Which New Mexico cities land on list of best, worst places to rent?
List: Unique places to stay in New Mexico
New Mexico had two cities rank on the list with Albuquerque ranking 84th overall and Las Cruces ranking 92nd overall. In individual metrics Albuquerque ranked 21st in rental market and affordability and 151st in quality of life. Las Cruces ranked 32nd and 160th in those same individual metrics. To view the complete study and rankings, click here.
Source: WalletHub
WalletHub's ten best places to rent
Overland Park, KS
Scottsdale, AZ
Chandler, AZ
Gilbert, AZ
Bismarck, ND
Sioux Falls, SD
Huntsville, AL
Peoria, AZ
Lewiston, ME
Nashua, NH
WalletHub's ten worst places to rent
Memphis, TN
Detroit, MI
Cleveland, OH
Tacoma, WA
New Orleans, LA
Newark, NJ
Jackson, MS
Baton Rouge, LA
San Bernadino, CA
Huntington, WV
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
New tax break for auto loans could save some buyers thousands of dollars. But will it boost sales?
Millions of people receive a federal tax deduction for the interest they pay on home loans. Under President Donald Trump's new tax-cut law, many people for the first time also could claim a tax deduction for interest on their vehicle loans. The new tax break will be available even to people who don't itemize deductions. But there are some caveats that could limit its reach. The vehicles must be new, not used. They must be assembled in the U.S. And the loans must be issued no sooner than this year, to list just a few qualifications. Candidate Trump promised an auto loan interest tax break Trump pledged while campaigning last year to make interest on car loans tax-deductible. He said it would make car ownership more affordable and 'stimulate massive domestic auto production.' The idea made it into the big tax-cut bill passed by Congress, which Trump signed into law July 4. The law allows taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 of interest payments annually on loans for new American-made vehicles from 2025 through 2028. It applies to cars, motorcycles, sport utility vehicles, minivans, vans and pickup trucks weighing less than 14,000 pounds, a threshold referred to as light vehicles. But it only applies to vehicles purchased for personal use, not for fleets or commercial purposes. The tax break can be claimed starting on 2025 income tax returns. But the deduction phases out for individuals with incomes between $100,000 and $150,000 or joint taxpayers with incomes between $200,000 and $250,000. Those earning more cannot claim the tax break. Millions of buyers could benefit, but millions of others will not U.S. automobile dealers sold 15.9 million new light vehicles last year, a little over half of which were assembled in the U.S, according to Cox Automotive. It says around 60% of retail sales are financed with loans. After excluding fleet and commercial vehicles and customers above the income cutoff, an estimated 3.5 million new vehicle loans could be eligible for the tax break this year, if purchasing patterns stay the same, said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive. It's the assembly plant, not the automaker's headquarters that matters The tax break applies to vehicles assembled in the U.S., no matter where the company making them is headquartered. All Tesla vehicles sold in the U.S. are assembled in this country. But so are all Acura brands, the luxury model of Japanese automaker Honda. Last year, 78% of Ford vehicles sold in the U.S. were assembled in this country, according to Cox Automotive. But customers wanting the tax break will need to pay attention to specific models. While the Ford Mustang is assembled in Michigan, the Mustang Mach-E is built in Mexico. General Motors assembles all of its Cadillacs in the U.S. But just 44% of its Chevrolets sold last year were assembled in the U.S., and just 14% of Buicks, according to Cox Automotive. That's a lower U.S-assembled rate than Honda (60%), Toyota (52%) and Nissan (48%), which all are headquartered in Japan. Taxpayers could save hundreds of dollars a year The average new vehicle loan is about $44,000 financed over six years. Interest rates vary by customer, so the savings will, too. In general, the tax deduction will decline after the initial year, because interest payments on loans are frontloaded while principal payments grow on the back end. At a 9.3% interest rate, an average new vehicle buyer could save about $2,200 on taxes over four years, Smoke said. The tax savings would be less on a loan at 6.5%, which is the rate figured into calculations by the American Financial Services Association, a consumer credit industry trade group. Some people also could see a reduction in state income taxes Whereas the tax deduction for home loan interest can be claimed only by people itemizing on their tax returns, Congress wrote the deduction for auto loan interest so that it can apply to all taxpayers, including those claiming the standard deduction. On a tax form, the auto loan deduction will come before the calculation of a taxpayer's adjusted gross income. That's an important distinction, because many states use a taxpayer's federal adjusted gross income as the starting point for figuring their state income taxes. If that income figure is lower, it could reduce the state taxes owed. The verdict is out on whether the tax break will boost sales At Bowen Scarff Ford in Kent, Washington, customers started asking about the auto loan tax deduction before Congress had even taken a final vote on the tax-cut bill, said General Manager Paul Ray. So he decided to promote it on the dealer's website. A website ribbon exclaims: 'CAR LOAN TAX DEDUCTION NOW AVAILABLE" while also promoting an electric vehicle tax credit that is ending soon as a result of Trump's tax-cut law. 'I think it's going to help incentivize vehicle purchases through this year," Ray said. Celia Winslow, president and CEO of the American Financial Services Association, concurred: 'For some people deciding — should I buy it, should I not — this could be something that tips the scale.' Others remain skeptical. According to Smoke's math, the average annual tax savings is smaller than a single month's loan payment for a new vehicle. 'I don't think it moves the needle on somebody on the fence of buying a new vehicle or not," Smoke said. "But I think it could influence their decision to finance that vehicle instead of paying cash or instead of leasing a vehicle.'
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
72-Month Car Loan Trap: Why Low Payments Cost You More
What does stretching a five-figure purchase into six-year installments say about our relationship with cars? Is it healthy? Great for finance companies, less our pockets. Have we allowed ourselves to be driven there? Here's how to take back control. I slid into the dealer's driver's seat, felt the leather hug my palms, then froze at "72 months." Whoa! The finance manager tapped the screen and winked: "Lower payment." I typed six years of obligation like signing a lease on a sculpture I'd never own outright. Americans now average 68.63-month new-car loan terms, financing vehicles almost like mortgages. Sticker shock meets budget limits. The average new-vehicle transaction price hit $48,641 in January. Buyers fixate on seat-of-the-pants monthly payments, then let lenders stretch terms until that number lands in their "comfort zone." Subprime shoppers chase 84-month deals; prime borrowers opt for 72 months. Captive finance arms splash incentives on 72-month deals like syrup on pancakes, while banks pocket profit on the back end. A slip from 6.85% to 6.73% APR year-over-year looks shiny, but tack on a dozen extra payments and watch your savings evaporate. Extending your loan term doesn't build equity - it delays it. Stretching to 72 months increases total interest paid by thousands. Once the warranty expires, repair bills hit like a pothole at highway speed. Negative equity becomes normal when your balance outpaces resale value. Mortgages build home equity; auto loans front-load interest and back-load payoff. You don't treat a car like real estate. A six-year debt run transforms ownership into an endurance contest, not a milestone. Opt for 60 months or less: Fewer payments, less your down payment: Reduces loan principal and negative equity credit unions and banks: Compare APRs on 48- to 60-month total-interest disclosures: Demand clarity on what you'll pay over the life of the loan. You'll be shocked by the differences. That engine growl under your hood isn't just horsepower - it's the sound of a 72-month clock winding down. You pay for control. Don't let your loan own you. Focus on ownership, not just monthly relief. Drivers deserve options that reward true purchase, not prolong debt. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Indianapolis Star
6 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Republicans stooped to Democrats' level using Trump's tax bill to buy votes
Now that President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act has been signed into law, we can get into analyzing what is actually in the legislation. There are a few things that are clear to me as a conservative who hoped Republicans would push sound fiscal policies. Primarily, this is a flawed conservative policy. While it is a good thing that the 2017 Trump tax cuts were extended, there remain a ton of problems with the bill. Many of the tax break provisions have less to do with economics and more to do with pandering to the American people. Congressional Republicans seemingly made little attempt to justify their poor fiscal ideas, choosing instead to pass Trump's agenda by any means necessary. More: Data centers are inevitable, but why should Indiana pay for their energy demand? | Opinion However, the law goes further, creating new tax exemptions for Social Security, tips and overtime pay. These policies, in addition to the poor policy of an increased cap on state and local taxes, are little more than bribes to the American people. Opinion: Trump's tax bill will crush the rural voters who chose him I'm all for new tax cuts, provided we are reducing spending at the same time. But there is no economic rationale for exempting any of these forms of income from taxation. These incomes are not unique in their impact on the economy and should not be treated as such. The only reason for not taxing tips or overtime in favor of other forms of income is that MAGA lawmakers think they can buy votes. It's a tactic often employed by congressional Democrats, who promise either student loan forgiveness or taxing the ultrawealthy in order to buy middle-class and youth votes. Conservatives should not be proud of our leaders for stooping so low. Not only are these cuts not coherent in theory, they aren't even fiscally sound conservative policies. The issue with this law is that it overlooks the increasingly massive deficit that will be incurred to fund it, as well as the aforementioned new tax breaks. While it attempts to bridge this gap with good policies, such as work requirements for Medicaid and food stamp benefits, it isn't enough. Even after accounting for the economic growth the tax cuts are anticipated to generate, the bill is estimated to add $3.8 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Tax cuts paid for through deficit spending aren't really tax cuts. The cuts still need to be paid for, and both options for doing so would be an additional burden on the American people. The first option is through borrowing money, which not only further increases the national debt but also increases the revenue required later to repay that debt. Second, this is achieved through printing more money, which is inflationary and places further costs on Americans. There is no magic third way that allows the government to cut taxes and keep spending without, at some point, hurting Americans. The only way to truly create tax cuts is by commensurately cutting spending at the same time. However, responsible budgets are not the goal of the current GOP. The main goal is to deliver on Trump's populist attempts to bribe voters, even if, ultimately, this will hurt those voters.
