link, who are based in China, said their results provide further evidence that excessive screen time has a lifelong impact on children's brain development. 'These findings highlight the critical need to manage and regulate children's media use while also promoting increased physical activity,' they wrote in the journal Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. While there can be benefits, including building friendships and improving learning, negative effects include online bullying, exposure to violence and pornography, lower levels of physical activity and eye strain. Sir Cary Cooper, a psychology professor at the University of Manchester, told the Mail on Sunday: "Children are using these devices and they are not learning social and non-verbal skills that we pick up from interacting, face-to-face, with other people." The NHS suggests no screen time, except for video calling caregivers and family for babies, while they say there should be a limit of one hour a day for those aged two to five. For school children aged six to 12 years they say up to two hours of screen time per day and for teenagers aged 13 plus, no more than two hours per day. The NHS advice is: 'Limit the amount of time your child spends on inactive pastimes such as watching television, playing video games and playing on electronic devices. 'There's no hard and fast advice on how much is too much, but experts say children should have no more than 2 hours of screen time each day. 'And remove all screens (including mobile phones) from their bedroom at night.'
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Pregnant teacher rushed to hospital with bleed on the brain days before due date
Secondary school teacher Rachel Rimmer took a worrying turn days before she was due to give birth to her daughter after suddenly suffering a headache on her last day of work A pregnant mum a week away from her due date has spoken of her trauma after a bleed was detected on her brain. Teacher Rachel Rimmer, 33, said she had a perfect pregnancy for the first eight months, but started to feel unwell on her last day before maternity leave. She started experiencing severe headaches, before vomiting and feeling neck soreness and she said she was soon left "screaming in pain". Rachel's husband Alex, who also works at the same school in Southport, Merseyside, rushed her to hospital for a series of tests and things soon turned serious. Although doctors told her the baby was fine and despite anti-sickness injections and paracetamol, the headaches and vomiting persisted. The mum, who already had three-year-old son Roman, told the LiverpoolEcho: "I remember thinking, 'how can I have been so fine this morning?' It's really scary how everything can change so quickly. I had an absolutely amazing pregnancy. I had no complications all the way through. My blood pressure was always normal and I was really relaxed." After doctors established the problem was neurological, Rachel was transferred by ambulance to Southport Hospital. Following an MRI scan, doctors gave Rachel the devastating news she had a bleed on the brain. Rachel said: "Even when they took me to A&E, nothing was clicking as to what was wrong with me. It was only when they told me I might have had a bleed on my brain that it started to hit me. "I wasn't thinking about myself at all. The only thing I was thinking about was the baby. My kids are my world. All I was thinking was if the kids were going to be okay." After the bleed was identified, Rachel was transferred to the Walton Centre, where a lumbar drain was used to drain excess fluid on the brain caused by the bleed. Doctors told Rachel her safest option was to deliver the baby as soon as possible so she could continue with her treatment. As the nearest maternity hospital was Liverpool Women's, a team of consultants and midwives were transferred to the Walton Centre. Baby Betsy was delivered by C-section the next day on March 13 - eight days before Rachel's due date - but Rachel said "she was ready to come out." She said: "I was really nervous, even though I knew she was full term and I knew a C-section would be fine. I just wasn't mentally prepared to have a baby that day." Rachel could not meet Betsy until 12 hours after she was born, having given birth to her under general anaesthetic and taken to ICU immediately afterwards. She said: "That was really difficult but I knew it needed to be done. To look after her, I needed to be healthy first." Following two weeks of recovery, Rachel was sent home - but within 12 hours, a severe headache woke her from her sleep. Neck pain and vomiting followed, and Rachel had no option but to return to A&E. By this time, she was showing signs of deliriousness and was non-responsive. Eventually, she was put into an induced coma for her own safety. Following a CT scan, Rachel was told she had hydrocephalus - a build-up of fluid in the brain. The excess fluid puts pressure on the brain, which can damage it. If left untreated, hydrocephalus can be fatal. The next day, Rachel was transferred back to the Walton Centre, where stayed for four weeks after undergoing brain surgery. During the surgery, a shunt was implanted into her brain, allowing the excess fluid to flow through the shunt to another part of the body. From there, it's absorbed into the bloodstream, preventing a build-up. During her four-week stay at the hospital, Alex was able to bring Betsy to see Rachel every day, thanks to the Walton Centre's Home from Home accommodation, designed to offer the comforts of home to families who want or need to stay close to their loved one undergoing treatment, which they fund free of charge. Rachel, who lives in Southport, said: "I obviously didn't want to be apart from Betsy, having only just had her. So the fact Alex was able to bring Betsy to the hospital to see me everyday was a massive help. That's where she was from the minute she woke up to the minute she went to sleep. "She's such a good baby. She's so smiley and happy; she's just so chill. I've been quite lucky, depending on the way you look at it. You might be the unluckiest person in the world to have a bleed when you're pregnant. But I honestly feel so lucky that both times we caught it really fast. I had amazing care at every single hospital I went to. Betsy's fine, I'm fine. I feel really lucky."
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Six ice lollies under 100 calories – and the ones to swerve if you're dieting
Whether it's a classic choc ice taking you back to childhood summers on a windswept British beach; the nation's favourite, the Magnum; or the one I crave on a hot summer's day, a fruity Solero, there are ice lollies for all moods. But in these health-conscious days, with everything we know about the dangers of added sugars, not only to our waistline but to our hearts, are there better options out there? Should we all be throwing out the Magnums and embracing the newer, reduced-sugar ice lollies which come with indulgent brownie pieces and a 'rich fudge swirl' yet contain only 90 calories? Are the versions with real fruit purée and less sugar any better? With the help of our experts, it's time to put the nation's favourites, and some of the 'healthy' upstarts, to the test. Our reviewers, registered nutritionist Eli Brecher and consultant dietitian Rebecca McManamon, put their taste-bud-led biases to the side for this analysis. Instead, they ranked the ice lollies objectively, based on health metrics including nutritional information, calories and ingredients. According to a YouGov poll, the Magnum is the UK's favourite ice lolly and it's not hard to see why with its velvety ice cream and signature cracking chocolate. However, it's bad news for fans of the moreish treat as our experts rate it one of the worst of the bunch. With 231 calories, 20g of sugar and almost 10g of saturated fat per stick, Brecher advises people to 'save it to enjoy on occasions, rather than making it a regular summer snack'. Per stick: 231kcal, saturated fat 9.8g, carbohydrates 23g, of which sugars 20g, protein 2.5g, salt 0.09g Nobbly Bobbly Ice Cream Bar 'The combination of a chocolate coating plus sugary sprinkles is double trouble from a nutritional perspective,' Brecher says. The Nobbly Bobbly packs a high sugary punch with 16.9g per stick, and provides little protein or fibre. In fact, Brecher struggles to find anything positive to say about it. Per stick: 166kcal, saturated fat 4.5g, carbohydrates 21g, of which sugars 16.9g, protein 1.3g, salt 0.07g Calippo Orange Ice Lolly With 17g per serving, the Calippo is one of the highest sugar ice lollies on this list, Brecher notes. It also contains 'almost no fibre or protein'. However, it's low in fat and calories. McManamon advises Calippo fans to opt for the mini option if possible, which is slightly lower in sugar. Fab Strawberry Ice Lolly With layers of strawberry and vanilla ice lolly and a satisfying chocolate coating, the Fab is a firm favourite among the UK's under-50s. It contains slightly less sugar than a Twister, although still a significant amount. 'It's very low in protein, fibre and satiating nutrients,' Brecher says, 'and also contains added sugar and artificial ingredients.' Per stick: 75kcal, saturated fat 1g, carbohydrates 12.5g, of which sugars 10g, protein 0.3g, salt 0.03g This has a decent protein content thanks to the vanilla ice cream; however, it's high in saturated fat, according to NHS recommendations, containing far more than 5g per 100g. 'It's higher in calories than the Magnum and could lead to weight gain if eaten regularly,' McManamon says. It is slightly lower in sugar, but still contains a significant amount of your daily recommended intake. Per stick: 244kcal, saturated fat 14g, carbohydrates 22g, of which sugars 18g, protein 2.2g, salt 0.09g Twister Ice Lolly A firm favourite among children and young people, the Twister is relatively low in calories. However, it contains 12g of sugar, 'which is high for its size,' Brecher says. The NHS recommends adults have no more than 30g of free sugars a day, and children have no more than 24g, so just one Twister puts you well on the path towards your daily allowance. Again, McManamon says to opt for the mini version if possible, which contains 6.5g of sugar. Per stick: 70kcal, saturated fat 0.3g, carbohydrates 16g, of which sugars 12g, protein <0.5g, salt 0.02g Mini Milk Ice Cream Lolly A classic favourite among small children, Mini Milks are one of the healthiest options, says McManamon. One lolly provides just 30 calories, is made with fresh milk, and contains 36 per cent of a child's recommended daily allowance of calcium, 'meaning it's the only ice cream that offers a nutritional benefit,' McManamon concludes. Solero Exotic Ice Cream Stick The Solero contains real fruit purée and juice, with most of its sugar coming from these sources, making it one of the healthier options, Brecher says. At just 98 calories per serving, and filled with creamy vanilla ice cream, it's a satiating treat, best for adults who 'want a more luxurious ice cream or dessert' without the high sugar content of the chocolate-based lollies, McManamon says. Per stick: 98kcal, saturated fat 1.9g, carbohydrates 17g, of which sugars 12g, protein 1.1g, salt 0.06g What about the 'healthy' alternatives? Halo Top Gooey Brownie Stick This provides a good amount of protein, Brecher says, and has a moderate calorie content. However, it contains sweeteners and additives which 'may disrupt the gut microbiome and lead to digestive symptoms like bloating in some people'. Per stick: 90kcal, saturated fat 1.6g, carbohydrates 12g, of which sugars 9.9g, protein 2.9g, salt 0.19g Halo Top Peanut Butter Swirl Stick This is a 'lighter dessert option with a moderate amount of calories,' Brecher says. However, its sugar content is verging on the high side, despite it being marketed as a healthier option, and, again, it includes sweeteners and additives, which may interfere with gut health. Per stick: 100kcal, saturated fat 1.4g, carbohydrates 9.6g, of which sugars 7.8g, protein 3.9g, salt 0.18g Expert verdict: What's a good healthy alternative? As our analysis proves, it's difficult to find a truly 'healthy' ice lolly with many popular variations being high in calories and sugar, and low in protein and fibre. Our experts agree that the Mini Milk and Solero are the best of the bunch, with the Magnum, Nobbly Bobbly and Feast among the worst offenders. While Brecher believes ice lollies can still form part of a balanced diet, she recommends making a batch of frozen yogurt lollies when you're craving a sweet refreshing treat. Simply blend Greek yogurt with fresh berries and a drizzle of honey or maple syrup. Pour the mixture into ice lolly moulds, pop a wooden stick in each one and freeze. 'These provide natural probiotics, protein and heart-healthy fats,' Brecher concludes, 'while being lower-sugar than shop-bought options, with zero ultra-processed ingredients.' A win all round.
