Q&A on Florida's affordable-housing Live Local Act: What is it and why is it controversial?
The Live (pronounced "liv") Local Act is intended to address the state's growing housing-affordability crisis by encouraging development with significant land-use, zoning and tax benefits. It makes various changes and additions to affordable-housing-related programs and policies at both the state and local level. It also requires certain information be made available on local government websites.
However, things have not always run smoothly for the statewide housing strategy.
Among the key criticisms: The plan has not reached those most in need; that it has the potential for developers to prioritize tax incentives over affordability; and that it intrudes on local authority and planning efforts, infringing on the surrounding community.
Here are some key provisions and everything you need to know:
The Live Local Act has a provision that gives developers a 75% exemption on property taxes when they build rental housing targeted for middle-income families — those with incomes that fall in the range of what a family with 80% to 120% of the area median income of the community would be able to comfortably afford. This group is sometimes called "the missing middle."
There must be more than 70 affordable units in a development to qualify for this tax break, and only the affordable units would qualify. So, for example, in a 200-unit project with 75 affordable units, only the portion of property taxes covered by the 75 affordable units would get the tax reduction.
Under a separate provision, developers can get a 100% property-tax exemption for qualifying developments with units targeted to families with incomes that are less than 80% of the area median income of the community.
SPECIAL REPORT: Florida's Live Local Act wanted to spur affordable housing, but has it?
In a training session on the act, Marisa Button, managing director of strategic initiatives for the Florida Housing Finance Corp., said this tax break provides "another tool in the tool belt of affordable-housing providers."
There is a two-step application process to get approval for this tax break — going through the Florida Housing Finance Corp., then to the local county property appraiser.
A governing board of a county, city or school district can opt out of the missing-middle property-tax exemption through a "supermajority" vote of at least two-thirds of the board.
The board can opt out only if the geographic region it is in already has more affordable-housing units than the number of households at or below 120% of the area median income of the community — in other words, it has a "surplus" of affordable housing.
More: Senator who championed Live Local Act says local governments must embrace it to work
Among cities that now have a deficit of affordable housing — and are thus not eligible to opt out of offering the tax break — are the metropolitan areas that include Miami, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Port St. Lucie, Fort Myers, Naples, Sarasota, Lakeland, and Ocala.
There is no opt-out provision for the tax break for developments targeted to families with incomes that are less than 80% of the area median income.
Local governments also have the option to enact an ordinance providing property-tax exemptions to certain affordable-housing development of 50 or more units that set aside at least 20% of the units as affordable to household at or below 60% of a community's median income. The exemptions apply only to the property taxes for the affordable units.
The tax break can be up to 75% if fewer than 100% of the units are considered affordable, and up to 100% of all the units are considered affordable.
Jacksonville and St. Petersburg were among the first cities to adopt such programs.
There are provisions for more flexible zoning for affordable housing in areas within a county or city that had been designated for commercial, industrial and mixed-use development.
For example, this includes easing of rules on building height, under which a residential building can be built to the highest currently allowed height for a residential or commercial building in that county or city that is within a mile of the proposed development site, or three stories, whichever is higher. There also is more flexibility related to site use (the category of development allowed on a parcel), as well as to density standards (the number of housing units allowed per acre). These provisions override the local government's height, zoning and density regulations for a specific parcel of land.
To qualify for these zoning rule exemptions, a developer must set aside at least 40% of the project's rental units for affordable rental housing geared to households earning no more than 120% of the area median income for at least 30 years.
Such projects would be administratively approved, with no action required by county or city governing bodies, such as a zoning board or a city council, as long as the development otherwise complies with the local government's comprehensive plan.
The Live Local Act assures full funding of two long-established state housing programs through the Sadowski Trust Fund program, which gets revenue generated through a portion of documentary stamp taxes collected on real estate transactions.
These housing programs are the State Apartment Incentive Loan or SAIL program, which provides low-interest or no-interest loans for development of affordable housing; and the State Housing Incentive Partnership or SHIP program, which deploys funds to Florida's 67 counties and 55 eligible municipalities for various housing programs.
The act also codifies the state's Hometown Heroes Program into state statute. This program provides down-payment and closing-cost assistance to eligible first-time homebuyers who are Florida residents and work for a Florida-based company.
Counties and cities must compile an inventory of publicly owned land that could be appropriate for affordable-housing projects, if such land exists in the community. The resulting list of those properties must be posted on the local government's website.
Property-tax exemptions on the value of the land are provided on land owned by a nonprofit organization and leased for a period of 99 years to predominantly provide affordable housing to households at or below 120% of a community's median income.
The Florida House on April 30 and the Florida Senate on May 1 unanimously approved a series of changes to the Live Local Act, as part of Senate Bill 1730. They would take effect July 1, unless vetoed by DeSantis.
In analysing the legislation, Kody Glazer, chief legal and policy officer for the Florida Housing Coalition, believes the amendments are generally beneficial for spurring efforts to build more affordable-housing projects. Glazer said he believes the most significant change in the bill is that it clarifies that the act applies to properties within planned unit developments, which sometimes also are known as master planned communities.
Among other changes, the measure offers more flexibility for approval of affordable-housing projects on parcels owned by religious institutions. This type of provision is considered a "Yes In God's Backyard," or a "YIGBY," reform. Such reforms are becoming more common across the country as a way to unlock land owned by religious institutions to address local housing shortages.
The bill also prevents local building moratoria that have the effect of delaying the permitting or construction of a Live Local Act land-use project unless:
The moratorium lasts no more than 90 days in any three-year period after a local assessment of the jurisdiction's need for affordable housing.
The moratorium is imposed or enforced to address stormwater or flood water management; to address the supply of potable water; or due to the necessary repair of sanitary sewer systems, if such moratoria apply equally to all types of multifamily or mixed-use residential development.
The amendments also have some added restrictions. For example:
They create more building height limits for sites in certain historic parcels.
They also exempt the Wekiva Study Area in Central Florida and the Everglades Protection Area from Live Local Act land-use mandates.
Dave Berman is business editor at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Berman at dberman@floridatoday.com, on X at @bydaveberman and on Facebook at www.facebook.com/dave.berman.54
This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Live Local Act: Questions and answers
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Breakout Growth Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade
Key Points Nvidia and TSMC are two of the best ways to play the growth in AI infrastructure. Meta Platforms and Toast are using AI to help drive growth. GitLab is helping transform the software development lifecycle. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Investors looking for long-term winners should focus on companies with strong growth runways, clear competitive advantages, and the ability to adapt to evolving tech trends. Let's look at five breakout growth stocks that fit this bill that you can buy now and hold for the long term. 1. Nvidia Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the undisputed leader in artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure. Its graphics processing units (GPUs) have become the backbone of AI workloads, and it's hard to overstate the company's dominance. It captured an incredible 92% market share in Q1, and even at a $4 trillion market cap, Nvidia is still in growth mode. Its real moat isn't just its chips -- it's its CUDA software platform. CUDA is the main reason why the company is in the position it is in today. Nvidia pushed its free software platform into research labs and universities well before AI went mainstream. This led to developers being trained on CUDA, and tools and libraries being built on top of it that improve its chips' performance in handling AI tasks. Nvidia, meanwhile, recently got good news when the Trump administration indicated it would once again let it sell its H20 chips in China. The company is also pushing into new markets beyond AI, with the auto segment being another potential huge market with the advent of autonomous driving and robotaxis. As such, Nvidia remains a great growth stock to own for the long haul. 2. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) is the world's leading chip foundry, and its importance just keeps growing. Today, most advanced chipmakers just design chips, leaving their production to TSMC. That includes top names like Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, and Apple. TSMC is benefiting from the AI surge, with high-performance computing (HPC) now making up 60% of its revenue -- up from 52% a year ago. The company is far ahead in advanced node manufacturing, and that lead keeps widening. Nodes refer to how many transistors can be fit on a chip, and the more dense a chip is, the more powerful and energy efficient it becomes. Chips built on 7-nanometer and smaller nodes made up 74% of TSMC's revenue last quarter, with 3nm chips accounting for 24%. With other foundries struggling, TSMC is the clear leader in the space due to its scale and technological expertise. As a result, it has been an invaluable partner to top chip designers. The great thing is that it doesn't matter which company takes market share, as they all use TSMC. With AI demand continuing to grow and new markets like autonomous driving emerging, TSMC looks like a cornerstone stock to own for the next decade. 3. Meta Platforms One company looking to win the AI battle is Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META). Meta already owns one of the most powerful digital ad platforms in the world, and it is now using AI to supercharge it. Meta's Llama models are helping boost engagement across Facebook and Instagram, which means users are spending more time on the apps, leading to more ad inventory to sell. At the same time, its AI tools are helping advertisers build better campaigns and target users more precisely, leading to higher ad prices and stronger return on ad spend. But the biggest opportunities are still ahead. Meta is only just beginning to serve ads on WhatsApp and Threads. WhatsApp has more than 3 billion users, and Threads already has 350 million. Both are early in their ad rollouts, and that gives Meta a long runway for growth. Meanwhile, CEO Mark Zuckerberg is spending aggressively to secure AI talent, with a stated goal of delivering "personal superintelligence." That's a bold vision, but if Meta succeeds, it could become the most important AI platform in the world. That's a reason to own it for the long term. 4. GitLab GitLab (NASDAQ: GTLB) is transforming itself from a code repository into a full-blown software development lifecycle platform. Its platform now provides tools for planning, coding, testing, securing, deploying, and monitoring software, as it looks to become a single platform for the entire software development lifecycle. And it's doing this just as AI is fundamentally changing how code is written, tested, and deployed. Software development has been accelerating due to AI, and GitLab is becoming a key partner. GitLab 18 marked a big leap forward, with over 30 new features including Duo Agent, which allows AI agents to help across the full development lifecycle. That matters, because only about 20% of a developer's time is spent actually writing code. GitLab is now focused on helping drive efficiency everywhere else. In an AI-first software world, GitLab's position as an end-to-end workflow solution puts it in a strong spot. This looks like a strong growth story with a lot of upside potential in the years to come. 5. Toast Toast (NYSE: TOST) is growing in importance in the restaurant industry, as its software platform helps restaurants manage operations and drive sales. Meanwhile, the company is now integrating AI into its platform in a way that could meaningfully change how restaurants make decisions. Tools like ToastIQ and Sous Chef are helping restaurants make smarter, faster decisions in real time -- whether it's optimizing staffing, adjusting menus, or helping improve supply chains. It has even started piloting new modules to help restaurants upsell customers and improve their advertising with Google. Toast's value proposition is clear: It helps restaurants run better and make more money. Meanwhile, through its payment processing, it benefits when its customers succeed. As restaurants face rising costs and tighter margins, they're turning to tech to help, and Toast is becoming one of the first places they look. That said, the restaurant industry is large and fragmented, giving Toast plenty of room to continue to expand over the next decade. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has positions in GitLab and Toast. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Apple, GitLab, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, and Toast. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 5 Breakout Growth Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade was originally published by The Motley Fool

Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House presses Fed for ‘dramatically lower' rates as meeting looms
The White House on Sunday demanded 'dramatically lower' interest rates as it raised pressure on US Federal Reserve chair Jay Powell for a Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key)
Key Points The future of the auto industry lies in electric vehicles and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles. After many years in service, Waymo still can't point to a timeline of profitability. Tesla also faces challenges with its robotaxi offering, but it's well positioned, provided it can demonstrate safety and efficacy. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) isn't, strictly speaking, an electric vehicle (EV) company. However, its autonomous driving technology company, Waymo, is committed to only using EVs in its fleet. Funnily enough, it could be argued that Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) isn't really a pure EV company either. After all, most of its sky–high valuation is attributable to the potential of its robotaxis. However, the comparison of these two as EV companies is valid because the future of the auto industry is EVs, and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles will be a larger part of the industry in the future. But which company is better placed, and which is the better stock? Alphabet vs. Tesla It's entirely possible that Alphabet could decide to spin off Waymo, not least because it reportedly could be valued at more than $45 billion. Meanwhile, one of Tesla's biggest supporters, Cathie Wood's Ark Invest, ascribes 88% of Tesla's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) to robotaxis in its investment case for the stock, producing an expected value of $2,600 for the stock in 2029. As I have previously discussed, the Ark targets should be taken with a pinch of salt, as its track record on Tesla hasn't been good. However, Ark's core argument is sound and points to Tesla being potentially a far more valuable stock than Waymo ever will be. Pathways to profitability The core argument is that Tesla's business model is scalable to profitability while Waymo's is far less so. The issue of Waymo's profitability arose in a recent CNBC interview with Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana, where she was asked whether Waymo is profitable. She replied, "We're proving out that it can be a profitable business." When asked when Waymo would be profitable, she replied, "not clear." It's also not clear if Alphabet/Waymo doesn't have an internal forecast for when it will hit profitability, or if Mawakana preferred not to divulge what the company considers an uncertain forecast. However, it's inconceivable that Alphabet is not internally crunching the numbers on this, and if it does decide to spin off Waymo, it's a question that needs to be answered. The point here is that a business that can't be profitable isn't worth anything, let alone $45 billion, so at some point, its management is going to have to set some timelines. Tesla and timelines Whereas investors need to hear more about timelines from Waymo, whose public self-driving ride-hailing service was launched in 2018, there's probably a need for fewer declared timelines from Tesla, or, rather, a need for more accurate ones. For example, in 2019, CEO Elon Musk famously told investors to expect a million self-driving vehicles on the road by mid-2020. In April 2022, he also stated that Tesla aspired to reach volume production of a dedicated robotaxi (Cybercab) in 2024 -- a timeline that has now been pushed back to 2026. These timeline estimates matter because plugging overly optimistic assumptions from them into valuation models can produce dramatically erroneous conclusions. Why Tesla is better positioned With all that said, Tesla has clear advantages over Waymo, provided it can demonstrate safety and reliability and achieve regulatory approvals. Its advantages include: Lower vehicle costs, with Musk aiming for a $30,000 price tag for a dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts estimate Waymo's current vehicles cost more than $120,000. In addition, Tesla manufactures its own cars (Waymo does not), and existing Teslas can be converted into robotaxis using Tesla's as-yet-unreleased-to-the-public unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software, giving Tesla a significant advantage in scaling the robotaxi business. Tesla's use of camera-centric technology is inherently less expensive than Waymo's combination of cameras, light detection and ranging (Lidar) lasers, and high-definition maps. Every Tesla car (robotaxi or not) on the road is effectively a data gatherer, with the data used to improve the AI that powers its AI models. As such, even though Waymo was first, Tesla has significantly more data than Waymo. Which is the better EV stock? Waymo may become profitable in the future, particularly if Lidar costs continue to drop. However, it's challenging to think that it will be a strong competitor to Tesla, provided Musk's company can master safe, unsupervised FSD using a camera-centric approach. That's a big "if" at this stage, but it becomes a smaller "if" as time goes by and Tesla expands its nascent robotaxi offering across new geographies. Tesla's next robotaxi launch is expected to be in Phoenix, as it plans to continue slowly building its robotaxi business. I think Tesla is the better EV stock when comparing Tesla and Alphabet. Should you buy stock in Tesla right now? The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key) was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio