Thinking about buying a 2025 Ford Explorer? Here are other top choices to consider
A popular nameplate among midsize three-row SUVs, the Ford Explorer has been around since 1991 as one of the most recognizable names in the segment.
Fast forward 34 years into the present and the Explorer continues to offer the all-weather capability of all-wheel drive with enough room to schlep the family.
For 2025, it gets a light makeover, with revised lighting and front fascia. Bigger changes await inside, with a new instrument panel and upgraded finishes, which it desperately needed. There's also a new 13.2-inch infotainment touchscreen running new software that allows for video streaming when the vehicle is parked.
The Explorer Active, ST, and Platinum grades are powered by a 300-horsepower turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine that returns an EPA-rated 23 mpg with all-wheel drive and 24 mpg with rear-wheel drive. The high-performance Explorer ST, which is standard, and the Platinum, which is optional, are powered by a 400-horsepower turbocharged 3.0-liter V6. According to the EPA, expect to get 21 mpg. Towing is rated at 5,000 pounds.
With a fairly firm ride and predictable handling, this Ford has plenty of room in the first two rows, while the third row is low and uncomfortable. Cargo space is average at 16 cubic feet, expanding to 85 cubic feet with the seats folded.
Still, you might wonder if there's something better out there. There just might be.Redesigned for 2024, the Chevrolet Traverse looks more like a true SUV and even boasts a Z71 trim, which adds an off-road suspension, underbody skid plate, tow hooks, all-terrain tires, and a twin-clutch all-wheel-drive system. A 17.7-inch infotainment touchscreen with Google-based software and a wireless smartphone charging pad are standard.
Power comes from an unrefined 328-horsepower turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that can tow 5,000 pounds. Performance is nothing special, but the cabin is very spacious, with three rows and 23 cubic feet of cargo space that expands to 98 cubic feet.
Very much the middle child between the smaller CR-V and Larger Pilot, the Honda Passport costs as much as three-row rivals but only offers two rows. Those two rows are put to better use, with a 41 cubic foot cargo hold that expands to 74 cubic feet. There's also a rather small 8-inch infotainment touchscreen in the functional-not-flashy interior.
The Passport is equipped the way most buyers would want it, with a 280-horsepower 3.5-liter V6 paired with a 9-speed automatic transmission and all-wheel drive. Towing is rated at 5,000 pounds.
Overall, the Passport is every bit a Honda with nimble handling and 8.1 inches of ground clearance. Still, you can get a three-row SUV for less.The three-row Hyundai Palisade offers a good imitation of a luxury vehicle at a mainstream price, with cabins trimmed in quilted Nappa leather and whitewashed wood trim. A punchy 291-horsepower 3.8-liter V6, 8-speed automatic transmission, and front-wheel drive are standard, but you can also opt for all-wheel drive. Towing is rated at 5,000 pounds.
A 12.3-inch infotainment touchscreen is standard, and the cabin is awash in USB ports and power points. Cargo space is rated at 18 cubic feet, expanding to 86 cubic feet with the seats folded.
The feeling of luxury is accentuated by Hyundai's smooth driveline and quiet, comfortable ride. It also benefits from precise steering and modest body roll while cornering, although its Sport driving mode is unconvincing. Still, this is one righteous wagon.
The Palisade's mechanically identical corporate cousin and current cul-de-sac darling is well worth considering. The main difference is its design, which seems more appealing, but the Palisade's goodness can still be found here. Aside from the Volkswagen Atlas, the Hyundai and Kia are the only midsize SUVs to offer an adult-friendly third row, making them compelling competitors to the Explorer.Like the Hyundai and Kia, the Mazda CX-90 has upper-class aspirations despite being a mainstream three-row, 8-passenger SUV. Powertrains include a mild hybrid 3.3-liter inline six-cylinder that generates 280 horsepower or 340 horsepower, depending on trim.
There's also a 323-horsepower 2.5-liter four-cylinder plug-in hybrid that offers 26 miles of pure electric range. All powertrains get a standard 8-speed automatic transmission with all-wheel drive. Towing is rated at 5,000 pounds with the Towing Package and 3,500 pounds without it. Its 14.9 cubic-foot cargo hold is the smallest here, but it does expand to more than 74 cubic feet.
Choosing refinement over ruggedness, the beautifully trimmed CX-90's adept athleticism, well-controlled body motions, perfectly weighted steering feel, and inline six-cylinder powerplant make it a paragon of smoothness. Mazda's infotainment system is the Achilles heel jere, with clunky software and a console-mounted controller.
Once a true SUV, the Nissan Pathfinder is now little more than a suburban road warrior. Its 284-horsepower 3.5-liter V6 feeds the front wheels through a 9-speed transmission, although all-wheel drive is offered. Towing is rated at 3,500 pounds with front-wheel drive and 6,000 pounds with all-wheel drive. The Pathfinder boasts a 17 cubic-foot cargo bay, expanding to 81 cubic feet with the second and third rows folded.
Power is adequate, but the transmission is slow to downshift when more juice is requested. The steering is light, and bumps are noticeable but do not filter through. While handsome, the Pathfinder's biggest advantage is its tow rating. Otherwise, you'll find it competent, if unexciting.If you'd like a Subaru with three rows, this is your ride of choice. With standard all-wheel drive, power comes from a 260-horsepower turbocharged flat-four engine and a continuously variable automatic transmission.
As you might imagine, this is not an exciting vehicle to drive. There's a lot of body lean in corners, the steering is fairly light, and the transmission isn't quick to offer up more power. At least the ride is comfy, and towing is rated at 5,000 pounds.
The Ascent also offers a decent tech package, with 4G LTE Wi-Fi, eight USB ports, and an 11.6-inch touchscreen with large, easy-to-hit buttons. The first two rows prove spacious, although the third one seems tight. Cargo space is rated at 18 cubic feet or 87 cubic feet with the seats folded.
Toyota's spacious three-row SUV offers a comfortable ride, light steering, a composed driving manner, and impressive cargo space. How much? How about 21 cubic feet, expanding to 96 cubic feet? Sweet, right? And because it's four inches longer than the standard Highlander, the third row is adult-friendly.
As you'd expect, there's a 12.3-inch infotainment touchscreen and wireless smartphone charging as standard.
Power comes from an adequate 265-horsepower turbocharged 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine with standard front-wheel drive and optional all-wheel drive. You can also opt for a 245-horsepower hybrid or 382-horsepower Hybrid Max option, all with a standard eight-speed automatic transmission is standard. Regardless of the powerplant, towing is rated at 5,000 pounds, and its 36-mpg fuel economy rating may be the best here.The Volkswagen Atlas has always offered three adult-sized rows along with generous cargo space—in this case, 21 cubic feet, which expands to 97 cubic feet. The 12-inch infotainment screen is beautifully integrated into the instrument panel, and the cabin's trim has been drastically upgraded for a much finer feel.
Being a VW, it won't surprise you that the Atlas's power is generated by a 269-horsepower turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine and 8-speed automatic transmission. All-wheel drive is standard, although the SE can be had with front-wheel drive. The Atlas is surprisingly smooth, quiet, and refined, with the turbo four providing the requisite power. The ride remains stable yet remarkably absorbent, lending a premium feel.
The Ford Explorer helped define the midsize SUV class decades ago, but there are many fine competitors in today's market. Each has its distinct advantages, be it Toyota's outstanding fuel economy, the Chevrolet Traverse's roominess, Nissan's towing capacity, or the Hyundai, Kia, and Mazda's class-above aspirations.
Having so many options gives buyers a lot of choice, so settling for the Ford is no longer a given.
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
US second-quarter auto sales set to rise, tariffs may drive up prices
(Reuters) -U.S. auto sales are set to rise in the second quarter aided by sustained demand, but industry experts forecast President Donald Trump's tariffs to pressure prices in the months ahead. Market research firm Cox Automotive expects U.S. new-vehicle sales volume to climb about 1.7% to 4.18 million units in the second quarter from a year ago. "New vehicle affordability concerns are expected to worsen in the second half of the year under potential upward pricing adjustments," said Chris Hopson, principal analyst at S&P Global Mobility. General Motors is expected to hold its top spot in the quarter, followed by Toyota Motor's North America unit and Ford, according to Cox. President Trump's move to levy tariffs on U.S. auto imports initially pulled forward demand from price-sensitive buyers, but that boost is expected to fade as higher prices take hold. "Much of the pull-ahead demand that fired up sales in April and May has now been satiated, so consumer demand is expected to be weaker in the coming months," said Charlie Chesbrough, senior economist at Cox Automotive. Cox also expects Tesla to report a near 21% drop in second-quarter vehicle sales from last year. The tariffs will majorly hit lower-cost imported models, such as Ford's compact Maverick pickup truck and GM's affordable Chevrolet Trax crossover, denting affordability concerns as the average new-vehicle price nears $50,000. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald
14 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Ford Should Be Concerned About the Kia EV6's Charging Speed
The Kia EV6 broke onto the electrified crossover scene for the 2022 model year, and even then, it was one of the top models when it came to range and charging speeds. Since then, Kia's electric crossover has only gotten better, with varying powertrains that can offer extensive ranges or thrilling performance. While competitors, including the Ford Mustang Mach-E, offer more contention these days, few EVs can match the Kia EV6 when it comes to long-range road trips. At its peak, the 2025 Kia EV6 boasts a maximum range of 319 miles, which isn't exactly out of the norm these days. In its most range-competitive variation, for example, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers a 320-mile range. By range alone, both electric crossovers are excellent picks for family road trips, at least until you take charging speed into consideration. Note that both models have access to Tesla's Supercharger network, eliminating accessibility as a deciding factor for some drivers. The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a maximum charging speed of 150 kW, which isn't bad at all. With those speeds, you could charge a Mustang Mach-E with a standard 73 kWh battery from 10% to 80% in around 32 minutes at a DC fast charger. Upgrading to the larger battery pushes that charging speed out to around 36 minutes. The Kia EV6 offers one of the highest charging speeds in the industry, with an 800-volt electrical architecture that can take advantage of a DC fast charger better than nearly every other EV. When connected to a DC fast charger, the Kia EV6 can charge from 10% to 80% in as little as 20 minutes, regardless of whether it comes equipped with the standard or larger battery. As though 20 minutes isn't crazy enough, the top-spec GT trim can see that time reduced to as little as 18 minutes. While DC fast charging speeds are great for road trips, most drivers will charge their electric crossovers at home or at Level 2 chargers. Thanks to its faster charging speeds, the Kia EV6 with an extended-range battery excels there as well, reaching a full charge in around seven hours. Comparatively, a Ford Mustang Mach-E connected to a level 2 charger can achieve a full charge in around nine hours. Rivalry promotes innovation, of which Kia and Ford are living proof. Both the EV6 and Mustang Mach-E offer a variety of powertrain and battery setups that allow consumers to create a car that fits their needs. As similar as they are, however, there are some differences when it comes to performance. As the name implies, the Mustang Mach-E offers high performance from the base level, with 264 horsepower and 387 lb-ft of torque serving as the floor. That's a good deal more than the base EV6's 167 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque. The gap narrows once the dual-motor all-wheel drivetrain comes into play, with the Mustang Mach-E offering 325 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque with a standard range battery. The Kia EV6 sees its performance boosted to 320 horsepower and 446 lb-ft of torque with AWD. The gap between the EVs nearly closes at the top of the range, with the Mustang Mach-E Rally's performance topping out at 480 horsepower and 700 lb-ft of torque. That kind of power launches the electric crossover to 60 mph in just 3.4 seconds. The Kia EV6 GT is close behind in terms of torque, topping out at 641 horsepower and 568 lb-ft of torque with launch mode, matching its American competitor's 3.4-second 60 mph time. Without launch mode, the EV6 GT taps 60 mph in 3.6 seconds. There's no denying the Kia EV6 and Ford Mustang Mach-E are rival EVs that offer an excellent combination of range, performance, and standard equipment. With 319- and 320-mile maximum ranges respectively, they're evenly matched in the road trip category. Once you factor in charging speeds, however, the Kia EV6 has a significant advantage. The capability to charge to 80% in 20 minutes or less at a fast charger simply can't be understated. If Ford manages to narrow that gap, the competition between these two EVs would only get more intense. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ford workers told their CEO ‘none of the young people want to work here.' So Jim Farley took a page out of the founder's playbook
Ford CEO Jim Farley learned from older employees that some young workers at the carmaker were taking shifts at Amazon to make ends meet, he said at the Aspen Ideas Festival. Farley said he drew on founder Henry Ford's decision to raise factory wages to $5 a day in 1914 to make temporary workers into full-time employees. Young people have previously eschewed manufacturing jobs due to low wages. Some economists credit carmaker Henry Ford for jump-starting the American middle class in the 20th century when, in January 1914, he hiked factory wages to $5, more than double the average wage for an eight-hour work day. More than 100 years later, facing the reality of many employees 'barely getting by,' Ford CEO Jim Farley said he took a page out of the founder's playbook. The carmaker's chief executive recognized the need to make a change in his workplace when he spoke to veteran employees during union contract negotiations and learned young Ford employees were working multiple jobs and getting inadequate sleep due to low wages, Farley said in an interview with journalist and biographer Walter Isaacson at the Aspen Ideas Festival on Friday. 'The older workers who'd been at the company said, 'None of the young people want to work here. Jim, you pay $17 an hour, and they are so stressed,'' Farley said. Farley learned some workers also held jobs at Amazon, where they worked for eight hours before clocking in to a seven-hour shift at Ford, sleeping for only three or four hours. As a result, the company made temporary workers into full-time employees, making them eligible for higher wages, profit-sharing checks, and better health care coverage. The transition was outlined in 2019 contract negotiations with the United Auto Workers (UAW), with temporary workers able to become full-time after two years of continuous employment at Ford. 'It wasn't easy to do,' Farley said. 'It was expensive. But I think that's the kind of changes we need to make in our country.' Ford's own decision to double factory wages in 1914 was not altruistic, but rather a strategy to attract a stable workforce, as well as provide a stimulus for his own workers to be able to afford Ford products. 'He said, 'I'm doing this because I want my factory worker to buy my cars. If they make enough money, they'll buy my own product,'' Farley said. 'It's a self-fulfilling prophecy, in a way.' Farley, a proponent of growing U.S. manufacturing productivity to support the essential economy, has advocated for young workers to have strong trade experiences. 'Our governments have to get really serious about investing in trade schools and skilled trades,' he said. 'You go to Germany, every one of our factory workers has an apprentice starting in junior high school. Every one of those jobs has a person behind it for eight years that is trained.' Despite the U.S. seeing 3.8 million new manufacturing jobs by 2033, according to Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute, the younger generation of workers has largely turned away from the career path. Gen Z enrollment in trade schools is on the rise, but the newest generation entering the workforce is largely eschewing factory jobs, citing low wages, according to a 2023 Soter Analytics study. U.S. manufacturing jobs in the U.S. have an average $25-per-hour wage—about $51,890 per year—falling short of the average American salary of $66,600. American carmakers like Ford may be trying to make it appealing for young workers to embark on manufacturing careers, but they are still not immune to workers' grievances over wages. In 2023, thousands of UAW members, including 16,600 Ford employees, went on strike before reaching a contract deal in October of that year, which, beyond increasing wages, also further decreased the period of time necessary for a temp worker to become full-time. Farley called the strike 'completely unnecessary' from management's perspective and maintained the onus of improving trade workers' wages isn't just on Ford. 'We're not just going to hope it gets better,' he said. 'We have the resources, and we have the know-how, after 120 years, to solve these problems, but we need more help from others.' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio